Colorectal surgery for functional bowel disorders.

Surgery is a last-resort treatment for the management of severe constipation, an alternative after failure of medical treatment. We can distinguish two types of management: "conservative" colon-sparing surgery, i.e. the Malone procedure (MP), or sacral neuromodulation (SNM), and "radical" surgery such as colorectal resection. While the place of SNM remains to be defined, the MP is well codified and has shown very satisfactory results. For radical treatment, total colectomy with ileo-rectal anastomosis is the reference procedure because it is the best documented. The place of more limited segmental colectomies is poorly defined and needs a more precise identification of the colonic segment involved. Finally, it is imperative that any severe constipation be managed within a multidisciplinary radiology-medico-surgical consultative program. Indeed, a multidisciplinary strategy allows rigorous selection of patients, the only guarantee of better long-term functional results, even though they unfortunately remain uncertain.

Video assisted thoracoscopy or laparoscopy for enucleation of esophageal leiomyoma: A seven-year single center experience of 75 cases.

OBJECTIVE: Leiomyoma is the most common benign tumor of the esophagus. Extra mucosal enucleation is the standard treatment. Herein we evaluated the feasibility and the outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) using video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) or laparoscopic surgery (VALS) for esophageal leiomyoma enucleation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of patients who were treated via VATS or VALS for esophageal leiomyoma enucleation in "Hanoi Viet Duc Hospital" from 2010 to 2017 by the same operator. The operative approach, tumor size, complications and outcomes after surgery were recorded. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were included. Mean age was 41.9 (range 20-68) years. The male/female sex ratio was 2.1:1. Fifty-five patients had clinical symptoms (73.3%). Tumors were identified in the upper third (12%), middle third (51%), and lower third (37%) of the esophagus. Mean tumor size was 3.7 (range 2-11) cm. VALS enucleation was performed in 23 patients who had leiomyoma located near the cardia (gastroesophageal junction or abdominal esophagus). The remaining 52 patients underwent right (n=42) or left VATS (n=10). Five patients (6.7%) sustained esophageal mucosa injury during dissection, repaired by MIS without late morbidity. A mini-incision (2 mini-laparotomies and 1 thoracotomy) was required in three patients (4%) due to large tumor size or mucosal injury. The mean operative time was 105min in VATS and 174min in VALS. No major perioperative surgical or medical complications were reported. The mean duration of hospital stay was 7.2 (range 5-12) days. CONCLUSIONS: MIS enucleation of esophageal leiomyoma is technically safe and associated with a high therapeutic success rate with low medico-surgical morbidity. VATS could be applied for almost all esophageal leiomyoma tumors; however, the VALS approach was preferred for tumors located near the gastroesophageal junction in order to create an anti-reflux valve after enucleation.

Laparoscopy in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy for abdominal surgical emergencies.

OBJECTIVE: To assess complications and outcomes of pregnancies following laparoscopic abdominal surgery during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective single-center study of 23 cases of laparoscopic surgery in the second or third trimesters of pregnancy between January 2005 and May 2016. RESULTS: The laparoscopies were performed between 15 and 33 weeks of gestation, a mean of 23 weeks+2 days, with 6 cases in the 3rd trimester. The operations were: 11 cholecystectomies, 6 appendectomies, 1 intestinal occlusion (volvulus on a gastric band), 3 adnexal torsions, 1 ovarian cyst and 1 paratubal cyst with torsion. No secondary laparotomy was required. The postoperative courses were favorable in most cases. However, 3 appendectomies were complicated, one by chorioamnionitis and miscarriage at 20½ weeks of gestation and 2 by right iliac fossa abscesses requiring percutaneous radiological drainage, one of these women delivered a healthy term baby and the other had chorioamnionitis and preterm delivery at 34 weeks, followed by neonatal death. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy can be safely performed for surgical indications in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. In case of abdominal symptoms, a timely diagnosis is required to decide whether or not to operate and imaging should not be withheld particularly in case of suspected appendicitis which has a high risk of complications.

