Off-Label Use of Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Valves to Treat Pure Aortic Regurgitation.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in native pure aortic regurgitation (AR) with off-label use of balloon-expandable valves (BEV) has been reported. However, there are scant data regarding optimal oversizing and its safety, and our study assessed BEV oversizing and outcomes of TAVI. Thirteen consecutive tricuspid aortic valve patients who underwent transfemoral TAVIs for pure AR with Sapien BEV at our center between 2019 and 2023 (69.2% males, mean age 80.8 years, Society of Thoracic Surgeons 4.0%) were divided into small annulus (SA) group (≤618 mm2) where ≥20% oversizing is achievable based on published data on BEV overexpansion, and larger annulus (LA) group (>618 mm2). Overexpansion and actual oversizing were measured on postprocedural computed tomography scan. Technical success was 92.3% with 1 valve embolization in the LA group. The postprocedural computed tomography showed a mean 28.3% oversizing, significantly higher in SA (31.2%) than in LA group (19.4%), p = 0.0092. Oversizing ≥20% was achieved in 100% SA versus 33.3% LA patients (p = 0.046). In conclusion, TAVI in pure AR with oversized Sapien BEV showed good procedural and short-term outcomes when ≥20% oversizing was predictably achievable.

The role of the vascular surgeon in transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the standard treatment for severe aortic valve stenosis in patients at increased surgical risk. Percutaneous transfemoral (TF) is the access of choice due to its reduced invasiveness and perioperative morbidity/mortality compared with the trans-axillary, aortic, and apical routes. On the other hand, vascular access complications (VACs) of the TF access are associated with prolonged hospitalization, 30-day, and 1-year mortality. In addition, the concomitance of peripheral arterial disease may require associated endovascular management. A multidisciplinary team with Interventional Cardiologists and Vascular Surgeons may minimize the rate of VACs in patients with challenging femoral-iliac access or concomitant disease of other vascular districts, thus optimizing the outcome of TF-TAVI. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of Vascular Surgeons in TF TAVI procedures. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center review of all TF-TAVI procedures assisted by Vascular Surgeons between January 2016 and December 2020 in a high-volume tertiary hospital. Pre, intra, and postoperative data were analyzed by a dedicated group of Interventional Cardiologists and Vascular Surgeons. VACs were defined according with the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC) three guidelines. The outcomes of TF-TAVI procedures with Vascular Surgeons involvement were assessed as study's endpoints. RESULTS: Overall, 937 TAVI procedures were performed with a TF approach ranging between 78% (2016) and 98% (2020). Vascular Surgeons were involved in 67 (7%) procedures with the following indications: concomitant abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR + TAVI) - 3 (4%), carotid stenosis (TAVI + CAS) - 2 (3%), hostile femoral/iliac access, or VACs - 62 (93%). Balloon angioplasty of iliac artery pre-TAVI implantation was performed in 51 cases (conventional PTA: 38/51%-75%; conventional PTA + intravascular lithotripsy: 13/51%-25%; stenting: 5/51%-10%). TAVI procedure was successfully completed by percutaneous TF approach in all 62 cases with challenging femoral/iliac access. VACs necessitating interventions were 18/937 (2%) cases, localized to the common femoral or common/external iliac artery in 15/18 (83%) and 3/18 (17%) cases, respectively. They were managed by surgical or endovascular maneuvers in 3/18 (17%) and 15/18 (83%) cases, respectively. Fifteen/18 (83%) VACs were treated during the index procedure. There was no procedure-related mortality or 30-day readmission. CONCLUSION: In our experience, Vascular Surgeon assistance in TAVI procedures was not infrequent and allowed safe and effective device introduction through challenging TF access. Similarly, the concomitant significant disease of other vascular districts could be safely addressed, potentially reducing postoperative related mortality and morbidity. The implementation of multidisciplinary team with interventional cardiologists and vascular surgeons should be encouraged whenever possible.

