Assessing the prevalence and patterns of COVID-19 vaccine side effects among Syrian adults: A cross-sectional study.

Aim: This study aimed to assess the prevalence and patterns of COVID-19 vaccine side effects among Syrian adults, with a focus on the AstraZeneca and Sputnik Light vaccines, in light of the low vaccination rate in Syria (below 18%) attributed to fear of side effects. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted between January and May 2022, using probability-based and convenient sampling strategies. Data was collected through online, paper, and face-to-face questionnaires that included demographic and vaccine-related questions. Result: Out of 3,766 participants, the majority were female (56.7 %) and aged 18-24 years (53.3 %). Most participants had a university-level qualification (71.2 %) and were related to the medical sector (53.2 %). A significant proportion (47.0 %) received AstraZeneca, Sputnik Light (22.1 %) and Sinopharm (14.7 %). Common side effects included sleepiness and lethargy (50.0 %), fever and chills (45.0 %), and pain/swelling at the injection site (35.9 %). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that male (OR: 0.57, CI: 0.48-0.68) and participants aged 45-65 years (OR: 0.53, CI: 0.40-0.70) were less likely to experience side effects. Participants who believed COVID-19 posed a high threat to their personal life had higher odds of side effects (OR: 1.74, CI: 1.22-2.46). Vaccine type was also associated with side effects, with Sputnik Light (OR: 2.52, CI: 1.85-3.46) and AstraZeneca (OR: 1.61, CI: 1.26-2.05) having increased odds. Conclusion: Our study found that COVID-19 vaccines are well tolerated among the Syrian population, with short-term side effects that typically resolve within three days. These findings are expected to bolster vaccination rates through enhanced public confidence and acceptance.

Genotype Mutations in Palestinian Children with Familial Mediterranean Fever: Clinical Profile, and Response to Colchicine Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Familial Mediterranean fever is a hereditary autoinflammatory disease affecting mainly Arabs, Turks, Armenians, and Jews with genotype-phenotype heterogeneity, presenting as recurrent episodes of fever along with polyserositis and rash. To date, more than 370 mutations in the MEFV gene have been recognized to cause the disease. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 124 patients in Hebron, Palestine, diagnosed with FMF at the Al-Ahli, and Palestinian Red Crescent Society (PRCS) Hospitals. Results: The median age of diagnosis was five years, presenting as abdominal pain (76.6%), fever (67.7%), joint pain and arthritis. Regarding MEFV gene mutations, we had 62 patients (50%) with heterozygous genotypes, 40 patients (32.3%) with homozygous phenotypes, 21 patients (16.9%) with compound heterozygous genotypes, and one was a missing state. Regarding variant frequencies, M694V was the most common one (43.4%), followed by E148Q (15.6%), V726A (5.7%), A744S (4.1%), and R202Q (4.1%). Positive family history was detected in 59 patients (54.6%), and there was no significant difference in zygosity regarding characteristics, consanguinity, and family history. Conclusions: We affirm in this study of 124 children with FMF, abdominal pain, followed by fever, joint pain and arthritis were the main manifestations. Further, M694V, E148Q, V726A, A744S, and R202Q were the most frequent mutations, and carrying the M649V mutations is associated with a predisposition to other comorbidities. We believe that this study gives a pervasive overview of FMF in Palestinian patients. Looking forward, future studies on a larger number of patients could precisely highlight the genotype-phenotype association among FMF patients.

Immune thrombocytopenic purpura after influenza vaccine administration; a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The American Society of Haematology defines immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) as a common hematologic disorder characterized by a transient or long-term decrease in platelet counts (< 100 × 109/L.), purpura, and haemorrhagic episodes caused by antiplatelet autoantibodies, with the exclusion of other clinical conditions. We aimed to systematically determine the incidence of ITP in adults and children following influenza vaccination, the duration between vaccination and the occurrence of ITP, and to identify predictors of ITP after the vaccine. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, and Science Direct. We included primary studies that assessed the occurrence of immune thrombocytopenia in individuals who had received any influenza vaccine (primary or booster dose), regardless of the dosage, preparation, time of administration, or age of the participants. We excluded studies that were (a) Narrative, scoping, and umbrella reviews ;(b) studies with no accessible full text, abstract-only studies, or (c) Overlapping or unreliable data. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool. We categorized studies for qualitative analysis based on study design. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize quantitative data, including the incidence of ITP after influenza vaccination. RESULTS: Out of 729 articles retrieved from the database search, we included 24 studies. All patients identified and included in this systematic review presented with immune thrombocytopenia, determined by their platelet count. The period between vaccination and the occurrence of ITP ranged from (2:35 days). The mean duration was 13.5 days. The analysis revealed a statistically significant incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.85,95% CI [1.03-3.32] of ITP occurrence after 42 days. CONCLUSIONS: Influenza-associated ITP is uncommon, self-limiting, non-life-threatening, and curable. None of the patients reported having severe adverse events or death. Further studies are required to confirm the exact incidence of the ITP to better understand the pathophysiology of ITP development post-influenza vaccination.