Determinants of outcome following laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for perforated diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage has been proposed for generalized peritonitis from perforated diverticulitis to avoid a stoma. Reports of its feasibility and safety are promising. This study aimed to establish determinants of failure to enable improved selection of patients for this approach. METHODS: The study included all patients with perforated sigmoid diverticulitis who underwent emergency laparoscopic peritoneal lavage from January 2000 to December 2013. Factors predicting failure of laparoscopic treatment were analysed from data collected retrospectively. RESULTS: For patients undergoing emergency sigmoid resection (72 of 361), mortality and morbidity rates were 13 and 35 per cent respectively. In all, 71 patients had laparoscopic lavage, with mortality and morbidity rates of 6 and 28 per cent respectively. Reintervention was necessary in 11 patients (15 per cent) for unresolved sepsis. Age 80 years or more, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade III or above, and immunosuppression were associated with reintervention. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients and those with immunosuppression or severe systemic co-morbidity are at risk of reintervention after laparoscopic lavage.

Can postoperative complications be predicted by a routine CT scan on day 5? A study of 78 laparoscopic colorectal resections.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan patterns after colorectal resection are difficult to analyze for both clinicians and radiologists. This study aimed to assess the role of single CT scan on postoperative day 5 in predicting postoperative morbidity. METHODS: From October 2007 to August 2009, 78 patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection were enrolled in a research study involving a routine contrast-enhanced multi-detector CT scan on postoperative day 5. Two groups were defined: patients with intra-abdominal postoperative morbidity requiring specific management, i.e., surgical or radiological procedure, and/or antibiotic therapy ("complications" group), and patients with uneventful postoperative outcome ("uneventful" group). CT findings were compared between the two groups with Fisher's exact test or chi-square test. RESULTS: Postoperative abdominal complications occurred in 16 patients (21 %). Of the CT findings on day 5, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, portal or mesenteric thrombosis, operative area fat infiltration, peritoneal effusion, pneumoperitoneum, intra-abdominal collection, parietal inflammation or collection, and subcutaneous emphysema were observed in both groups without any significant difference. Only small bowel distension [25 % (4/16) in the "complications" group vs. 5 % (3/62) in the "uneventful" group; p = 0.029] and pleural effusion [81 % (13/16) vs. 48 % (30/62); p = 0.024, respectively] were observed significantly more often in the "complications" group. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that abdominal complications cannot be predicted by a CT scan on day 5 after laparoscopic colorectal resection. Thus, it cannot be recommended for routine use.

Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: a prospective long-term evaluation of functional results and quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse combines the advantages of a minimally invasive approach with the low recurrence rate observed after abdominal procedures. To date, only a few long-term functional studies and no quality of life assessment are available. The aim of this study was to assess long-term functional outcomes and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy. METHODS: Between January 2007 and December 2008, patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for full-thickness external rectal prolapse and/or rectocele were prospectively included. Fecal incontinence and constipation were scored (Wexner score and Rome II criteria). Quality of life was assessed using the gastrointestinal quality of life form (GIQLI). RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were included and 30 (91 %) completed all the questionnaires. There was no morbidity or mortality. The mean length of hospital stay was 5 ± 1 days (range 3-7 days). After a mean follow-up of 42 ± 7 months (range 32-52 months), recurrence of rectocele was observed in two patients (6 %). At the end of follow-up, constipation was improved in 13/18 patients (72 %) and two patients (7 %) presented de novo constipation. The patients' Wexner score improved between preoperative status and end of follow-up (12 ± 7 vs. 4 ± 3, p = 0.002). Compared to the preoperative score, quality of life significantly improved over time: 77 ± 21 preoperatively versus 107 ± 17 at 1 year versus 109 ± 18 at the end of follow-up (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study showed that laparoscopic ventral rectopexy was associated with excellent postoperative outcomes and a low long-term recurrence rate. Long-term functional results were excellent in terms of continence, with significant improvement of quality of life and without worsening constipation.

Prior abdominal open surgery does not impair outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a case-control study in 367 patients.

