RESUMO
Introducción: las manifestaciones hematológicas en el lupus eritematoso sistémico (LES) son frecuentes. La leucopenia se presenta del 50 al 60% de los casos, pero solo el 17% tiene un recuento leucocitario <1.000/mm3. La neutropenia en pacientes con leucopenia ocurre entre un 20-40% (según el valor de corte del laboratorio). Los mecanismos posibles de neutropenia descriptos son: aumento en la destrucción de granulocitos periféricos por anticuerpos antineutrófilos, opsonización y destrucción por monocitos; cambios en el pool esplénico y marginal; y disminución en la producción medular. La formación de trampas extracelulares de neutrófilos (neutrophil extracellular traps, NETs) contribuye en la producción de interferón tipo 1 (IFN-1) a partir de plasmocitos y células dendríticas causando daño endotelial y cambios protrombóticos. La NETosis y el clearence anormal de material apoptótico promueven mayor liberación de antígenos y la consiguiente formación de autoanticuerpos. Las consecuencias infecciosas de la neutropenia al diagnóstico de LES se desconocen. Los objetivos del presente estudio fueron conocer la prevalencia de la neutropenia al diagnóstico de LES, determinar su correlación con otras variables de la patología, y estudiar su relación con una mayor probabilidad de actividad, daño, infecciones y mortalidad. Materiales y métodos: estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo. Se incluyeron pacientes con diagnóstico de LES (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics, SLICC 2012) de la cohorte del Sanatorio, desde enero de 2010 a diciembre de 2020. Se consignaron variables demográficas y asociadas a la enfermedad (criterios clínicos y de laboratorio). Escala de actividad: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2k (SLEDAI-2k). Se dividieron en dos grupos según la presencia de neutropenia (<1.500/mm3). Se definió un subgrupo de neutropenia severa: <500/mm3. En pacientes con neutropenia se evaluó la presencia de infección viral, bacteriana y tratamiento con factor de crecimiento de colonias de granulocitos y monocitos (GM-GSF). Análisis estadístico: los datos descriptivos se presentaron como medias y sus desvíos estándar (±DS) (variables continuas) y porcentajes (variables categóricas). Se compararon variables independientes de acuerdo con su distribución con test Mann Whitney. Se utilizó prueba t de Student para comparación de medias, y chi cuadrado (X2) para variables cualitativas. Se consideró como estadísticamente una p≤0,05. Resultados: se incluyeron 70 pacientes. Mujeres 59 (84%), edad media 38,6 años (18-72). Leucopenia 24 (34%), linfopenia 30 (42,8%), neutropenia 12 (17%), neutropenia severa 2 (2,8%) y plaquetopenia 7 (10%). Grupo con neutropenia (n=12): Sicca 12 (100%). Media índice neutrófilo/linfocito (INL) 1,33 (DS 0,69), infecciones: virus de Epstein-Barr (VEB) IgM (+) uno, parvovirus y CMV solicitados y negativos dos. PAMO realizada una: normal. Pacientes en tratamiento con GM-GSF: dos, sin eventos adversos. Dos infecciones urinarias. Conclusiones: en nuestro estudio se observó correlación entre neutropenia con síntomas Sicca, leucopenia y linfopenia, y un INL menor. Se desconoce si se relacionó a peor evolución. La presencia de infección fue baja (16%). Dos pacientes requirieron GM-GSF (con neutropenia severa), sin haber presentado eventos adversos.
Introduction: hematological manifestations are frequent in systemic erythematosus lupus (SLE). Leukopenia is seen in between 50 to 60% of cases, but only 17% has a leukocyte count <1,000/mm3. Neutropenia in patients with leukopenia occurs between 20-40% of cases, depending on the cut-off value used. Possible described mechanisms for neutropenia are: an increase in destruction of granulocytes by anti-neutrophil antibodies, opsonization and destruction by monocytes; change in the splenic and marginal neutrophil pool; a diminished production in the bone marrow. The formation of NETs contributes to the production of INF-1 from plasmocytes and dendritic cells, causing endothelial damage and pro-thrombotic changes. NETosis and apoptotic abnormal clearence promote the formation of antigens and subsequent autoantibodies. Infectious consequences of neutropenia in SLE are still unknown. The objectives of this article were to know the prevalence of neutropenia at diagnosis of SLE in our hospital, and secondly to determine its correlation with other variables of the disease and to investigate whether it's related with a greater probability of infections. Materials and methods: descriptive, retrospective study. Patients with diagnosis of SLE (SLICC 2012) from our cohort were included. Demographic and related to disease variables were stated. Activity scale: SLEDAI-2k. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of neutropenia (<1.500/mm3 ) and multivariate analysis was performed to clinical and analytical variables. A subgroup with severe neutropenia (<500/mm3) was evaluated. Multivariate analysis was performed to detect correlations between a diminished neutrophil count and clinical manifestations, disease severity, autoantibodies profile, infections, and associated diseases. In neutropenic patients, the presence of viral or bacterial infection and the use of GM-GSF were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed as mean +/-SD for continuous variables and percentage for categorical variables. T-Test or Mann-Whitney were used to compare independent variables according to distribution. Student's T and Chi-Square for qualitative variables. Statistical significance: p<0.05. Results: 70 patients were included. Female 59 (84%), mean age 38.6 years (18- 72). Leukopenia 24 (34%), lymphopenia 30 (42.8%), neutropenia 12 (17%), severe 2 (2.8%), thrombocytopenia 7 (10%). Neutropenic group: Sicca 12 (100%), neutrophil/lymphocyte index (NLI) 1.33 (DS 0.69), infections: EBV IgM+1/12, parvovirus and CMV negative 2/12. BMA 1/12, without pathologic findings. GM-GSF 2/12. Infections: 2/12 (urinary). Conclusions: we observed a correlation between Sicca symptoms, leuko and lymphopenia, and a lower NLI. The clinical significance of these findings was uncertain. The presence of infection was low (16%). Two required GM-GSF, having not presented adverse events.
Assuntos
Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico , Doenças Autoimunes , NeutropeniaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to ascertain the frequency of use, search intent (SI), level of accessibility, and degree of reliability of sources of information (SOIs) in rheumatology. METHODS: A survey among adult outpatients with rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, and spondyloarthritis was conducted. They were asked if they had procured information from 12 selected SOIs during the past year. Search intent was defined as the source they would like to consult. Accessibility and reliability were assessed through 0-to-10 scales (minimum and maximum, respectively). RESULTS: Four hundred two patients were surveyed. They had consulted a median of 3 SOIs (interquartile range, 2-6) but described a higher SI: median of 5 SOIs (interquartile range 3-8); p = 0.001.The most consulted SOIs were the physician (83%), other patients (45%), and Facebook (36%). The main differences between SI and the searches actually performed were observed in community lectures by health care professionals (49%), scientific societies (48%), and associations of patients (27%); p < 0.001. These 3 sources showed low level of accessibility. Facebook, press, radio, and YouTube were the least reliable sources. CONCLUSIONS: Patients consulted a median of 3 SOIs but reported a significantly higher SI. Although patients demand more information, the request is leveled at SOIs with difficult accessibility but high reliability.