Predictors of bail-out stenting in patients with small vessel disease treated with drug-coated balloon percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have shown comparable results with drug-eluting stents in small vessel disease (SVD) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in terms of target vessel revascularization and a reduced incidence of myocardial infarction. However, the relatively high rate of bail-out stenting (BOS) still represents a major drawback of DCB PCI. AIMS: The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical, anatomic, and procedural features predictive of BOS after DCB PCI in SVD. METHODS: We included all consecutive patients undergoing PCI at our institution between January 2020 and May 2022 who were treated with DCB PCI of a de novo lesion in a coronary vessel with a reference vessel diameter (RVD) between 2.0 and 2.5 mm. Angiographic success was defined as a residual stenosis <30% without flow-limiting dissection. Patients who did not meet these criteria underwent BOS. RESULTS: A total of 168 consecutive patients and 216 coronary stenoses were included. The rate of bail-out stent was 13.9%. On multivariate analysis, DCB/RVD ratio (odds ratio [OR]: 4.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.71-11.29, p < 0.01), vessel tortuosity (OR: 7.00, 95% CI: 1.66-29.62, p < 0.01), distal vessel disease (OR: 5.66, 95% CI: 2.02-15.83, p < 0.01), and high complexity (Grade C of ACC/AHA classification) coronary stenoses (OR: 6.31, 95% CI: 1.53-26.04, p = 0.01) were independent predictors of BOS. CONCLUSIONS: BOS is not an infrequent occurrence in DCB PCI of small vessels and is correlated with vessel tortuosity, distal diffuse vessel disease, higher lesion complexity, and balloon diameter oversizing.

Vascular Access in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease Undergoing TAVR: The Hostile Registry.

BACKGROUND: The optimal access route in patients with severe peripheral artery disease (PAD) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains undetermined. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare clinical outcomes with transfemoral access (TFA), transthoracic access (TTA), and nonthoracic transalternative access (TAA) in TAVR patients with severe PAD. METHODS: Patients with PAD and hostile femoral access (TFA impossible, or possible only after percutaneous treatment) undergoing TAVR at 28 international centers were included in this registry. The primary endpoint was the propensity-adjusted risk of 30-day major adverse events (MAE) defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), or main access site-related Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 major vascular complications. Outcomes were also stratified according to the severity of PAD using a novel risk score (Hostile score). RESULTS: Among the 1,707 patients included in the registry, 518 (30.3%) underwent TAVR with TFA after percutaneous treatment, 642 (37.6%) with TTA, and 547 (32.0%) with TAA (mostly transaxillary). Compared with TTA, both TFA (adjusted HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.45-0.75) and TAA (adjusted HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.47-0.78) were associated with lower 30-day rates of MAE, driven by fewer access site-related complications. Composite risks at 1 year were also lower with TFA and TAA compared with TTA. TFA compared with TAA was associated with lower 1-year risk of stroke/TIA (adjusted HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.24-0.98), a finding confined to patients with low Hostile scores (Pinteraction = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with PAD undergoing TAVR, both TFA and TAA were associated with lower 30-day and 1-year rates of MAE compared with TTA, but 1-year stroke/TIA rates were higher with TAA compared with TFA.

Coronary ectasia in different scenarios, primarily in myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary artery disease.

AIMS: Several causes have been reported for coronary artery ectasia (CAE), mostly atherosclerosis and tunica media abnormalities. The main aim of the present study was to investigate if CAE extension differs in distinct clinical settings. METHODS: Three hundred and forty-one patients with diagnosis of CAE were identified among 9659 coronary angiographies and divided into four groups according to the patient's admission diagnosis: stable or unstable angina (S-UA), myocardial infarction (MI), aortic disease, aortic valvular disease (AVD). S-UA and MI were subgrouped according to the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease (OCAD). Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate the relationship between clinical diagnosis and CAE extension as expressed by Markis classification and number of coronary vessels affected by CAE. RESULTS: No significant differences in CAE extension were found among the four groups, in terms of vessels affected by CAE (P = 0.37) or Markis class (P = 0.33). CAE was not related to the extension of OCAD as assessed by the Gensini score, which was higher in MI and S-UA groups (P < 0.01). However, when ischemic patients were sub-divided on the basis of the presence of OCAD, MI without obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) was associated with a higher extension of CAE in terms of Markis class 1 (OR 5.08, 95% CI 1.61-16.04; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The extension of CAE is comparable in patients referred to coronary angiography for different clinical scenarios, including S-UA, MI, aortic disease, and AVD; however, patients with MINOCA were associated with a higher extension of CAE.Graphical abstract: Difference in coronary artery ectasia extension in terms of Markis class severity, respectively, stratified by clinical presentation and obstructive coronary artery disease presence, http://links.lww.com/JCM/A519.