AIM: This prospective case-matched study was conducted to compare the outcome of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in patients with and without prior abdominal open surgery (PAOS). METHOD: From June 1997 to December 2010, 167 patients with PAOS (including midline, Pfannenstiel, subcostal, right upper quadrant or transverse incision) were manually matched to all identical patients without PAOS from our prospective laparoscopic colorectal surgery database. Matching criteria included age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, body mass index, diagnosis and surgical procedure performed. Primary end-points were postoperative 30-day mortality and morbidity. Secondary end-points included operating time, conversion rate and length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 367 patients (167 with PAOS and 200 without PAOS) were included in this study. PAOS was associated with a significantly increased mean operating time (229±66 min vs 216±71 min, P=0.044). The conversion rate was significantly higher in patients with PAOS, compared with patients without PAOS (22%vs 13%, P=0.017). There was one (0.3%) postoperative death. The overall postoperative morbidity rate was similar in both groups (22%vs 19%, P=0.658), including Grade 3 or Grade 4 morbidity, according to Dindo's classification (5%vs 5%, P=0.694). Mean hospital stay showed no difference between both groups (10±7 days vs 9±5 days, P=0.849). CONCLUSION: This large case-control study suggests that PAOS does not affect postoperative outcomes. For this reason, a systematic laparoscopic approach in patients with PAOS, even with midline incision, should be considered in colorectal surgery.

Laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer facilitates simultaneous surgery of synchronous liver metastases.

AIM: Combined resection of colorectal cancer with surgery for synchronous liver metastases (LM) still remains controversial because of the possible higher morbidity rate, the necessity of an adequate abdominal approach for both resections and the impact on oncological results. However, laparoscopy may be beneficial in terms of operative results and could facilitate this combined procedure. The aim was to assess the benefit of the laparoscopic approach for colorectal cancer resection in patients undergoing simultaneous liver resection for synchronous LM. METHOD: From 2006 to 2011, all patients with colorectal cancer and resectable synchronous LM, for which the total length of the procedure was suspected to be less than 8 h, underwent colorectal laparoscopic resection combined with open and/or laparoscopic liver surgery. In order to identify selection criteria, a comparative analysis was performed between patients with and without major postoperative morbidity. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients underwent combined surgery with laparoscopic colectomy (n = 31) and proctectomy (n = 20). The conversion rate was 8%. Liver resections included major surgery (n = 10) and minor surgery (n = 41). Extraction of the colorectal specimen was performed through an incision used for open liver resection, except in seven patients who underwent a total laparoscopic procedure. Overall and major morbidity rates were 55% and 25%, respectively. Median (range) hospital stay was 16 (6-40) days. Regarding patient and tumour characteristics, no independent criteria of major morbidity risk were identified. CONCLUSION: This study showed that laparoscopic colorectal resection combined with liver resection for synchronous LM was feasible and safe. Moreover, laparoscopy facilitates the surgical abdominal approach for combined colorectal and liver resection.

Intestinal transplantation: indications and prospects.

Intestinal transplantation (IT) can involve small bowel transplantation alone, or be associated with liver or multivisceral transplantation. Although IT is the radical treatment for intestinal failure, home parenteral nutrition (PN) remains the treatment of choice for this disease. Indications for IT are still debated. A recent study showed that early referral for IT is recommended for patients with life-threatening combined liver and intestinal failure or for patients with invasive intra-abdominal desmoid tumors. In the same study, no survival benefit was shown for patients undergoing IT for ultra-short bowel or major complications related to the PN catheter; indications still need to be fully assessed. While short-term outcomes for IT have improved dramatically (one-year survival for small bowel-alone IT is now 80% versus 0-28% in the 1980s), long-term outcomes have not improved much since the introduction of Tacrolimus in the 1990s: five-year survival still does not exceed 60%. Some prospective developments could improve these results: the use of multivisceral grafts, the use of Sirolimus and Thymoglobulins in the immunosuppressive treatment, or the use of new biochemical markers for early diagnosis of graft rejection.

Single-incision laparoscopy for colorectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of more than a thousand procedures.

AIM: Single-incision laparoscopy for colorectal surgery is of growing importance. The experience of colorectal resection through single-incision laparoscopic surgery was assessed, including the patient outcomes. METHOD: A meta-analysis was performed of studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic with multiport laparoscopy. Endpoints included conversion to laparotomy, operation time, postoperative morbidity, length of skin incision and length of hospital stay. The MEDLINE database was searched and only comparative studies were included in the meta-analysis. Data were retrieved from full-text manuscripts. Meta-analysis was performed according to the Mantel-Haenszel method for random effects. RESULTS: From October 2008 to December 2011, 1026 colorectal resections including 921 colonic and 105 rectal procedures using single-incision laparoscopic surgery were reported in 64 studies. Meta-analysis of the 15 comparative studies, including a total of 1075 procedures (494 single-incision and 581 multiport laparoscopies), showed no difference in conversion to open laparotomy [odds ratio (OR) 0.58 (0.24, 1.38); P=0.22], morbidity [OR 0.84 (0.61, 1.15); P=0.27] or operation time [weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.27 (-6.50, 5.95); P=0.93], but a significantly shorter total skin incision [WMD -0.52 (-0.79, -0.25); P<0.001] and a significantly shorter postoperative length of stay [WMD -0.75 (-1.30, -0.20); P=0.008] after single-incision laparoscopic surgery compared with a multiport laparoscopic approach. CONCLUSION: Although only 15 nonrandomized comparative studies of varying methodology have been reported, this systematic review and meta-analysis of more than 1000 colorectal procedures suggest that single-incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery is feasible and safe.

