Surgical Treatment of Patients with Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome: Comparative Study of Two Implants. / Operative Behandlung von Patienten mit Iliosakralgelenksyndrom: Vergleichsstudie zweier Implantate.

The treatment of patients with ISJ dysfunction is difficult due to the multifactorial causes of pain and various problems in clarification. Treatment includes physical therapy, corticosteroids, prolotherapy, radiofrequency denervation and sacroiliac joint fusion. A new option for the surgical treatment of ISG dysfunction is the Torpedo implant system. For a safe fusion, only 2 implants are needed, which are available in lengths of 30-50 mm. The new implant system has been tested in pilot studies for efficacy and biocompatibility with good results. For further documentation for the Torpedo implant system, a comparative study against the iFuse system was carried out.Two different implants were used: Group 1: Deltacor Torpedo, Group 2: iFuse implants (Si-Bone). The data generated during admission and subsequent check-ups (VAS, ODI, opioid use) were entered into an evaluation file set up for this purpose. Follow-up appointments were set at 1 month, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.The data of 65 patients were evaluated comparatively. In all comparisons, only very small effect sizes were found with regard to the differences in the decrease in pain intensities, so that equivalent effectiveness of the two methods could initially be postulated from a clinical point of view. Most patients in both groups reported taking opioids to treat pain before surgery. According to the decrease in pain intensity, opioid treatment could be discontinued in some patients after the operation. After 12 months, the number of patients treated with opioids decreases to 23% in group 1 and to 17% in group 2. The success of the fusions with the two methods can also be proven by image documentation, from which the position of the implants can also be clearly recognised. In no case was there any loosening.Overall, the evaluation of this study allows the conclusion that both implant systems can be successfully used for the treatment of patients with ISJ syndrome. The present results should be confirmed in further comparative studies with the proposed evaluation methods.

[Surgical treatment of congenital muscular torticollis]. / Operative Behandlung des Torticollis muscularis congenitus.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical treatment of congenital muscular torticollis with tripolar release of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, followed by modified postoperative treatment with a special orthosis. INDICATIONS: Muscular torticollis due to contracture of the sternocleidomastoid muscle; failure of conservative therapy. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Torticollis due to bony anomaly or other muscular contractures. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Tenotomy of the sternocleidomastoid muscle occipitally and resection of at least 1 cm of the tendon at the sternal and clavicular origin. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Orthosis must be worn for 6 weeks 24 h/day, then for another 6 weeks 12 h/day. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients were treated with tripolar release of the sternocleidomastoid muscle and modified postoperative management. Average follow-up time was 25.7 months. One patient presented with recurrence after 3 years. No intra- or postoperative complications were observed.

Four decades of the Graf method in screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip (part I): Rightly the gold standard or of dubious benefit?

Introduction: The method of infant hip sonography according to Graf is used for general hip screening in Serbia, Austria, and Germany and is considered the gold standard. In other countries, such as the USA, however, it is not well accepted and is claimed to lead to high costs and overtreatment. The aim of this study was to investigate how many of the mentioned sources in a recent review article contained sonograms that met the quality criteria as taught in Graf's ultrasound courses. Methods: A systematic review published by Sakkers et al. was analyzed in terms of addressing the quality criteria of Graf's method. Studies that were suitable by title, abstract, manuscript, that contained an image of sonographic hip examination, and that were accessible were included into analysis. Results: Within the described review, there were 22 papers on the Graf method. Of these, 10 contained hip sonograms and were applicable for final analysis. The quality criteria according to Graf were not fulfilled within 5 of these 10 papers. Within these papers, there are examples of schematic sonograms that do not correspond with the quality criteria either. Conclusion: Skepticism regarding the Graf method may be based on user errors and insufficient application of the Graf quality assessment algorithm, which results in high intra- and inter-observer variations. Based on these findings, a working group was initiated to evaluate further work according to the same procedure (currently approximately 130 papers).

Four decades of developmental dysplastic hip screening according to Graf: What have we learned?

Purpose: Sonographic hip examination according to Graf is widely accepted standard for diagnosing developmental dysplastic hips (DDH) but it is criticized for alleged intra- and interobserver variations. This review was conducted to evaluate whether objective quality criteria according to the Graf method are fulfilled within scientific literature. Methods: A systematic literature search on Pubmed was performed using the search string: [(DDH) OR (Hip dysplasia)] AND (Graf). Studies suitable by title, abstract, manuscript, containing an image of sonographic hip examination and online accessibility were included into analysis. Results: 131 studies were included into final analysis. Only 68 (51.9%) presented correct sonographic images according Graf's criteria. 98 (74.8%) studies plotted alpha-angles (angle between bony roof line and base line) but only 85 (64.8%) studies beta-angles (angle between cartilage roof line and base line). Studies were contributed from 25 countries. Conclusion: Assumingly, skepticism regarding the Graf method is based on user errors and insufficient application of the Graf quality assessment algorithm resulting in high intra- and interobserver variations. When performed correctly, the Graf method is of high diagnostic value.

Intramedullary Nailing Versus Compound Plate Osteosynthesis in Pathologic Diaphyseal Humerus Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pathologic fractures of the extremities due to carcinoma metastases require individual and patient prognosis-related stabilization procedures. Considering the anatomic features of the humerus, implant material stability is less critical than femoral fractures because of less weight-bearing stress. Therefore, operation length, blood loss, and quick recovery of function are of greater interest. In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated and compared the outcomes of compound plate osteosynthesis and intramedullary (IM) nailing while managing diaphyseal pathologic fractures of the humerus. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients treated at our institution for pathologic fractures of the diaphyseal humerus between 2010 and 2021 for group differences (plate osteosynthesis vs. IM nailing) in terms of blood loss, length of operation, implant survival, and upper extremity function. RESULTS: We reviewed 42 stabilization procedures due to pathologic diaphyseal humerus fractures, with a mean follow-up of 8.5±15.4  months. IM nailing (n=20) showed a significantly lower blood loss (266.7±23.7 mL) than plate osteosynthesis (n=22, 571.1±92.6 mL). We did not detect statistically significant differences in the complication rate, length of operation, or Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggested that diaphyseal fractures of the humerus should be stabilized using an IM nail rather than plate osteosynthesis due to lower blood loss, while complication rate, implant survival, and length of operation remain indifferent.

[Minimally invasive tibialis anterior tendon transfer in shuttle technique for the treatment of clubfoot recurrence in adolescent patients]. / Minimalinvasiver Tibialis-anterior-Sehnentransfer in Shuttle-Technik zur Behandlung des Klumpfußrezidivs im Wachstumsalter.

OBJECTIVE: Tibialis anterior transfer in shuttle technique using the tunnelator is an atraumatic surgical technique without injuring the extensor retinaculum. The technique allows for postoperative treatment with pain-adapted full weight-bearing for 6 weeks in a lower leg cast which is simplified compared to the current literature. INDICATIONS: Passive, correctable clubfoot recurrences in the event of muscular imbalance (overbalanced anterior tibial muscle). CONTRAINDICATIONS: Structural movement restrictions of the foot, muscular insufficiency of the anterior tibial muscle, infection or cancerous lesions in the surgical site. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Loosen the tibialis anterior muscle at the base of the first metatarsal. Guide the tendon proximally out of the extensor retinaculum, then shuttle the tendon below the retinaculum with the help of the "tunnelator" and transosseous fixation at the lateral cuneiform. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Pain-adapted full weight-bearing in a lower leg walking cast for 6 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: In the course of a retrospective study, the above-mentioned surgical procedure was carried out in 20 patients (total n = 26 surgeries) between 2013 and 2019. After a follow-up of 12 months, complete correction of the clubfoot relapse was found in 88.5% of cases. There were no general or specific surgical complications.

Mid-term Follow-Up after Closed Reduction in Developmental Dysplastic Hips.

PURPOSE: Closed reduction and subsequent spica casting is the gold standard for treatment of unstable or dislocated developmental dysplastic hips (DDHs). There are few data on mid-term results after treatment of DDH, especially on closed reduction. METHODS: Thirty-one consecutive patients with unstable or dislocated hips (n = 36) that were treated by fluoroscopic, contrast agent-supported closed reduction and spica casting were included and evaluated clinically and radiologically 2 and 5 years after treatment. RESULTS: After 2 and 5 years, there were no significant differences between healthy and successfully treated hips that were detectable with respect to acetabular coverage (AC) angle, center-edge angle, and clinical stability of the hip. There was a significant difference at the 2-year follow-up between healthy hips and hips that needed to undergo secondary open reduction surgery (n = 4) with respect to the AC angle (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Closed reduction in DDHs results in acceptable clinical and radiological results in the mid-term follow-up. It remains unclear why some patients with subsequent sonographically matured hips show secondary deterioration and recurrence of dysplasia.

