Antibiotic prophylaxis for skin toxicity induced by antiepidermal growth factor receptor agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Topical and systemic prophylactic measures, which are administered before the development of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-related acneiform rash, are appropriate interventions to mitigate the intensity of skin toxicity. We have performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether prophylactic antibiotics may reduce the occurrence and severity of anti-EGFR drug-related skin rashes. A systematic review was performed by searching Medline, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library from inception until March 2016 for publications regarding the pre-emptive role of antibiotics for EGFR-induced skin rashes. Fixed- or random-effects meta-analyses, according to heterogeneity, were used to summarize odds ratios of skin toxicity with antibiotic use. Of the 827 citations found in the search, 13 studies comprising 1073 patients were included in the analysis. In 12 studies, patients in the prophylactic antibiotic arms had a lower risk of developing a skin rash (odds ratio 0·53, 95% confidence interval 0·39-0·72, P < 0·01) than patients without antibiotic prophylaxis. In particular, moderate-to-severe toxicities (grades 2-4) were reduced by nearly two-thirds (odds ratio 0·36, 95% confidence interval 0·22-0·60, P < 0·01) in 13 studies. This translated to a 26% absolute difference of high-grade skin rash compared with the control arms (from 50% to 24%). The results of this meta-analysis show that the risk of skin rash after treatment with anti-EGFR agents for solid tumours was significantly lower in patients taking prophylaxis with antibiotics than in those who were not. Therefore, taking pre-emptive tetracyclines for several weeks at the start of anti-EGFR treatment can significantly reduce the incidence and severity of cutaneous acneiform rash.

Tumour Budding and Survival in Stage II Colorectal Cancer: a Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.

PURPOSE: Tumour budding is defined as the presence of isolated or small clusters of malignant cells at the invasive edge of the tumour. It is considered a negative prognostic factor in colorectal cancer (CRC) and is associated with a poor outcome and adverse pathological features. Here, we report a meta-analysis of the association of tumour budding and survival in stage II CRC patients. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and SCOPUS were searched for studies that assessed the relationship between tumour budding and 5-year overall survival (OS) in stage II CRC patients. Published data were extracted and used to compute odds ratios (ORs) for death at 5 years and hazard ratios (HRs) for survival amongst patients with respect to the extent of tumour budding, using multivariate analysis. Data were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel random effect model. RESULTS: We analysed 12 studies that included a total of 1652 patients. High-grade budding was associated with worse OS at 5 years (OR for death, 6.25; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 4.04-9.67; P < 0.00001). The absolute difference in 5-year OS was -25 % (95 % CI, -18- - 33 %, P < 0.00001). It was particularly noteworthy that the presence of high-grade budding was associated with an increased risk of death (HR for death, 3.68; 95 % CI, 2.16-6.28, P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Tumour budding is associated with worse survival in stage II CRC, in particular in pT3N0M0 patients. It could therefore potentially be used when deciding whether to administer adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk node negative CRC patients.

Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy: a new option in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. a systematic review and pooled analysis.

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), for which locoregional treatment is not an option, is a candidate for palliative systemic therapy, but an accepted chemotherapy regimen does not exist. We have conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analyses to quantify the benefits of oxaliplatin (OXA)-based chemotherapy in advanced HCC in patients not exposed to sorafenib. Studies that enrolled advanced HCC patients treated with first-line OXA-based chemotherapy were identified using PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials and EMBASE. A systematic review was conducted to calculate the pooled response rate and 95% confidence interval. The pooled median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival, weighted on the number of patients of each selected trials, were also calculated. We tested for significant heterogeneity by Cochran's chi-squared test and I-square index. Thirteen studies were included in this review, with a total of 800 patients analysed. The pooled response rate was 16.8%. The median PFS and overall survival were 4.2 and 9.3 months, respectively, with a 1 year overall survival of 37%. The weighted median PFS/overall survival and response rate were 4.5/11 months and 20% in Western patients. Conversely, in Asiatic studies, the median PFS/overall survival and response rate were 2.43/6.47 months and 13.2%, respectively. OXA-based chemotherapy is effective in advanced HCC and represents a viable option in these patients. A head to head comparison with sorafenib or a second-line agent should be verified in prospective trials.

The predictive role of skin rash with cetuximab and panitumumab in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published trials.

Skin rash is an early and frequent phenomenon during treatment with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies. The objective of this review is to assess the predictive value of skin rash in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab and panitumumab. We searched PubMed and ASCO Meetings for publications reporting the correlation of skin rash with survival and/or response rate. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals for progression and/or survival, and/or risk ratios (RRs) for response rate in patients with rash were obtained from publications and pooled in a meta-analysis. Fourteen publications (for a total of 3,833 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. The occurrence of skin toxicity represents a predictive factor for survival (HR 0.51; p<0.00001) and progression (HR 0.58; p<0.00001). Similarly, patients who developed moderate or severe rash had an increased chance of response (35 vs 13%; RR 2.23, p<0.00001). The occurrence of skin rash during treatment with cetuximab and panitumumab represents a significant predictor of the efficacy of these drugs. The hypothesis that, in patients who lack substantial skin toxicity, this treatment is not beneficial and requires early discontinuation deserves further study.

