Increased gallstone formation after sleeve gastrectomy and the preventive role of ursodeoxycholic acid.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: To investigate the incidence of gallstone formation, and the use of Ursodeoxycholic Acid (UDCA), weight loss and serum lipid profile changes following obesity surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent bariatric surgery due to obesity were retrospectively reviewed and divided into 2 groups for their prophylactic UDCA use. Patients who had a previous gallbladder pathology and ones who did not have a preoperative ultrasonography (US) were excluded. The patients who have returned to our clinic for a control ultrasound between 6 and 18 months following the surgery were included in this study, but only if they did not have any gall bladder pathology demonstrated with an US prior to surgery. Body mass index (BMI) and lipid profile measurements were also recorded. RESULTS: Of the 108 patients who had undergone obesity surgery, it is reported that 42 (38.9%) were given UDCA as a preventative medication, and 66 (61.1%) were not prescribed any preventative medications. During the ultrasound controls in the postoperative period between 6 and 18 months after surgery, gallbladder stones were seen in 42 patients (38.9%) and biliary sludge development was detected in 5 patients (4.6%). A total of 47 patients (43.5%) developed gallbladder pathology. Fewer patients who took UDCA developed gallstones when compared with the patients who did not take UDCA (10% vs 33%). Also, there is a correlation between BMI loss rate and the frequency of gallstone development. Though the decrease in triglyceride (TG) levels was higher in patients with gallstone development, this decrease was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Stone or sludge development in the gallbladder due to rapid weight loss after obesity surgery is quite common. However, we observed that the gallstone development decreased significantly with the prophylactic use of UDCA in patients who had undergone obesity surgery.

Analysis of glenohumeral morphological factors for anterior shoulder instability and rotator cuff tear by magnetic resonance imaging.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether there are glenohumeral morphological differences between normal population, glenohumeral instability, and rotator cuff pathology. METHOD: In this study, shoulder magnetic resonance (MR) images of 150 patients were evaluated. Patients included in the study were studied in three groups of 50 individuals: patients with anterior shoulder instability in group 1, patients with rotator cuff tear in group 2, and control subjects without shoulder pathology in group 3. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences between groups in evaluations for glenoid version, glenoid coronal height, glenoid coronal diameter, humeral axial and coronal diameters, and coracohumeral interval distances. Significant differences were observed between groups 2 and 3 in glenoid axial diameter, glenoid coronal height, glenoid depth, humeral coronal diameter, and coracohumeral distances. CONCLUSION: The results obtained in this study suggest that glenoid version, glenoid coronal height and diameter, humeral diameter, and coracohumeral interval parameters in glenohumeral morphology-related parameters in patients with anterior instability are different from those of normal population and patients with rotator cuff pathology. In cases where there is a clinically difficult diagnosis, these radiological measurements will be helpful to clinicians in diagnosis and treatment planning, especially in cases of treatment-resistant cases.