Reduced Mortality With Antiplatelet Therapy Deescalation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet therapy deescalation has been suggested as an alternative to standard treatment with potent dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 1 year in low bleeding risk patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention to mitigate the increased risk of bleeding. Whether this strategy preserves the ischemic and survival benefits of potent DAPT is uncertain. METHODS: We performed a pairwise meta-analysis in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention treated with either 1-year standard potent DAPT versus deescalation therapy (potent DAPT for 1-3 months followed by either reduced potency DAPT or ticagrelor monotherapy for up to 1 year). Randomized trials comparing standard DAPT versus deescalation therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were searched through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and proceedings of international meetings. The primary end point was 1-year all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 6 trials in which 20 837 patients were randomized to potent DAPT for 1 to 3 months followed by deescalation therapy for up to 1 year (n=10 392) or standard potent DAPT for 1 year (n=10 445). Deescalation therapy was associated with lower 1-year rates of all-cause mortality compared with standard therapy (odds ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.59-0.95]; P=0.02). Deescalation therapy was also associated with lower rates of major bleeding (odds ratio, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.48-0.72]; P<0.0001), with no significant difference in major adverse cardiac events (major adverse cardiovascular events; odds ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.77-1.04]; P=0.14). CONCLUSIONS: In low bleeding risk patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, compared with 1-year of potent DAPT, antiplatelet therapy deescalation therapy after 1 to 3 months was associated with decreased mortality and major bleeding with similar rates of major adverse cardiovascular events.

Female gender and mortality in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary PCI.

AIMS: To investigate gender difference in mortality among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous angioplasty (PPCI). METHODS: We analyzed data from the prospective registries of two hub PPCI centres over a 10-year period to assess the role of female gender as an independent predictor of both all-cause and cardiac death at 30 days and 1 year. To account for all confounding variables, a propensity score (PS)-adjusted multivariable Cox regression model and a PS-matched comparison between the male and female were used. RESULTS: Among 4370 consecutive STEMI patients treated with PPCI at participating centres, 1188 (27.2%) were women. The survival rate at 30 days and 1 year were significantly lower in women (Log-rank P-value < 0.001). At PS-adjusted multivariable Cox regression analysis, female gender was independently associated with an increased risk of 30-day all-cause death [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.09; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.45-3.01, P < 0.001], 30-day cardiac death (HR = 2.03;95% CI:1.41-2.93, P < 0.001), 1-year all-cause death (HR = 1.45; 95% CI:1.16-1.82, P < 0.001) and 1-year cardiac death (HR = 1.51; 95% CI:1.15-1.97, P < 0.001). For the study outcome, we found a significant interaction of gender with the multivessel disease in females who were at increased risk of mortality in comparison with men in absence of multivessel disease. After the PS matching procedure, a subset of 2074 patients were identified. Women still had a lower survival rate and survival free from cardiac death rate both at 30-day and at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: As compared with men, women with STEMI treated with PPCI have higher risk of both all-cause death and cardiac mortality at 30-day and 1-year follow-up.

Pattern of arterial inflammation and inflammatory markers in people living with HIV compared with uninfected people.

STUDY DESIGN: To compare arterial inflammation (AI) between people living with HIV (PLWH) and uninfected people as assessed by 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET). METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 20 PLWH and 20 uninfected people with no known cardiovascular disease and at least 3 traditional cardiovascular risk factors. All patients underwent 18F-FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) of the thorax and neck. Biomarkers linked to inflammation and atherosclerosis were also determined. The primary outcome was AI in ascending aorta (AA) measured as mean maximum target-to-background ratio (TBRmax). The independent relationships between HIV status and both TBRmax and biomarkers were evaluated by multivariable linear regression adjusted for body mass index, creatinine, statin therapy, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular 10-year estimated risk (ASCVD). RESULTS: Unadjusted mean TBRmax in AA was slightly higher but not statistically different (P = .18) in PLWH (2.07; IQR 1.97, 2.32]) than uninfected people (2.01; IQR 1.85, 2.16]). On multivariable analysis, PLWH had an independent risk of increased mean log-TBRmax in AA (coef = 0.12; 95%CI 0.01,0.22; P = .032). HIV infection was independently associated with higher values of interleukin-10 (coef = 0.83; 95%CI 0.34, 1.32; P = .001), interferon-γ (coef. = 0.90; 95%CI 0.32, 1.47; P = .003), and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) (coef. = 0.75; 95%CI: 0.42, 1.08, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with high cardiovascular risk, HIV status was an independent predictor of increased TBRmax in AA. PLWH also had an increased independent risk of IFN-γ, IL-10, and VCAM-1 levels.

