Health care services use in assisted living: a time series analysis.

This article describes British Columbia's regulatory model for assisted living and used time series analysis to examine individuals' use of health care services before and after moving to assisted living. The 4,219 assisted living residents studied were older and predominantly female, with 73 per cent having one or more major chronic conditions. Use of health care services tended to increase before the move to assisted living, drop at the time of the move (most notably for general practitioners, medical specialists, and acute care), and remain low for the 12-month follow-up period. These apparent positive effects are not trivial; the cohort of 1,894 assisted living residents used 18,000 fewer acute care days in the year after, compared to the year before, their move. Future research should address whether and how assisted living affects longer-term pathways of care for older adults and ultimately their function and quality of life.

Patterns of physician follow-up among young cancer survivors: report of the Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Survivors (CAYACS) research program.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency and pattern of physician visits in 1998 to 2000 among childhood and adolescent cancer survivors in British Columbia (BC), to compare their use of physician services with use in the general population, and to examine the effects of clinical and sociodemographic factors on care. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational, population-based cohort study, with a comparison group. Cohort records from population registries were linked to physician claim data and oncology visit records for 1998 to 2000. SETTING: Outpatient physician care in BC. PARTICIPANTS: All (N = 1157) survivors of cancer diagnosed before age 20 years in BC between 1970 and 1992 who survived at least 5 years after diagnosis, and an age-sex frequency-matched population sample of 11 570 individuals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Probability of a physician visit and frequency of physician visits. RESULTS: Approximately 97% of survivors saw at least 1 physician in the 3-year period, compared with 50% of the general population sample. The probability of a GP visit was 96% higher (adjusted 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8 to 2.1), and the likelihood of a specialist visit was 157% higher (adjusted 95% CI 2.4 to 2.8) than for the general population. Survivors were more than twice as likely to see GPs at least 10 times (adjusted relative risk 2.23, 95% CI 2.0 to 2.4) and had 49% more visits than the general population. Cancer diagnosis and treatment affected visit patterns, but socioeconomic status and rural residency did not significantly affect the probability of a visit. CONCLUSION: Demand for physician care among childhood and adolescent cancer survivors is considerably greater than for the general population, and this need persists many years after diagnosis. Physicians need information on the unique health care requirements of this patient group in order to provide appropriate care.

Hospitalisations 1998-2000 in a British Columbia population-based cohort of young cancer survivors: report of the Childhood/Adolescent/Young Adult Cancer Survivors (CAYACS) Research Program.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Because of late effects among survivors of cancer in young people, increased hospitalisations would be expected. This study determined the occurrence, frequency and days in hospital (DIH) of hospital admissions among 5-year survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer diagnosed in British Columbia (BC), compared hospitalisation risk with the general population and examined the impact of sociodemographic, health care system and clinical factors. DESIGN: This population-based study frequency matched 1157 survivors of cancer diagnosed before 20 years of age from 1970 to 1992 from the BC Cancer Registry with 11,570 randomly selected individuals from BC's health insurance plan Client Registry. Administrative hospitalisation records from 1998 to 2000 were linked to study cohorts, and regression and trend analyses were carried out. RESULTS: From 1998 to 2000, 240 (21%) of survivors and 614 (5.3%) of the population sample were admitted to hospital at least once [adjusted OR=4.36 (95% CI 3.68-5.16)]. Hospitalised survivors had a higher average number of admissions (2.0 versus 1.5 admissions, respectively) and longer mean DIH (10.9 versus 7.8d, respectively) than hospitalised population controls. Female gender and older age increased the risk of hospitalisation, as did the presence of a relapse or second cancer by 5 years post-diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Our cohort of child and adolescent cancer survivors had higher odds of hospitalisation, more admissions among those hospitalised and longer stay in hospital compared to the population sample. This has implications for health care system resources and appropriate management of late effects of survivors.

Childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors research program of British Columbia: objectives, study design, and cohort characteristics.

BACKGROUND: The Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Survivors Research Program (CAYACS) has been established in the province of British Columbia (BC), Canada, to carry out research into late effects and survivor care in multiple domains, and to inform policy and practice. PROCEDURE: This program identifies a survivor cohort and comparison groups from population-based registries and links their records to population-based files of outcomes and outcome determinants, to create a research database and conduct studies of long-term outcomes and care. RESULTS: The initial cohort consisted of all 5-year survivors of cancer or a tumor diagnosed under age 25 years from 1970 to 1995, who were residents in BC at the time of diagnosis, and followed till 2000 (3,841 subjects). Seven percent have died, and 77% have treatment information available. Data on death and second cancer occurring in BC are available. Late morbidity and healthcare utilization information is available for 68% of survivors (79% of those diagnosed from 1981). Education outcomes are available for 71% of those born during 1978-1995 and diagnosed under age 15 years. CONCLUSIONS: Use of registries, administrative databases, and record linkage methodologies is a cost-effective and comprehensive means to conduct survivorship research. This program should add to knowledge of risks of late effects and impacts on care, inform development of strategies to manage risks, evaluate the effects of surveillance and interventions, and assess new risks as the cohort ages, more recent survivors enter the cohort, and treatments change.