One-year results of minimally invasive fusion surgery of the sacroiliac joint as an alternative treatment after failed endoscopic thermal coagulation.

BACKGROUND: While pain in the severe sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is a common cause of lower back pain, SIJ disease is often overlooked as a diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: This study examines the extent of sufficient long-term pain relief and functional improvement in patients with SIJ syndrome that are treated with thermocoagulation. Some patients treated with thermocoagulation noted initial improvement, but the functionality and pain relief had limited duration and efficacy. Patients with insufficient improvement were recommended to undergo fusion surgery as an option for better and longer lasting results. METHOD: Patients with a long history of back or pelvic problems were selected for the study. Endoscopic thermal coagulation of the SIJ was carried out. The follow-up examinations took place after 1, 3, 6, 12 months. In patients with insufficient pain relief and functionality after thermocoagulation, a fusion surgery was performed. The results of the fusion surgery were documented over a 12-month follow-up period. To carry out the statistical evaluation visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry-Disability-Index (ODI) and the consumption of opioids were recorded. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included. The mean VAS values 12 months after thermocoagulation were 68.9. The ODI after 12 months was very near or somewhat higher than their baseline prior to the thermocoagulation. Thus, a fusion surgery was recommended. Thirty-three patients agreed to the fusion operation. The VAS values 12 months after fusion surgery decreased to 53.1. Analogous to the VAS values, the Oswestry index (ODI) showed a significant improvement after the fusion operation. CONCLUSION: The success of surgical intervention in 88% of the SIJ syndrome patients with inadequate results 12 months after thermocoagulation proves the superiority of SIJ fusion surgery. This study showed long-lasting pain relief by an average of 65% and a median improvement in functional impairments of 60%. In view of these results, fusion surgery should be considered for patients without sufficient success of thermocoagulation.

First clinical results of a novel minimally-invasive fusion system for the sacroiliac joint.

BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) painful dysfunction is a common source of low back pain (LBP). Several surgical treatment options for SIJ fusion were described. A promising treatment option with demonstrated clinical improvement is the minimally-invasive SIJ fusion. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this case study was to document the effectiveness and safety of the new SIJ system (Torpedo®) over a period of 6 months after the minimally invasive implantation. METHODS: Patients with failed conservative treatment of painful SIJ dysfunction were enrolled successively in two centers. The Diagnosis was made by positive response to SIJ-injection with local anesthetic and at least by two positive SIJ provocation tests. The Torpedo® Implant system was used for the implantation. This workpiece made of titanium alloy is characterized by a helical profile geometry (CST: chronical spinal turn) with a hydrophilic surface. The evaluated endpoints LBP and grade of disability were assessed using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) preoperatively and at one, three and six months postoperatively. RESULTS: 15 patients (10 female, 5 male; mean age 59 ± 13 years) were operated on one after the other. The pain intensity decreased in all 15 patients. After 6 months, a decrease in the median values of 70% (quartiles 1-3: 65-79%) was calculated. The median values of the Oswestry Disability Index after 6 months were 62% (quartiles 1-3: 53-67) lower than before the operation. Before surgery, 13 patients (87%) were taking opioids for pain management. Six months after the operation, opioids were only needed by 3 patients (20%). Implant malpositioning was not detected on plain radiograph. No surgical site infections or perioperative complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical improvement in early follow up and the absence of surgery related complications demonstrate a high grade of device-related safety and effectiveness of the treatment with a novel minimally-invasive SIJ fusion system.

Is Prematurity a Protective Factor Against Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip? A Retrospective Analysis of 660 Newborns.