Peripheral intravascular lithotripsy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a multicentre observational study.

BACKGROUND: The presence of severe calcific atherosclerosis at the iliofemoral axis may preclude transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) by the transfemoral (TF) approach. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel technology that fractures intimal/medial calcium and increases vessel compliance allowing TF TAVI in selected patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). AIMS: The aim of this study was to report on the safety and efficacy of IVL-assisted TF TAVI in an all-comers population. METHODS: Clinical, imaging and procedural data on all consecutive patients treated by IVL-assisted TF TAVI in six high-volume European centres (2018-2020) were collected in this prospective, real-world, multicentre registry. RESULTS: IVL-assisted TF TAVI was performed in 108 patients, increasing from 2.4% to 6.5% of all TAVI from 2018 to 2020, respectively. The target lesion was most often localised at the common and/or external iliac artery (93.5% of cases; average TL-MLD 4.6±0.9 mm with 318 degrees of calcium arc). Transfemoral aortic valve delivery was successful in 100% of cases; final procedural success in 98.2% (two conversions to cardiac open surgery for annular rupture and valve migration). Complications of the IVL-treated segments consisted of 1 perforation and 3 major dissections requiring stent implantation (2 covered stents and 2 BMS). Access-site-related complications included 3 major bleedings. Three in-hospital deaths were recorded (2.8%, 1 failed surgical conversion after annular rupture, 1 cardiac arrest after initial valvuloplasty, 1 late hyperkalaemia in renal dysfunction). CONCLUSIONS: IVL-assisted TF TAVI proved to be a safe and effective approach, which helps to expand the indications for TF TAVI in patients with severe calcific PAD. However, these patients continue to have a higher-than-average incidence of periprocedural complications.

Risk-Benefit of 1-Year DAPT After DES Implantation in Patients Stratified by Bleeding and Ischemic Risk.

BACKGROUND: Although a 1-year duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is used in many patients after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation, the evidence supporting this duration is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The authors investigated the risk-benefit profile of 1-year vs ≤6-month DAPT after DES using 2 novel scores to risk stratify bleeding and ischemic events. METHODS: Ischemic and bleeding risk scores were generated from ADAPT-DES (Assessment of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Drug-Eluting Stents), a multicenter, international, "all-comers" registry that enrolled 8,665 patients treated with DES. The risk-benefit profile of 1-year vs ≤6-month DAPT was then investigated across risk strata from an individual patient data pooled dataset of 7 randomized trials that enrolled 15,083 patients treated with DES. RESULTS: In the derivation cohort, the ischemic score and the bleeding score had c-indexes of 0.76 and 0.66, respectively, and both were well calibrated. In the pooled dataset, no significant difference was apparent in any ischemic endpoint between 1-year and ≤6-month DAPT, regardless of the risk strata. In the overall dataset, there was no significant difference in the risk of clinically relevant bleeding between 1-year and ≤6-month DAPT; however, among 2,508 patients at increased risk of bleeding, 1-year compared with ≤6-month DAPT was associated with greater bleeding (HR: 2.80; 95% CI: 1.12-7.13) without a reduced risk of ischemic events in any risk strata, including those with acute coronary syndromes. These results were consistent in a network meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In the present large-scale study, compared with ≤6-month DAPT, a 1-year duration of DAPT was not associated with reduced adverse ischemic events in any risk strata (including acute coronary syndromes) but was associated with greater bleeding in patients at increased risk of bleeding.

Risk-Benefit of 1-Year DAPT After DES Implantation in Patients Stratified by Bleeding and Ischemic Risk

BACKGROUND: Although a 1-year duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is used in many patients after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation, the evidence supporting this duration is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The authors investigated the risk-benefit profile of 1-year vs ≤6-month DAPT after DES using 2 novel scores to risk stratify bleeding and ischemic events. METHODS: Ischemic and bleeding risk scores were generated from ADAPT-DES (Assessment of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with Drug-Eluting Stents), a multicenter, international, "all-comers" registry that enrolled 8,665 patients treated with DES. The risk-benefit profile of 1-year vs ≤6-month DAPT was then investigated across risk strata from an individual patient data pooled dataset of 7 randomized trials that enrolled 15,083 patients treated with DES. RESULTS: In the derivation cohort, the ischemic score and the bleeding score had c-indexes of 0.76 and 0.66, respectively, and both were well calibrated. In the pooled dataset, no significant difference was apparent in any ischemic endpoint between 1-year and ≤6-month DAPT, regardless of the risk strata. In the overall dataset, there was no significant difference in the risk of clinically relevant bleeding between 1-year and ≤6-month DAPT; however, among 2,508 patients at increased risk of bleeding, 1-year compared with ≤6-month DAPT was associated with greater bleeding (HR: 2.80; 95% CI: 1.12-7.13) without a reduced risk of ischemic events in any risk strata, including those with acute coronary syndromes. These results were consistent in a network meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In the present large-scale study, compared with ≤6-month DAPT, a 1-year duration of DAPT was not associated with reduced adverse ischemic events in any risk strata (including acute coronary syndromes) but was associated with greater bleeding in patients at increased risk of bleeding.