Trends in long-term care staffing by facility ownership in British Columbia, 1996 to 2006.

BACKGROUND: Long-term care facilities (nursing homes) in British Columbia consist of a mix of for-profit, not-for-profit non-government, and not-for-profit health-region-owned establishments. This study assesses the extent to which staffing levels have changed by facility ownership category. DATA AND METHODS: With data from Statistics Canada's Residential Care Facilities Survey, various types of care hours per resident-day were examined from 1996 through 2006 for the province of British Columbia. Random effects linear regression modeling was used to investigate the effect of year and ownership on total nursing hours per resident-day, adjusting for resident demographics, case mix, and facility size. RESULTS: From 1996 to 2006, crude mean total nursing hours per resident-day rose from 1.95 to 2.13 hours in for-profit facilities (p = 0.06); from 1.99 to 2.48 hours in not-for-profit non-government facilities (p < 0.001); and from 2.25 to 3.30 hours in not-for-profit health-region-owned facilities (p < 0.001). The adjusted rate of increase in total nursing hours per resident-day was significantly greater in not-for-profit health-region-owned facilities. INTERPRETATION: While total nursing hours per resident-day have increased in all facility groups, the rate of increase was greater in not-for-profit facilities operated by health authorities.

Developing strategies to enhance health services research capacity in a predominantly rural Canadian health authority.

CONTEXT: This article outlines the planning, implementation and preliminary evaluation of a research capacity building (RCB) initiative within a predominantly rural Canadian health authority, Interior Health (IH), including initiative characteristics and key activities designed to initiate and enhance health services research capacity within the organization. Interior Health is one of 5 geographic health authorities in British Columbia. Over half of the population IH serves is considered to be rural/remote (approximately 3 people/km2), contributing to difficulties in sharing research information (ie geographical distance to meet in-person and a diverse set of needs and/or priority topics that warrant research support). An initial assessment of IH research capacity in 2006, using an organizational self-assessment tool and discussions with key stakeholders, revealed a need for enhanced communication of health research results, research education and networking opportunities for staff at all levels of the organization. Staff noted barriers to using and sharing research such as lack of time, resources and skills for, and value placed on, participating in research, as well as lack of awareness of linkages with local academic health researchers, including faculty located at two universities within the region. In response to this baseline assessment and stakeholder feedback, short-term funding has allowed for the initial development of RCB strategies in both urban and rural/remote areas of the region, including: IH Research Brown Bag Lunch Seminars; IH Research Skills Workshop Series; literature syntheses/summaries on priority topic areas; research collaboration/partnerships with health authorities, research networks and academic researchers; and an annual IH Research Conference. ISSUE: Although currently a poorly defined term, RCB is a concept that speaks to the need for improvement in the skills and assets that can facilitate the production and application research. It is difficult to gauge the progress of RCB initiatives when there is debate as to what the optimal outcomes and indicators of success are. Most definitions of RCB have focused on enhancing the ability to do research; however, there appears to be growing support for a more inclusive definition that also addresses the ability to use and apply research. The use and application of existing research findings, often referred to as knowledge translation and exchange (KTE), is one means of building organizational research capacity, and is particularly important within a rural health region where time, resources, and research skills are often limited. LESSONS LEARNED: Dedicated RCB resources and staff support, as well as enthusiasm, academic partnerships, and identification of research 'champions' within the organization, have been critical in building research capacity within the region. Video- and teleconferencing, as well as webcasts, have allowed for expansion of RCB activities to rural/remote communities. Preliminary evaluation parameters to date suggest that the information translated during the RCB activities is motivating different groups within IH to initiate their own research and/or KTE strategies. Although preliminary results indicate improvements in research capacity within the organization, barriers to research participation such as time, funding, and communication are still evident 3 years post-implementation. Additional challenges to building research capacity within a rural health authority include geographical distances, diverse 'hot'/priority topics in need of research support, lack of protected time and limited research-related human resource capacity. The translation of research evidence and enhancement of staff research skills through the IH RCB initiatives has helped to achieve new standards of excellence in the planning, management and delivery of all health services across the predominantly rural health authority.

