Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Hum Exp Toxicol ; 43: 9603271241254338, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39052968

RESUMO

Frameworks have been developed to standardize the assessment of carcinogenic potential in the pharmaceutical and agrochemical industries, building upon decades of research. Carcinogenicity is also evaluated during the safety evaluation of food substances, using a comprehensive approach unique to each substance. To better understand these approaches, a retrospective assessment was conducted on the publicly available database of substances notified to the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) as being Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS). The data contained within these GRAS notifications (GRNs) were reviewed for the methods used to evaluate carcinogenic potential (genotoxicity studies, 2-year bioassays, other pre-clinical animal studies) to identify patterns that could provide an understanding of how this assessment has been conducted for different categories of food substances. While different approaches to the safety evaluation were required to adapt to the unique food substances, the data in all notifications supported the conclusion of safety. The evaluation of food substances for carcinogenic potential must consider all available data, including identifying the need for when more data must be generated to support an evaluation. Due to the complexity of substances used in food, ranging from defined chemical entities to minimally processed agricultural commodities to live microorganisms, the approach to conducting the safety evaluation of food substances must be able to adapt to the most relevant scientifically supported approach. This paper illustrates the data commonly used to support the safety of different types of food substances and proposes an approach familiar to other product sectors.


Assuntos
Testes de Carcinogenicidade , Carcinógenos , United States Food and Drug Administration , Estados Unidos , Animais , Carcinógenos/toxicidade , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Inocuidade dos Alimentos , Bases de Dados Factuais
2.
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf ; 18(3): 738-752, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33336919

RESUMO

The acceptance of many foods is related to traditional cooking practices, which create taste and texture and are important to digestibility, preservation, and the reduction of foodborne illnesses. A wide range of compounds are formed during the cooking of foods, a number of these have been shown to lead to adverse effects in classical toxicological models and are known as food processing contaminants (FPC). It is essential that the presence and effects of such compounds alone and in combination within the diet are understood such that proportionate risk management measures can be developed, while taking a holistic view across the whole value chain. Furan and alkylfurans (principally 2- and 3-methylfuran) are highly volatile FPC, which are formed in a wide range of foods at low amounts. The focus of research to-date has been on those foods, which have been identified to be most consequential in terms of being sources of exposure, namely jarred and canned foods for infants and young children (meals and drinks) and coffee (roast and ground, soluble). This report presents (i) new industry data on the occurrence of furan and methylfurans in selected food categories following previous coffee studies, (ii) the most salient parameters that impact furan formation, and (iii) aspects of importance for the risk assessment.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA