Upregulation of the esophago-UES relaxation response: a possible pathophysiological mechanism in suspected reflux laryngitis.

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate or excessive, non-swallow related, reflexive relaxation of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) in response to esophageal distension may be the principal mechanism permitting retrograde trans-sphincteric flow during acid regurgitation. The neural pathways mediating reflexive UES relaxation in the human have received little attention. Patients with laryngitis demonstrate an increased acid reflux in the proximal esophagus. Such events, combined with an increased tendency for UES relaxation, might precipitate regurgitation into the pharynx. The aim was to determine whether the esophago-UES relaxation reflex induced by rapid esophageal distension is upregulated in patients with posterior laryngitis. METHODS: In 21 healthy volunteers and 14 patients with posterior laryngitis, UES responses to rapid air insufflation were examined. UES responses were monitored with perfused manometry catheter with a oval sleeve sensor. KEY RESULTS: The probability of triggering UES relaxation in response to the rapid esophageal air distension, for all volumes of insufflation, was higher in laryngitis (45%) than in health (17%). The minimum distension volume required to elicit an UES relaxation response was significantly lower in laryngitis patients when compared with controls. Patients who demonstrated a laryngoscopic response to a trial of omeprazole, were less likely to generate a distension-induced UES contractile response (5%) than patients who did not respond (23%). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The threshold for esophageal distension-induced UES relaxation is reduced in patients with laryngitis when compared with controls. This finding supports the hypothesis that in this population, a hypersensitive belch-like response may be one contributory mechanism of regurgitation when triggered by an abrupt spontaneous gastro-esophageal reflux event.

Predictors of outcome in an open label, therapeutic trial of high-dose omeprazole in laryngitis.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux is implicated in some cases of laryngitis. There are no established predictors of response to acid suppression therapy in suspected reflux laryngitis. AIM: In a population with laryngitis, the aim is to determine whether (a) omeprazole 20 mg tds (3 months) improves symptoms and laryngitis, and (b) the outcome in response to potent acid suppression can be predicted by esophageal and/or pharyngeal parameters during ambulatory pH monitoring or by other pretreatment variables. METHODS: From the 70 consecutive patients with laryngitis screened, 20 patients met the inclusion criteria (dysphonia >3 months; laryngoscopically demonstrated laryngitis); and 50 patients were excluded because of one or more criteria indicating alternative causes for laryngeal injury. The primary outcome measure was improvement of at least one level in a 4-point laryngitis grading at 3 months. Twenty-four-hour dual, pharyngo-esophageal pH monitoring was performed at baseline. Secondary outcomes (symptom questionnaire; computerized voice analysis) were measured at baseline, and at 6 and 12 wk. RESULTS: Response rates at 6 and 12 wk were 47% and 63%, respectively. GERD symptoms (heartburn (p= 0.03) and regurgitation (p= 0.0001)) improved. However, neither baseline GERD symptoms nor endoscopic findings predicted laryngoscopic or symptomatic response. Neither baseline laryngitis grade (p= 0.46) nor esophageal acid exposure on pH testing (p= 0.3) predicted outcome. Four of 20 patients demonstrated pharyngeal regurgitation on pH testing, all four of whom responded to potent acid suppression (p= 0.2). Computerized voice measures were not predictive of outcome, although fundamental frequency (Fo) was inversely related to baseline laryngoscopic grade. CONCLUSION: In a carefully defined population of patients with laryngitis (a) 63% have a laryngoscopic response to 3 months of potent acid suppression without significant improvement in laryngeal symptoms; (b) neither voice measures, esophageal acid exposure time, symptoms nor severity of laryngitis predict outcome; and (c) although numbers were small, all patients with a positive pharyngeal pH study responded to therapy and pharyngeal pH-metry may prove useful; (4) available evidence supports an empiric trial of high-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPI), for at least 12 wk, as the initial diagnostic step for suspected reflux laryngitis.

Spasmodic dysphonia: clinical features and effects of botulinum toxin therapy in 169 patients-an Australian experience.

Adductor spasmodic dysphonia (SD) is a focal laryngeal dystonia, characterised by strangled, effortful speech with breaks in pitch and phonation. Injection of laryngeal muscles with BTX is widely used in the treatment of SD. A consecutive series of 169 patients with SD, of whom 144 were treated with BTX injections, seen at St. Vincent's Hospital between 1983 and 1999 were studied prospectively. Patients underwent neurological, quantitative voice and otolaryngological assessment. Females (62.1%) outnumbered males (37.9%) and the mean age at diagnosis was 56 years (range 19-88). Adductor SD (89.4%) was more frequent than abductor SD (1.8%) or mixed SD (4.7%). Stridor was present in 14 patients (8.3%) and in 7 was the sole manifestation of the laryngeal dystonia. The median treatment outcome score was excellent in 63.2%, very good in 18.5%, satisfactory in 14.7% and unsatisfactory in 3.5%. Poorer treatment outcome was associated with abductor SD (OR = 4.69, CI [1.23, 17.92] p=0.024] and age >65 (OR = 2.83, CI [0.95, 8.42] p=0.049). Mild post-injection paralytic dysphonia was associated with longer lasting treatment (4.42 vs. 3.62 months p<0.001) and superior treatment outcome rating (1.37 vs. 1.81 p<0.001). We conclude that BTX injections are highly effective and severe adverse events are rare. Older age and abductor SD may confer a relatively poorer treatment outcome. Mild post-injection paralytic dysphonia may be a marker for more effective and lasting treatment in adductor SD.