The impact of alcohol use on the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation among festival attendees: A prespecified analysis of a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrests often occur in public places, but despite the undisputed impact of bystander CPR, it is debated whether one should act as a rescuer after alcohol consumption due to the perceived adverse effects. We provide the first objective data on the impact of alcohol levels on CPR-skills. METHODS: Pre-specified analysis of a randomised study at the Lowlands music festival (August 2019, the Netherlands) on virtual reality vs face-to-face CPR-training. Participants with an alcohol level ≥ 0.5‰ (WHO-endorsed cut-off for traffic participation) were eligible provided they successfully completed a tandem gait test. We studied alcohol levels (AL, ‰) in relation to CPR-quality (compression depth and rate) and CPR-scenario performance. RESULTS: Median age of the 352 participants was 26 (22-31) years, 56% were female, with n = 214 in Group 1 (AL = 0‰), n = 85 in Group 2 (AL = 0-0.5‰) and n = 53 in Group 3 (AL ≥ 0.5‰). There were no significant differences in CPR-quality (depth: 57 [49-59] vs 57 [51-60] vs 55 mm [47-59], p = 0.16; rate: 115 [104-121] vs 114 [106-122] vs 111 min-1 [95-120], p = 0.19). There were no significant correlations between alcohol level and compression depth (Spearman's rho -0.113, p = 0.19) or rate (Spearman's rho -0.073, p = 0.39). CPR-scenario performance scores (maximum 13) were not different between groups (12 (9-13) vs 12 (9-13) vs 11 (9-13), p = 0.80). CONCLUSION: In this study on festival attendees, we found no association between alcohol levels and CPR-quality or scenario performance shortly after training. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Lowlands Saves Lives is registered on https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT04013633).

Towards individualised treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: an update on technical innovations in the prehospital chain of survival.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major healthcare problem, with approximately 200 weekly cases in the Netherlands. Its critical, time-dependent nature makes it a unique medical situation, of which outcomes strongly rely on infrastructural factors and on-scene care by emergency medical services (EMS). Survival to hospital discharge is poor, although it has substantially improved, to roughly 25% over the last years. Recognised key factors, such as bystander resuscitation and automated external defibrillator use at the scene, have been markedly optimised with the introduction of technological innovations. In an era with ubiquitous smartphone use, the Dutch digital text message alert platform HartslagNu ( www.hartslagnu.nl ) increasingly contributes to timely care for OHCA victims. Guidelines emphasise the role of cardiac arrest recognition and early high-quality bystander resuscitation, which calls for education and improved registration at HartslagNu. As for EMS care, new technological developments with future potential are the selective use of mechanical chest compression devices and extracorporeal life support. As a future innovation, 'smart' defibrillators are under investigation, guiding resuscitative interventions based on ventricular fibrillation waveform characteristics. Taken together, optimisation of available prehospital technologies is crucial to further improve OHCA outcomes, with particular focus on more available trained volunteers in the first phase and additional research on advanced EMS care in the second phase.

The effect of the localisation of an underlying ST-elevation myocardial infarction on the VF-waveform: A multi-centre cardiac arrest study.

INTRODUCTION: In cardiac arrest, ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveform characteristics such as amplitude spectrum area (AMSA) are studied to identify an underlying myocardial infarction (MI). Observational studies report lower AMSA-values in patients with than without underlying MI. Moreover, experimental studies with 12-lead ECG-recordings show lowest VF-characteristics when the MI-localisation matches the ECG-recording direction. However, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA)-studies with defibrillator-derived VF-recordings are lacking. METHODS: Multi-centre (Amsterdam/Nijmegen, the Netherlands) cohort-study on the association between AMSA, ST-elevation MI (STEMI) and its localisation. AMSA was calculated from defibrillator pad-ECG recordings (proxy for lead II, inferior vantage point); STEMI-localisation was determined using ECG/angiography/autopsy findings. RESULTS: We studied AMSA-values in 754 OHCA-patients. There were statistically significant differences between no STEMI, anterior STEMI and inferior STEMI (Nijmegen: no STEMI 13.0mVHz [7.9-18.6], anterior STEMI 7.5mVHz [5.6-13.8], inferior STEMI 7.5mVHz [5.4-11.8], p = 0.006. Amsterdam: 11.7mVHz [5.0-21.9], 9.6mVHz [4.6-17.2], and 6.9mVHz [3.2-16.0], respectively, p = 0.001). Univariate analyses showed significantly lower AMSA-values in inferior STEMI vs. no STEMI; there was no significant difference between anterior and no STEMI. After correction for confounders, adjusted absolute AMSA-values were numerically lowest for inferior STEMI in both cohorts, and the relative differences in AMSA between inferior and no STEMI was 1.4-1.7 times larger than between anterior and no STEMI. CONCLUSION: This multi-centre VF-waveform OHCA-study showed significantly lower AMSA in case of underlying STEMI, with a more pronounced difference for inferior than for anterior STEMI. Confirmative studies on the impact of STEMI-localisation on the VF-waveform are warranted, and might contribute to earlier diagnosis of STEMI during VF.

Coronary angiography findings in patients with shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest.