A results-based logic model for primary healthcare: a conceptual foundation for population-based information systems.

A conceptual framework for population-based information systems is needed if these data are to be created and used to generate information to support healthcare policy, management and practice communities that seek to improve quality and account for progress in primary healthcare (PHC) renewal. This paper describes work conducted in British Columbia since 2003 to (1) create a Results-Based Logic Model for PHC using the approach of the Treasury Board of Canada in designing management and accountability frameworks, together with a literature review, policy analysis and broad consultation with approximately 650 people, (2) identify priorities for information within that logic model, (3) use the logic model and priorities within it to implement performance measurement and research and (4) identify how information systems need to be structured to assess the impact of variation or change in PHC inputs, activities and outputs on patient, population and healthcare system outcomes. The resulting logic model distinguishes among outcomes for which the PHC sector should be held more or less accountable.

Measuring the performance of primary healthcare: existing capacity and potential information to support population-based analyses.

WHAT DID WE DO?: We reviewed the degree to which existing population-based data in Canada can be used to describe and report on primary healthcare (PHC) performance. We identified gaps in current data sources and made recommendations on how these gaps might be addressed to support quality improvement and public reporting for PHC. WHAT DID WE LEARN?: Population-based survey and administrative data are available to describe population characteristics and other contextual factors for PHC, as well as some aspects of the material, financial and human resources inputs, and selected activities and decisions at the policy, management and clinical levels. Existing data can also be used to describe some volumes and types of PHC outputs. However, we currently have limited population-based data to assess selected qualities of PHC services (e.g., coordination and interpersonal effectiveness) and most immediate outcomes of PHC. The ability to link data to assess outcomes and attribute changes in outcomes to PHC is limited. A full report describing more than 130 indicators from existing data sources and gaps in current data is available at www.chspr.ubc.ca. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS?: As we look to the future, there is a clear need to build on existing data sources to expand PHC data capacity in Canada. Data are needed to inform an understanding of PHC outputs, outcomes and the linkages among PHC dimensions. Commitment to a comprehensive PHC data collection strategy and information system is needed across Canadian provinces and territories to inform policy development and planning, to evaluate PHC redesign initiatives and to meet the accountability expectations of Canadians.

Developing and maintaining a population research registry to support primary healthcare research.

WHAT DID WE DO?: This paper describes the creation of a population research registry as part of an information system to support primary healthcare (PHC) research in British Columbia. The population registry includes all residents of the province who were either eligible to use or actually used healthcare services, together with demographic, geographic, health status, registration and service use data. The PHC population research registry is built using administrative data inputs, and data are anonymized to comply with privacy and confidentiality standards. WHAT DID WE LEARN?: The registry provides data to undertake research into PHC needs and service utilization. It facilitates both population-based research as well as research on population subgroups. Combined with anonymous physician and utilization data, the information system can be used to study service utilization rates for population-based analyses. Over the longer term, the information will contribute to our understanding of PHC qualities and outcomes. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS?: Continued completeness of the population research registry depends upon full administrative source data. Planning to ensure complete data capture is critical both for the research registry and our ability to undertake population-based PHC research.

Population patterns of chronic health conditions, co-morbidity and healthcare use in Canada: implications for policy and practice.

Managing chronic health conditions is a daily reality for approximately nine million Canadians, and the numbers of people affected are expected to increase as our population ages, particularly if risk factors that contribute to poor health continue to rise. These conditions impact health and well-being and represent a significant, and growing, healthcare and economic burden. The Health Council of Canada has focused its attention on the prevention and management of chronic conditions to encourage discussion of the changes to public policy, healthcare management and health services delivery required to improve health outcomes for Canadians. In December 2007, the Health Council released a report that described the health and healthcare use among Canadians who have chronic conditions as well as their self- reported experiences with chronic illness care. It highlighted initiatives under way in all jurisdictions to improve the situation. In order to inform that report, we analyzed population-based survey data from the Canadian Community Health Survey to report on patterns of health and healthcare use by community-dwelling youth and adults who have one or more of seven high-prevalence, high-impact chronic conditions. We demonstrated that the vast majority of people with chronic conditions have a regular medical doctor and visit community-based doctors and nurses frequently. Not surprisingly, people with chronic conditions use healthcare services more often and more intensively than do those without, and the intensity of service use increases as the numbers of conditions go up. The 33% of Canadians with one or more of seven chronic conditions account for approximately 51% of family physician/general practitioner consultations, 55% of specialist consultations, 66% of nursing consultations and 72% of nights spent in a hospital. This information highlights the imperative of immediate, comprehensive and sustained attention to undertake proven strategies to delay or prevent the onset of chronic conditions and to improve the quality of primary healthcare to prevent complications, reduce the need for more expensive health services and secure a better quality of life for Canadians.

