Teaching Evidence-Based Practice Competencies to Meet Professional Practice Needs.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a major concept threaded throughout nursing education, yet competencies are not clearly identified in The Essentials. PURPOSE: Nurse leaders' EBP competency expectations for professional practice were explored to inform competency-based education for students and practicing nurses. A secondary aim explored potential effects of misinformation on EBP. METHODS: Descriptive qualitative inquiry was performed with a focus group of 6 clinical nurse leaders. RESULTS: EBP expectations were identified, discriminating between novice entry level and advanced-level nurses. Participants emphasized asking questions, linking evidence to practice, and acknowledging that evidence changes over time. All advanced-level nurses were expected to apply, lead, and teach EBP. Post pandemic, nurses need to reclaim evidence-based practices, critically appraise evidence, and educate patients and families to address misinformation. CONCLUSIONS: Information learned will inform competency-based EBP education for students and nurses in academic and clinical settings.

A Review of Chlorhexidine Oral Care in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation.

BACKGROUND: Chlorhexidine gluconate has been considered the criterion standard of oral care for patients receiving mechanical ventilation because of its ability to reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated events. Optimal concentrations and frequencies remain unclear, as do adverse events related to mortality in various intensive care unit populations. OBJECTIVE: To examine the current evidence for the efficacy of chlorhexidine gluconate in reducing the incidence of ventilator-associated events, mortality, intensive care unit length of stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation in patients receiving ventilator support. METHODS: In this integrative review, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), MEDLINE, and Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition were searched using terms related to mechanical ventilation and chlorhexidine gluconate oral care with dates ranging from 2012 to 2023. RESULTS: Seventeen articles were included in this review: 8 systematic reviews, 8 randomized clinical trials (3 of which were not included in any systematic review), and 1 quasi-experimental study. Chlorhexidine gluconate oral care was associated with a reduced incidence of ventilator-associated events, but efficacy depended on concentration and frequency of administration. With stratification by intensive care unit population type, a nonsignificant trend toward increased mortality was found among non-cardiac surgical patients who received this care. CONCLUSION: The evidence regarding the efficacy of chlorhexidine gluconate oral care in reducing ventilator-associated events in specific intensive care unit populations is contradictory. Recently published guidelines recommend de-implementation of chlorhexidine gluconate oral care in all patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Such care may be beneficial only in the cardiac surgical population.

Trends in publication impact of evidence-based healthcare terminology (2013-2022).

AIMS: This article explored the publication impact of evidence-based healthcare terminology to determine usage and discuss options for low usage terms. BACKGROUND: A plethora of terms describe the scholarship of evidence-based healthcare. Several terms are synonyms, creating redundancy and confusion. The abundance and overlap of terms may impede the discovery of evidence. DESIGN: This discursive article explored and discussed publication impact of evidence-based healthcare terms. METHODS: Evidence-based healthcare terms were identified, and their 10-year (2013-2022) publication impact was assessed in the CINAHL and Medline databases. A card sort method was also used to identify terms with low usage. RESULTS: A total of 18/32 terms were included in the review. The terms evidence-based practice, quality improvement, research and translational research were the most highly published terms. Publication data were presented yearly over a 10-year period. Most terms increased in publication use over time, except for three terms whose use decreased. Several terms related to translational research have multiple synonyms. It remains unknown whether these terms are interchangeable and possibly redundant, or if there are nuanced differences between terms. CONCLUSION: We suggest a follow-up review in 3-5 years to identify publication trends to assess context and terms with continued low publication usage. Terms with persistent low usage should be considered for retirement in the reporting of scholarly activities. Additionally, terms with increasing publication trends should be treated as emerging terms that contribute to evidence-based healthcare terminology. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Confusion about the use of appropriate terminology may hinder progress in the scholarship of evidence-based healthcare. We encourage scholars to be aware of publication impact as it relates to the use of specific terminology and be purposeful in the selection of terms used in scholarly projects and publications.

