Higher primary stability of tuberosity fixation in reverse fracture arthroplasty with 135° than with 155° humeral inclination.

BACKGROUND: Proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients are frequently treated with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, and tuberosity healing improves clinical outcome and patient satisfaction. So far reverse prostheses with different humeral inclination (HI) angles have been used. However, it has not been investigated yet if the HI angle affects the primary stability of the tuberosity fixation in primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures in a biomechanical setting. METHODS: A 4-part fracture was created in 7-paired human cadaver proximal humeri after preceding power analysis. After randomization in a pairwise fashion, reverse prostheses with either 135° (n = 7) or 155° (n = 7) were implanted. The tuberosities were reduced anatomically to the metaphysis of the prostheses and were fixed with 3 suture cerclages in a standardized technique. Tightening was performed with a cerclage tension device with 50 Newton meter (N m). Before biomechanical testing, the initial vertical and horizontal gap formation was measured. The humeri were placed in a custom-made test setup enabling internal and external rotation. Cyclic loading with a gradually increasing load magnitude was applied with a material testing machine starting with 20 N m and increasing by 5 N m after each 100th cycle until failure (>15° rotation of the tuberosities). Any motion of the tuberosities was measured with a 3-dimensional camera system. RESULTS: Overall, the 155° group reached an average of 1460 ± 270 cycles and the 135° group of 1900 ± 271 cycles (P = .048). In contrast to the 135° group, in the 155° group, a mean initial vertical (0.3 ± 0.7 mm) and horizontal (2.7 ± 3.3 mm) gap formation could be observed before cyclic loading. After 1100 cycles, the 155° group showed increased rotation of both lesser and greater tuberosities in all 3 axes around the humeral shaft compared with the 135° group. CONCLUSION: Primary stability of the reattached tuberosities is significantly increased, whereas rotational movements are decreased in prostheses with an anatomic HI of 135° compared with a 155° HI according to the original Grammont design. In addition, a 135° HI allows an exact anatomic reposition of the tuberosities, whereas this was not possible for the 155° design. However, transferability and clinical relevance of these biomechanical results have to be verified with clinical studies.

Tensioning device increases biomechanical stability of tuberosity fixation technique with cerclage sutures in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture.

BACKGROUND: Complex proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients are increasingly treated with primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Many surgeons use cerclage sutures for tuberosity fixation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures. In this study, we hypothesized that sutures fixated with a tensioning device would achieve higher initial fixation stability of the tuberosities compared with manually knotted cerclage sutures in a biomechanical model. METHODS: A 4-part fracture was created in 7-paired human cadaver proximal humeri. The tuberosities were reduced anatomically and fixed with 3 cerclage sutures in a standardized technique. Tightening was performed either manually (n = 7) or with a cerclage tensioning device with 50 Newton meter (N m) (n = 7). The humeri were placed in a custom-made test setup enabling internal and external rotation. Cyclic loading with gradually increasing load was applied with a material testing machine starting with 20 N m and increasing by 5 N m after each 100th cycle until failure (>15° rotation of the tuberosities). Motion of the tuberosities was measured with a 3-dimensional camera system. RESULTS: Overall, the knot group reached 1040 ± 152 cycles, and the device group reached 1820 ± 719 cycles (P = .035). Major fragment motion was detected in the humeral shaft axis and in the distal divergence of the tuberosities. After 900 cycles, the knot group showed increased rotation of both lesser and greater tuberosities in all 3 axes around the humeral shaft compared with the device group. CONCLUSION: Biomechanical stability of the reattached tuberosities is significantly increased, and rotational movement of the tuberosities is decreased after tightening of the applied cerclage sutures with a tensioning device compared with manual knotting. However, transferability of these promising biomechanical results and their clinical relevance have to be verified with clinical studies.