Sino-tubular junction to sinuses of Valsalva ratio: An echocardiographic parameter to predict coronary artery ectasia in patients with aortic enlargement.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is associated with ascending aortic (AA) ectasia. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of different echocardiographic parameters (EP) in predicting the presence of CAE. METHODS: Four hundred-eighteen patients with AA ectasia candidate to coronary angiography were identified and divided in two groups in respect of the presence of CAE. Receiver-operating characteristic curves areas (AUC) were used to assess the discrimination power of the following EP: aortic annulus diameter, sinuses of Valsalva (SV) diameter, sino-tubular junction (STJ) diameter, AA diameter, STJ to SV ratio (STJ-to-SV) and STJ to AA ratio (STJ-to-AA). All these parameters were indexed by body surface area. The relationship between the best EP and the presence of CAE was investigated by means of multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The rate of CAE in the study population was 32%. On univariable logistic regression, aortic annulus, STJ, STJ-to-SV and STJ-to-AA were associated with the presence of CAE after Bonferroni correction. STJ-to-SV emerged as the parameter with the best discrimination power (AUC = 0.81) compared to STJ (AUC = 0.69), STJ-to-AA (AUC = 0.68), aortic annulus (AUC = 0.59), AA (AUC = 0.56) and SV (AUC = 0.55); (p for comparison <0.01). An 89.6% value for STJ-to-SV ratio emerged as the best cut-off to diagnose CAE with a sensitivity = 75%, specificity = 82%, positive predictive value = 66% and negative predictive value = 88%. On multivariable analysis, STJ-to-SV was still associated with the presence of CAE (OR = 1.15;95%CI:1.11-1.19;p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In patients with dilated aorta, STJ-to-SV sampled by transthoracic echocardiography shows a good diagnostic performance in predicting the presence of CAE.

[Endovascular repair of an aortic aneurysm by a custom-made three-inner branched endograft]. / Trattamento endovascolare di un aneurisma dell'arco aortico mediante endoprotesi custom-made con tre branch interni.

We report the case of a total endovascular repair of an aortic arch aneurysm by a custom-made endograft with three inner branches for supra-aortic trunks in a high-risk patient unfit for open surgery. An 82-year-old female at high risk for open repair was treated for an asymptomatic aortic arch aneurysm (97 mm in diameter) by a custom-made three-inner branched endograft. Two anterograde branches were planned for the innominate trunk and the left carotid artery while a retrograde branch with a preloaded catheter was planned for the left subclavian artery. The procedure was successfully completed and postoperative course was uneventful. Computed tomography angiography demonstrated aneurysm exclusion, patency of the three supra-aortic branches and absence of cerebral ischemic lesion at 30 and 90 days. A custom-made endovascular device with three inner branches is a safe and effective option to guarantee a total endovascular repair of aortic arch aneurysm in high-risk patients in the presence of anatomical feasibility.

Correlation between aortic root dimension and coronary ectasia.

BACKGROUND: Aortic aneurysms are associated with coronary artery ectasia (CAE). However, the relation between the extent of CAE and the severity of aortic dilatation is not understood. This study was undertaken to investigate the relationship between angiographic extension of CAE and aortic dimension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively include 135 patients with angiographic diagnosis of CAE defined as dilatation of coronary segment more than 1.5 times than an adjacent healthy one. Study population was divided in four groups according to the maximum diameter of ascending aorta beyond sinus of Valsalva obtained in the parasternal long-axis view (group 1: <40 mm; group 2: 40-45 mm; group 3: 45-55 mm; group 4: >55 mm or previous surgery because of aortic aneurysm/dissection). The relationship between aortic dimension and the extension of CAE was investigated by means of multivariable linear regression, including variables selected at univariable analysis (P < 0.1). The total estimated ectatic area (EEA total) was used as dependent variable. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of study groups were well balanced. Patients in group 4 were more likely to have both higher neutrophil count and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio. On univariable analysis ascending aorta diameter [Coef. = 0.075; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.052-0.103, P < 0.01] and c-reactive protein (CRP) values [Coef. = 0.033, 95% CI 0.003-0.174, P = 0.04] showed a linear association with total EEA. After adjustment for CRP values only the ascending aorta diameter was still associated with the extent of CAE (95% CI 0.025-0.063, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In patients with diagnosis of CAE, a strong linear association between aortic dimension and coronary ectasia extent exists.

