Safety and efficiency of medication withdrawal at home prior to long-term EEG video-monitoring.

PURPOSE: Long-term video-EEG monitoring (LTM) is frequently used for diagnostic purposes and in the workup of epilepsy surgery to determine the seizure onset zone. Different strategies are applied to provoke seizures during LTM, of which withdrawal of anti-epileptic drugs (AED) is most effective. Remarkably, there is no standardized manner of AED withdrawal. For instance, the majority of clinics taper medication during clinical admission, whereas we prefer to taper medication at home prior to admission. Our aim was to study the advantages (efficiency and diagnostic yield) and disadvantages (safety and complication rates) of predominantly tapering of medication at home. METHOD: We report a retrospective observational cohort of 273 patients who had a LTM at our tertiary epilepsy center from 2005 until 2011. Provocation methods to induce seizures were determined on individual basis. Success rate (duration of admittance, time to first seizure, efficiency and diagnostic yield) and complications and serious adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: AED were tapered in 180 (66%) patients, in 93 (24%) of these patients with additional (partial) sleep deprivation. In all of these patients tapering started at home one to four weeks prior to admission. In the other patients, only (partial) sleep deprivation or none provocation method at all was applied. Seizure recordings were successful in 79,9% of patients. Complications occurred in 19 patients (10.9%) of which 3 had (1.7%) serious adverse events (status epilepticus (SE)) with AED withdrawal. These complications only occurred during admittance, not at home. CONCLUSIONS: AED withdrawal at home prior to LTM is an efficient and convenient method to increase the diagnostic yield of LTM and appears relatively safe.

Detection of subclinical electroencephalographic seizure patterns with multichannel amplitude-integrated EEG in full-term neonates.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the seizure pattern detection rate of single-channel and multichannel amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG), using conventional EEG (cEEG) as a gold standard, in full-term neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. The optimal electrode derivation for seizure detection with single-channel aEEG was also investigated. METHODS: Twelve infants with cEEG seizure patterns (10s) were investigated. cEEG signals were transformed into aEEG signals. Seizure patterns and the number of patients identified with 1 seizure patterns were calculated for single- and multichannel aEEG. RESULTS: On cEEG, 121 seizure patterns with a mean duration of 58s were identified, 68% of which occurred over the centrotemporal region. The sensitivity of aEEG for the detection of seizure patterns was 30% (C.I.: 0.22-0.38) for single-channel aEEG and 39% (C.I.: 0.31-0.48) for multichannel aEEG. Multichannel aEEG identified all patients with 1 seizure pattern (C.I.: 0.75-1.00), whereas single-channel aEEG (with C4-C3 as the optimal electrode derivation) identified all but one of the patients (C.I.: 0.66-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Seizure pattern detection rate is slightly better with multichannel aEEG compared with single-channel (C4-C3) aEEG. Multichannel aEEG identified correctly all patients with 1 seizure pattern in this small selection of patients. SIGNIFICANCE: Single-channel aEEG may detect most patients (in a selected group) with severe neonatal seizures patterns; patient identification can be improved using multichannel recordings.