Anaesthesia praCtice for Caesarean dElivery Snapshot Study (ACCESS): Protocol and baseline characteristics of registered centres.

BACKGROUND: Specific guidelines to manage caesarean delivery anaesthesia are lacking. A European multicentre study, ACCESS investigates caesarean delivery anaesthesia management in European centres. In order to identify ACCESS participating centres, a registration survey was created. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current report is to describe the characteristics of ACCESS study participating centres, the rationale for the ACCESS study and the study methodology. DESIGN AND SETTING: The ACCESS study is a European multicentre cross-sectional study to describe anaesthesia management for caesarean delivery (CD) using a snapshot (2-week) design. The ACCESS registration survey gathered: contact details for National Coordinators (NC); Lead Investigators (LI) per centre; centre annual CD volume; expected no. of CD during 2-week snapshot window; centre practice information; data collection language. The ACCESS registration survey was launched July 2022 (Google Forms, Google Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA) and distributed through personal connections, national and international societies, social media networks, during Euroanaesthesia 2023, through the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care newsletter. RESULTS: The ACCESS registration survey identified Lead Investigators for 418 centres, in 32 countries, representing an anticipated number of 15,073 CD cases over the planned 12-month study period. A median (range) of 20 (2 to 400) CD cases are anticipated per centre during the 2-week snapshot window. Most 366/418 (87.6%) centres are small, ≤2000 annual CD cases, 42 are medium 2000-5000 cases and 10 are large, ≥5000 annual CD cases. Registered centres reported in 134 (32.0%) centres that anaesthesia for caesarean delivery is performed mostly by a specialist obstetric anaesthesiologist. CONCLUSION: The ACCESS registration survey revealed variability in volume and CD practice as well as training-levels and staffing among European countries. The ACCESS study (https://www.access-study.org/) aims to generate practice data to guide CD anaesthetic management strategies.

Obstetric anaesthesia manpower and service provision issues (introduction and European perspective).

Global health is an important and far-reaching concept in which health and access to surgical and anaesthetic care is crucial. Universal access to anaesthesia is a challenge in many countries. Manpower shortages are an important cause of difficulties and each European country has found different ways of facing a lack of healthcare professionals. In obstetric anaesthesia, the availability of competent anaesthesiologists has been related to the morbidity and mortality outcomes of patients. In this narrative review, authors from different European countries explain how manpower is managed in obstetric anaesthesia in delivery suites and obstetric operating rooms in different settings. To address manpower difficulties and issues, the goals are to achieve a minimum standard of care and at the same time, to promote clinical excellence through training, delegation to younger or less experienced colleagues, direct or at-a-distance supervision, or other means. The experience of sharing knowledge about the way in which manpower and service provision are organised in other healthcare settings is a significant opportunity to develop strategies for advancing tomorrow's obstetric anaesthesia in the world. While taking into account the level of socio-economic development in different countries, the aim is to standardise practice and workload organisation. Co-operative international projects in training and education in obstetric anaesthesia are ways in which better obstetric patient care can be achieved in the future.

On-Line Assessment (OLA) as a preparation for the European Diploma in Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (EDAIC), a retrospective observational study on the results and the potential impact on the Part-I examination.

BACKGROUND: The EDAIC is a diploma of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC). which is obtained after passing two a written MCQ-based (Part1) and a structured oral (part2) examinationIn 2011, a formative On-Line Assessment (OLA) was introduced to help candidates to prepare for EDAIC Part1 examination (EDAIC-I). This retrospective observational study evaluated the results of the OLA and its impact on the EDAIC-1 between 2013 and 2019. METHODS: After obtaining the authorisation from the ESAIC Examinations Committee, all the results of candidates registered to OLA and/or EDAIC-I between 2013 and 2019 were included. The total number of registrations and the results were analysed and compared for both. RESULTS: Over 17,000 candidates (17,401) sat any of the written exams of the EDAIC. The overall pass-rate for the EDAIC-1 was 68.95%. The OLA score increased significantly with the number of attempts for Paper A (Basic Science) (p=0.006). Overall success of the EDAIC-I was higher in candidates who took the OLA before (72.9% versus 68.3%; OR: 1.25; 95% CI [1.12; 1.39]; p<0.001). Candidates who failed in their first attempt for EDAIC-I were more likely to sit the exam again if they had performed the OLA before (OR: 1.396, 95% CI [1.237; 1.574]; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The OLA was associated with an improvement of the results in basic science and success rate in the EDAIC-I.

