Identification of modifications procuring growth on xylose in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains carrying the Weimberg pathway.

The most prevalent xylose-assimilating pathways in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae, i.e. the xylose isomerase (XI) and the xylose reductase/xylitol dehydrogenase (XR/XDH) pathways, channel the carbon flux through the pentose phosphate pathway and further into glycolysis. In contrast, the oxidative and non-phosphorylative bacterial Weimberg pathway channels the xylose carbon through five steps into the metabolic node α-ketoglutarate (αKG) that can be utilized for growth or diverted into production of various metabolites. In the present study, steps preventing the establishment of a functional Weimberg pathway in S. cerevisiae were identified. Using an original design where a S. cerevisiae strain was expressing the essential four genes of the Caulobacter crescentus pathway (xylB, xylD, xylX, xylA) together with a deletion of FRA2 gene to upregulate the iron-sulfur metabolism, it was shown that the C. crescentus αKG semialdehyde dehydrogenase, XylA was not functional in S. cerevisiae. When replaced by the recently described analog from Corynebacterium glutamicum, KsaD, significantly higher in vitro activity was observed but the strain did not grow on xylose. Adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) on a xylose/glucose medium on this strain led to a loss of XylB, the first step of the Weimberg pathway, suggesting that ALE favored minimizing the inhibiting xylonate accumulation by restricting the upper part of the pathway. Therefore three additional gene copies of the lower Weimberg pathway (XylD, XylX and KsaD) were introduced. The resulting S. cerevisiae strain (ΔΔfra2, xylB, 4x (xylD-xylX-ksaD)) was able to generate biomass from xylose and Weimberg pathway intermediates were detected. To our knowledge this is the first report of a functional complete Weimberg pathway expressed in fungi. When optimized this pathway has the potential to channel xylose towards value-added specialty chemicals such as dicarboxylic acids and diols.

Equality bias impairs collective decision-making across cultures.

We tend to think that everyone deserves an equal say in a debate. This seemingly innocuous assumption can be damaging when we make decisions together as part of a group. To make optimal decisions, group members should weight their differing opinions according to how competent they are relative to one another; whenever they differ in competence, an equal weighting is suboptimal. Here, we asked how people deal with individual differences in competence in the context of a collective perceptual decision-making task. We developed a metric for estimating how participants weight their partner's opinion relative to their own and compared this weighting to an optimal benchmark. Replicated across three countries (Denmark, Iran, and China), we show that participants assigned nearly equal weights to each other's opinions regardless of true differences in their competence-even when informed by explicit feedback about their competence gap or under monetary incentives to maximize collective accuracy. This equality bias, whereby people behave as if they are as good or as bad as their partner, is particularly costly for a group when a competence gap separates its members.