Probable Non-Ventilator-Associated Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia: A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: Non-ventilator-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia is a preventable health care-associated infection accounting for 1 in 14 hospital deaths. Clinical factors influencing this condition include oral health and bacteria and oral care. This case report addresses diagnostics and clinical variables related to non-ventilator-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia and emphasizes the importance of prevention. CLINICAL FINDINGS: A 90-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital with shortness of breath and generalized weakness from new-onset atrial fibrillation and suspected heart failure exacerbation. During the hospitalization, her oral health status declined and oral bacterial colonization shifted, with Neisseria becoming the most common oral bacterial genus around the time of development of probable non-ventilator-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia. DIAGNOSIS: The patient had new respiratory symptoms and a chest radiograph positive for pneumonia on day 4 and was subsequently diagnosed with probable non-ventilator-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia. INTERVENTIONS: Intravenous antibiotic treatment was initiated. Oral care was completed on only 2 of 7 days. The patient received limited ambulation assistance and encouragement from staff and family members. No dysphagia screening was documented. OUTCOMES: On day 6, the patient was discharged with oral antibiotics to her independent living facility with home health care. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent oral care, early and frequent physical activity, and measures aimed to reduce aspiration risk are key interventions for all hospitalized patients to prevent non-ventilator-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia. Further research is warranted to assess shifts in oral bacteria and general oral health during hospitalization, which could provide clinically meaningful data on risk for non-ventilator-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia.

Microbiome profile informs cleansing and storage practices for reusable feeding tube stylets in critical care.

BACKGROUND: Cleansing and storage practices for reusable feeding tube stylets are varied and lack consensus guidelines. Almost 40% of critical care nurses do not cleanse reusable stylets. Our proof-of-concept study aimed to identify potential microbial contamination of stylets before and after cleansing with 70% isopropyl alcohol to establish practice standards. METHODS: This prospective, exploratory pilot study sampled reusable feeding tube stylets using three different stylet sample sets. Set 1 included human participant stylets sampled for microbiome profile precleansing, and postcleansing and reinsertion into feeding tubes (n = 4). Sets 2 and 3 included stylets stored at the bedside. Set 2 included precleansed stylets for microbiome profiles (n = 5). Set 3 included precleansed and postcleansed stylets sampled for quantitative cultures (n = 5). Careful handling and storage protocols were used. Microbiome profiling used 16s ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing. RESULTS: Bacterial species identified on stylets were primarily common microflora and opportunistic pathogens, including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas fulva, Cutibacterium acnes, Prevotella melaninogenica, and Lactobacillus paracasei. Microbiological culturing of stylet samples (set 3) did not yield growth for 9/10 samples; Staphylococcus capitis was identified in one postcleansed sample. Mean bacterial species diversity (alpha diversity) decreased following alcohol cleansing (M = 2.54 pre, M = 1.5 post; P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The abundance of several potentially opportunistic pathogens indicated plausible risk for gut contamination secondary to reinsertion of stylets into small-bore feeding tubes. Stylet cleansing with 70% isopropyl alcohol reduced bacterial burden on the stylets, although viability was unknown. Careful cleansing, handling, and storage protocols for reusable stylets are necessary to minimize contamination.

Association of enteral feeding with microaspiration in critically ill adults.

AIM: This study explored relationships between enteral feeding and tracheal pepsin A. BACKGROUND: Mechanically ventilated (MV) patients receiving enteral feeding are at risk for microaspiration. Tracheal pepsin A, an enzyme specific to gastric cells, was a proxy for microaspiration of gastric secretions. METHODS: Secondary analysis of RCT data from critically ill, MV adults was conducted. Microaspiration prevention included elevated head of bed, endotracheal tube cuff pressure management, and regular oral care. Tracheal secretions for pepsin A were collected every 12 h. Microaspiration was defined as pepsin A ≥ 6.25 ng/mL. Positive pepsin A in >30 % of individual tracheal samples was defined as abundant microaspiration (frequent aspirator). Chi-squared, Fisher's Exact test, and generalized linear model (GLM) were used. RESULTS: Tracheal pepsin A was present in 111/283 (39 %) mechanically ventilated patients and 48 (17 %) had abundant microaspiration. Enteral feeding was associated with tracheal pepsin A, which occurred within 24 h of enteral feeding. Of the patients who aspirated, the majority received some enteral feeding 96/111 (86 %), compared to only 15/111 (14 %) who received no feeding. A greater number of positive pepsin A events occurred with post-pyloric feeding tube location (55.6 %) vs. gastric (48.6 %), although significant only at the event-level. Frequent aspirators (abundant pepsin A) had higher pepsin A levels compared to infrequent aspirators. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirmed the stomach as the microaspiration source. Contrary to other studies, distal feeding tube location did not mitigate microaspiration. Timing for first positive pepsin A should be studied for possible association with enteral feeding intolerance.

