RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Ophthalmia neonatorum (ON) is a conjunctivitis occurring in neonates and can be caused by multiple bacterial pathogens. The risk of invasive bacterial infection (IBI) in neonates with ON is poorly known. Our objectives were to document the association of ON with IBI in term neonates and to investigate practice variation. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of all neonates who presented to a single emergency department (ED) between January 2018 and December 2019. Participants were all children with a final diagnosis of ON according to the treating physician as registered in the ED computerized database. Newborns with craniofacial malformations and premature infants were excluded. The primary outcome was IBI as defined by growth of any bacterial pathogen in the blood or cerebrospinal fluid. Perinatal risk factors, ED visit details (symptoms on presentation, management, and treatment plan) as well as complications (ocular morbidity, death, and unscheduled return visits) were collected. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Fifty-two term neonates were included. There were no cases of IBI associated with ON (0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0%-6.9%). Six ocular bacterial infections were identified, one of which was Chlamydia trachomatis . Although there were no IBIs, ocular complications, deaths, or unscheduled return visits to the ED, there was a wide variation in physician's management of ON. Physicians ordered investigations in 49% (95% CI, 34%-62%) of neonates, prescribed antibiotics to 87% (95% CI, 74%-94%), and involved specialists in 39% (95% CI, 27%-52%) of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency department presentations of term neonates with ON are associated with a low risk of IBI. A better understanding of the current practice variation is needed to inform clinical guidelines for the management of neonates with ON presenting to the ED.
Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas , Oftalmia Neonatal , Lactente , Criança , Gravidez , Feminino , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Oftalmia Neonatal/diagnóstico , Oftalmia Neonatal/epidemiologia , Oftalmia Neonatal/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Chlamydia trachomatisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the rapid pain improvement provided by medications for children presenting to an emergency department (ED) with headaches. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate pain reduction provided by intranasal fentanyl (INF) compared with placebo in addition to ibuprofen. METHODS: A single-center, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted in a tertiary care pediatric ED. All children aged 8-17 years presenting with a moderate to severe headache were eligible. Study participants were randomly allocated to receive INF 1.5 µg/kg (maximum dose of 100 µg) or similar placebo solution. Co-administration of oral ibuprofen 10 mg/kg (maximum dose of 600 mg) was also provided. The primary outcome was the mean pain rating reduction at 15 min. RESULTS: Among the 62 participants, the median age was 14 years (interquartile range [IQR] 12-16 years in both groups) and the median initial visual analog scale (VAS) score was 64 (IQR 55-72 in the intervention group; IQR 50-81 in the control group). There was no difference in the mean pain score reduction at 15 min between the two groups (mean difference 2 mm; 95% CI -7 to 11 mm). Mean VAS score reductions were also similar at 30 and 60 min. Adverse events were more frequent in the INF group (risk ratio 2.8; 95% CI 1.29 to 6.22), but all events were minor and transient. No significant differences were found in other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not find a benefit from INF for providing additional pain relief in children presenting to ED with headaches.
Assuntos
Fentanila , Ibuprofeno , Criança , Humanos , Adolescente , Fentanila/farmacologia , Fentanila/uso terapêutico , Ibuprofeno/farmacologia , Ibuprofeno/uso terapêutico , Manejo da Dor , Analgésicos Opioides/farmacologia , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Dor/etiologia , Cefaleia/tratamento farmacológico , Cefaleia/induzido quimicamente , Método Duplo-CegoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: In studies that included children diagnosed with toddler's fractures (TFs), we determined the fracture-related adverse outcomes in those treated with immobilization versus no immobilization. Furthermore, we compared health services utilization between these 2 immobilization strategies. METHODS: A search was done on Ovid MEDLINE(R), Embase Classic + Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials along with reference lists as conference proceedings and abstracts. No language or publication status or location restrictions were used. All study steps, including the methodological quality assessment, were conducted independently and in duplicate by 2 authors. RESULTS: Of the 490 references identified, 4 retrospective studies of low quality met inclusion criteria and collectively included 355 study participants. With respect to fracture-related adverse outcomes, there was no risk difference [0; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.09 to 0.09] between the immobilization and no immobilization treatment strategies. Furthermore, in the immobilization versus no immobilization groups, there was a higher mean difference in the number of radiographs (0.69; 95% CI, 0.15-1.23) and scheduled outpatient orthopedic visits (0.96; 95% CI, 0.24-1.68), but a decreased relative risk (0.41; 95% CI, 0.05-3.19) of repeat emergency department visits. No data were reported on patient pain or caregiver satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: In children with TF, this study suggests that no immobilization may be a safe alternative to immobilization for this minor fracture; however, high-quality evidence is needed to optimally inform clinical decision making. Future work should include validated measures of patient recovery, pain, and caregiver perspectives when comparing treatment strategies for this injury.
Assuntos
Fraturas da Tíbia , Humanos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Estrogens are suspected to have a negative effect on pulmonary function in women with cystic fibrosis (CF). The aim of our study was to investigate, in a CF adolescent population, the effect of hormonal contraception (HC) on lung function by assessing the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), the number of exacerbations of pulmonary condition, and antibiotic use. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We conducted a cohort retrospective chart review of girls from age 13 to 18 years old who were followed in the CF clinic of a university hospital center. Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction, 2-sample t test, conditional test of Poisson rates, and χ2 test were conducted to identify differences in results between adolescents with or without use of HC for the following outcomes: FEV1, use of antibiotics by nebulizer, and hospital admission for exacerbations of pulmonary condition. RESULTS: Among 127 adolescents, 64/127 (50.4%) took HC; 12/127 (9%) continuously had been taking HC over 3 years. For girls taking HC for more than 3 years, FEV1 at 18 years old was significantly higher than for girls who had never taken HC (85.17% vs 71.05%; P = .043). However, there was no difference in the number of hospital admissions for exacerbation of pulmonary condition between these 2 groups (P = .057). There was no difference between HC vs non-HC users in the percent of patients taking antibiotics by nebulizer over the 6 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that in adolescents with CF, HC has no deleterious effects on the FEV1. Further prospective studies could be done to confirm these results.
Assuntos
Fibrose Cística/patologia , Volume Expiratório Forçado/efeitos dos fármacos , Contracepção Hormonal , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Pulmão/efeitos dos fármacos , Adolescente , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Canadá/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Trying to differentiate serious bacterial infection (SBI) from a self-limiting illness in febrile infants seen in the pediatric emergency department (PED) is a significant challenge. The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of dehydration and its relationship to SBI in febrile full-term newborns under 1 week of age seen in a PED. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was carried out on all children younger than 8 days of age with fever who presented to a single, tertiary care, PED from January 2009 to April 2014. Dehydration was defined as plasma sodium >150 mmol/L or >10% loss of birth weight. SBI was defined by the presence of a positive culture in the blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid; osteoarticular infection; bacterial enteritis; or pneumonia. The primary analysis was the proportion of children with dehydration. A secondary analysis compared proportion of infection according to hydration status. RESULTS: Of the 895 children under 8 days of age who visited the PED, 69 consulted for fever. Seven patients were excluded because they were transferred from another hospital. Sixty-two eligible patients were included in the final analysis. Of these, 17 (27%) were dehydrated according to our definition. Only 2 patients had an SBI while 2 others had a final diagnosis of viral myocarditis and encephalitis, respectively. None of the 4 children with serious infection fulfilled our definition of dehydration, and all had a plasma sodium level lower than 145 mmol/L. CONCLUSIONS: Dehydration is frequently associated with fever in infants younger than 8 days of age seen in a PED. Early identification of dehydration may be useful in limiting the aggressive intervention in some of these infants.