Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 92
Filtrar
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 78(6): 1451-1457, 2024 Jun 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38412060

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The high mortality of systemic anthrax is likely a consequence of the severe central nervous system inflammation that occurs in anthrax meningitis. Effective treatment of such infections requires, at a minimum, adequate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) antimicrobial concentrations. METHODS: We reviewed English medical literature and regulatory documents to extract information on serum and CSF exposures for antimicrobials with in vitro activity against Bacillus anthracis. Using CSF pharmacokinetic exposures and in vitro B. anthracis susceptibility data, we used population pharmacokinetic modeling and Monte Carlo simulations to determine whether a specific antimicrobial dosage would likely achieve effective CSF antimicrobial activity in patients with normal to inflamed meninges (ie, an intact to markedly disrupted blood-brain barrier). RESULTS: The probability of microbiologic success at achievable antimicrobial dosages was high (≥95%) for ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin (500 mg every 12 hours), meropenem, imipenem/cilastatin, penicillin G, ampicillin, ampicillin/sulbactam, doxycycline, and minocycline; acceptable (90%-95%) for piperacillin/tazobactam and levofloxacin (750 mg every 24 hours); and low (<90%) for vancomycin, amikacin, clindamycin, and linezolid. CONCLUSIONS: Prompt empiric antimicrobial therapy of patients with suspected or confirmed anthrax meningitis may reduce the high morbidity and mortality. Our data support using several ß-lactam-, fluoroquinolone-, and tetracycline-class antimicrobials as first-line and alternative agents for treatment of patients with anthrax meningitis; all should achieve effective microbiologic exposures. Our data suggest antimicrobials that should not be relied on to treat suspected or documented anthrax meningitis. Furthermore, the protein synthesis inhibitors clindamycin and linezolid can decrease toxin production and may be useful components of combination therapy.


Assuntos
Antraz , Antibacterianos , Bacillus anthracis , Meningites Bacterianas , Humanos , Bacillus anthracis/efeitos dos fármacos , Antraz/tratamento farmacológico , Meningites Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Meningites Bacterianas/microbiologia , Meningites Bacterianas/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Método de Monte Carlo , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana
3.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 43(5): e169-e174, 2024 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38241644

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Leptospirosis is an important zoonotic infection worldwide. Diagnosis of leptospirosis is challenging given its nonspecific clinical symptoms that overlap with other acute febrile illnesses and limitations with conventional diagnostic testing. Alternative advanced diagnostics, such as microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA), are increasingly being used to aid in the diagnosis of infections and can be applied to pathogens with public health importance such as Leptospira , a nationally notifiable disease. METHODS: The Karius Test uses plasma mcfDNA sequencing to detect and quantify DNA-based pathogens. This test offered through the Karius lab detected 4 cases of Leptospira santarosai during a 5-month period across the United States in 2021 and were clinically reviewed. RESULTS: In our case series, 4 adolescents with recent travel to Central America (Costa Rica, n = 3 and Belize, n = 1) from April to August 2021 were diagnosed with leptospirosis. While a large workup was performed in all cases, mcfDNA testing was the first test to detect L. santarosai as the microbiological diagnosis in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the Karius Test enabled rapid, noninvasive diagnosis of leptospirosis allowing for targeted therapy. Use of mcfDNA can be utilized for diagnosis of pathogens where conventional testing is challenging or limited. This in turn can enable quick diagnosis for targeted treatment and potentially aid in supporting case definitions of reportable diseases of public health concern.


Assuntos
Ácidos Nucleicos Livres , Leptospira , Leptospirose , Humanos , Adolescente , Viagem , Leptospira/genética , Leptospirose/diagnóstico , Leptospirose/tratamento farmacológico , Leptospirose/microbiologia , Análise de Sequência de DNA
4.
N Engl J Med ; 389(25): 2355-2362, 2023 Dec 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38118023

RESUMO

Melioidosis, caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei, is a rare but potentially fatal bacterial disease endemic to tropical and subtropical regions worldwide. It is typically acquired through contact with contaminated soil or fresh water. Before this investigation, B. pseudomallei was not known to have been isolated from the environment in the continental United States. Here, we report on three patients living in the same Mississippi Gulf Coast county who presented with melioidosis within a 3-year period. They were infected by the same Western Hemisphere B. pseudomallei strain that was discovered in three environmental samples collected from the property of one of the patients. These findings indicate local acquisition of melioidosis from the environment in the Mississippi Gulf Coast region.