Functional disorders after rectal cancer resection: does a rehabilitation programme improve anal continence and quality of life?

AIM: A poor functional outcome is often reported after total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer, especially when sphincter-saving resection with intersphincteric dissection is performed for low tumours. Anal sphincter rehabilitation is widely proposed for faecal incontinence. Very few studies have reported results to improve anal dysfunction following rectal surgery. This prospective study aimed to assess the benefits of sphincter training after TME in terms of functional outcome and quality of life. METHODS: Anal sphincter training was performed in patients undergoing laparoscopic sphincter-saving TME for rectal cancer. Rehabilitation was performed after ileostomy closure. This group was compared with 24 matched patients. Assessment included one functional and two quality of life questionnaires (SF-36 Health Status and Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life score). RESULTS: From 2007 to 2009, 22 patients underwent laparoscopic TME. The median follow-up after stoma closure was 21.2 (range 8-46) months. The mean stool frequency per day was significantly lower after sphincter training (2.6 in the training group vs 4.0 in the control group, P=0.025). Following rehabilitation, patients complained significantly less about dyschezia (22 vs 63%, P=0.008). Both groups had similar continence (Wexner score 8.3 after training vs 9.9 in controls, NS). Quality of life was significantly improved by sphincter training as measured by the vitality (P=0.004) and mental functioning (P=0.02) subscales on the SF-36 Health Status questionnaire and by the depression and self-perception (P = 0.005) categories of the Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life score. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that anal sphincter training following TME could decrease stool frequency and improve both general and specific quality of life.

Risk of recurrence after surgery for chronic radiation enteritis.

BACKGROUND: Approximately one-third of patients with chronic radiation enteritis (CRE) require surgery, which is associated with a high morbidity rate and a high risk of reoperation. The aim of this study was to report outcome after surgery for CRE. METHODS: Patients with CRE who underwent operation with extensive small bowel resection between 1980 and 2009 were included in the study. Postoperative morbidity and mortality, reoperation for recurrent enteritis and risk factors for reoperation were analysed. RESULTS: Of 107 patients (94 women; 87·8 per cent) with CRE included in the study, the main indication for surgery was symptomatic stricture (82 patients; 76·6 per cent). Forty-nine ileocaecal resections (45·8 per cent) were performed. Overall and surgical morbidity rates were 74·8 per cent (80 patients) and 28·0 per cent (30) respectively. Fourteen patients (13·1 per cent) underwent reoperation for complications. Reoperation rates for CRE at 1 and 3 years of follow-up were 37 and 54 per cent respectively. Risk factors for reoperation for recurrent enteritis were: emergency surgery (odds ratio (OR) 2·72, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·57 to 4·86), anastomotic leakage (OR 2·53, 1·54 to 4·42) and male sex (OR 3·57, 1·82 to 7·29). The only protective factor for reoperation was ileocaecal resection during the first surgical procedure (OR 4·48, 2·52 to 8·31). CONCLUSION: Ileocaecal resection was the only factor that protected against reoperation for recurrent CRE, demonstrating the importance of resecting all damaged tissue in these patients. These results suggest that there is little place for intestinal bypass surgery or adhesiolysis.

Single-incision laparoscopic colonic surgery.

