Effect of ischaemic postconditioning on markers of myocardial injury in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to perform a meta-analysis of the short-term impact of ischaemic postconditioning (IPoC) on myocardial injury in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) using surrogate cardiac biomarkers. METHODS: Eligible studies were identified using several article databases. Randomised controlled trials published between 1 January 2000 and 1 December 2021 comparing IPoC to standard of therapy in STEMI patients were included in the search. Outcomes included surrogates of myocardial injury, specifically peak troponin, creatine-kinase (CK) and CK myoglobin binding (CK-MB) enzyme levels. RESULTS: 11 articles involving 1273 patients reported on CK-MB and 8 studies involving 505 patients reported on CK. Few studies used troponin as an outcome, thus, a subanalysis of troponin dynamics was not performed. Meta-regression analysis demonstrated no significant effect of IPoC on peak CK-MB (effect size -0.41, 95% CI -1.15 to 0.34) or peak CK (effect size -0.42, 95% CI -1.20 to 0.36). Linear regression analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between a history of smoking and CK-MB in the IPoC group (p=0.038). CONCLUSIONS: IPoC does not seem to protect against myocardial injury in STEMI, except possibly in smokers. These results resonate with some studies using imaging techniques to ascertain myocardial damage. More research using troponin and cardiac imaging should be pursued to better assess the effects of IPoC on cardiovascular outcomes in STEMI.

Ischemic Postconditioning Confers No Benefit to Left Ventricular Systolic Function: A Meta-Analysis of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Results.

Ischemic postconditioning (IPoC) is a technique suggested to reduce reperfusion injury in patients suffering acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), although its use is highly controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of IPoC with percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute STEMI, as measured by follow-up left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The investigators searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for all randomized controlled trials published during the last 2 decades. After the removal of duplicates, 2,021 articles from online databases had been identified using relevant search criteria. The included randomized controlled trials had studied patients with acute STEMI and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow 0 to 1 at presentation and had measured follow-up LVEF using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Overall, 11 studies (n = 1,339 patients) qualified for inclusion. In each study, the control group did not differ significantly from the experimental group. The pooled data from included studies were analyzed using standardized mean difference between IPoC and control groups, and the 95% confidence interval for LVEF; the results were visualized using a forest plot. Bivariate regression analyses and 1-way analyses of LVEF coefficient ratios were done to isolate for various clinical and procedural parameters. An analysis of pooled data of the IPoC (n = 674) and control (n = 665) groups showed that IPoC did not significantly impact follow-up LVEF (using standardized mean difference 0.10, 95% confidence interval 0.00 to 0.21). Further analysis showed that IPoC did not improve follow-up LVEF when isolating for relevant clinical and procedural parameters. In conclusion, the use of IPoC as an adjunctive therapy to percutaneous coronary intervention seemingly provides no benefit to left ventricular systolic function, as quantified with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, in patients with acute STEMI with Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow 0 to 1.

Safety and Outcomes of Peripherally Administered Vasopressor Infusion in Patients Admitted with Shock to an Intensive Cardiac Care Unit-A Single-Center Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Vasopressors are frequently utilized for blood pressure stabilization in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), although with a questionable benefit. Obtaining central venous access is time consuming and may be associated with serious complications. Hence, we thought to evaluate whether the administration of vasopressors through a peripheral venous catheter (PVC) is a safe and effective alternative for the management of patients with CS presenting to the intensive cardiovascular care unit (ICCU). METHODS: A prospective single-center study was conducted to compare the safety and outcomes of vasopressors administered via a PVC vs. a central venous catheter (CVC) in patients presenting with CS over a 12-month period. RESULTS: A total of 1100 patients were included; of them, 139 (12.6%) required a vasopressor treatment due to shock, with 108 (78%) treated via a PVC and 31 (22%) treated via a CVC according to the discretion of the treating physician. The duration of the vasopressor administration was shorter in the PVC group compared with the CVC group (2.5 days vs. 4.2 days, respectively, p < 0.05). Phlebitis and the extravasation of vasopressors occurred at similar rates in the PVC and CVC groups (5.7% vs. 3.3%, respectively, p = 0.33; 0.9% vs. 3.3%, respectively, p = 0.17). Nevertheless, the bleeding rate was higher in the CVC group compared with the PVC group (3% vs. 0%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of vasopressor infusions via PVC for the management of patients with CS is feasible and safe in patients with cardiogenic shock. Further studies are needed to establish this method of treatment.