Assuntos
Burkholderia pseudomallei , Microbiologia Ambiental , Melioidose , Humanos , Burkholderia pseudomallei/genética , Burkholderia pseudomallei/isolamento & purificação , Melioidose/epidemiologia , Melioidose/microbiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
MMWR Recomm Rep ; 72(6): 1-47, 2023 11 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37963097

RESUMO

This report updates previous CDC guidelines and recommendations on preferred prevention and treatment regimens regarding naturally occurring anthrax. Also provided are a wide range of alternative regimens to first-line antimicrobial drugs for use if patients have contraindications or intolerances or after a wide-area aerosol release of: Bacillus anthracis spores if resources become limited or a multidrug-resistant B. anthracis strain is used (Hendricks KA, Wright ME, Shadomy SV, et al.; Workgroup on Anthrax Clinical Guidelines. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention expert panel meetings on prevention and treatment of anthrax in adults. Emerg Infect Dis 2014;20:e130687; Meaney-Delman D, Rasmussen SA, Beigi RH, et al. Prophylaxis and treatment of anthrax in pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:885-900; Bradley JS, Peacock G, Krug SE, et al. Pediatric anthrax clinical management. Pediatrics 2014;133:e1411-36). Specifically, this report updates antimicrobial drug and antitoxin use for both postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) and treatment from these previous guidelines best practices and is based on systematic reviews of the literature regarding 1) in vitro antimicrobial drug activity against B. anthracis; 2) in vivo antimicrobial drug efficacy for PEP and treatment; 3) in vivo and human antitoxin efficacy for PEP, treatment, or both; and 4) human survival after antimicrobial drug PEP and treatment of localized anthrax, systemic anthrax, and anthrax meningitis. Changes from previous CDC guidelines and recommendations include an expanded list of alternative antimicrobial drugs to use when first-line antimicrobial drugs are contraindicated or not tolerated or after a bioterrorism event when first-line antimicrobial drugs are depleted or ineffective against a genetically engineered resistant: B. anthracis strain. In addition, these updated guidelines include new recommendations regarding special considerations for the diagnosis and treatment of anthrax meningitis, including comorbid, social, and clinical predictors of anthrax meningitis. The previously published CDC guidelines and recommendations described potentially beneficial critical care measures and clinical assessment tools and procedures for persons with anthrax, which have not changed and are not addressed in this update. In addition, no changes were made to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations for use of anthrax vaccine (Bower WA, Schiffer J, Atmar RL, et al. Use of anthrax vaccine in the United States: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, 2019. MMWR Recomm Rep 2019;68[No. RR-4]:1-14). The updated guidelines in this report can be used by health care providers to prevent and treat anthrax and guide emergency preparedness officials and planners as they develop and update plans for a wide-area aerosol release of B. anthracis.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Antraz , Antraz , Anti-Infecciosos , Antitoxinas , Bacillus anthracis , Meningite , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Criança , Gravidez , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Antraz/diagnóstico , Antraz/tratamento farmacológico , Antraz/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Antraz/uso terapêutico , Vacinas contra Antraz/efeitos adversos , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Antitoxinas/farmacologia , Antitoxinas/uso terapêutico , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Aerossóis/farmacologia , Aerossóis/uso terapêutico , Meningite/induzido quimicamente , Meningite/tratamento farmacológico
6.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 29(12): 2520-2523, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37856215

RESUMO

Reports of tecovirimat-resistant mpox have emerged after widespread use of antiviral therapy during the 2022 mpox outbreak. Optimal management of patients with persistent infection with or without suspected resistance is yet to be established. We report a successfully treated case of severe mpox in California, USA, that had suspected tecovirimat resistance.