Practical recommendations in the obstetrical patient with a COVID-19 infection. / Recomendaciones prácticas en la paciente obstétrica con infección por COVID-19.

COVID-19 infection also affects obstetric patients. Regular obstetric care has continued despite the pandemic. Case series of obstetric patients have been published. Neuroaxial techniques appear to be safe and it is important to obtain the highest possible rate of success of the blocks before a cesarean section. For this reason, it is recommended that the blocks be carried out by senior anesthesiologists. The protection and safety of professionals is a key point and in case of general anesthesia, so it is also recommended to call to the most expert anesthesiologist. Seriously ill patients should be recognized quickly and early, in order to provide them with the appropriate treatment as soon as possible. Susceptibility to thrombosis makes prophylactic anticoagulation a priority.

European Diploma in Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care in Spain: Results for the part 1 and part 2 exams in the last five years. Are we going in the right direction? / Diploma Europeo en Anestesiología y Cuidados Intensivos en España: resultados de los exámenes de las partes 1 y 2 de los últimos cinco años. ¿Vamos por el buen camino?

BACKGROUND: The European Diploma in Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (EDAIC) has become a standard of quality among Spanish anaesthesiologists. The aim of this retrospective observational study was to assess the results of Spanish participants for the Part1 and Part2 exams over a recent five years period from 2012 to 2016 and 2013 to 2017, respectively. MATERIAL AND METHODS: After obtaining the authorization from the European Society of Anaesthesiology, the results of both parts of the EDAIC exams were anonymously analysed for five years. We analysed the number of registrations, the pass rates, the cause for failure and the mean scores for basic sciences (paperA of part1 exam and the two first vivas of part2 exam) and clinical anaesthesia and intensive care (paperB of part1 exam and the two last vivas of part2 exam). Quantitative variables were analysed using the one-way analysis of variance, and qualitative variables using the chi-square test for trends. The level of statistical significance was set at P<.05. RESULTS: For the written part1 exam, 1,189 of a total of 10,954 candidates (10.85%) were registered in Spanish centres, reflecting the global growth of the exam (P=.29). The pass rate was 62.1%, with no significant differences from other countries (P=.38). Basic sciences were involved in 84.1% of failing candidates. Mean scores were 71.74±5.98% for basic science (paperA) and 74.48±4.29% for clinical anaesthesiology (paperB). Regarding the part2 exam, 72.4% of the candidates who had passed the part1 exam registered for the oral part2, with a pass rate of 62.7% versus 62.2% in the rest of the world (P=.91). Failing in the basic sciences sections of the part2 resulted in 93.8% of candidates failing the part2 exam. Bad fails were registered in 56 (31.5%) of failing candidates, of which 71.3% occurred in the basic sciences vivas. Isolated bad fails only occurred in 7 (3.9%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: The evolution of the EDAIC in Spain has been very similar to evolution of the EDAIC in the rest of the world. Further efforts to improve knowledge in basic sciences and better preparation in the technique of oral examination should improve the pass rate of the EDAIC examinations from an ever-increasing cohort of candidates.

Use of the cumulative sum method (CUSUM) to assess the learning curves of ultrasound-guided continuous femoral nerve block. / Método de suma acumulada (CUSUM) para evaluar las curvas de aprendizaje del bloqueo femoral continuo guiado por ecografía.