PURPOSE: In Middle Europe developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) has an incidence of up to 5.9 %. The rate of congenital hip dislocation as the worst complication of a growth disorder of the hip is between 1.5 % and 2.5 %. Among known risk factors of DDH are breech position, multiples, foot deformities and family history. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate prematurity as a risk factor for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The hips of 283 infants who were born before the 38th week of gestation or earlier, and those of 377 infants who were born after the 37th week of gestation, none of whom had other risk factors for DDH, were compared using the ultrasound technique according to Graf et al., within the first week after birth. Both hips of all infants were included in the study. RESULTS: Surprisingly, the difference in alpha angles between the two groups was statistically extremely significant, favoring the preterm infants. Moreover, we found a physiological curve of alpha angle development with a peak after the 31st week of gestation. The incidence of pathological dysplasia was not significantly different in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that prematurity is not a predisposing factor for DDH, but rather is protective for hip development.

Biomechanical evaluation of temporary epiphysiodesis at the femoral epiphysis using established devices from clinical practice.

The aim of this study is to compare biomechanical features of different devices used in clinical routine for temporary epiphysiodesis (eight-Plate® and FlexTackTM). The tested implants were divided into four different groups (eight-Plate® vs. FlexTackTM for lateral and anterior implantation) á 10 samples for testing implanted eight-Plate® vs. FlexTackTM in fresh frozen pig femora for maximum load forces (Fmax) and axial physis distance until implant failure (lmax). A servo hydraulic testing machine (858 Mini Bionix 2) was used to exert and measure reproducible forces. Statistical analyses tested for normal distribution and significant (p < 0.05) differences in primary outcome parameters. There were no significant differences between the eight-Plate® lateral group and the FlexTackTM lateral group for neither Fmax (p = 0.46) nor lmax (p = 0.65). There was a significant higher Fmax (p < 0.001) and lmax (p = 0.001) measured in the eight-Plate® group compared to the FlexTackTM group when implanted anteriorly. In anterior temporary ephiphysiodesis, eight-Plate® demonstrated superior biomechanical stability. At this stage of research, there is no clear advantage of either implant and the choice remains within the individual preference of the surgeon.

Implants for Vertebral Body Replacement - Which Systems are Available and Have Become Established. / Wirbelkörperersatz ­ welche Systeme sind am Markt, was hat sich bewährt?

Since the first vertebral body replacement operations over 50 years ago until now, there were developed numerous methods and implants. Vertebral body replacement after corpectomy nowadays is a standard procedure in spinal surgery. At the beginning mainly bone grafts were used. Due to continuous development, PMMA and titanium implants were developed. Nowadays various expandable and non-expandable implants are available. Numerous implants can still be justified. The question arises which methods and systems are on the market and which ones have proven themselves? This article describes and compares the advantages and disadvantages of each implant type.

Risk factors for failed closed reduction in dislocated developmental dysplastic hips.

AIM OF THE STUDY: The present study aimed to identify risk factors for unsuccessful CR. INTRODUCTION: Closed reduction (CR) represents the gold standard for treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), but to a minor percentage, it fails to reduce dysplastic hips successfully. METHODS: Seventy-three dysplastic hips underwent closed reduction and post-interventional MRI of the pelvis. MRIs were evaluated for successful reduction of the hip, volumes of femoral heads, and acetabular diameter. Initial treatment results were correlated to AC angles at two years of follow-up. Contralateral, healthy hips served as control. RESULTS: Out of 73 instable, dysplastic hips, there were nine cases of CR failure. These cases showed significantly increased femoral head volumes (p = 0.002) and a significantly (p = 0.02) larger ratio of femoral head volume to acetabular opening area. There was no significant difference (p = 0.15) in acetabular diameter between both groups. At two years of follow-up, AC angles were significantly (p = 0.003) larger and pathologic in cases of CR failure. CONCLUSION: Exclusive enlargement of the femoral head is a risk factor for unsuccessful reduction and its ratio to the acetabular opening surface is predictive for CR success in DDH.

Endoscopic facet joint denervation for treatment of chronic lower back pain.

OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous radiofrequency is an established method for treatment of chronic low back pain of intervertebral facet etiology. Endoscopic techniques have the advantage of visualization of the facet joint and the dorsal medial ramus and thus allow for more accurate denervation. It was thus hypothesized that pain reduction is vaster and longer enduring. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 98 consecutive patients that underwent endoscopic facet joint denervation (EFJD) were included in this study. Prior to intervention and for follow-up, patients were asked to complete VASpain, ODI, COMI and EQ5D questionnaires. RESULTS: VASpain was reduced significantly (EFJD: p < 0.001) at last follow-up. Values for ODI, COMI and EQ5D showed significant improvements towards subjective well-being at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: EFJD is a promising technique for the treatment of facet joint syndrome caused CLBP as it contributes to sustaining significant pain reduction and improvement of subjective quality of life parameters.

Treatment with and without stabilizing lumbar spinal orthosis after one- or two-level spondylodesis: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Musculature affected during spondylodesis surgery may benefit and recover faster if supported by spine orthosis postoperatively. METHODS: This prospective study included 50 consecutive patients undergoing one- or two-level spondylodesis. The intervention group received a lumbar spine orthosis (n= 23), while the control group remained without orthosis (n= 27). Patients were assessed for pain (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS), Oswestry Disability index (ODI) as well as the use of analgesics. RESULTS: Patients wearing an orthosis postoperatively reported a higher degree of subjective stability. However, both intervention as well as control group did not show any significant differences for each of the follow-up points regarding VAS, ODI or the use of analgesics. CONCLUSION: Wearing an orthosis has neither impact on subjective pain, the need for analgesics nor for postoperative functionality. However, patients reported that they profited from wearing the orthosis by feeling more stable, thereby nicely improving their postoperative mobility. Thus, novel patient reported outcome measures have to be developed to assess these features in future studies.

Closed Reduction as Therapeutic Gold Standard for Treatment of Congenital Hip Dislocation. / Die geschlossene Reposition der Säuglingshüfte als therapeutischer Goldstandard der kongenitalen Hüftluxation.

BACKGROUND: Congenital hip dislocation (luxation) has an incidence of 0.4 - 0.7% and is regarded as a prearthrotic deformity. Thus, if not being diagnosed and treated at a very early age, extensive surgical measures are inevitable in childhood and early adulthood. METHODS: In the time between 01/2013 and 02/2019 we performed 28 600 hips sonographies in babies as part of general screening measures at U2 or U3. There were 71 instable, dysplastic or dislocated hips diagnosed that were treated by arthrographic, closed reduction. After a hip spica cast was applied, reposition was controlled by MRI, estimating the acetabular head index (ACI), the head coverage index (HCI) as well as the femoral head's sphericity or by sonography using the Graf method. RESULTS: Overall success rate was 91.6% for primary closed reduction. Patients with primarily irreducible hips were significantly older (p < 0.003) than patients with primarily successful reducible hips. Congenital dislocated hips had significantly higher ACIs (p < 0.001) and HCIs (p = 0.03) as well as significantly less well rounded femoral heads (sphericity; p < 0.001) compared to stable hips. CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis and treatment of congenital dislocated hips by closed reduction is essential for a sufficient and regular maturation of the hips without further surgical interventions.

The Phenomenon of the Apparent (Double) Femoral Head in Infant Hip Sonography According to Graf-Description, Incidence and Clinical Relevance. / Das Phänomen des scheinbar (ver)doppelten Hüftkopfes bei der Säuglingssonografie nach Graf-Beschreibung, Inzidenz und klinische Relevanz.

PURPOSE: Hip screening sonography according to Graf in rare cases yields the appearance of a double femoral head, aptly named the Double-Head-Sign. The goal of this retrospective study is to offer a definition of this rare sign, evaluate its incidence of occurrence and compare the sonographic findings with the clinical findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This Double-Head-Sign is caused by the overlap of the trochanter major with the actual head of the femur in cases of coxa vara. This was observed in 13 of 2800 neonates we screened as part of our sonographical neonatal hip screening. RESULTS: 13 neonates presented themselves with ultrasound findings in accordance with our description, yielding an incidence of 0,46% in our patient cohort. In correlation, these neonates also exhibited increased external and decreased internal rotation of the hip. Two had an underlying condition (achondroplasia). CONCLUSION: In these rare cases, clinical examination of hip rotation in 90° hip flexion has proved helpful and further interdisciplinary examination of such infants to distinguish a possible underlying primary condition is recommended.