Long-term outcomes after endoscopic removal of malignant colorectal polyps: Results from a 10-year cohort.

BACKGROUND: Choosing an optimal post-polypectomy management strategy of malignant colorectal polyps is challenging, and evidence regarding a surveillance-only strategy is limited. AIM: To evaluate long-term outcomes after endoscopic removal of malignant colorectal polyps. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate outcomes after endoscopic removal of malignant colorectal polyps between 2010 and 2020. Residual disease rate and nodal metastases after secondary surgery and local and distant recurrence rate for those with at least 1 year of follow-up were investigated. Event rates for categorical variables and means for continuous variables with 95% confidence intervals were calculated, and Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney test were performed. Potential risk factors of adverse outcomes were determined with univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: In total, 135 lesions (mean size: 22.1 mm; location: 42% rectal) from 129 patients (mean age: 67.7 years; 56% male) were enrolled. The proportion of pedunculated and non-pedunculated lesions was similar, with en bloc resection in 82% and 47% of lesions, respectively. Tumor differentiation, distance from resection margins, depth of submucosal invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and budding were reported at 89.6%, 45.2%, 58.5%, 31.9%, and 25.2%, respectively. Residual tumor was found in 10 patients, and nodal metastasis was found in 4 of 41 patients who underwent secondary surgical resection. Univariate analysis identified piecemeal resection as a risk factor for residual malignancy (odds ratio: 1.74; P = 0.042). At least 1 year of follow-up was available for 117 lesions from 111 patients (mean follow-up period: 5.59 years). Overall, 54%, 30%, 30%, 11%, and 16% of patients presented at the 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 7-year, and 9-10-year surveillance examinations. Adverse outcomes occurred in 9.0% (local recurrence and dissemination in 4 patients and 9 patients, respectively), with no difference between patients undergoing secondary surgery and surveillance only. CONCLUSION: Reporting of histological features and adherence to surveillance colonoscopy needs improvement. Long-term adverse outcome rates might be higher than previously reported, irrespective of whether secondary surgery was performed.

Risk Factors and Interpretation of Inconclusive Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions.

BACKGROUND: The inconclusive cytological findings of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) remain a major clinical challenge and often lead to treatment delays. METHODS: Patients who had undergone EUS-FNA sampling for solid pancreas lesions between 2014 and 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. The "atypical" and "non-diagnostic" categories of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System were considered inconclusive and the "negative for malignancy" category of malignancy was suspected clinically. We determined the frequency and predictors of inconclusive cytological finding. RESULTS: A total of 473 first EUS-FNA samples were included, of which 108 cases (22.83%) were inconclusive. Significant increases in the odds of inconclusive cytological findings were observed for lesions with a benign final diagnosis (OR 11.20; 95% CI 6.56-19.54, p < 0.001) as well as with the use of 25 G FNA needles (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.09-4.01, p = 0.023) compared to 22 G needles. Furthermore, the use of a single EUS-FNA technique compared to the combined use of slow-pull and standard suction techniques (OR 1.70; 95% CI 1.06-2.70, p = 0.027) and less than three punctures per procedure led to an elevation in the risk of inconclusive cytology (OR 2.49; 95% CI 1.49-4.14, p < 0.001). Risk reduction in inconclusive cytology findings was observed in lesions between 2-4 cm (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.23-0.68, p = 0.001) and >4 cm (OR 0.16; 95% CI 0.08-0.31, p < 0.001) compared to lesions ≤2 cm. CONCLUSIONS: The more than two punctures per EUS-FNA sampling with larger-diameter needle (19 G or 22 G) using the slow-pull and standard suction techniques in combination may decrease the probability of inconclusive cytological findings.

[Endoscopic ultrasound in the lower gastrointestinal tract]. / Az alsó tápcsatornai endoszkópos ultrahangvizsgálat.

Endoscopic ultrasound is a minimally invasive modality that combines endoscopy with ultrasound, providing a possibility to visualize the wall of the gastrointestinal tract and adjacent tissues and organs. Since the development of the modality in the 1980s, advancements in endoscopic ultrasound technology have led to increasingly broadening indications: besides diagnostic indications, therapeutic indications have also expanded greatly. According to recent guidelines regarding rectal cancer staging, rectal ultrasonography is mainly considered to be a secondary imaging modality compared to magnetic resonance imaging. With the use of forward-viewing echoendoscopes and ultrasound miniprobes that can be inserted through the working channel of the endoscope, endoscopic ultrasound technology can be expanded to proximal, colonic areas as well. Rectal ultrasonography can also play an important role in the differential diagnosis of subepithelial lesions, in the detection of rectal varices, in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel diseases as well as perianal complications. Diagnostic accuracy can further be improved with the addition of ultrasound-guided sampling in certain cases. Currently, therapeutic indications are more like promising possibilities, than part of everyday clinical practice, but this might change in the near future. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current indications of rectal ultrasound in the clinical practice, including diagnostic and therapeutic ones as well. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(30): 1176-1186.