BACKGROUND: Although ultrasound is a basic competence for anaesthesia residents (AR) there is few data available on the learning process. This prospective observational study aims to assess the learning process of ultrasound-guided continuous femoral nerve block and to determine the number of procedures that a resident would need to perform in order to reach proficiency using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method. METHODS: We recruited 19 AR without previous experience. Learning curves were constructed using the CUSUM method for ultrasound-guided continuous femoral nerve block considering 2 success criteria: a decrease of pain score>2 in a [0-10] scale after 15minutes, and time required to perform it. RESULTS: We analyse data from 17 AR for a total of 237 ultrasound-guided continuous femoral nerve blocks. 8/17 AR became proficient for pain relief, however all the AR who did more than 12 blocks (8/8) became proficient. As for time of performance 5/17 of AR achieved the objective of 12minutes, however all the AR who did more than 20 blocks (4/4) achieved it. CONCLUSIONS: The number of procedures needed to achieve proficiency seems to be 12, however it takes more procedures to reduce performance time. The CUSUM methodology could be useful in training programs to allow early interventions in case of repeated failures, and develop competence-based curriculum.

Modern approach to an old technique: Narrative revision of techniques used to locate the epidural space. / Visión moderna sobre una técnica antigua: revisión narrativa de técnicas de localización del espacio epidural.

Since the first description of the epidural technique during the 1920s, the continuous progress of knowledge of the anatomy and physiology of the epidural space has allowed the development of different techniques to locate this space while increasing both the safety and efficacy of the procedure. The most common techniques used today are based on the two main characteristics of the epidural space: the difference in distensibility between the ligamentum flavum and the epidural space, and the existence of negative pressure within the epidural space. However, over recent years, technological advances have allowed the development of new techniques to locate the epidural space based on other physical properties of tissues. Some are still in the experimental phase, but others, like ultrasound-location have reached a clinical phase and are being used increasingly in daily practice.

Perioperative temperature control: Survey on current practices.

INTRODUCTION: Prevention of perioperative hypothermia decreases morbidity and mortality, as well as hospital costs. This study was conducted to evaluate the level of implementation of protocols in 3 tertiary Spanish University Hospitals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A survey among anaesthesiologists assessed estimated importance and clinical practice in terms of prevention of perioperative hypothermia. Results were compared depending on their experience. P<.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 116 anaesthesiologists answered the survey, of whom 48 (41.3%) were residents, 32 (27.6%) were staff with less than 10 years of experience, and 36 (31.1%) staff with 10 years or more of experience, In a 0-10 importance scale, prevention of hypothermia was scored 7.49±1,79, with no difference between groups (P=.58). Younger staff were more concerned of the end surgery temperature than other colleagues (P=.02). The most usual practice was a combination warming the intravenous fluids and an electric blanket (55%). Only 20% of the anaesthesiologists monitored temperature intra-operatively, even though 75% considered it an important parameter. No unit had a written protocol for prevention of perioperative hypothermia. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Despite the absence of prevention protocols, the anaesthesiologists were aware of the importance maintaining a normal peri-operative temperature, but this awareness is still not enough to influence their perioperative management to diagnose and prevent hypothermia. A harmonisation of practice at local, regional and national level could improve this practice in the future.

Transoesophageal Doppler-guided fluid management in massive obstetric haemorrhage.

Massive postpartum haemorrhage is a major worldwide cause of maternal mortality. Management requires intensive fluid resuscitation and blood transfusion. Although fluid therapy is often directed by the results of a full blood count and clotting screen, recent technological advances allow monitoring of haemodynamic function and cardiac output. Transoesophageal Doppler technology has been used during haemorrhagic shock in non-obstetric patients. We present the case of a caesarean delivery complicated by massive haemorrhage where transoesophageal Doppler monitoring with the CardioQ-ODM™ was used to guide fluid therapy and the use of vasoactive drugs.

[Reasons residents choose to specialize in anesthesiology and postoperative critical care in the autonomous community of Madrid]. / Motivación de los residentes de Anestesia-Reanimación de la Comunidad de Madrid en la elección de su especialidad.

