APG350 induces superior clustering of TRAIL receptors and shows therapeutic antitumor efficacy independent of cross-linking via Fcγ receptors.

Cancer cells can be specifically driven into apoptosis by activating Death-receptor-4 (DR4; TRAIL-R1) and/or Death-receptor-5 (DR5; TRAIL-R2). Albeit showing promising preclinical efficacy, first-generation protein therapeutics addressing this pathway, especially agonistic anti-DR4/DR5-monoclonal antibodies, have not been clinically successful to date. Due to their bivalent binding mode, effective apoptosis induction by agonistic TRAIL-R antibodies is achieved only upon additional events leading to antibody-multimer formation. The binding of these multimers to their target subsequently leads to effective receptor-clustering on cancer cells. The research results presented here report on a new class of TRAIL-receptor agonists overcoming this intrinsic limitation observed for antibodies in general. The main feature of these agonists is a TRAIL-mimic consisting of three TRAIL-protomer subsequences combined in one polypeptide chain, termed the single-chain TRAIL-receptor-binding domain (scTRAIL-RBD). In the active compounds, two scTRAIL-RBDs with three receptor binding sites each are brought molecularly in close proximity resulting in a fusion protein with a hexavalent binding mode. In the case of APG350-the prototype of this engineering concept-this is achieved by fusing the Fc-part of a human immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1)-mutein C-terminally to the scTRAIL-RBD polypeptide, thereby creating six receptor binding sites per drug molecule. In vitro, APG350 is a potent inducer of apoptosis on human tumor cell lines and primary tumor cells. In vivo, treatment of mice bearing Colo205-xenograft tumors with APG350 showed a dose-dependent antitumor efficacy. By dedicated muteins, we confirmed that the observed in vivo efficacy of the hexavalent scTRAIL-RBD fusion proteins is-in contrast to agonistic antibodies-independent of FcγR-based cross-linking events.

The transmembrane domains of TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) receptors 1 and 2 co-regulate apoptotic signaling capacity.

TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) ligand family that exerts its apoptotic activity in human cells by binding to two transmembrane receptors, TRAILR1 and TRAILR2. In cells co-expressing both receptors the particular contribution of either protein to the overall cellular response is not well defined. Here we have investigated whether differences in the signaling capacities of TRAILR1 and TRAILR2 can be attributed to certain functional molecular subdomains. We generated and characterized various chimeric receptors comprising TRAIL receptor domains fused with parts from other members of the TNF death receptor family. This allowed us to compare the contribution of particular domains of the two TRAIL receptors to the overall apoptotic response and to identify elements that regulate apoptotic signaling. Our results show that the TRAIL receptor death domains are weak apoptosis inducers compared to those of CD95/Fas, because TRAILR-derived constructs containing the CD95/Fas death domain possessed strongly enhanced apoptotic capabilities. Importantly, major differences in the signaling strengths of the two TRAIL receptors were linked to their transmembrane domains in combination with the adjacent extracellular stalk regions. This was evident from receptor chimeras comprising the extracellular part of TNFR1 and the intracellular signaling part of CD95/Fas. Both receptor chimeras showed comparable ligand binding affinities and internalization kinetics. However, the respective TRAILR2-derived molecule more efficiently induced apoptosis. It also activated caspase-8 and caspase-3 more strongly and more quickly, albeit being expressed at lower levels. These results suggest that the transmembrane domains together with their adjacent stalk regions can play a major role in control of death receptor activation thereby contributing to cell type specific differences in TRAILR1 and TRAILR2 signaling.

The tumor necrosis factor receptor stalk regions define responsiveness to soluble versus membrane-bound ligand.

The family of tumor necrosis factor receptors (TNFRs) and their ligands form a regulatory signaling network that controls immune responses. Various members of this receptor family respond differently to the soluble and membrane-bound forms of their respective ligands. However, the determining factors and underlying molecular mechanisms of this diversity are not yet understood. Using an established system of chimeric TNFRs and novel ligand variants mimicking the bioactivity of membrane-bound TNF (mTNF), we demonstrate that the membrane-proximal extracellular stalk regions of TNFR1 and TNFR2 are crucial in controlling responsiveness to soluble TNF (sTNF). We show that the stalk region of TNFR2, in contrast to the corresponding part of TNFR1, efficiently inhibits both the receptor's enrichment/clustering in particular cell membrane regions and ligand-independent homotypic receptor preassembly, thereby preventing sTNF-induced, but not mTNF-induced, signaling. Thus, the stalk regions of the two TNFRs not only have implications for additional TNFR family members, but also provide potential targets for therapeutic intervention.

