Sonographic assessment of infectious diseases of the gastrointestinal tract: from scanning to diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Sonography of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is a practical, safe, inexpensive, and reproducible diagnostic tool for the evaluation, diagnosis, and follow-up of infectious bowel disease. The modality is rapidly gaining prominence among clinicians on a global scale. In the United States, however, ultrasound of the bowel remains underutilized primarily due to insufficient experience among radiologists and sonographers in performing sonographic bowel assessment. This lack of experience and knowledge results in misinterpretations, missed diagnoses, and underutilization of this modality in patients with acute abdomen, with the majority of GI pathology on sonography discovered incidentally. OBJECTIVES: This article aims to demonstrate the characteristic sonographic findings associated with GI infectious processes as well as provide dedicated ultrasound protocols for evaluation of the GI tract. CONCLUSION: This article serves a twofold purpose, raising awareness of the utility of this imaging modality within the radiology community and also providing practical teaching points for sonographic evaluation of infectious disorders of the GI tract.

Social Distancing with Portable Chest Radiographs During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Assessment of Radiograph Technique and Image Quality Obtained at 6 Feet and Through Glass.

PURPOSE: To develop a technique that allows portable chest radiography to be performed through the glass door of a patient's room in the emergency department. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 100 radiographs (50 [mean age 59.4 ± 17.3, range 22-87; 30 women] performed with the modified technique in April 2020, randomized with 50 [mean age 59 ± 21.6, range 19-100; 31 men] using the standard technique was completed by three thoracic radiologists to assess image quality. Radiation exposure estimates to patient and staff were calculated. A survey was created and sent to 32 x-ray technologists to assess their perceptions of the modified technique. Unpaired Ttests were used for numerical data. A P value < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The entrance dose for a 50th percentile patient was the same between techniques, measuring 169 µGy. The measured technologist exposure from the modified technique assuming a 50th percentile patient and standing 6 feet to the side of the glass was 0.055 µGy, which was lower than standard technique technologist exposure of 0.088 µGy. Of the 100 portable chest radiographs evaluated by three reviewers, two reviewers rated all images as having diagnostic quality, while the other reviewer believed two of the standard images and one of the modified technique images were non-diagnostic. A total of 81% (26 of 32) of eligible technologists completed the survey. Results showed acceptance of the modified technique with the majority feeling safer and confirming conservation of PPE. Most technologists did not feel the modified technique was more difficult to perform. CONCLUSIONS: The studies acquired with the new technique remained diagnostic, patient radiation doses remained similar, and technologist dose exposure were decreased with modified positioning. Perceptions of the new modified technique by frontline staff were overwhelmingly positive.

Automated Test-Item Generation System for Retrieval Practice in Radiology Education.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and disseminate an automated item generation (AIG) system for retrieval practice (self-testing) in radiology and to obtain trainee feedback on its educational utility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An AIG software program (Radmatic) that is capable of generating large numbers of distinct multiple-choice self-testing items from a given "item-model" was created. Instead of writing multiple individual self-testing items, an educator creates an "item-model" for one of two distinct item styles: true/false knowledge based items and image-based items. The software program then uses the item model to generate self-testing items upon trainee request. This internet-based system was made available to all radiology residents at our institution in conjunction with our didactic conferences. After obtaining institutional review board approval and informed consent, a written survey was conducted to obtain trainee feedback. RESULTS: Two faculty members with no computer programming experience were able to create item-models using a standard template. Twenty five of 54 (46%) radiology residents at our institution participated in the study. Twelve of these 25 (48%) study participants reported using the self-testing items regularly, which correlated well with the anonymous website usage statistics. The residents' overall impression and satisfaction with the self-testing items was quite positive, with a score of 7.89 ± 1.91 (mean ± SD) out of 10. Lack of time and email overload were the main reasons provided by residents for not using self-testing items. CONCLUSION: AIG enabled self-testing is technically feasible, and is perceived positively by radiology residents as useful to their education.

US of the Inguinal Canal: Comprehensive Review of Pathologic Processes with CT and MR Imaging Correlation.

Ultrasonography (US) has a fundamental role in the initial examination of patients who present with symptoms indicating abnormalities of the inguinal canal (IC), an area known for its complex anatomy. A thorough understanding of the embryologic and imaging characteristics of the contents of the IC is essential for any general radiologist. Moreover, an awareness of the various pathologic conditions that can affect IC structures is crucial to preventing misdiagnoses and ensuring optimal patient care. Early detection of IC abnormalities can reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality and facilitate proper treatment. Abnormalities may be related to increased intra-abdominal pressure, which can result in development of direct inguinal hernias and varicoceles, or to congenital anomalies of the processus vaginalis, which can result in development of indirect hernias and hydroceles. US is also helpful in assessing postoperative complications of hernia repair, such as hematoma, seroma, abscess, and hernia recurrence. In addition, it is often the modality initially used to detect neoplasms arising from or invading the IC. US is an important tool in the examination of patients suspected of having undescended testes or posttraumatic testicular retraction and is essential for the examination of patients suspected of having torsion or infectious inflammatory conditions of the spermatic cord. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2016.

