RESUMO
While most melanomas can be distinguished from nevi by histopathology, the histology is ambiguous for some melanocytic tumors, contributing to diagnostic uncertainty. Therefore molecular assays, including FISH or SNP array, and more recently a gene expression test (myPath, Myriad Genetics) have been proposed to aid in the work-up of ambiguous tumors. Two hundred and sixty-eight prospectively submitted cases were gathered, with the goal of comparing the myPath assay to morphologic diagnosis in (1) morphologically unequivocal cases (198), and to morphologic diagnosis and FISH in (2) morphologically ambiguous cases (70). Melanoma FISH was performed using probes for 6p25, 6q23, 11q13, Cep6, 9p21, and Cep9 and scored according to established criteria. The myPath assay was scored by the manufacturer as benign, indeterminate, or malignant. In the unequivocal group, myPath assay showed 75% agreement with morphologic diagnosis, with 67% sensitivity and 81% specificity. In the ambiguous group, FISH and myPath showed 69% inter-test agreement. For these cases agreement with histopathologic interpretation was 84% for FISH and 74% for myPath. Sensitivity and specificity of FISH was 61 and 100%, 50 and 93% for myPath, respectively. Cases from both groups in which myPath was discordant with either morphologic diagnosis and/or FISH (81/268 cases), were submitted for evaluation by two experienced dermatopathologist and also by SNP-array. SNP-array results correlated better than FISH, which correlated better than myPath, with the morphologic interpretation. Our findings document that molecular diagnostics show good correlation with consensus diagnoses, but discordant results occur, and vary in level of correlation with consensus interpretations. Studies with long-term outcomes data within specific ambiguous lesion subsets are required to establish the accuracy of this test, as each molecular diagnostic technique has limitations based on both lack of clinical outcomes data in ambiguous melanocytic tumors and in terms of their sensitivity and specificity in melanocytic lesion subtypes.
Assuntos
Perfilação da Expressão Gênica/métodos , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Nevo Pigmentado/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Humanos , Hibridização in Situ Fluorescente/métodos , Melanoma/classificação , Nevo Pigmentado/classificação , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Neoplasias Cutâneas/classificaçãoRESUMO
ALK rearrangements occur in up to 10% of spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms. No reported cases have shown homozygous deletion of 9p21 (CDKN2A) or gains of 6p25 (RREB1) or 11q13 (CCND1), which have been associated with aggressive clinical behavior. Here we report 2 unique cases. Case 1 occurred in a 9-year-old male with a 14-mm nodule on the anterior left thigh. Biopsy revealed an ALK-positive Spitz tumor containing an irregular nodule of densely packed melanocytes with increased mitoses and loss of p16 immunoreactivity. FISH analysis showed homozygous deletion of 9p21 and gain of 6p25. Sentinel lymph node biopsy revealed small subcapsular foci of tumor. Case 2 occurred in a 7-year-old female with a 12-mm nodule on the anterior right ankle. Biopsy revealed an ALK-positive Spitz tumor containing an expansile nodule of pleomorphic epithelioid melanocytes with numerous mitoses and loss of p16 immunoreactivity. By FISH, the nodule showed homozygous deletion of 9p21 and gains of 6p25 and 11q13. Our cases show the transformation of tumors produced by an activating kinase fusion gene (ALK) through secondary genetic changes including loss of tumor suppressor activity (CDKN2A). Long-term follow up will be important to further define the behavior of these unique Spitz tumors.