Oral Microbes in Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia: Practice and Research Implications.

BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired pneumonia accounts for 25% of all health care-associated infections and is classified as either ventilator-associated or non-ventilator-associated pneumonia. Hospital-acquired pneumonia most frequently results from aspiration of oropharyngeal secretions into the lungs. Although preventive measures for ventilator-associated pneumonia are well established, few preventive measures exist for the nonventilator type. OBJECTIVE: To (1) explore oral microbes associated with ventilator-associated and non-ventilator-associated pneumonia in acutely ill, adult hospitalized patients, and (2) provide evidence-based recommendations for measures to prevent pneumonia in hospitalized patients. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using CINAHL, Academic Search Premier, Medline, and the Cochrane Library. RESULTS: Ten studies were found that identified common oral microbes in ventilator-associated and non-ventilator-associated pneumonia, including Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, S aureus, and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Collectively, oral colonization with E coli, P aeruginosa, methicillin-resistant S aureus, and S aureus increased the risk of nonventilator pneumonia. Findings also suggested microaspiration of colonized oral microbes into the lungs. Non-ventilator-associated pneumonia had similar colonization rates of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, whereas ventilator-associated pneumonia had greater colonization with gram-negative bacteria. The literature did not indicate a standard of oral care effective in all patient populations. DISCUSSION: Oral care is an effective intervention to prevent hospital-acquired pneumonia by reducing pathogenic oral microbial colonization. The impact of different methods and timing of oral care on oral microbes should be further explored, particularly in patients not receiving mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Findings reaffirm the importance of consistent oral care in hospitalized patients. In addition, practices should be different in patients receiving mechanical ventilation versus patients not receiving ventilation. Results may also provide knowledge to inform future preventive measures for pneumonia, particularly for nonventilator pneumonia.

Faculty writing accountability groups: A protocol for traditional and virtual settings.

Publishing is a measure of faculty performance, yet barriers often include getting started, time management, and difficulty finishing. Manuscript submissions also lack deadlines, which creates additional challenges. Writing accountability groups (WAGs) are associated with increased faculty writing productivity. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of WAGs, including the process, participants, writing productivity outcomes, benefits, challenges, and unintended consequences. To maintain our writing progress during the COVID-19 pandemic, we moved our WAG sessions to a virtual platform. Our WAG protocol (both face-to-face and virtual) is shared to help other faculty members or doctoral students implement writing accountability groups. We also advocate for hybrid WAG sessions to promote attendance. In addition to facilitation of scholarly writing and improved writing habits, our WAG created opportunities for scholarly communication and networking with colleagues.

Strategies to enhance the success of mid-career nurse scientists.

BACKGROUND: The mid-career nurse scientist, defined as an associate professor with/without tenure, is often faced with a multitude of challenges and opportunities PURPOSE: This paper shares strategies to assist mid-career scientists as they juggle required career demands and navigate the mid-career phase in pursuit of the rank of full professor. METHOD: A review of the literature was performed on mid-career nurse scientists. DISCUSSION: A combination of increased research responsibilities, increased institutional teaching and service demands, and dwindling support can result in a sense of overwhelm and burnout. The mid-career nurse scientist must balance several balls in the air at one time to remain successful. CONCLUSION: Strategies aligned with the Ecological Framework, focus on intrapersonal, interpersonal, institutional, organizational, and public policy domains to provide a wide scope of strategies that target the mid-career scientist and engage the larger nursing community.

Challenges of de-implementing feeding tube auscultation: A qualitative study.

AIM: This qualitative study explored de-implementation of feeding tube auscultation practice in adult patients by critical care nurses. BACKGROUND: Despite years of evidence suggesting inaccuracy and harm, auscultation (air bolus method) continues to be used by the majority of critical care nurses to verify small-bore feeding tube placement in adults. DESIGN: This descriptive qualitative study used thematic analysis with telephone interview data. METHODS: Fourteen critical care nurses from four stratified groups within the United States (by hospital type and auscultation practice) participated in telephone interviews. RESULTS: Two major themes of individual influence and organizational leadership emerged from the data. Categories identified key components required for auscultation de-implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses feel obligated to follow hospital policies and expressed less accountability for their own practice. Organizational leadership involvement is recommended to facilitate de-implementation of this tradition-based, low-value practice and mitigate harm events.