RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy is advocated for acute cholecystitis, debate still exists about its optimal timing. This retrospective study compares the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy within versus later than 5 days of onset of symptoms in patients with acute cholecystitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty six patients with acute cholecystitis grade I or II were included in the study and divided in two groups. Group 1 received surgery within 5 days of symptoms and group 2 received conservative therapy and delayed surgery after 6 weeks. RESULTS: Group 1 and 2 consisted of 100 and 36 patients respec- tively. Because of failure of conservative therapy 5 patients of group 2 had surgery before 6 weeks. The remaining 31 patients underwent surgery after 6 weeks. Preoperative ERCP was indicated in 2 and 11 patients in groups 1 and 2 respectively (p < 0.001). The median total hospital stay was 3.0 days for group 1 and 11.0 days for group 2 (p < 0.001). In terms of operation time, conversion rates, intraoperative cholangiography, postoperative ERCP, morbidity or mortality both groups were comparable (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed safely within 5 days after the onset of symptoms in patients with acute cholecystitis. Because of shortened total hospital stay and risk of failure of conservative therapy, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be favored.
