Evaluation of NU-FlexSIV Socket Performance for Military Service Members with Transfemoral Amputation.

Ischial containment sockets are the current standard of care for military service members with transfemoral amputation. However, they fit intimately with the ischium, which may limit hip motion and contribute to proximal socket discomfort, a common complaint among prosthesis users. Subischial sockets, such as the newly described Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum (NU-FlexSIV) Socket technique, do not interact with the ischium, potentially increasing hip motion and improving comfort. PURPOSE: To transfer the NU-FlexSIV Socket technique to military prosthetists and evaluate performance among military service members with transfemoral amputation. STUDY DESIGN: case series. METHODS: Four of the 11 enrolled subjects completed the study protocol comparing the NU-FlexSIV Socket to the ischial containment socket. Gait kinematics (over ground and on stairs), physical performance measures (Four-Square Step Test, T-test of Agility, and an obstacle course), limb-socket motion, and socket comfort were assessed after accommodation time in each socket. RESULTS: While wearing the NU-FlexSIV Socket, sagittal plane hip motion generally increased while coronal plane trunk motion and walking speed remained largely unaffected during over ground walking. During stair ascent, sagittal plane hip motion increased while wearing the NU-FlexSIV Socket, with minimal changes in walking speed for all subjects. Pre- and post-walking fluoroscopy measures suggest fit of the NU-FlexSIV Socket was less affected by activity. Most subjects reported that the NU-FlexSIV Socket was more comfortable for sitting but some found it less comfortable for walking and running. Performance measure results were mixed. Although attempts were made to consistently implement the NU-FlexSIV Socket technique, some challenges were experienced. CONCLUSIONS: The NU-FlexSIV Socket provided greater hip motion across a variety of tasks without adversely affecting other movement mechanics but did not consistently improve socket comfort. Variability in the liners and socket materials used may have contributed to variability in results. Overall, the design was a viable alternative to traditional ischial containment sockets for some individuals with transfemoral amputation.

The effect of ankle foot orthosis alignment on walking in individuals treated for traumatic lower extremity injuries.

Limb salvage surgeries are performed to treat a variety of lower limb pathologies and traumatic injuries. Individuals who have undergone limb salvage surgeries may require an ankle foot orthosis (AFO) to compensate for limb impairments and restore walking ability. Understanding the effects of AFO design parameters on gait biomechanics is important to refine AFO prescription criteria. In this study sagittal plane kinematic and kinetic data, muscle activity and alignment preference were examined as individuals treated for traumatic lower extremity injuries (N=12) walked over level ground with Plantarflexed (PF), Neutral, and Dorsiflexed (DF) aligned AFOs. A PF alignment resulted in earlier center of pressure progression (p<0.007) and a resulting decrease in both internal knee extensor moment (p<0.001) and quadriceps and soleus muscle activity (p<0.014) compared to the Neutral and DF alignments without affecting the lower limb support moment. A clear alignment preference was observed, with eight participants preferring the PF over the Neutral and DF alignments. The increase in internal knee extensor moment between the PF and DF alignments in the present study is consistent with previous investigations in other patient populations, suggesting a more DF aligned AFO may affect the knee joint moment similarly across patient populations. The results of this study suggest AFO alignment is an important design parameter that affects ankle and knee joint moments and muscle activity and should be carefully considered during AFO design and clinical fitting.

Relation between postural sway magnitude and metabolic energy cost during upright standing on a compliant surface.

Postural control performance is often described in terms of postural sway magnitude, assuming that lower sway magnitude reflects better performance. However, people do not typically minimize sway magnitude when performing a postural control task. Possibly, other criteria are satisfied when people select the amount of sway they do. Minimal metabolic cost has been suggested as such a criterion. The aim of this study was to experimentally test the relation between sway magnitude and metabolic cost to establish whether metabolic cost could be a potential optimization criterion in postural control. Nineteen healthy subjects engaged in two experiments in which different magnitudes of sway were evoked during upright standing on a foam surface while metabolic energy expenditure, center of pressure (CoP) excursion, and muscle activation were recorded. In one experiment, sway was manipulated by visual feedback of CoP excursion. The other experiment involved verbal instructions of standing still, natural or relaxed. In both experiments, metabolic cost changed with sway magnitude in an asymmetric parabolic fashion, with a minimum around self-selected sway magnitudes and a larger increase at small compared with large sway magnitudes. This metabolic response was paralleled by a change in tonic and phasic EMG activity in the major leg muscles. It is concluded that these results are in line with the notion that metabolic cost can be an optimization criterion used to set postural control and as such could account for the magnitude of naturally occurring postural sway in healthy individuals, although the pathway remains to be elucidated.