AIM: SILS is an area of growing interest in colorectal surgery. We report our preliminary experience of 13 consecutively selected patients undergoing colonic surgery using SILS. METHOD: From July 2009 to January 2010, 13 patients (five men) of median age 56 (23-82) years and a body mass index (BMI) of 23.5 (18-30) kg/m(2) underwent colonic surgery. Procedures included subtotal colectomy (1), ileocolic resection (2), right colectomy (4) and sigmoidectomy for benign disease (6). Three instruments (including camera) were introduced through a single 2.5-cm port (SILS™ Port Multiple Instrument Access Port; Covidien Inc., Norwalk, Connecticut, USA) inserted at the umbilicus. RESULTS: The median operating time was 150 (100-240) min, and the median size of the umbilical port incision was 32 (25-50) mm. There was no postoperative mortality and morbidity, and the median hospital stay was 6 (4-10) days. The cosmetic result was judged to be excellent in 12 of 13 patients who felt it to be better than expected. CONCLUSION: This preliminary experience shows that SILS is technically feasible and safe for colonic resection.

Single port access proctectomy with total mesorectal excision and intersphincteric resection with a primary transanal approach.

AIM: Minimally invasive surgery is advancing with single port access (SPA). We describe a technique for a SPA transabdominal combined with transanal approach to perform laparoscopic proctectomy with total mesorectal excision (TME) and intersphincteric resection of low rectal adenocarcinoma. METHOD: Transanal intersphincteric resection was followed by laparoscopic abdominal proctectomy with TME. An SPA device was placed at the site of the future stoma through a 2.5-cm incision. A hand-sewn side-to-end coloanal anastomosis was performed and a terminal loop ileostomy was created at the site of the SPA device. RESULTS: The procedure was performed on two healthy nonobese women who had not had previous abdominal surgery. The operating times were 195 and 210 min, and blood loss < 250 ml. The postoperative course was uneventful, with discharge on postoperative days 5 and 6. Pathological examination revealed adequate surgical margins and lymph node retrieval with an intact mesorectum. Four weeks after stoma closure, the scar in the right lower quadrant was 35 mm in one patient and 45 mm in the other, and the scar from the 5-mm port was barely visible. CONCLUSION: This preliminary experience shows that proctectomy with TME and intersphincteric resection can be safely performed using only two ports.

Conservative management is associated with a decreased risk of definitive stoma after anastomotic leakage complicating sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer.

AIM: Anastomotic leakage (AL) after sphincter-saving resection (SSR) for rectal cancer can result in a definitive stoma (DS). The aim of the study was to assess risk factors for DS after AL-complicating SSR. METHOD: Between 1997 and 2007, 200 patients underwent SSR for rectal cancer. AL occurred in 20.5% (41/200) [symptomatic 13.5% (n = 27), asymptomatic 7% (n = 14)]. Possible risk factors for DS after AL were analysed. RESULTS: Management of AL consisted in no treatment (n = 14), medical treatment (n = 6), local drainage (n = 10) and abdominal reoperation (n = 11). After a median follow-up of 38 months, the overall rate of DS was 3% (n = 6): 0% for asymptomatic vs 22% after symptomatic AL (P = 0.061). After reoperation, the risk of DS was 13% when the anastomosis was preserved vs 100% after Hartmann's procedure (P = 0.007). Risk factors of DS after AL included obesity, age over 65, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score > 2 and abdominal reoperation for AL. CONCLUSION: The risk of DS after SSR for cancer is low (3%) but rises to 22% after symptomatic AL. This risk depends on the surgical treatment for AL and is up to 100% if a Hartmann's procedure is performed.

Laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis using the novel Chex(®) circular stapler: a case-control study.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of a new cost-effective circular stapler for colorectal anastomosis, the Chex(®) CS. METHOD: From 2007 to 2009, a case-control study was conducted of 54 patients who underwent left colectomy with stapled anastomosis using the Chex stapler. The patients were matched to 64 patients in whom the anastomoses were performed using the CDH(®) stapler or the EEA(®) stapler. The following criteria were matched: sex, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiology grade, diagnosis, formation of a temporary stoma and surgical approach. Primary end-points were postoperative mortality and morbidity. The surgeon was asked to fill out a questionnaire to assess the ergonomics of the device using an analogue visual scale. A cost analysis was performed to compare the cost of the different devices. RESULTS: There were no postoperative deaths. Morbidity, including anastomotic leakage (9%vs 8%, P = 1.000), was similar in the two groups. The surgeon's overall appreciation was scored at 8.1/10 (3-9.5), including the best score for stapler removal (9.5). No major device failure was observed during the study. Mean surgical costs were significantly lower in the Chex group: € 903 ± 73 (885-1192) vs the control group € 971 ± 61 (956-1263) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that colorectal anastomosis using the Chex circular stapler is safe and does not increase overall morbidity. In particular, this device did not have a higher rate of anastomotic leakage in our patients than more expensive models currently used in our hospital.

