Prediction of survival with second-line therapy in biliary tract cancer: Actualisation of the AGEO CT2BIL cohort and European multicentre validations.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of second-line chemotherapy (L2) over standard first-line (L1) gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GEMCIS) or oxaliplatin (GEMOX) chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC) is unclear. Our aim was to identify and validate prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) with L2 in aBTC to guide clinical decisions in this setting. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of four prospective patient cohorts: a development cohort (28 French centres) and three validation cohorts from Italy, UK and France. All consecutive patients with aBTC receiving L2 after GEMCIS/GEMOX L1 between 2003 and 2016 were included. The association of clinicobiological data with OS was investigated in univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. A simple score was derived from the multivariate model. RESULTS: The development cohort included 405 patients treated with L1 GEMOX (91%) or GEMCIS. Of them, 55.3% were men, and median age was 64.8 years. Prior surgical resection was observed in 26.7%, and 94.8% had metastatic disease. Performance status (PS) was 0, 1 and 2 in 17.8%, 52.4% and 29.7%, respectively. Among 22 clinical parameters, eight were associated with OS in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, four were independent prognostic factors (p < 0.05): PS, reason for L1 discontinuation, prior resection of primary tumour and peritoneal carcinomatosis. The model had the Harrell's concordance index of 0.655, a good calibration and was validated in the three external cohorts (N = 392). CONCLUSION: We validated previously reported predictive factors of OS with L2 and identified peritoneal carcinomatosis as a new pejorative factor in nearly 800 patients. Our model and score may be useful in daily practice and for future clinical trial design.

Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colon Cancer With Microsatellite Instability: A Large Multicenter AGEO Study.

BACKGROUND: Deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) colon cancer (CC) is reportedly resistant to 5-fluorouracil (5FU) adjuvant chemotherapy while preliminary data suggest chemosensitivity to oxaliplatin. We assessed the efficacy of fluoropyrimidine with and without oxaliplatin in a large cohort of dMMR CC patients. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included all consecutive patients who underwent curative surgical resection for stage II or III dMMR CC between 2000 and 2011. Prognostic factors were analyzed using Cox models, and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: A total of 433 dMMR CC patients were included (56.8% stage II, 43.2% stage III). Mean follow-up was 47.0 months. The patients received surgery alone (n = 263) or surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of fluoropyrimidine with (n = 119) or without (n = 51) oxaliplatin. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 16.7% of stage II and 69.0% of stage III CC patients. As compared with surgery alone, adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy improved disease-free survival (DFS) in multivariable analysis (HR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.19 to 0.65, P < .001), contrary to adjuvant fluoropyrimidine alone (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.36 to 1.49, P = .38). In the subgroup analysis, the DFS benefit of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy was statistically significant in multivariable analysis only in stage III (HR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.19 to 0.87, P = .02). CONCLUSION: This study supports the use of adjuvant chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin in stage III dMMR CC.

[PIPAC--Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy. A novel treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis]. / PIPAC--Chimiothérapie intrapéritonéale vaporisée. Un traitement innovateur de la carcinose péritonéale.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis remains a diagnostic challenge with sparse treatment options. The effect of systemic chemotherapy remains limited inside the peritoneum due to low penetration and a relative resistance of peritoneal nodules. Heated IntraPeritoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) improves survival in selected patients but entails a high incidence of complications. Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) allows to disperse the active agents inside the peritoneal cavity by laparoscopy. Distribution and tissue penetration of chemotherapy by PIPAC are superior to HIPEC and systemic chemotherapy despite of lower doses. Systemic side effects are uncommon and surgical trauma is limited. Histological and clinical response rates in platinum-resistant patients approach 70% and survival data appear to be favorable compared with standard therapy.

Second-line chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer after failure of the gemcitabine-platinum combination: A large multicenter study by the Association des Gastro-Entérologues Oncologues.