Organ laceration grading adherence by radiologists.

American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) abdominopelvic organ laceration grading is used to determine which patients can be managed non-operatively. We assess a change in the use of AAST grading system by radiologists at a single, large, academic institution before and after a one-time departmental intervention and reviewed non-graded reports evaluating if grading could be inferred. After IRB approval, a keyword search for "laceration" identified traumatic abdominopelvic CT reports in a 2-year period before and after the one-time intervention. Reports were reviewed to determine if an organ laceration was seen, if it was graded by AAST criteria, and if grading could be inferred for non-graded reports. T test was performed to assess statistical significance. Before the intervention, 348 reports contained the keyword "laceration," 81 with lacerations, 31 graded (38 %). After the intervention, 302 reports were found, 79 with lacerations, 59 graded (75 %). The increase was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). A decreasing trend in grading was seen over time following the intervention. Two out of 50 (4 %) pre-intervention and four out of 20 (20 %) post-intervention reports gave enough detailed descriptions for the grading to be inferred when it was not explicitly stated. Non-graded reports did not describe laceration parenchymal depth and subcapsular hematoma surface area percentage; however, the presence/absence of active extravasation, omitted in the 20-year-old AAST grading scheme, was described in every report. One-time departmental intervention yielded a significant increase in adherence to AAST laceration grading. Lack of perfect compliance, which diminished over time, suggests a need for further reinforcement.

Predictive factors for failure of nonoperative management in perforated appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Identifying patients on admission with perforated appendicitis who have phlegmon or abscess initially selected for but likely to fail nonoperative management may avoid delays in definitive treatment. METHODS: Patients older than 15 years presenting to a university tertiary care hospital with perforated appendicitis and abscess or phlegmon and planned nonoperative management were reviewed. Comorbidities, clinical findings, laboratory markers, radiographic findings, and nonsurgical treatments associated with failure of nonoperative management were recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were identified, and 69 were managed successfully to discharge without operation. Length of stay was greater in the failure group (11 days vs. 5 days, p = 0.001), and intensive care unit care was more common (10% vs. 0%, p = 0.049). On univariate and multivariate analyses, smoking (odds ratio [OR], 13.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-142; p = 0.039), tachycardia (OR, 4.93; 95% CI, 1.21-20.06; p = 0.026), and generalized abdominal tenderness (OR, 5.52; 95% CI, 1.40-21.73; p = 0.015) were associated with failure of nonoperative management. On computed tomographic scan, the failure group had higher rates of abscess (75% vs. 55%, p = 0.110), and their abscesses were more likely smaller than 50 mm (OR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.01-7.92; p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Patients with perforated appendicitis and phlegmon or abscess who smoke or present with tachycardia, generalized abdominal tenderness, and abscesses smaller than 50 mm are more likely to fail nonoperative management and should be considered for early operation. These findings should be validated prospectively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level III.

Stump appendicitis: a surgeon's dilemma.

BACKGROUND: Stump appendicitis is defined by the recurrent inflammation of the residual appendix after the appendix has been only partially removed during an appendectomy for appendicitis. Forty-eight cases of stump appendicitis were identified in the English literature. DATABASE: The institutional CPT codes were evaluated for multiple hits of the appendectomy code, yielding a total of 3 patients. After appropriate approval from an internal review board, a retrospective chart review was completed and all available data extracted. All 3 patients were diagnosed with stump appendicitis, ranging from 2 months to 20 years after the initial procedure. Two patients underwent a laparoscopic and the one an open completion appendectomy. All patients did well and were discharged home in good condition. CONCLUSION: Surgeons need a heightened awareness of the possibility of stump appendicitis. Correct identification and removal of the appendiceal base without leaving an appendiceal stump minimizes the risk of stump appendicitis. If a CT scan has been obtained, it enables exquisite delineation of the surrounding anatomy, including the length of the appendiceal remnant. Thus, we propose that unless there are other mitigating circumstances, the completion appendectomy in cases of stump appendicitis should also be performed laparoscopically guided by the CT findings.

