Large-scale opacification of a hydrophilic/hydrophobic intraocular lens.

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence and risk factors related to the opacification of the LS-502-1 intraocular lens. METHODS: Cross-sectional study including patients submitted to cataract surgery between January 2010 and March 2012, with implantation of the LS-502-1 intraocular lens. Past medical history was registered and a complete ophthalmologic evaluation, that included best-corrected visual acuity, slit-lamp examination and fundoscopy, was performed. Anterior segment photographs were taken whenever intraocular lens opacification was present. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-nine eyes of 154 patients were included, mean age 78.5 ± 7.9 years. The average follow-up after intraocular lens implantation was 65.6 ± 10.0 months. Intraocular lens opacification was seen in 53.3% (n = 90) and presented as one of four different patterns: peripheral (15.6%, n = 14), central (4.4%, n = 4), diffuse (71.1%, n = 64) and superficial white deposits (8.9%, n = 8). There was no statistically significant association with systemic or ophthalmic conditions. In patients with bilateral implantation, intraocular lens opacification in one eye was significantly related to intraocular lens opacification in the fellow eye. A significant variability in opacification was found across intraocular lens serial numbers: the odds ratio for opacification in intraocular lens with serial number beginning with 200003 was 6.0 when comparing with the remaining lenses. CONCLUSION: The opacification prevalence of the LS-502-1 intraocular lens was 53.3%, which is the highest ever described for any intraocular lens model. Our results suggest that this occurrence is secondary to an interaction between unknown patient variables and problems related to intraocular lens manufacturing and storage procedures.

Late postoperative opacification of a hydrophilic-hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens.

PURPOSE: To report late postoperative opacification of a model of hydrophilic-hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) as well as the clinical consequences and laboratory characteristics. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed of patients with Lentis LS-502-1 IOL opacification reporting visual loss who had IOL explantation between November 2013 and March 2015. Patients were identified in the emergency room or during regular follow-up visits. Explanted IOLs were analyzed at the Ophthalmic Explants Biobank, Vissum, Spain, or at the John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, USA. RESULTS: Twenty opacified IOLs were explanted from 19 patients. The mean interval between cataract surgery and diagnosis of opacification was 29.15 months ± 9.57 (SD) (range 6 to 45 months). Opacification led to a statistically significant reduction in corrected distance visual acuity (mean 0.86 ± 0.76 logMAR; P < .001) and occurred in 5.1% of the hydrophilic-hydrophobic acrylic IOLs implanted at the department. The most frequently associated medical conditions were arterial hypertension, diabetes, and glaucoma. All IOLs but 1 had a similar pattern of opacification, with yellowish diffuse opacification uniformly distributed and calcium deposits on the surface and/or subsurface of the optic and haptics and within the IOL material. CONCLUSIONS: Opacification of the hydrophilic-hydrophobic acrylic IOL was found in a significant number of patients and had a significant effect on their vision. The opacification was attributed to primary calcification. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.