Development of saliva-based cardiac troponin I point-of-care test using alpha-amylase depletion: a feasibility study.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac troponin (cTn) is the biomarker of choice for detection of myocardial injury. There is a great need for simple point-of-care (POC) troponin testing among patients with chest pain, mainly in the prehospital setting. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the presence of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) in saliva of patients with myocardial injury using alpha-amylase depletion technique. METHODS: Saliva samples were collected from 40 patients with myocardial injury who were tested positive for conventional high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (cTnT) blood tests, and from 66 healthy volunteers. Saliva samples were treated for the removal of salivary alpha-amylase. Treated and untreated samples were tested with blood cTnI Rapid Diagnostic Test. Salivary cTnI levels were compared to blood cTnT levels. RESULTS: Thirty-six of 40 patients with positive blood cTnT had positive salivary samples for cTnI following alpha-amylase depletion treatment (90.00% sensitivity). Moreover, three of the four negative saliva samples were obtained from patients with relatively low blood cTnT levels of 100 ng/L or less (96.88% sensitivity for 100 ng/L and above). The negative predictive value was 93.65% and rose up to 98.33% considering the 100 ng/L cutoff. Positive predictive values were 83.72% and 81.58%, respectively. Among 66 healthy volunteers and 7 samples yielded positive results (89.39% specificity). CONCLUSION: In this preliminary work, the presence of cTnI in saliva was demonstrated for the first time to be feasibly identified by a POC oriented assay. The specific salivary alpha-amylase depletion technique was shown to be crucial for the suggested assay.

Nonagenarians admission and prognosis in a tertiary center intensive coronary care unit - a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: With increasing life expectancy, the prevalence of nonagenarians with cardiovascular disease is steadily growing. However, this population is underrepresented in randomized trials and thus poorly defined, with little quality evidence to support and guide optimal management. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical management, therapeutic approach, and outcomes of nonagenarians admitted to a tertiary care center intensive coronary care unit (ICCU). METHODS: We prospectively collected all patients admitted to a tertiary care center ICCU between July 2019 - July 2022 and compared nonagenarians to all other patients. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 3807 patients were included in the study. Of them 178 (4.7%) were nonagenarians and 93 (52%) females. Each year the prevalence of nonagenarians has increased from 4.0% to 2019, to 4.2% in 2020, 4.6% in 2021 and 5.3% in 2022. Admission causes differed between groups, including a lower rate of acute coronary syndromes (27% vs. 48.6%, p < 0.001) and a higher rate of septic shock (4.5% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.001) in nonagenarians. Nonagenarians had more comorbidities, such as hypertension, renal failure, and atrial fibrillation (82% vs. 59.6%, 23% vs. 12.9%, 30.3% vs. 14.4% p < 0.001, respectively). Coronary intervention was the main treatment approach, although an invasive strategy was less frequent in nonagenarians in comparison to younger subjects. In-hospital mortality rate was 2-fold higher in the nonagenarians (5.6% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: With increasing life expectancy, the prevalence of nonagenarians in ICCU's is expected to increase. Although nonagenarian patients had more comorbidities and higher in-hospital mortality, they generally have good outcomes after admission to the ICCU. Hence, further studies to create evidence-based practices and to support and guide optimal management in these patients are warranted.

Peripheral artery disease, abnormal ankle-brachial index, and prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Objectives: Ankle-brachial index (ABI) is an independent prognostic marker of cardiovascular events among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We aimed to investigate the outcome of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and abnormal ABI. Approach and results: ABI was prospectively measured in 1,047 patients hospitalized due to ACS, who were stratified into three groups, namely, those with clinical peripheral artery disease (PAD) (N = 132), those without clinical PAD but with abnormal (< 0.9) ABI (subclinical PAD; N = 148), and those without clinical PAD with normal ABI (no PAD; N = 767). Patients were prospectively followed for 30-day major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) and 1-year all-cause mortality. The mean age was 64 years. There was a significant gradual increase throughout the three groups in age, i.e., the incidence of prior stroke, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension (p for trend = 0.001 for all). The in-hospital course showed a gradual rise in the incidence of complications with an increase in heart failure [2.5, 6.1, and 9.2%, (p for trend = 0.001)] and acute kidney injury [2, 4.1, and 11.5%, (p for trend = 0.001)]. At day 30, there was a stepwise increase in MACE, such that patients without PAD had the lowest rate, followed by subclinical and clinical PADs (3.5, 6.8, and 8.1%, respectively, p for trend = 0.009). Similarly, there was a significant increase in 1-year mortality from 3.4% in patients without PAD, through 6.8% in those with subclinical PAD, to 15.2% in those with clinical PAD (p for trend = 0.001). Conclusion: Subclinical PAD is associated with poor outcomes in patients with ACS, suggesting that routine ABI screening could carry important prognostic significance in these patients regardless of PAD symptoms.