Care outcomes in long-term care facilities in British Columbia, Canada. Does ownership matter?

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated whether for-profit (FP) versus not-for-profit (NP) ownership of long-term care facilities resulted in a difference in hospital admission and mortality rates among facility residents in British Columbia, Canada. RESEARCH DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study used administrative data on all residents of British Columbia long-term care facilities between April 1, 1996, and August 1, 1999 (n = 43,065). Hospitalizations were examined for 6 diagnoses (falls, pneumonia, anemia, dehydration, urinary tract infection, and decubitus ulcers and/or gangrene), which are considered to be reflective of facility quality of care. In addition to FP versus NP status, facilities were divided into ownership subgroups to investigate outcomes by differences in governance and operational structures. RESULTS: We found that, overall, FP facilities demonstrated higher adjusted hospitalization rates for pneumonia, anemia, and dehydration and no difference for falls, urinary tract infections, or DCU/gangrene. FP facilities demonstrated higher adjusted hospitalization rates compared with NP facilities attached to a hospital, amalgamated to a regional health authority, or that were multisite. This effect was not present when comparing FP facilities to NP single-site facilities. There was no difference in mortality rates in FP versus NP facilities. CONCLUSIONS: The higher adjusted hospitalization rates in FP versus NP facilities is consistent with previous research from U.S. authors. However, the superior performance by the NP sector is driven by NP-owned facilities connected to a hospital or health authority, or that had more than one site of operation.

Staffing levels in not-for-profit and for-profit long-term care facilities: does type of ownership matter?

BACKGROUND: Currently there is a lot of debate about the advantages and disadvantages of for-profit health care delivery. We examined staffing ratios for direct-care and support staff in publicly funded not-for-profit and for-profit nursing homes in British Columbia. METHODS: We obtained staffing data for 167 long-term care facilities and linked these to the type of facility and ownership of the facility. All staff were members of the same bargaining association and received identical wages in both not-for-profit and for-profit facilities. Similar public funding is provided to both types of facilities, although the amounts vary by the level of functional dependence of the residents. We compared the mean number of hours per resident-day provided by direct-care staff (registered nurses, licensed practical nurses and resident care aides) and support staff (housekeeping, dietary and laundry staff) in not-for-profit versus for-profit facilities, after adjusting for facility size (number of beds) and level of care. RESULTS: The nursing homes included in our study comprised 76% of all such facilities in the province. Of the 167 nursing homes examined, 109 (65%) were not-for-profit and 58 (35%) were for-profit; 24% of the for-profit homes were part of a chain, and the remaining homes were owned by a single operator. The mean number of hours per resident-day was higher in the not-for-profit facilities than in the for-profit facilities for both direct-care and support staff and for all facility levels of care. Compared with for-profit ownership, not-for-profit status was associated with an estimated 0.34 more hours per resident-day (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18-0.49, p < 0.001) provided by direct-care staff and 0.23 more hours per resident-day (95% CI 0.15-0.30, p < 0.001) provided by support staff. INTERPRETATION: Not-for-profit facility ownership is associated with higher staffing levels. This finding suggests that public money used to provide care to frail eldery people purchases significantly fewer direct-care and support staff hours per resident-day in for-profit long-term care facilities than in not-for-profit facilities.

Applying a risk-adjustment framework to primary care: can we improve on existing measures?

Outcome-based performance measurement and prospective payment are common features of the current managed care environment. Increasingly, primary care clinicians and health care organizations are being asked to assume financial risk for enrolled patients based on negotiated capitation rates. Therefore, the need for methods to account for differences in risk among patients enrolled in primary care organizations has become critical. Although current risk-adjustment measures represent significant advances in the measurement of morbidity in primary care populations, they may not adequately capture all the dimensions of patient risk relevant to primary care. We propose a risk-adjustment framework for primary care that incorporates clinical features related to patients' health status and nonclinical factors related to patients' health behaviors, psychosocial factors, and social environment. Without this broad perspective, clinicians with more unhealthy and more challenging populations are at risk of being inadequately compensated and inequitably compared with peers. The risk-adjustment framework should also be of use to health care organizations that have been mandated to deliver high-quality primary care but are lacking the necessary tools.