Assuntos
Mpox , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Benzamidas , Surtos de Doenças
7.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 411, 2023 Jun 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37328808

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Historically, malaria has been the predominant cause of acute febrile illness (AFI) in sub-Saharan Africa. However, during the last two decades, malaria incidence has declined due to concerted public health control efforts, including the widespread use of rapid diagnostic tests leading to increased recognition of non-malarial AFI etiologies. Our understanding of non-malarial AFI is limited due to lack of laboratory diagnostic capacity. We aimed to determine the etiology of AFI in three distinct regions of Uganda. METHODS: A prospective clinic-based study that enrolled participants from April 2011 to January 2013 using standard diagnostic tests. Participant recruitment was from St. Paul's Health Centre (HC) IV, Ndejje HC IV, and Adumi HC IV in the western, central and northern regions, which differ by climate, environment, and population density. A Pearson's chi-square test was used to evaluate categorical variables, while a two-sample t-test and Krukalis-Wallis test were used for continuous variables. RESULTS: Of the 1281 participants, 450 (35.1%), 382 (29.8%), and 449 (35.1%) were recruited from the western, central, and northern regions, respectively. The median age (range) was 18 (2-93) years; 717 (56%) of the participants were female. At least one AFI pathogen was identified in 1054 (82.3%) participants; one or more non-malarial AFI pathogens were identified in 894 (69.8%) participants. The non-malarial AFI pathogens identified were chikungunya virus, 716 (55.9%); Spotted Fever Group rickettsia (SFGR), 336 (26.2%) and Typhus Group rickettsia (TGR), 97 (7.6%); typhoid fever (TF), 74 (5.8%); West Nile virus, 7 (0.5%); dengue virus, 10 (0.8%) and leptospirosis, 2 (0.2%) cases. No cases of brucellosis were identified. Malaria was diagnosed either concurrently or alone in 404 (31.5%) and 160 (12.5%) participants, respectively. In 227 (17.7%) participants, no cause of infection was identified. There were statistically significant differences in the occurrence and distribution of TF, TGR and SFGR, with TF and TGR observed more frequently in the western region (p = 0.001; p < 0.001) while SFGR in the northern region (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Malaria, arboviral infections, and rickettsioses are major causes of AFI in Uganda. Development of a Multiplexed Point-of-Care test would help identify the etiology of non-malarial AFI in regions with high AFI rates.


Assuntos
Malária , Infecções por Rickettsia , Rickettsia , Febre Tifoide , Humanos , Feminino , Adolescente , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Uganda/epidemiologia , Infecções por Rickettsia/diagnóstico , Febre/epidemiologia , Febre/etiologia , Febre/diagnóstico , Malária/complicações , Malária/epidemiologia , Malária/diagnóstico , Febre Tifoide/complicações
9.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 72(15): 404-410, 2023 Apr 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37053126

RESUMO

As of March 7, 2023, a total of 30,235 confirmed and probable monkeypox (mpox) cases were reported in the United States,† predominantly among cisgender men§ who reported recent sexual contact with another man (1). Although most mpox cases during the current outbreak have been self-limited, cases of severe illness and death have been reported (2-4). During May 10, 2022-March 7, 2023, 38 deaths among persons with probable or confirmed mpox¶ (1.3 per 1,000 mpox cases) were reported to CDC and classified as mpox-associated (i.e., mpox was listed as a contributing or causal factor). Among the 38 mpox-associated deaths, 94.7% occurred in cisgender men (median age = 34 years); 86.8% occurred in non-Hispanic Black or African American (Black) persons. The median interval from symptom onset to death was 68 days (IQR = 50-86 days). Among 33 decedents with available information, 93.9% were immunocompromised because of HIV. Public health actions to prevent mpox deaths include integrated testing, diagnosis, and early treatment for mpox and HIV, and ensuring equitable access to both mpox and HIV prevention and treatment, such as antiretroviral therapy (ART) (5).