Risk of venous and arterial thromboembolic events associated with anti-EGFR agents: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

PURPOSE: Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) agents [monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)] are targeted therapies used in advanced cancers. Arterial and venous thromboembolic events (ATEs and VTEs excluding catheter-related events) were not investigated with these agents, and the risk of these events is still unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have carried out a meta-analysis in order to determine the incidence and the relative risk (RR) of VTEs and ATEs associated with these agents. Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate the summary incidence, RRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by using either random effects or fixed effect models according to the heterogeneity of the included studies. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies (7611 patients) was selected for this meta-analysis. The associated RRs of VTEs (11 studies comprising 7073 patients) and ATEs (5 studies consisting of 3030 patients) were 1.32 (95% CI 1.07-1.63; P equals 0.01) and 1.34 (95% CI 0.94-1.9; P equals 0.11) compared with control patients. The analysis of VTEs was also stratified by class of agents: MoAbs (RR 1.34; P equals 0.01) and oral TKIs (RR 1.16; P equals 0.65). CONCLUSION: Anti-EGFR agents are associated with a significant increase in the risk of VTEs. In particular, the risk is significant with cetuximab and panitumumab in settings where these drugs are currently approved.

The emerging issue of ratio of metastatic to resected lymph nodes in gastrointestinal cancers: an overview of literature.

The prognosis of gastrointestinal epithelial malignancies is derived from TNM staging. The nodal status has the most importance. It guides the subsequent adjuvant therapies and gives the oncologist outstanding information about the biology of disease. Recently, a growing number of publications seem to be attributing importance to a ratio of positive to resected lymph nodes as a bad prognostic factor; particularly in gastro-oesophageal carcinomas, colorectal carcinomas and also pancreatic cancer. This particular value predicts the best significance in optimally (nodal) staged carcinomas, with less accurate, but probably equally meaningful information in not adequately resected tumours. Lymph node ratio maintains its value even after neo-adjuvant therapy, a factor known to be able to reduce lymph nodes' retrieval. The lymph node ratio is most accurate when more specialised pathologists in adequate volume cancer centres perform treatment and harvest of the lymph nodes. To date, no unconventional radiological tool is better able to perform standard armamentarium in correctly defining (preoperatively) patient carriers of massive nodal extension. The accurate definition of nodal staging is crucial for the potential down-staging benefit of neo-adjuvant chemo(radio)therapy on lymph node ratio. In conclusion, lymph node ratio stands out as an independent prognostic factor in adequately (nodal)-staged gastrointestinal epithelial malignancies and could be useful as a stratification factor in future randomised controlled trials.

Targeted therapies and other agents as first-line maintenance and beyond: particular benefit in pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients.

As of today, advanced non-small cell lung cancer is still an incurable disease. However, recent researches on the biology of adenocarcinoma have led to considerable progress in the treatment of this subgroup of patients. The administration of bevacizumab and pemetrexed as first-line therapy, erlotinib in the maintenance phase and erlotinib again combined with vandetanib as second-line therapy, gives patients with lung adenocarcinoma new hope. In particular, in metastatic adenocarcinoma with an EML4-ALK fusion oncogene, crizotinib (a selective, ATP-competitive, small molecule, orally bioavailable inhibitor of the ALK and MET/HGF receptor tyrosine kinases), led to a response rate of 64%, which is similar to the results achieved in chronic myeloid leukemia and GIST with imatinib. Overall, the application of all available active therapies during the natural history of adenocarcinoma may lead to a survival benefit that was unimaginable only a few years ago. This article reviews the main studies on molecular targeted therapies in various lines of treatment of advanced lung adenocarcinoma.

Thrombosis-related complications and mortality in cancer patients with central venous devices: an observational study on the effect of antithrombotic prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Recent guidelines do not recommend antithrombotic prophylaxis (AP) to prevent catheter-related thrombosis in cancer patients with a central line. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study assessed the management of central lines in cancer patients, current attitude towards AP, catheter-related and systemic venous thromboses, and survival. RESULTS: Of 1410 patients enrolled, 1390 were seen at least once in the 6-month median follow-up. Continuous AP, mainly low-dose warfarin, was given to 451 (32.4%); they were older, with a more frequent history of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and more advanced cancer. There was no difference in catheter-related thrombosis in patients given AP or not (2.8% and 2.2%, odds ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval 0.64-2.6). The median time to first catheter-related complication was 120 days. Systemic VTE including deep and superficial thromboses and pulmonary embolism, were less frequent with AP (4% versus 8.2%, P = 0.005). Mortality was also lower (25% versus 44%, P = 0.0001). Multiple logistic regression analysis found only advanced cancer and no AP significantly associated with mortality. No major bleeding was recorded with AP. CONCLUSIONS: Current AP schedules do not appear to prevent catheter-related thrombosis. Systemic VTE and mortality, however, appeared lower after prophylaxis.