T4 colorectal cancer: is laparoscopic resection contraindicated?

AIM: T4 colorectal cancer remains a contraindication for laparoscopy. It is argued that the risk of incomplete resection could be higher than in open surgery. Furthermore, difficulty in dissection could lead to a very high rate of conversion. There is little information on this. The study aimed at assessing feasibility and operative and oncologic results of laparoscopic resection for T4 colorectal cancer. METHOD: Between 2006 and 2009, 39 patients with colorectal cancer with suspected involvement of another organ (T4) on computed tomography scanning and/or magnetic resonance imaging were included. The cancers were in the right colon (n = 18), left colon (n =9) and rectum (n = 12). The distribution of possible organ involvement was abdominal or pelvic side-wall (n = 21), urinary bladder (n = 4), small bowel or colon (n = 6), vagina and ovary (n = 3), prostate or seminal vesicles (n = 3) and duodenum (n = 2). RESULTS: The overall conversion rate was 18%. Postoperative mortality and morbidity were 2.5 and 33%, respectively. Clinical anastomotic leakage rate was 15% (n = 6). Abdominal reoperation was required in three (7%) patients. Pathological invasion to other organs (pT4) was confirmed in 30 (77%) patients. The R1 resection rate was 13% (4 of 30). After a median follow up of 19 months (range 1.5-45 months), the overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 97 and 89%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that laparoscopic surgery is feasible for colorectal T4 cancer resection. Laparoscopy cannot therefore be considered an absolute contraindication for T4 colorectal cancer.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for rectal tumor: the first French single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) allows complete local excision of rectal tumor, especially in the middle and upper part of the rectum, and provides an alternative to conventional surgery. This is a report of the first French single-center experience to assess the feasibility and postoperative results for rectal tumor excised by TEM. METHODS: From October 2007 to December 2008, 27 patients underwent TEM for excision of either rectal adenoma (n=19) or carcinoma (n=8). The median distance from the anal verge was 60mm (range: 10-140). RESULTS: TEM excision was performed in 26/27 patients. Intraoperative technical difficulties were recorded in two patients (peritoneal perforation and gas leakage, respectively). The morbidity rate was 22% (n=6), including two patients (7%) with major complications (delayed rectal bleeding) requiring readmission to hospital for both, and surgical hemostasis for one. R0 resection rates for adenoma and carcinoma were 84% and 75%, respectively. Immediate salvage surgery was performed in one patient because of a T2R1 carcinoma. At the time of the median follow-up at nine months (range: 2.5-17.5), no patient had experienced a recurrence. CONCLUSION: TEM is a safe and effective procedure with low morbidity for local rectal tumor resection. It allows local excision of benign tumors, especially those that are inaccessible to conventional local surgery resection, thereby avoiding radical surgery. In cases of carcinoma, its role in local surgery remains controversial and is yet to be defined.

Colorectal breast carcinoma metastasis diagnosed as an obstructive colonic primary tumor. A case report and review of the literature.

Common sites of colorectal breast carcinoma metastasis are bones, lungs, the central nervous system and the liver. Metastases in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract are rare and especially involve the stomach rather than the colon. Clinical or radiological features usually cannot differentiate them from a primary colorectal tumor, resulting in inappropriate treatment. In some cases, this lesion suggests multifocal spread of breast cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Colorectal breast cancer metastasis is a rare finding and there is no consensus on the management of these lesions. The present case report describes a 69-year-old female with metastatic breast cancer presenting as an obstructive tumor of the transverse colon.

[Ultrasound and CT imaging in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis]. / Place de l'imagerie dans le diagnostic d'appendicite aiguë

The diagnosis of acute appendicitis is still made on the basis of clinical findings in the majority of cases. When the clinical picture is unclear, ultrasound examination is a simple and effective tool to confirm the diagnosis. When ultrasound is unsatisfactory due to patient habitus or otherwise fails to clarify clinical uncertainty, abdominopelvic CT scan yields excellent results in terms of both sensitivity and specificity. While recognizing these evidence-based results, the surgeon must remain pragmatic and realize that the quality of each exam depends on the quality of the examination and the experience of the radiologist.