The efficacy and safety of olokizumab for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review, pairwise, and network meta-analysis.

Olokizumab (OKZ) is a novel IL-6 inhibitor that directly targets IL-6 rather than its receptor. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OKZ for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to investigate the optimal treatment regimen. A systematic review, pairwise, and network meta-analysis synthesizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from WOS, CENTRAL, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and PubMed until August 31, 2022. We used the risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively, presented with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). We registered our protocol in PROSPERO with ID: CRD42022358082. Five RCTs with 2277 patients were included. OKZ significantly improved the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR) 20 (RR: 1.97 with 95% CI [1.49, 2.58], P = 0.00001), ACR50 (RR: 3.83 with 95% CI [2.13, 6.87], P = 0.00001), ACR70 (RR: 3.83 with 95% CI [2.13, 6.87], P = 0.00001), disease activity score 28 based on C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) (RR: 3.91 with 95% CI [2.65, 5.79], P = 0.00001), clinical disease activity index (CDAI) (RR: 2.80 with 95% CI [1.43, 5.48], P = 0.003), and health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) (MD: - 0.28 with 95% CI [- 0.38, - 0.18], P = 0.00001) after 12 weeks, compared to placebo. However, OKZ was also associated with a higher incidence of any adverse events (AEs) (RR: 1.15 with 95% CI [1.06, 1.25], P = 0.0005) and AEs leading to drug discontinuation (RR: 1.86 with 95% CI [1.05, 3.29], P = 0.03). OKZ is effective and with acceptable safety profile when administrated with methotrexate in patients with RA not adequately controlled by tumor necrosis factor inhibitors; however, more large-scale RCTs are still required to investigate the optimal dosing, long-term effects, and comparative efficacy versus established biological DMARDs. Key Points • OKZ is effective especially with methotrexate in RA patients.

Monkeypox viral detection in semen specimens of confirmed cases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The current literature shows increasing concerns about potential seminal transmission of monkeypox virus (MPXV). Accordingly, we aimed to understand better the potential presence of MPXV in the seminal fluids and others specimens obtained from MPX cases. On June 26, 2022, a systematic search of the literature was conducted to find articles that examine the presence of MPXV in the seminal fluid of confirmed cases. The search was updated once on August 12 and another on October 12, 2022, to include newly published articles. The prevalence of MPXV DNA presence in the seminal fluid and other specimens was pooled in a meta-analysis (from studies with sample size > 5 to reduce overestimation) and results were presented as effect sizes (ES) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Nine articles were included. Only five studies were eligible for a meta-analysis, and the pooled prevalence of MPXV DNA in semen specimens was 72.4% (95% CI: 55.7%-84.5%) among 115 patients. The positive rate of MPXV viral polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was higher among skin samples (89%; 95% CI: 78.2%-94.8%; N = 62; studies = 2), followed by anogenital/rectal samples (74.3%; 95% CI: 60.4%-84.5%; N = 54; studies = 2). On the other hand, the positivity rate was lower in nasopharyngeal (62.4%; 95% CI: 20.4%-91.5%; N = 587; studies = 3), urine (21.1%; 95% CI: 4.3%-61.1%; N = 617; studies = 4), and blood/plasma (14.3%; 95% CI: 11.3%-18.1%; N = 609; studies = 3) samples. Besides, MPXV can be detected in semen early from Day 1 and up to 19 days after symptoms onset. Finally, two articles investigated the infectivity of MPXV particles detected in seminal specimens by testing their replication competence. Culturing MPXV was successful in two out of four patients included in these studies. MPXV is highly prevalent in seminal specimens of MPX cases, further corroborating the role of sexual transmission of the disease. However, further evidence is still needed to shed more light on the replication competence of these particles.