Assuntos
Mpox , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Surtos de Doenças , Mpox/mortalidade , Saúde Pública , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
10.
Sci Total Environ ; 862: 160862, 2023 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36521613

RESUMO

Uranium dioxide (UO2) and metaschoepite (UO3•nH2O) particles have been identified as contaminants at nuclear sites. Understanding their behavior and impact is crucial for safe management of radioactively contaminated land and to fully understand U biogeochemistry. The Savannah River Site (SRS) (South Carolina, USA), is one such contaminated site, following historical releases of U-containing wastes to the vadose zone. Here, we present an insight into the behavior of these two particle types under dynamic conditions representative of the SRS, using field lysimeters (15 cm D x 72 cm L). Discrete horizons containing the different particle types were placed at two depths in each lysimeter (25 cm and 50 cm) and exposed to ambient rainfall for 1 year, with an aim of understanding the impact of dynamic, shallow subsurface conditions on U particle behavior and U migration. The dissolution and migration of U from the particle sources and the speciation of U throughout the lysimeters was assessed after 1 year using a combination of sediment digests, sequential extractions, and bulk and µ-focus X-ray spectroscopy. In the UO2 lysimeter, oxidative dissolution of UO2 and subsequent migration of U was observed over 1-2 cm in the direction of waterflow and against it. Sequential extractions of the UO2 sources suggest they were significantly altered over 1 year. The metaschoepite particles also showed significant dissolution with marginally enhanced U migration (several cm) from the sources. However, in both particle systems the released U was quantitively retained in sediment as a range of different U(IV) and U(VI) phases, and no detectable U was measured in the lysimeter effluent. The study provides a useful insight into U particle behavior in representative, real-world conditions relevant to the SRS, and highlights limited U migration from particle sources due to secondary reactions with vadose zone sediments over 1 year.


Assuntos
Urânio , Poluentes Radioativos da Água , Poluentes Radioativos da Água/análise , Urânio/análise , Análise Espectral , Rios , South Carolina , Oxirredução
12.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(Suppl 3): S379-S391, 2022 10 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36251546

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anthrax is endemic to many countries, including the United States. The causative agent, Bacillus anthracis, poses a global bioterrorism threat. Without effective antimicrobial postexposure prophylaxis (PEPAbx) and treatment, the mortality of systemic anthrax is high. To inform clinical guidelines for PEPAbx and treatment of B. anthracis infections in humans, we systematically evaluated animal anthrax treatment model studies. METHODS: We searched for survival outcome data in 9 scientific search engines for articles describing antimicrobial PEPAbx or treatment of anthrax in animals in any language through February 2019. We performed meta-analyses of efficacy of antimicrobial PEPAbx and treatment for each drug or drug combination using random-effects models. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships were developed for 5 antimicrobials with available pharmacokinetic data. Monte Carlo simulations were used to predict unbound drug exposures in humans. RESULTS: We synthesized data from 34 peer-reviewed studies with 3262 animals. For PEPAbx and treatment of infection by susceptible B. anthracis, effective monotherapy can be accomplished with fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, ß-lactams (including penicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and imipenem-cilastatin), and lipopeptides or glycopeptides. For naturally occurring strains, unbound drug exposures in humans were predicted to adequately cover the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs; those required to inhibit the growth of 50% or 90% of organisms [MIC50 or MIC90]) for ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and doxycycline for both the PEPAbx and treatment targets. Dalbavancin covered its MIC50 for PEPAbx. CONCLUSIONS: These animal studies show many reviewed antimicrobials are good choices for PEPAbx or treatment of susceptible B. anthracis strains, and some are also promising options for combating resistant strains. Monte Carlo simulations suggest that oral ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and doxycycline are particularly robust choices for PEPAbx or treatment.


Assuntos
Antraz , Anti-Infecciosos , Bacillus anthracis , Combinação Amoxicilina e Clavulanato de Potássio/uso terapêutico , Animais , Antraz/tratamento farmacológico , Antraz/prevenção & controle , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Combinação Imipenem e Cilastatina/farmacologia , Combinação Imipenem e Cilastatina/uso terapêutico , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapêutico , Doxiciclina/uso terapêutico , Glicopeptídeos/farmacologia , Glicopeptídeos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Levofloxacino/uso terapêutico , Lipopeptídeos/farmacologia , Lipopeptídeos/uso terapêutico , Modelos Animais , Tetraciclinas/uso terapêutico , Estados Unidos , beta-Lactamas/uso terapêutico
13.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(Suppl 3): S459-S467, 2022 10 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36251551