OBJECTIVES: Our main objective was to determine the reasons why residents chose to specialize in anesthesiology and postoperative critical care in the autonomous community of Madrid. We also wished to know if prior contact with this specialty influenced their choice, if those who chose it as a second specialization differed from those who were doing a first residency, what expectations the residents had and if they had been met, and if they were satisfied with their training. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Survey of all residents in anesthesiology and postoperative critical care medicine in the community of Madrid between November 2008 and February 2010. The questionnaire items covered demographic data, prior specialty training, undergraduate contact with the specialty, reasons for choosing this specialty (technical, social, or employment-related interests), satisfaction, and expectations met. RESULTS: We received 89 valid questionnaires, a sample that represented 35% of the residents. The reasons expressed most often were learning and performing techniques (97.8%); that the specialty was dynamic, with broad theoretical and practical content (98.9%), and an interest in providing critical care (93.3%). These 3 reasons were considered important or very important by most of the respondents; 55.8% considered that learning and carrying out techniques was the most important reason. All the respondents who had previously done specialty training said they were dissatisfied. Prior contact with the specialty was associated with having different reasons and interests, such as an interest in pain (F = .037) or emulating a role model (P = .014). CONCLUSIONS: The specialty's mix of theoretical and practical content and the chance to perform techniques and provide critical care are the features the residents find most attractive. Residents who already have another specialty are less satisfied and their expectations are not as well met.

A randomized control trial of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with and without a background infusion using levobupivacaine and fentanyl.

BACKGROUND: Continuous infusion associated with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) is used in many maternal units. This randomized controlled study evaluated the effect of a 10 mL/h background infusion associated with a 10 mL-20 minutes lockout time demand-only PCEA protocol using L-bupivacaine plus fentanyl in terms of local anaesthetic consumption, pain management and maternal satisfaction. METHODS: Forty consenting parturients were randomly assigned to receive a 0.125% levobupivacaine plus 1.5 mcg/mL fentanyl PCEA (10 mL bolus with a 20 min lock time) with or without a 10 mL/h background infusion. The total volume of local anesthetic, the number of PCEA demand boluses, pain levels, delivery outcome and maternal satisfaction were evaluated. RESULTS: The total volume of local anaesthetic was 35[20-120] mL in demand-only PCEA group versus 63.8[22.5-123] mL in PCEA plus background infusion group (P<0.001). This decrease in total volume was associated with an increase of self-administrated boluses in demand-only group (3.5[2-12] boluses, versus 1[0-3] bolus in PCEA plus background infusion group) (P<0.001). Pain scores were comparable between groups at any time of the study (P>0.05). Maternal satisfaction did not differ between groups (10[8-10] vs. 10[7-10]; P=0.11). CONCLUSION: When a levobupivacaine plus fentanyl PCEA protocol with high volume boluses and long lockout interval is used for labour analgesia, the background infusion increased the total local anesthetic dose with no change in pain management and maternal satisfaction.

[Acute early postpartum cardiac failure associated with dilated cardiomyopathy: successful treatment with intra-aortic balloon counter-pulsation and levosimendan]. / Défaillance cardiaque aiguë associée à une cardiomyopathie dilatée en post-partum précoce: traitement par ballon de contrepulsion aortique et lévosimendan.

The use of levosimendan (Simdax(®)) was described in cases of acute cardiac failure in patients with peripartum cardiopmyopathy. We report the case of a 36 years old Philippine woman with an undiagnosed dilated myocardiopathy. She developed an acute severe left ventricular dysfunction in the early postpartum period after a cesarean section, possibly related to the recurrence of an unknown peripartum myocardiopathy. Due to failure of the conventional treatment with diuretics and inotropic support, an intra-aortic balloon with counter-pulsation was inserted. In rescue, treatment with levosimendan permitted to wean the patient from haemodynamic support, and a heart transplant was probably avoided. Three months later, a new echocardiography showed a persistent left ventricular dilation and a still marked alteration of left ventricular ejection fraction (28%).