The effects of acupressure on postoperative nausea and vomiting among patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic surgery is one of the most commonly performed surgeries in general surgery, with fewer side effects and rapid recovery. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remains the main challenge that confronts the prognosis of this minimally invasive surgery. We aimed to evaluate the effect of acupressure, a nonpharmacological non-invasive method, on the incidence of nausea and vomiting following laparoscopic surgery within the early phase (first six hours postoperatively) and the extended phase (for at least 24 h postoperatively). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochran, Scopus, Web of Science, Google scholar, and Wiley for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effect of acupressure on PONV in patients undergoing laparoscopy. Data were extracted and analyzed in a random model, and pooled risk ratios (RRs) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Eleven trials were included in the meta-analysis, comprising 941 patients. Most of the included patients were females undergoing gynecological laparoscopy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acupressure significantly lowered the incidence of nausea and vomiting, within the early phase (RR = 0.62, 95% CI [0.44 to 0.88]; p = 0.008), (RR = 0.5, 95% CI [0.30 to 0.84]; p = 0.008), and the extended phase (RR = 0.65, 95% CI [0.52 to 0.83]; p = 0.0003), (RR = 0.44, 95% CI [0.32 to 0.61]; p < 0.00001), respectively. Moreover, acupressure significantly reduced the need for rescue antiemetic drugs in both phases (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Acupressure is an effective procedure for reducing nausea, vomiting, and the need for antiemetic drugs after laparoscopic surgery.

Preventing the Next Pandemic: Is Live Vaccine Efficacious against Monkeypox, or Is There a Need for Killed Virus and mRNA Vaccines?

(1) Background: The monkeypox virus (MPV) is a double-stranded DNA virus belonging to the Poxviridae family, Chordopoxvirinae subfamily, and Orthopoxvirus genus. It was called monkeypox because it was first discovered in monkeys, in a Danish laboratory, in 1958. However, the actual reservoir for MPV is still unknown. (2) Methods and Results: We have reviewed the existing literature on the options for Monkeypox virus. There are three available vaccines for orthopoxviruses-ACAM2000, JYNNEOS, and LC16-with the first being a replicating vaccine and the latter being non- or minimally replicating. (3) Conclusions: Smallpox vaccinations previously provided coincidental immunity to MPV. ACAM2000 (a live-attenuated replicating vaccine) and JYNNEOS (a live-attenuated, nonreplicating vaccine) are two US FDA-approved vaccines that can prevent monkeypox. However, ACAM2000 may cause serious side effects, including cardiac problems, whereas JYNNEOS is associated with fewer complications. The recent outbreaks across the globe have once again highlighted the need for constant monitoring and the development of novel prophylactic and therapeutic modalities. Based on available data, there is still a need to develop an effective and safe new generation of vaccines specific for monkeypox that are killed or developed into a mRNA vaccine before monkeypox is declared a pandemic.

The effects of resveratrol on glycemic control and cardiometabolic parameters in patients with T2DM: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a progressive meta-inflammatory disorder, which induce micro and macrovascular complications. Resveratrol is a nutraceutical known to have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. It improves insulin resistance; however, no clear evidence regarding its effects in patients with T2DM. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of oral resveratrol supplementation in type 2 diabetic patients concerning dose and duration. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, WOS, Wiley, and Google Scholar for RCTs evaluating the efficacy and safety of resveratrol on patients with T2DM. We screened the studies for the eligibility criteria, performed the quality assessment, extracted the studies' characteristics, baseline, and outcome data of interest, and finally conducted the meta-analysis using RevManV5.3. RESULTS: This systematic review and meta-analysis, including 17 RCTs with total 871 patients with T2DM, showed that resveratrol was superior to placebo on fasting blood glucose (FBG) and total cholesterol (TC) with doses ≥500mg {MD=-13.34, 95%CI [-22.73, -3.95], P=0.005}, {MD=-5.64, 95%CI [-6.95, -4.33], P<0.00001} respectively. Moreover, it improved HbA1c at three months {MD=-0.41, 95%CI [-0.65, -0.16], P=0.001 and systolic blood pressure {MD: -7.91, 95%CI [-10.44, -5.37], P<0.00001}. CONCLUSION: We concluded that resveratrol beneficially modulates glycemic control as well as cardiometabolic parameters in patients with T2DM.