A clinical evaluation of an ex vivo organ culture system to predict patient response to cancer therapy.

Introduction: Ex vivo organ cultures (EVOC) were recently optimized to sustain cancer tissue for 5 days with its complete microenvironment. We examined the ability of an EVOC platform to predict patient response to cancer therapy. Methods: A multicenter, prospective, single-arm observational trial. Samples were obtained from patients with newly diagnosed bladder cancer who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumor and from core needle biopsies of patients with metastatic cancer. The tumors were cut into 250 µM slices and cultured within 24 h, then incubated for 96 h with vehicle or intended to treat drug. The cultures were then fixed and stained to analyze their morphology and cell viability. Each EVOC was given a score based on cell viability, level of damage, and Ki67 proliferation, and the scores were correlated with the patients' clinical response assessed by pathology or Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Results: The cancer tissue and microenvironment, including endothelial and immune cells, were preserved at high viability with continued cell division for 5 days, demonstrating active cell signaling dynamics. A total of 34 cancer samples were tested by the platform and were correlated with clinical results. A higher EVOC score was correlated with better clinical response. The EVOC system showed a predictive specificity of 77.7% (7/9, 95% CI 0.4-0.97) and a sensitivity of 96% (24/25, 95% CI 0.80-0.99). Conclusion: EVOC cultured for 5 days showed high sensitivity and specificity for predicting clinical response to therapy among patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer and other solid tumors.

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte transfusion in a patient with treatment refractory triple negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive form of breast cancer that is treated with chemotherapy. Recently, programmed death 1 (PD1) inhibition, as well as antibody-drug conjugates, have been added to the available treatment regimen, yet metastatic disease is fatal. Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) using tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has been well described in melanoma, but less data is available on other solid malignancies. CASE: Herein, we present a case of a 31-year-old patient diagnosed with Breast Cancer gene 1 (BRCA1) positive, TNBC. The patient's disease rapidly progressed while under standard treatment protocols. As a result, additional genetic testing of the tumor was carried out and revealed loss of BRCA1 heterozygosity, a double Tumor Protein 53 (TP53) mutation, and MYC amplification. Due to resistance to conventional therapy, an experimental approach was attempted using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in November 2021 at Hadassah University Medical Center. While receiving this treatment, the patient exhibited a reported subjective clinical improvement including a month spent out of the hospital. However, the final result, presumably due to Interleukin 2 (IL-2) toxicity, was the patient's passing. CONCLUSION: This case is unique and peculiar regarding the treatment modality chosen, due to the extremely refractory disease the patient suffered from. After standard therapies rapidly failed, adoptive cell therapy was attempted with the infusion of TILs. This treatment has been shown effective in melanoma, however, there is an extreme paucity of data on other solid tumors, including TNBC. Although the patient ultimately demised presumably due to treatment side effects, brief clinical benefit was apparent. Further studies are warranted.

Breast Cancer with Low Recurrence Score on Oncotype DX©: Interplay Between Early Recurrence, Lobular Histology and BRCA Mutation.

INTRODUCTION: The 21-gene recurrence score assay Oncotype DX© (ODX) has clear prognostic and predictive value regarding adjuvant chemotherapy. However, recent studies have shown the clinical distinctiveness of both BRCA1/2-driven early breast cancer (EBC) and invasive lobular (ILC) breast cancers. We evaluated the association between BRCA1/2-driven EBC/ILC and Oncotype DX failure despite a recurrence score ≤ 20. METHODS: Here, we describe a small cohort of 16 patients from our center who, despite a low recurrence score (RS) ≤ 20, suffered from early disease recurrence. Clinical parameters of our cohort of patients were compared to a cohort from the general population of Clalit Health Service (CHS). RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis in our cohort was significantly younger. BRCA mutational status was available in 14 patients in our cohort. A high percentage of these patients had BRCA1/2 mutations (35.7%), either germline (in 3) or somatic (in 2). Half of our cohort was diagnosed with lobular carcinoma (ILC) relative to 10-15% in the general population of BC (p = 0.02). The median time to recurrence was 44 months. CONCLUSION: BRCA1/2 mutation and ILC are highly represented in this cohort. Although our cohort is small, these data may suggest that a RS ≤ 20 in these subgroups may not reflect a low risk of recurrence.

Ex-vivo organ culture as potential prioritization tool for breast cancer targeted therapy.

The growing use of genomic testing presents new treatment options but also new dilemmas. We describe here a heavily-pretreated metastatic triple negative breast cancer patient who failed to respond to conventional treatment. Genomic analyses were performed that discovered several targetable alterations (e.g. FGFR1, CDK6, INSR) and created a clinical challenge - which target to target first? Our solution to this relatively common scenario was using ex-vivo organ culture (EVOC) system to prioritize treatment directed toward the best molecular target. EVOC enabled the trial of several potent targeted agents (Everolimus, Linsitinib, Palbociclib, AZD4547) and allowed semi-quantitative measurement of tumor response. The best response was to FGFR inhibitor, AZD4547. Consequently, the most accessible FGFR inhibiting agents (Pazopanib, then Nintedanib) were administered and some response was achieved. This report provides a potential rationale for utilizing EVOC system to predict tumor response to targeted therapy when multiple targets are proposed.

TL-118-anti-angiogenic treatment in pancreatic cancer: a case report.

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive malignant tumors. In recent years, little progress has been made in understanding and treatment of the disease. The two most commonly used chemotherapy drugs approved for the treatment of pancreatic cancer are gemcitabine and fluorouracil. Anti-angiogenic treatment is one of the current promising approaches in cancer translational research. Its aim is to inhibit development of new blood vessels and thereby prevent further tumor growth. We present a first description of a pancreatic cancer patient treated with standard chemotherapy and TL-118, an anti-angiogenic combination of 4 drugs that target non-overlapping aspects of the angiogenic process (Provided by Tiltan Pharma Ltd for compassionate use). Our patient, treated with standard chemotherapy combined with TL-118, was diagnosed about 16 months ago and is still considered progression free, while being treated with that combination. Moreover, when the treatment with TL-118 was stopped, there was a clear elevation of tumor marker which dropped again with the renewal of TL-118. This effect was not achieved by gemcitabine treatment alone. Recently, a phase II clinical trial of TL-118 for pancreatic cancer patients that have not yet been treated with chemotherapy was initiated. (Tiltan Pharma Ltd). The study objective is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of TL-118 in gemcitabine-treated metastatic pancreatic cancer patients. This report describes a new approach in treating pancreatic cancer, enabling patients to obtain a longer progression-free survival using this new anti-angiogenic drug combination, added on standard chemotherapy.