Impact of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (ASIR) on radiation dose and image quality in aortic dissection studies: a qualitative and quantitative analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to quantify the radiation dose reduction achieved when imaging the aorta using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (ASIR) and to determine if this has an effect on image quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 31 CT angiography examinations of the thoracic and abdominal aorta performed with ASIR and 32 consecutive similar examinations performed without ASIR. Volume CT dose index (CTDI(vol)), dose-length product (DLP), aortic enhancement at multiple levels, aorta-to-muscle contrast-to-noise ratio at multiple levels, and subjective image quality were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The mean CTDI(vol) and DLP were significantly lower for the studies performed with ASIR versus studies without ASIR (15.6 vs 21.5 mGy, with an average difference of 5.8 mGy [95% CI 2.3-9.4 mGy] and 818 vs 1075 mGy × cm with an average difference of -257 mGy × cm [54-460 mGy × cm], respectively). Aortic enhancement, aortic signal-to-noise ratio, and aortic to muscle contrast-to-noise ratio were not different between the two groups. Subjectively, one reviewer preferred the non-ASIR images and one found the images equivalent. Both reviewers believed the images were of diagnostic quality. CONCLUSION: A 29% decrease in CTDI(vol) and a 20% decrease in DLP were obtained in scans with ASIR compared with scans without ASIR, without a quantitative loss of image quality.

Comparison of two methods for ranking applicants for residency.

Ranking radiology residency applicants is a complex process. Multiple factors, such as the variability in evaluation of candidates and the sometimes excessive subjectivity experienced, may influence the final outcome. To address inconsistencies, Yale University's selection committee integrated a mathematical model of ranking. The goal is to compare the mathematically generated rank list with the traditional committee-derived list to identify applicants with discrepancies between the two rank orders as a safety net to ensure that the final rank order list reflects true committee consensus. For three consecutive years, beginning with the 2006-2007 interview season, three rank order lists were compiled. The subjective list was developed by committee consensus on appropriate rank for each applicant. The mathematical list was developed using an equation to assign a score from each of an applicant's three interviewers, which were then averaged and arranged in descending order. These two lists were compared to identify applicants who had differences of 10 rank order positions. Identified applicants were reassessed and reassigned if necessary, forming the National Resident Matching Program (final) list submitted for the match. Over three years, 224 applicants were ranked in total, with 109 being reevaluated (49%) and 24 ultimately reassigned (11%). Discrepancies in rank on the two lists were identified and discussed. In some but not all cases, the discrepancies were remedied. Reasons for discrepancies are discussed. The mathematical method used in parallel with the subjective method has proved useful in identifying misplaced applicants and provided assurance that the final rank list reflects the committee's evaluation of each applicant.

Prevalence of abnormal CT findings in patients with proven ovarian torsion and a proposed triage schema.

Many women with ovarian torsion present with nonspecific abdominal/pelvic pain and initially receive computed tomography (CT). We hypothesize that the CT scans preformed on these women will all show abnormalities of the involved ovary. Our purpose is to review cases of surgically proven ovarian torsion at our institution over the last 20 years, assessing CT findings in women with ovarian torsion. A retrospective review of all patients at our institution with surgically proven ovarian torsion from 1985-2005 was conducted. Two physicians reviewed available CT reports, and a radiologist reviewed all available images. CT was obtained in 33% of the 167 patients. Dictated reports were available for 28 studies; all described an enlarged ovary, ovarian cyst, or adnexal mass of the involved ovary. Radiologist review of the available CT images confirmed these findings. This series supports the claim that a CT scan with well-visualized normal appearing ovaries rules out ovarian torsion, while abnormal pelvic findings or failure to visualize the ovaries in women with pelvic pain necessitates further evaluation of torsion.

The appendix sign: a radiographic marker for irreducible intussusception.

PURPOSE: Radiographic reduction (hydrostatic or pneumatic) of intussusception has become the standard of care in the pediatric population with success rates of more than 80%. Identification of those patients who are likely to fail nonoperative management could lead to earlier operation, a reduction in radiation exposure, and a decreased risk for complications after repeated attempts at enema reduction. During successful radiographic reduction, the small bowel is almost always visualized before the appendix. Visualization of the appendix before visualization of the small bowel during a successful reduction of an intussusception is a rare event. We report a new radiographic sign that we have termed the appendix sign (radiographic visualization of the appendix without reflux of air or contrast into the small intestine), which we hypothesize may have association with failure of nonoperative management. METHOD: We performed a retrospective review of the last 12 years of irreducible intussusception. The associated studies were then reviewed to examine the incidence, sensitivity, and specificity of this radiographic finding. RESULTS: Ninety-one cases of intussusception were identified and had films available for review. Seventy-seven (76%) of the studies included the appropriate image. The appendix sign was visualized in 14 studies for an incidence of 18%. Of 14 patients, 10 failed enema reduction (positive predictive value, 71%). The sensitivity of the appendix sign is 43%. The specificity of the sign is 93%. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests that the presence of an appendix sign is associated with failing enema reduction of an intussusception and may be useful as a marker for determining the end point for further attempts at radiographic reduction.