Routine minimalist transcatheter aortic valve implantation with local anesthesia only.

AIMS: Conscious sedation instead of general anesthesia has been increasingly adopted in many centers for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Improvement of materials and operators' experience and reduction of periprocedural complications allowed procedural simplification and adoption of a minimalist approach. With this study, we sought to assess the feasibility and safety of transfemoral TAVR routinely performed under local anesthesia without on-site anesthesiology support. METHODS: The routine transfemoral TAVR protocol adopted at our center includes a minimalist approach, local anesthesia alone with fully awake patient, anesthesiologist available on call but not in the room, and direct transfer to the cardiology ward after the procedure. All consecutive patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR between January 2015 and July 2018 were included. We assessed the rates of actual local anesthesia-only procedures, conversion to conscious sedation or general anesthesia and 30-day clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Among 321 patients, 6 received general anesthesia upfront and 315 (98.1%) local anesthesia only. Mean age of the local anesthesia group was 83.2 ±â€Š6.9 years, Society of Thoracic Surgery score 5.8 ±â€Š4.8%. A balloon-expandable valve was used in 65.7%. Four patients (1.3%) shifted to conscious sedation because of pain or anxiety; 6 patients (1.9%) shifted to general anesthesia because of procedural complications. Hence, local anesthesia alone was possible in 305 patients (96.8% of the intended cohort, 95% of all transfemoral procedures). At 30 days, in the intended local anesthesia group, mortality was 1.6%, stroke 0.6%, major vascular complications 2.6%. Median hospital stay was 4 days (IQR 3-7). CONCLUSION: Transfemoral TAVR can be safely performed with local anesthesia alone and without an on-site anesthesiologist in the vast majority of patients.

Long-term outcome of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Incidence and long-term clinical consequences of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are still unclear. METHODS: We enrolled 710 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR. PPM was defined as absent if the index orifice area (iEOA) was >0.85 cm2/m2, moderate if the iEOA was between 0.65 and 0.85 cm2/m2 or severe if the iEOA was <0.65 cm2/m2. RESULTS: Among the 566 patients fulfilling the study criteria, the distribution of PPM was as follows: 50.5% none (n = 286), 43% moderate PPM (n = 243) and 6.5% severe PPM (n = 37). At 5-year follow-up, patients with severe PPM had a significantly higher incidence of the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction and stroke (p = .025) compared with the other patients. After adjusting the results for possible confounders, severe PPM remained an independent predictor of long-term adverse outcome (HR: 2.46; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.10-5.53). The independent predictors of severe PPM were valve-in-valve procedure and body mass index. Balloon-expandable valves were not associated with higher rates of severe PPM in comparison with self-expandable valves (8% vs. 5%, respectively, p = .245). CONCLUSIONS: In our study severe PPM emerged as a risk factor for long-term major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.

Predicting and improving outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in older adults and the elderly.

INTRODUCTION: Indications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are progressively extending to younger and lower risk patients. In this scenario, minimizing periprocedural complications and optimizing procedural result are both crucial to achieve an excellent long-term outcome. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we summarize the main strategies that can be adopted before, during, and after TAVR to predict and prevent complications, to optimize procedural results and ultimately improve outcomes, with an emphasis on more recent evidence, new devices, and new techniques. EXPERT OPINION: In the next future TAVR will probably represent the first treatment option for patients affected by aortic valve stenosis who are candidates to receive a biological valve. Continuous refinement of TAVR devices has been key to allow safer and most effective procedures and further progress is expected. Development of new techniques and devices, such as ultrasound-guided puncture and intravascular lithotripsy, will expand safety and eligibility to transfemoral procedures. Effective preemptive measures for coronary occlusion have been developed. Open issues include cerebral protection, re-access to coronary arteries, post-procedural management, and therapy.