RESUMO
Peripheral vascular dysfunction, measured as flow-mediated dilation (FMD), is present across all phases of stroke recovery and elevates the risk for recurrent cardiovascular events. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to characterize baseline FMD in individuals' poststroke, with consideration for each phase of stroke recovery. Three databases (PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase) were searched between January 1, 2000 and October 12, 2023 for studies that examined baseline FMD in stroke. Three reviewers conducted abstract and full-text screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. A random effects model was used to estimate FMD across studies. Meta-regression was used to examine the impact of age and time since stroke (acute, subacute, chronic) on FMD. Twenty-eight studies with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke were included. Descriptive statistics for the demographics and FMD values of each study are presented. For the meta-analysis, average estimate FMD was 3.9% (95% CI: 2.5-5.3%). We report a large amount of heterogeneity (Cochrane's Q P value <0.001, and I2 = 99.6%). Differences in average age and the time poststroke between studies were not significantly associated with differences in FMD values. Despite the large heterogeneity for FMD values across studies, our primary finding suggests that FMD remains impaired across all phases of stroke.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This systematic review and meta-analysis offers invaluable insight into poststroke vascular function. Despite the inherent heterogeneity among the 28 studies analyzed, we report that peripheral vascular dysfunction, as quantified by flow-mediated dilation, exists across all stages of stroke recovery. This finding underscores the importance for interventions that focus on improving vascular health and secondary stroke prevention.
Assuntos
Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Vasodilatação , Humanos , Endotélio Vascular/fisiopatologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Vasodilatação/fisiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Deficits in the ability to multitask contribute to gait abnormalities and falls in many at-risk populations. However, it is unclear whether older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) also demonstrate impairments in multitasking. The purpose of this study was to compare multitasking performance in cognitively intact older adults with and without DM and explore its relationship to measures of gait and functional ability. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 40 individuals aged 60 and older with type 2 DM and a matched group of 40 cognitively intact older adults without DM. Multitasking was examined via the ambulatory Walking and Remembering Test (WART) and seated Pursuit Rotor Test (PRT). Self-selected normal and fast walking speed and stride length variability were quantitatively measured, and self-reported functional ability was assessed via the Late Life Function and Disability Index (LLFDI). RESULTS: Participants with DM walked slower and took more steps off path when multitasking during the WART. No between-group differences in multitasking performance were observed on the PRT. Multitasking performance demonstrated little correlation with gait and functional ability in either group. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with DM appear to perform poorly on an ambulatory measure of multitasking. However, we analyzed a relatively small, homogenous sample of older adults with and without type 2 DM and factors such as peripheral neuropathy and the use of multiple comparisons complicate interpretation of the data. Future research should explore the interactions between multitasking and safety, fall risk, and function in this vulnerable population. Clinicians should recognize that an array of factors may contribute to gait and physical dysfunction in older adults with type 2 diabetes, and be prepared to assess and intervene appropriately.