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous anthrax accounts for approximately 95% of anthrax cases worldwide. About 24% of untreated patients die, and many cases are complicated by meningitis. Here, we explore clinical features of cutaneous disease associated with poor outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review identified 303 full-text articles published from 1950 through 2018 that met predefined inclusion criteria. Cases were abstracted, and descriptive analyses and univariate logistic regression were conducted to identify prognostic indicators for cutaneous anthrax. RESULTS: Of 182 included patients, 47 (25.8%) died. Previously reported independent predictors for death or meningitis that we confirmed included fever or chills; nausea or vomiting; headache; severe headache; nonheadache, nonmeningeal signs; leukocytosis; and bacteremia. Newly identified predictors included anxiety, abdominal pain, diastolic hypotension, skin trauma, thoracic edema, malignant pustule edema, lymphadenopathy, and evidence of coagulopathy (all with P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: We identified patient presentations not previously associated with poor outcomes.


Assuntos
Antraz , Meningite , Dermatopatias Bacterianas , Adulto , Antraz/diagnóstico , Cefaleia , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , Dermatopatias Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico
14.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(Suppl 3): S392-S401, 2022 10 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36251553

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bacillus anthracis can cause anthrax and is a potential bioterrorism agent. The 2014 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations for medical countermeasures against anthrax were based on in vitro data and expert opinion. However, a century of previously uncompiled observational human data that often includes treatment and outcomes is available in the literature for analysis. METHODS: We reviewed treatment outcomes for patients hospitalized with anthrax. We stratified patients by meningitis status, route of infection, and systemic criteria, then analyzed survival by treatment type, including antimicrobials, antitoxin/antiserum, and steroids. Using logistic regression, we calculated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals to compare survival between treatments. We also calculated hospital length of stay. Finally, we evaluated antimicrobial postexposure prophylaxis (PEPAbx) using data from a 1970 Russian-language article. RESULTS: We identified 965 anthrax patients reported from 1880 through 2018. After exclusions, 605 remained: 430 adults, 145 children, and 30 missing age. Survival was low for untreated patients and meningitis patients, regardless of treatment. Most patients with localized cutaneous or nonmeningitis systemic anthrax survived with 1 or more antimicrobials; patients with inhalation anthrax without meningitis fared better with at least 2. Bactericidal antimicrobials were effective for systemic anthrax; addition of a protein synthesis inhibitor(s) (PSI) to a bactericidal antimicrobial(s) did not improve survival. Likewise, addition of antitoxin/antiserum to antimicrobials did not improve survival. Mannitol improved survival for meningitis patients, but steroids did not. PEPAbx reduced risk of anthrax following exposure to B. anthracis. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy appeared to be superior to monotherapy for inhalation anthrax without meningitis. For anthrax meningitis, neither monotherapy nor combination therapy were particularly effective; however, numbers were small. For localized cutaneous anthrax, monotherapy was sufficient. For B. anthracis exposures, PEPAbx was effective.


Assuntos
Antraz , Anti-Infecciosos , Antitoxinas , Bacillus anthracis , Adulto , Antraz/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Antitoxinas/uso terapêutico , Armas Biológicas , Bioterrorismo , Criança , Hospitais , Humanos , Manitol/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Síntese de Proteínas/uso terapêutico , Infecções Respiratórias , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(Suppl 3): S468-S477, 2022 10 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36251554

