Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact ; 17(4): 292-298, 2017 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29199188

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to specifically define the FRAX-based cost-effective treatment thresholds for osteoporosis among people living with HIV (PLWHIV) in Greece and to compare them with those of the general population. METHODS: A previously described state transition Markov cohort model was used in order to estimate the cost-effective intervention thresholds for osteoporotic therapy among Greek PLWHIV employing the FRAX® tool. The model-derived relative risk at which an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 30,000€/QALY gained was observed for treatment versus no intervention was multiplied by the average Greek FRAX-based 10-year probabilities for both major osteoporotic and hip fractures. RESULTS: There exists no significant difference in the cost-effective FRAX® based thresholds between PLWHIV and general population. The absolute 10-year probabilities of 2.5 and 10% for hip and major osteoporotic fractures, respectively, could be used for the initiation of treatment for PLWHIV of both genders under the age of 75; for older subjects the proposed intervention threshold is raised to 5 and 15% 10-year probability for hip and major osteoporotic fracture, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the general recommendation for the use of country specific FRAX® thresholds when managing bone fragility within PLWHIV. In any case, clinical judgment and appropriate screening are mandatory and irreplaceable.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/economia , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose/economia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Grécia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Cadeias de Markov , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Fraturas por Osteoporose/economia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco
2.
J Hum Hypertens ; 31(7): 479-482, 2017 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28124684

RESUMO

A pocket-size cuffless electronic device for self-measurement of blood pressure (BP) has been developed (Freescan, Maisense Inc., Zhubei, Taiwan). The device estimates BP within 10 s using three embedded electrodes and one force sensor that is applied over the radial pulse to evaluate the pulse wave. Before use, basic anthropometric characteristics are recorded on the device, and individualized initial calibration is required based on a standard BP measurement performed using an upper-arm BP monitor. The device performance in providing valid BP readings was evaluated in 313 normotensive and hypertensive adults in three study phases during which the device sensor was upgraded. A formal validation study of a prototype device against mercury sphygmomanometer was performed according to the American National Standards Institute/Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/International Organization for Standardization (ANSI/AAMI/ISO) 2013 protocol. The test device succeeded in obtaining a valid BP measurement (three successful readings within up to five attempts) in 55-72% of the participants, which reached 87% with device sensor upgrade. For the validation study, 125 adults were recruited and 85 met the protocol requirements for inclusion. The mean device-observers BP difference was 3.2±6.7 (s.d.) mm Hg for systolic and 2.6±4.6 mm Hg for diastolic BP (criterion 1). The estimated s.d. (inter-subject variability) were 5.83 and 4.17 mm Hg respectively (criterion 2). These data suggest that this prototype cuffless BP monitor provides valid self-measurements in the vast majority of adults, and satisfies the BP measurement accuracy criteria of the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 2013 validation protocol.


Assuntos
Determinação da Pressão Arterial/instrumentação , Autocuidado/instrumentação , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
3.
Osteoporos Int ; 26(7): 1949-57, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25740208

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: A Greek-specific cost-effectiveness analysis determined the FRAX-based intervention thresholds. Assuming a willingness to pay of 30,000 , osteoporosis treatment is cost-effective in subjects under the age of 75 with 10-year probabilities for hip and major osteoporotic fractures of 2.5 and 10 %, respectively, while for older patients, the same thresholds are raised to 5 and 15 %. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine the FRAX calculated fracture probabilities at which therapeutic intervention can be considered as cost-effective in the Greek setting. METHODS: A Markov cohort model was populated with Greek data, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were used to calculate the cost-effective thresholds for an annual medication cost of 733.7 by gender and age. Average FRAX-based 10-year probabilities for both major osteoporotic and hip fractures were multiplied by the model-derived relative risk at which a cost of 30,000 for each QALY gained was observed for treatment versus to no intervention. RESULTS: A biphasic intervention threshold model is supported by our findings. Osteoporosis treatment becomes cost-effective when absolute 10-year probabilities for hip and major osteoporotic fractures reach 2.5 and 10 %, respectively, among both men and women under the age of 75. For older subjects, the proposed intervention thresholds are raised to 5 and 15 % 10-year probability for hip and major osteoporotic fractures, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cost-effective osteoporosis treatment may be facilitated in Greece if FRAX algorithm is used to identify subjects with 10-year probabilities for hip and major osteoporotic fractures of 2.5 and 10 %, under the age of 75, while for older patients, the relevant thresholds are 5 and 15 %, respectively.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Osteoporose/economia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/economia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Grécia/epidemiologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Fraturas do Quadril/economia , Fraturas do Quadril/epidemiologia , Fraturas do Quadril/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econométricos , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores Sexuais
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA