Risk of Neurological Decline in Patients With Temporal Lobe Brain Masses.

AIM: The objective of this study was to assess which clinical and radiographic findings may be associated with neurological decline in patients with temporal lobe mass lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This represents a retrospective cohort study. Neurological decline was defined as a decline in Glasgow Coma Scale of 2 or more or new anisocoria. Adult patients aged 18 to 89 years with isolated temporal lobe, intra-axial, contrast-enhancing masses diagnosed between 1/1/2010 and 12/31/2020 were included. Clinical and radiographic findings were collected for each patient. Linear regression analysis was used to identify findings predictive of neurological decline. Patients with neurological decline were compared to stable patients to identify factors that may increase risk for neurological decline. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients met the inclusion criteria. Four out of the 71 patients experienced neurological decline, representing an incidence of 6%. Linear regression analysis identified only radiographic transtentorial herniation as a predictor of neurological decline (ß=0.26, p=0.03). A midline shift greater than 5 mm (100% vs. 40%; odds ratio=1.12, 95% confidence interval=1.00-1.32; p=0.05) and radiographic transtentorial herniation (75% vs. 18%; odds ratio=32.12, 95% confidence interval=3.91-264.18; p=0.03) were significantly more prevalent in patients with neurological decline and were associated with an increased risk of neurological decline. CONCLUSION: Radiographic transtentorial herniation and a midline shift greater than 5 mm may be useful findings to suggest an increased risk of neurological decline in patients with masses of the temporal lobe. This knowledge may be useful to neurosurgeons and physicians in other specialties to best care for this patient population.

Comparison of sodium fluorescein and intraoperative ultrasonography in brain tumor resection.

Various intraoperative neuroimaging modalities are available to the neurosurgeon during brain tumor surgery. There remains no consensus on which modalities are superior. This retrospective, single-center cohort study directly compares sodium fluorescein (SF) and intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) as intraoperative imaging modalities in a sample of patients with glioblastoma isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 wildtype (GBM). Adult patients with GBM who underwent surgical resection using SF or IOUS guidance between 2010 and 2020 were included. Primary outcomes included extent of resection (EOR), post-operative residual tumor volume, gross total resection (GTR) rate, false negative assessments, and the incidence of new post-operative neurologic deficits. Additionally, pre-and post-test probabilities were calculated to assess each modality's ability to identify residual tumor. 98 patients met inclusion criteria (34 SF and 64 IOUS). Mean EOR was significantly higher for SF (94 ± 11 %) when compared to IOUS (87 ± 20 %; p = 0.032). Mean post-operative residual tumor was significantly higher for IOUS (197 ± 358 mm2) when compared to SF (81 ± 161mm2; p = 0.038). GTR was more frequent with SF (62 % vs 46 %, p = 0.12). False negative assessments for residual tumor were more common with IOUS (22 % vs 15 %, p = 0.53). One patient in each group suffered a new neurologic deficit post-operatively (p = 0.58). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 62 %, 100 %, 100 %, and 81 % for SF and 59 %, 100 %, 100 %, and 67 % for IOUS, respectively. Taken together, SF may be superior to IOUS in maximizing EOR in patients with GBM, however, both modalities appear to have good efficacy.

Association of Outcomes of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain and Psoas Measurements Based on Size of Iliopsoas Muscles.

INTRODUCTION: Patients experience variable long-term improvement in chronic back pain despite successful spinal cord stimulation (SCS) trials. Iliopsoas (IP) size has been shown to differ between patients with low back pain and healthy controls. In this study, we examine whether the IP muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) is associated with SCS outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined patients for whom we had lumbar MRIs 6.3 years prior to SCS and baseline and one-year outcome data. Percent change from baseline to one year was calculated for Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). Correlations between IP muscle CSA, ratio of iliopsoas muscle size to the vertebral body area (P/VBA), and the ratio of iliopsoas muscle size to BMI (P/BMI) were examined. Sex differences were considered. RESULTS: A total of 73 subjects were included in this study, including 30 females and 43 males. Males had significantly larger IP (males 15.70 ± 0.58, females 9.72 ± 0.43; p < 0.001), P/VBA (males 1.00 ± 0.04, females 0.76 ± 0.03; p < 0.001), and P/BMI ratio (males 0.51 ± 0.02, females 0.32 ± 0.01; p < 0.001) than females. In females, P/VBA predicted NRS worst pain scores (ß = 0.82, p = 0.004, r2 = 0.55) and BDI (ß = 0.59, p = 0.02, r2 = 0.24). In males, P/BMI was a significant predictor of BDI outcome scores (ß = 0.45, p = 0.03, r2 = 0.16). Males who had more muscle mass measured by iliopsoas size had more depression as measured using BDI (p = 0.03, r = 0.61). Females with less muscle mass measured by P/VBA also experienced more depression (p = 0.02, r = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that psoas measurements correlated with various pain outcomes specifically. P/VBA was most predictive in females and P/BMI in males. Depression correlated with P/BMI, reinforcing the complex relationship between depression and constant chronic pain. Tertile analyses further showed a relationship between iliopsoas CSA and depression in males and females. We provide preliminary data of sex-specific psoas measurements as a risk factor for worse SCS outcomes.

Age as an Independent Predictor of Adult Spinal Cord Stimulation Pain Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an efficacious chronic pain treatment most commonly used in middle-aged patients. Results from previous studies that investigated SCS' effects in older patient populations have been equivocal. We examine whether SCS outcomes correlate with age. METHODS: We retrospectively examined prospectively collected outcomes from 189 patients who underwent SCS at Albany Medical Center between 2012 and 2020. The patients completed the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The mean percent change in each outcome was determined and compared via a regression analysis to determine relationships between patient age and each respective outcome metrics. Demographics were compared between patients aged under 65 versus those aged 65 and older via χ2 tests. RESULTS: All subjects demonstrated the expected improvement on NRS, BDI, PCS, and MPQ from baseline to 1-year follow-up, with several demonstrating statistically significant changes: NRS-worst pain (18.66%, p < 0.001), NRS-least pain (26.9%, p < 0.001), NRS-average pain (26.9%, p < 0.01), NRS-current pain (26.4%, p < 0.001), ODI (19.6%, p < 0.001), PCS (29.8%, p < 0.001), and MPQ (29.4%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between patients aged under 65 versus those aged 65 and older based on lead type (p = 0.454). Six patients (3.1%) had lead migration, one of whom was 65 or older. Regression analysis revealed improvements in MPQ-sensory and MPQ-affective scores as age increased (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.09; p = 0.046, R2 = 0.05, respectively). Age did not correlate with NRS, ODI, BDI, or PCS. Diagnosis, spinal level of SCS, and lead type were not found to influence any respective outcome measure based on covariate analysis. CONCLUSION: This study represents the largest study where age was correlated to specific pain, depression, and disability outcomes following SCS. We provide evidence that SCS outcomes are equivalent, or better, in older patients following SCS. Based on these findings, SCS is a viable option for treatment of chronic pain in elderly patient populations.