INTRODUCTION: Shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation (VF) poses a therapeutic challenge during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). For these patients, new treatment strategies are under active investigation, yet underlying trigger(s) and substrate(s) have been poorly characterised, and evidence on coronary angiography (CAG) data is often limited to studies without a control group. METHODS: In our OHCA-registry, we studied CAG-findings in OHCA-patients with VF who underwent CAG after hospital arrival. We compared baseline demographics, arrest characteristics, CAG-findings and outcomes between patients with VF that was shock-resistant (defined as >3 shocks) or not shock-resistant (≤3 shocks). RESULTS: Baseline demographics, arrest location, bystander resuscitation and AED-use did not differ between 105 patients with and 196 patients without shock-resistant VF. Shock-resistant VF-patients required more shocks, with higher proportions endotracheal intubation, mechanical CPR, amiodaron and epinephrine. In both groups, significant coronary artery disease (≥1 stenosis >70%) was highly prevalent (78% vs. 77%, p = 0.76). Acute coronary occlusions (ACOs) were more prevalent in shock-resistant VF-patients (41% vs. 26%, p = 0.006). Chronic total occlusions did not differ between groups (29% vs. 33%, p = 0.47). There was an association between increasing numbers of shocks and a higher likelihood of ACO. Shock-resistant VF-patients had lower proportions 24-h survival (75% vs. 93%, p < 0.001) and survival to discharge (61% vs. 78%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In this cohort of OHCA-patients with VF and CAG after transport, acute coronary occlusions were more prevalent in patients with shock-resistant VF compared to VF that was not shock-resistant, and their clinical outcome was worse. Confirmative studies are warranted for this potentially reversible therapeutic target.

The role of coronary angiography in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in the absence of ST-segment elevation: A literature review.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major cause of death. Although the aetiology of cardiac arrest can be diverse, the most common cause is ischaemic heart disease. Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention, if indicated, has been associated with improved long-term survival for patients with initial shockable rhythm. However, in patients without ST-segment elevation on the post-resuscitation electrocardiogram, the optimal timing of performing this invasive procedure is uncertain. One important challenge that clinicians face is to appropriately select patients that will benefit from immediate coronary angiography, yet avoid unnecessary delay of intensive care support and targeted temperature management. Observational studies have reported contradictory results and until recently, randomised trials were lacking. The Coronary Angiography after Cardiac Arrest without ST-segment elevation (COACT) was the first randomised trial that provided comparative information between coronary angiography treatment strategies. This literature review will provide the current knowledge and gaps in the literature regarding optimal care for patients successfully resuscitated from OHCA in the absence of ST-segment elevation and will primarily focus on the role and timing of coronary angiography in this high-risk patient population.

The ventricular fibrillation waveform in relation to shock success in early vs. late phases of out-of-hospital resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: The amplitude spectrum area (AMSA) of the ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveform predicts shock success and clinical outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Recently, also AMSA-changes demonstrated prognostic value. Until now, most studies focused on early shocks, while many patients require prolonged resuscitations. We studied AMSA and its changes in relation to shock success, for both the early and later phase of resuscitation. METHODS: Per-shock VF-waveform analysis of a prospective OHCA-cohort (Nijmegen, The Netherlands). The absolute AMSA and relative AMSA-changes (ΔAMSA) were calculated from three-second VF-segments prior to defibrillation. Shocks were categorised as early (#1-3) or late (#4-8). Shock success was defined as return of organised rhythm. RESULTS: Shock success was 46% for early (131/286) and 52% for late shocks (85/162), p = 0.18. Early shock success varied from 23% to 70% with increasing quartiles of AMSA (p-trend<0.001). For late shocks, there also was an association with AMSA, with a narrower range in shock success from 43% to 68% (p-trend = 0.04). Higher values of ΔAMSA were associated with shock success in the early, but not in the later phase. CONCLUSION: AMSA relates to shock success during the entire resuscitation, but associations were most apparent for early shocks. AMSA-changes were also associated with shock success, but only in the early phase of resuscitation. In an era of smart defibrillators, absolute AMSA and relative changes hold promise for studies on early guidance of resuscitation, whereas additional studies are warranted to further characterize shock prediction in the later phase.

Changes in automated external defibrillator use and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the Nijmegen area.

PURPOSE: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) are a major healthcare problem. Over the years, several initiatives have contributed to more lay volunteers providing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and increased use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in the Netherlands. As part of a quality and outcomes program, we registered bystander CPR, AED use and outcome in the Nijmegen area. METHODS: Prospective resuscitation registry with a study cohort of non-traumatic OHCA cases from 2013-2016 and historical controls from 2008-2011. In line with previous reports, we studied patients transported to the hospital (Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands) and excluded arrests witnessed by the emergency medical service (EMS). Primary outcomes were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival to discharge. RESULTS: In the study cohort (n = 349) the AED was attached more often than in the historical cohort (n = 180): 46% vs. 23% and the proportion of bystander CPR was higher: 78% vs. 63% (both p < 0.001). A higher proportion of patients received an AED shock (39% vs. 15%, p < 0.001) and the number of required shocks by the EMS was lower (2 vs. 4, p = 0.004). Survival to discharge was higher (47% vs. 33%, p = 0.002) without differences in ROSC. The survival benefit was restricted to patients with a shockable initial rhythm. In both cohorts, bystander CPR and AED use were independently associated with survival. CONCLUSION: In patients admitted after OHCA, survival to discharge has markedly improved to 40-50%, comparable with other Dutch registries. As increased bystander CPR and the doubled use of AEDs seem to have contributed, all civilian-based resuscitation initiatives should be encouraged.