BACKGROUND: Few data are available on second-line chemotherapy (CT2) for advanced biliary tract cancer (ABTC). The aim of this multicenter study was to describe the CT2 regimens used, the response rates, and the outcomes of patients treated with various CT2 regimens. METHODS: Patients who received CT2 for ABTC at 17 French institutions after the failure of the gemcitabine-platinum combination were retrospectively studied. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox models were used for multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Among 603 patients who received first-line chemotherapy (CT1) for ABTC, 196 received CT2: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and irinotecan (n = 64), 5-FU and oxaliplatin (n = 21), 5-FU and cisplatin (n = 38), 5-FU or capecitabine (n = 40), sunitinib (n = 10), or other various regimens (n = 23). Among the 186 assessable patients, there were 22 partial responses and 70 stabilizations. After a median follow-up of 26.4 months, the median PFS and OS were 3.2 and 6.7 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in PFS or OS between CT2 regimens. Fluoropyrimidine-based doublet chemotherapy was not superior to fluoropyrimidine alone in terms of OS and PFS. In a multivariate analysis, a performance status of 0 to 1, disease control with CT1, and a carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) level ≤ 400 IU/mL were significantly associated with longer PFS and OS. Grade 3 to 4 toxicity occurred in 32% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: CT2 might provide disease control for selected patients with ABTC after the failure of gemcitabine-platinum, but the prognosis remains poor. No particular regimen seems superior to others, and this calls for new treatments. A good performance status, disease control with CT1, and a low level of CA 19-9 were associated with longer survival.

Digestive neuroendocrine tumors (DNET): the era of targeted therapies.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of malignancies. Therapeutic options depend on location of the primitive tumor, its expandability, its hormonal symptoms and its differentiation. Though relatively rare, with an increasing incidence and a high prevalence digestive neuroendocrine tumors (DNETs) are ranked just behind colorectal cancer as the most common digestive cancers in developed countries. Three main therapeutic axes have been individualized in the field of well-differentiated DNETs (corresponding to grades 1 and 2 of new WHO classification 2010), firstly, antitumor activity of somatostatin analogs, particularly in slowly progressive metastatic DNETs with limited hepatic invasion, secondly, targeting angiogenesis in these hypervascular tumors and thirdly targeting the mTOR pathway involved in DNETs carcinogenesis. As a consequence of two major randomized phase III trials in 2011, sunitinib and everolimus have been considered as new therapeutic options for well-differentiated, advanced and progressive pancreatic NETs. For everolimus, another phase III study, although non-significant with the chosen criteria, showed effectiveness notably against small intestine NETs. These targeted therapies are new therapeutic weapons in management of well-differentiated DNETs, but its exact role in care strategy, in comparison with other treatments (somatostatin analogs, chemo-embolization, chemotherapy...) deserves to be precise in the future.

Neoadjuvant sorafenib combined with gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

This paper reports the first case of a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma with lymph node metastasis treated by sorafenib combined with gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin, with a partial response and normalization of α fetoprotein, which allowed curative surgery. The potential synergy between these three drugs needs to be confirmed, and is currently being investigated in a randomized phase II trial.

Medical treatment of pancreatic cancer: new hopes after 10 years of gemcitabine.

Exocrine pancreatic cancer has a very poor prognosis. R0 resection of the tumor is to date the only potentially curative approach, but less than 20% of patients are eligible for a curative surgery at diagnosis. Until recently, gemcitabine was the standard treatment for advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer patients, since it was shown more than a decade ago to induce clinical benefit and to improve survival when compared to weekly bolus 5-fluorouracil. In order to improve patients' outcome many trials have, during the last 10 years, explored the pharmacokinetic modulation of gemcitabine and combination therapies with gemcitabine and other anti-cancer agents with consistent negative results. It is finally a trial assessing the efficacy of a combination chemotherapy without gemcitabine: the FOLFIRINOX regimen, reported this year, that has shown for the first time a significant improvement in progression free and overall survivals. In parallel, many trials testing new targeted agents in these patients are currently ongoing. After 10 years without significant progress in the treatment of pancreatic cancer patients, the hope that a significant improvement in the outcome of these patients can be achieved has been raised.

[Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Where are we now? What's next?]. / Prise en charge thérapeutique du carcinome hépatocellulaire. Où en sommes-nous ? Où allons-nous ?

With 6,000 new cases per year in France and nearly 700,000 new cases per year worldwide, HCC is a frequent cancer occurring in more than 90% of cases on underlying liver disease. Both diseases (cirrhosis and HCC) are involved in patients morbidity and mortality. The prognosis of HCC on cirrhosis is thus generally poor, but mainly varies depending on the stage of the tumor. Despite this poor prognosis, many therapeutic options are available for HCC patients. The curative treatments include orthotopic liver transplantation, surgical resection and radiofrequency thermal ablation. The palliative treatments include transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and more recently a systemic treatment with a new multikinase inhibitor: the sorafenib. However, many questions still need to be address to optimize the therapeutic management of this disease. This review analyses the state of the art in HCC treatment and raises the main questions that clinical trials will have to answer in the future.