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: During an anthrax mass casualty event, prompt identification of patients with anthrax meningitis is important. Previous research has suggested use of a screening tool based on neurological symptoms and signs. METHODS: Using historical anthrax patient data from 1880 through 2018, we analyzed risk factors for meningitis. We developed lists of symptoms and signs (ie, algorithms) for predicting meningitis with high sensitivity and specificity. We evaluated both single and paired algorithms as screening tools. RESULTS: A single algorithm with 1 or more neurological symptoms or signs identifying patients with likely meningitis achieved high sensitivity (86%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 71%-100%) and specificity (90%; 95% CI, 82%-98%). Pairing algorithms with the same symptoms and signs (severe headache, altered mental status, meningeal signs, and "other neurological deficits") improved specificity (99%; 95% CI, 97%-100%) but left 17.3% of patients in a middle "indeterminate" meningitis category and in need of additional diagnostic testing to determine likely meningitis status. Pairing algorithms with differing symptoms and signs also improved specificity over the single algorithm (92%; 95% CI, 85%-99%) but categorized just 2.5% of patients as indeterminate. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms prior research suggesting quick and reliable assessment of patients for anthrax meningitis is possible based on the presence or absence of certain symptoms and signs. A single algorithm was adequate; however, if we assumed low-resource diagnostic testing was feasible for some patients, pairing algorithms improved specificity. Pairing algorithms with differing symptoms and signs minimized the proportion of patients requiring additional diagnostics.


Assuntos
Antraz , Incidentes com Feridos em Massa , Meningites Bacterianas , Algoritmos , Antraz/diagnóstico , Humanos , Meningites Bacterianas/diagnóstico
16.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(Suppl 3): S478-S486, 2022 10 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36251556

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines currently recommend triple-therapy antimicrobial treatment for anthrax meningitis. In the Kyrgyz Republic, a country with endemic anthrax, cutaneous anthrax patients are routinely hospitalized and treated successfully with only monotherapy or dual therapy. Clinical algorithms have been developed to identify patients with likely anthrax meningitis based on signs and symptoms alone. We sought to retrospectively identify likely meningitis patients in the Kyrgyz Republic using a clinical algorithm and evaluate risk factors and their outcomes by type of treatment. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of cutaneous anthrax patients in the Kyrgyz Republic from 2005 through 2012. Using previous methods, we developed a highly specific algorithm to categorize patients by meningitis status. We then evaluated patient risk factors, treatments, and outcomes by disease severity and meningitis status. RESULTS: We categorized 37 of 230 cutaneous anthrax patients as likely having meningitis. All 37 likely meningitis patients survived, receiving only mono- or dual-therapy antimicrobials. We identified underlying medical conditions, such as obesity, hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and tobacco and alcohol use, as potential risk factors for severe anthrax and anthrax meningitis. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our analyses, treatment of anthrax meningitis may not require 3 antimicrobials, which could impact future anthrax treatment recommendations. In addition, chronic comorbidities may increase risk for severe anthrax and anthrax meningitis. Future research should further investigate potential risk factors for severe anthrax and their impact on laboratory-confirmed meningitis and evaluate mono- and dual-therapy antimicrobial regimens for anthrax meningitis.


Assuntos
Antraz , Anti-Infecciosos , Meningites Bacterianas , Algoritmos , Antraz/diagnóstico , Antraz/tratamento farmacológico , Antraz/epidemiologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Quirguistão/epidemiologia , Meningites Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Meningites Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Meningites Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Dermatopatias Bacterianas , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(Suppl 3): S432-S440, 2022 10 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36251559

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bacillus anthracis is a high-priority threat agent because of its widespread availability, easy dissemination, and ability to cause substantial morbidity and mortality. Although timely and appropriate antimicrobial therapy can reduce morbidity and mortality, the role of adjunctive therapies continues to be explored. METHODS: We searched 11 databases for articles that report use of anthrax antitoxins in treatment or prevention of systemic anthrax disease published through July 2019. We identified other data sources through reference search and communication with experts. We included English-language studies on antitoxin products with approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for anthrax in humans, nonhuman primates, and rabbits. Two researchers independently reviewed studies for inclusion and abstracted relevant data. RESULTS: We abstracted data from 12 publications and 2 case reports. All 3 FDA-approved anthrax antitoxins demonstrated significant improvement in survival as monotherapy over placebo in rabbits and nonhuman primates. No study found significant improvement in survival with combination antitoxin and antimicrobial therapy compared to antimicrobial monotherapy. Case reports and case series described 25 patients with systemic anthrax disease treated with antitoxins; 17 survived. Animal studies that used antitoxin monotherapy as postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) demonstrated significant improvement in survival over placebo, with greatest improvements coming with early administration. CONCLUSIONS: Limited human and animal evidence indicates that adjunctive antitoxin treatment may improve survival from systemic anthrax infection. Antitoxins may also provide an alternative therapy to antimicrobials for treatment or PEP during an intentional anthrax incident that could involve a multidrug-resistant B. anthracis strain.


