Secretory carcinoma of the parotid with adenoid cystic carcinoma cytological pattern: A cytological-pathological correlation with literature review.

Secretory carcinoma (SC) is a rare low-grade malignant tumor, defined by ETV6-NTRK3 fusion, identifiable by FISH. We describe a case in a 58-year-old male with a painless slowly growing 16mm palpable mass within left superficial parotid. FNA of the mass showed highly cellular specimen with moderate to large pleomorphic cells with round to ovoid nuclei with vesicular chromatin and distinct nucleoli. Cells had moderate to large amounts of vacuolated cytoplasm. Abundant globular metachromatic material, resembling that of adenoid cystic carcinoma, was noted. This material was seen extracellularly and intracytoplasmic, and stained magenta on Diff-Quik and blue-green on Papanicolaou-stained slides. The tumor cells on a cell block preparation were positive for Mammaglobin and S-100. PAS stain highlighted extracellular and intracytoplasmic secretions. FNA diagnosis was "Positive for Malignancy. Morphologic features most compatible with Mammary Analogue Secretory Carcinoma". ETV6 FISH studies as well as histologic examination of excised tumor confirmed the diagnosis. Finding the globular metachromatic material in SC, that is generally seen in adenoid cystic carcinoma, broadens a cytological differential diagnosis of both entities. Cytological differential diagnosis, clinical, histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of secretory carcinomas are discussed in this study.

Desmoplastic melanoma: an updated immunohistochemical analysis of 40 cases with a proposal for an additional panel of stains for diagnosis.

Desmoplastic melanoma (DM) is histologically characterized by a proliferation of spindle melanocytes dispersed in a collagenous stroma that can be mistaken for a variety of neoplasms. The purpose of this study was to analyze 40 cases of DM with a comprehensive panel of immunohistochemical markers (KBA.62, p16, Ezrin, WT-1, MITF-1, SOX-10, CD117, SOX-2, nestin, PNL2, p75, MART-1, gp100 and S100p) to obtain a more complete understanding of the potential use of these antibodies in the diagnosis of DM. We found that all cases of DM expressed p16, WT-1, SOX-10, nestin and S100p and 95% of cases expressed p75. There was variable expression with Ezrin, SOX-2, KBA.62, MART-1 and HMB-45. Most DMs did not express MITF-1, PNL2 and CD117. Conditions that may enter in the histologic differential diagnosis of DM, including dermal scars, fibromatosis and dermatofibromas were also studied. Nearly all control cases also stained positive for p16 but were negative for WT1, SOX10, nestin, p75 and S-100p, as well as for most of the other markers tested. We conclude that a panel of S-100p, WT1, SOX10, p75 and nestin may constitute the optimal panel with the most sensitive and specific combination of immunostain available for the diagnosis of DM.