Single chain TNF derivatives with individually mutated receptor binding sites reveal differential stoichiometry of ligand receptor complex formation for TNFR1 and TNFR2.

Most members of the tumor necrosis factor ligand family form noncovalently linked homotrimers, capable to bind up to three molecules of the respective membrane receptors. For several receptors a membrane distal homophilic interaction domain has been identified, called pre-ligand binding assembly domain. Accordingly, affinity values determined by typical equilibrium binding studies are likely to be influenced by avidity effects. Using our recently introduced covalently stabilized TNF (single chain TNF, scTNF), we have here investigated receptor-ligand binding stoichiometry in our well characterized system of TNFR-Fas chimeras. We produced scTNF derivatives with functionally deleted individual receptor binding sites, resulting in TNF mutants capable to only bind to one or two receptor molecules, rather than three. Equilibrium binding affinity studies on ice with these molecules revealed no significant changes after a single receptor binding site had been functionally deleted. In contrast, functional abrogation of two receptor binding sites showed a strong decrease in both, affinity and bioactivity on TNFR2-Fas. In contrast, TNFR1-Fas ligand binding and receptor activation was only affected after functional deletion of all three receptor binding sites. Our data demonstrate pivotal differences in ligand/receptor interactions between TNFR1-Fas and TNFR2-Fas, arguing for avidity effects important for TNF binding and downstream signaling of TNFR2, but to a lesser extent of TNFR1. These results are supported by data revealed from chemical crosslinking experiments suggesting the existence of preformed TNFR-Fas homodimers.

Dual function of cysteine rich domain (CRD) 1 of TNF receptor type 1: conformational stabilization of CRD2 and control of receptor responsiveness.

The proinflammatory cytokine Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) exists as a homotrimer, capable of binding three receptor molecules. However, signal competent ligand/receptor complexes form large clusters, likely to be stabilized by additional molecular interactions. Both TNF receptors, TNFR1 and TNFR2, contain four cysteine rich domains (CRD) in their extracellular parts. Previous work showed that the membrane distal CRD1 carries a homophilic interaction domain. Here, we investigated the functional role of CRD1 and its two submodules, A1CRD1 and B2CRD1, in a TNFR1-Fas chimera model system. Removal of CRD1 abolishes TNF binding. In line with these data, molecular dynamics simulations suggest that B2CRD1 of TNFR1 serves as a scaffold to stabilize CRD2 in a conformation necessary for high affinity ligand binding. Deletion of only the N-terminal half of CRD1 (DeltaA1CRD1) of TNFR1 marginally affects ligand binding but abrogates responsiveness towards soluble TNF and reduces effectiveness as a dominant negative inhibitor of wild type TNFR1. A TNFR1-derived molecule containing the CRD1 from TNFR2 also shows reduced responsiveness to soluble TNF. These data strongly suggest that CRD1 is not only crucially involved in multimerization of unligated receptors, but is also directly involved in formation of signal competent ligand/receptor clusters, thereby controlling receptor responsiveness.

A humanized tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFR1)-specific antagonistic antibody for selective inhibition of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) action.

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is a recognized pathogenic mediator in a number of chronic and acute inflammatory diseases. Antibodies targeting TNF have significantly improved therapy of chronic inflammatory diseases, in particular rheumatoid arthritis. Despite this success, anti-TNF treatment shows clinical efficacy only in part of the patients and is often transient, necessitating the development of alternative reagents to combat TNF action. We here describe humanization and functional properties of a TNFR1-specific, monovalent antibody fragment, designated IZI-06.1, which binds to the cysteine-rich domain 1 of TNFR1 with high affinity and competes ligand binding. IZI-06.1 serves as a receptor-selective inhibitor of proapoptotic and antiapoptotic TNF actions, revealed from complete blockage of TNFR1-dependent apoptosis and interleukin-6 induction in Kym 1 and HeLa cells, respectively, whereas TNFR2-mediated signals remained intact, evident from TNF and interleukin-2-mediated costimulation of interferon-gamma production in T cells. Accordingly, IZI-06.1 is a TNFR1-selective TNF antagonist and holds great promise to be developed into a clinically applicable therapeutic. IZI-06.1 could be a useful therapeutic alternative in all diseases already known to clinically respond to anti-TNF treatment and particularly in those diseases, where anti-TNF treatment has failed because of complete blockade of TNF action.