Assuntos
Antraz , Anti-Infecciosos , Antitoxinas , Bacillus anthracis , Animais , Antraz/tratamento farmacológico , Antraz/prevenção & controle , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Antitoxinas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Primatas , Coelhos
18.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(Suppl 3): S341-S353, 2022 10 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36251560

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anthrax is a toxin-mediated zoonotic disease caused by Bacillus anthracis, with a worldwide distribution recognized for millennia. Bacillus anthracis is considered a potential biowarfare agent. METHODS: We completed a systematic review for clinical and demographic characteristics of adults and children hospitalized with anthrax (cutaneous, inhalation, ingestion, injection [from contaminated heroin], primary meningitis) abstracted from published case reports, case series, and line lists in English from 1880 through 2018, assessing treatment impact by type and severity of disease. We analyzed geographic distribution, route of infection, exposure to anthrax, and incubation period. RESULTS: Data on 764 adults and 167 children were reviewed. Most cases reported for 1880 through 1915 were from Europe; those for 1916 through 1950 were from North America; and from 1951 on, cases were from Asia. Cutaneous was the most common form of anthrax for all populations. Since 1960, adult anthrax mortality has ranged from 31% for cutaneous to 90% for primary meningitis. Median incubation periods ranged from 1 day (interquartile range [IQR], 0-4) for injection to 7 days (IQR, 4-9) for inhalation anthrax. Most patients with inhalation anthrax developed pleural effusions and more than half with ingestion anthrax developed ascites. Treatment and critical care advances have improved survival for those with systemic symptoms, from approximately 30% in those untreated to approximately 70% in those receiving antimicrobials or antiserum/antitoxin. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides an improved evidence base for both clinical care of individual anthrax patients and public health planning for wide-area aerosol releases of B. anthracis spores.


Assuntos
Antraz , Antitoxinas , Bacillus anthracis , Adulto , Aerossóis , Antraz/diagnóstico , Antraz/epidemiologia , Armas Biológicas , Criança , Heroína/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Infecções Respiratórias
19.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(Suppl 3): S354-S363, 2022 10 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36251561

RESUMO

Bacillus anthracis has traditionally been considered the etiologic agent of anthrax. However, anthrax-like illness has been documented in welders and other metal workers infected with Bacillus cereus group spp. harboring pXO1 virulence genes that produce anthrax toxins. We present 2 recent cases of severe pneumonia in welders with B. cereus group infections and discuss potential risk factors for infection and treatment options, including antitoxin.


Assuntos
Antraz , Antitoxinas , Bacillus anthracis , Antraz/diagnóstico , Antraz/tratamento farmacológico , Bacillus anthracis/genética , Bacillus cereus/genética , Humanos , Ferreiros , Plasmídeos
20.
Pathogens ; 11(8)2022 07 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35894048

RESUMO

Abstract Bacillus cereus group bacteria containing the anthrax toxin genes can cause fatal anthrax pneumonia in welders. Two welder's anthrax cases identified in 2020 were investigated to determine the source of each patient's exposure. Environmental sampling was performed at locations where each patient had recent exposure to soil and dust. Samples were tested for the anthrax toxin genes by real-time PCR, and culture was performed on positive samples to identify whether any environmental isolates matched the patient's clinical isolate. A total of 185 environmental samples were collected in investigation A for patient A and 108 samples in investigation B for patient B. All samples from investigation B were real-time PCR-negative, but 14 (8%) samples from investigation A were positive, including 10 from patient A's worksite and 4 from his work-related clothing and gear. An isolate genetically matching the one recovered from patient A was successfully cultured from a worksite soil sample. All welder's anthrax cases should be investigated to determine the source of exposure, which may be linked to their worksite. Welding and metalworking employers should consider conducting a workplace hazard assessment and implementing controls to reduce the risk of occupationally associated illnesses including welder's anthrax.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA