Reducing unnecessary outpatient group and screen testing at a regional cancer center.

BACKGROUND: Unnecessary group and screens (G&S) can lead to unnecessary antibody investigations, use of technologist time, and laboratory resources. LOCAL PROBLEM: A baseline audit at our institution identified that 25% of G&S from the cancer center were unnecessary. We aimed to reduce the ratio of monthly G&S to CBC samples processed from the cancer center by 10% (from 0.034 to 0.031) by January 2024. METHODS: This represents an interrupted time series design from November 2022 to January 2024. Using Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) cycles, we aimed to increase the use of an existing reflex testing system, termed "do not test." When this option is selected, the blood bank will only process the G&S sample if specific CBC criteria are met (e.g., hemoglobin <9.0 g/dL). Educational sessions increased awareness of this feature and sought feedback from end-users on its usability. With feedback, the design was updated to include a modifiable hemoglobin threshold for G&S testing, automatic re-selection of the "do not test" feature for future G&S orders, and aesthetic changes to make the feature more visible. RESULTS: The percentage of samples with "do not test" selected increased from 7.2% to 63.0% (p < .0001) and the ratio of G&S to CBC specimens improved from 0.034 to 0.028, exceeding the target of 0.031. We noted an improvement in the appropriateness of G&S orders from 75% at baseline (n = 20) to 97.5% (n = 80) post intervention (p = .003). CONCLUSIONS: We describe an effective strategy to improve G&S utilization at our institution's cancer center using a reflex testing system.

Contemporary Approach to The Diagnosis and Classification of Myelodysplastic Neoplasms/Syndromes- Recommendations from The International Consortium for MDS (icMDS).

Myelodysplastic neoplasms/syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of biologically distinct entities characterized by variable degrees of ineffective hematopoiesis. Recently, two classification systems (the 5th edition of the WHO Classification and the International Consensus Classification) further sub-characterized MDS into morphologic and genetically defined groups. Accurate diagnosis and subclassification of MDS require a multistep systemic approach. The International Consortium for MDS (icMDS) summarizes a contemporary, practical, and multimodal approach to MDS diagnosis and classification.

Developing Organizational Requirements to Standardize Delivery and Improve Quality of Acute Leukemia Care in Ontario.

Acute leukemia is a rapidly progressive cancer of the blood and bone marrow that requires a high degree of complex, specialized, resource-intensive clinical and supportive care. The aging Canadian population has introduced an unprecedented demand on the health care system for a variety of illnesses, including acute leukemia. The purpose of this work was to develop organizational requirements for service providers delivering care for patients aged 18 years and older with acute leukemia within a single-payer health care system in Ontario. This initiative was intended to support streamlining high-quality health care across Ontario. We worked collaboratively with an expert panel to conduct a review of the literature to synthesize the organizational requirements for delivering acute leukemia care. A total of 229 requirements were developed. The requirements were categorized into themes including (1) facility requirements, including infrastructure, data management, safety, policies and procedures; (2) availability of clinical services and service complexity; (3) personnel, including roles, responsibilities, and ongoing education; (4) patient care; (5) quality management; (6) clinical research; and (7) laboratory services. These requirements will act as a framework for the provision of service, complexity of care, safety, accessibility, and quality care across all levels from the patient, organization, and system perspectives. This framework will help support person-centred care, emphasizing providing care close to home, while optimizing the use of specialized resources. Moving forward, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) will continue to work with acute leukemia service providers in the province to determine compliance and focus improvement efforts in priority areas.

How I treat iron overload in adult myelodysplastic syndrome.

While clinical benefits of iron chelation therapy (ICT) in red blood cell transfusion dependent (RBC TD) hereditary anemias such as beta-thalassemia major are incontrovertible, the evidence supporting a similar benefit in patients with TD myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) and iron overload (IOL) is sometimes debated. MDS presents later in life, has a limited repertoire of life extending therapies, and patients may have comorbidities acting as competing causes of death. However, refined prognostication identifies MDS patients with a reasonable life expectancy, and since 50% of patients will ultimately become RBC transfusion dependent and develop transfusional iron overload (IOL), iron chelation therapy (ICT) should be considered in some. Using illustrative cases, we summarize mechanisms of iron toxicity, strategies for the identification of IOL and propose definitions of IOL severity. We provide rationale for and recommend which patients may benefit from ICT. We discuss currently available chelators, their administration, monitoring, side effects and their management. Given challenges with the use of iron chelators, we suggest the nuances to be considered when planning chelation initiation include the rate of iron accumulation, the presence of organ iron and/or dysfunction, and detectable indicators of oxidative stress. Areas for future investigation are identified.

Toward a more patient-centered drug development process in clinical trials for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS): Practical considerations from the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS).

Notable treatment advances have been made in recent years for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS), and several new drugs are under development. For example, the emerging availability of oral MDS therapies holds the promise of improving patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Within this rapidly evolving landscape, the inclusion of HRQoL and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is critical to inform the benefit/risk assessment of new therapies or to assess whether patients live longer and better, for what will likely remain a largely incurable disease. We provide practical considerations to support investigators in generating high-quality PRO data in future MDS trials. We first describe several challenges that are to be thoughtfully considered when designing an MDS-focused clinical trial with a PRO endpoint. We then discuss aspects related to the design of the study, including PRO assessment strategies. We also discuss statistical approaches illustrating the potential value of time-to-event analyses and their implications within the estimand framework. Finally, based on a literature review of MDS randomized controlled trials with a PRO endpoint, we note the PRO items that deserve special attention when reporting future MDS trial results. We hope these practical considerations will facilitate the generation of rigorous PRO data that can robustly inform MDS patient care and support treatment decision-making for this patient population.

Red cell transfusion thresholds in outpatients with myelodysplastic syndromes: Results of a pilot randomized trial RBC-ENHANCE.

BACKGROUND: The optimal hemoglobin (Hb) threshold for red blood cell transfusions in adult patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) has not been defined. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a pilot randomized multi-center study of two transfusion algorithms (liberal, to maintain Hb 110-120 g/L, transfuse 2 units if Hb < 105 g/L and 1 unit if Hb 105-110 g/L vs. restrictive, 85-105 g/L, transfuse 2 units when Hgb < 85 g/L). Primary objectives were 70% compliance in maintaining the q2 week hemoglobin within the targeted range and the achievement of a 15 g/L difference in pre-transfusion Hb. Secondary outcomes included measures of quality of life (QOL), iron studies and safety. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were randomized between February 2015-2020, 13 to the restrictive arm and 15 to the liberal arm in three tertiary care centers. The compliance was 66% and 45% and the mean pre-transfusion Hb thresholds were 86 (standard deviation [SD] 8) and 98 g/L (SD 10) in the restrictive and liberal arms, (mean difference 11.8 g/L, p < .0001), respectively. Patients in the liberal arm experienced a mean of 3.4 (SD 2.6) more transfusion visits and received a mean of 5.3 (SD 5.5) more units of blood during the 12-week study. Ferritin increased by 1043 (SD 1516) IU/L and 148 (SD 1319) IU/L in the liberal and restrictive arms, respectively. Selected QOL scores were superior pre-transfusion and more patients achieved clinically important improvements in the liberal arm compared with the restrictive arm for selected symptoms and function domains. CONCLUSION: The results establish that policies for transfusion support can be delivered in practice at multiple hospitals, but further research is required to understand the full clinical effects and safety of liberal transfusion policies in MDS outpatients.

A Markov analysis of azacitidine and venetoclax vs induction chemotherapy for medically fit patients with AML.

ABSTRACT: Although induction chemotherapy (IC) is the standard of care in medically fit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), limited retrospective data indicate that patients at adverse-risk may benefit from azacytidine and venetoclax (aza-ven). Our goal was to perform a Markov decision analysis to determine whether IC or aza-ven is the optimal induction regimen in this population. Using the TreeAge software, Markov models were created for adverse-risk and intermediate-risk cohorts. A systematic review of the literature informed the transition probabilities and utilities included in the analyses. Our primary outcome was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained over 5 years after diagnosis. Overall, patients at adverse risk treated with IC gained 1.4 QALYs, compared with 2.0 QALYs in patients treated with aza-ven. Patients at adverse risk treated with IC and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), IC, aza-ven and allo-SCT, or aza-ven gained 2.1, 1.5, 3.0, and 1.9 QALYs, respectively. Meanwhile, patients at intermediate risk treated with IC gained 2.0 QALY, compared with 1.7 QALY in patients treated with aza-ven. Patients at intermediate risk treated with IC and allo-SCT, IC, aza-ven and allo-SCT, and aza-ven gained 2.7, 2.3, 2.6, and 1.8 QALYs, respectively. We have demonstrated that medically fit patients with newly diagnosed adverse-risk AML may benefit from treatment with aza-ven over those treated with IC, whereas IC remains the preferred approach for patients at intermediate risk. Our work challenges the use of the European LeukemiaNet risk classification for patients treated with aza-ven and highlights the need for prospective investigation into aza-ven as induction therapy for medically fit patients.

Oral decitabine-cedazuridine versus intravenous decitabine for myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (ASCERTAIN): a registrational, randomised, crossover, pharmacokinetics, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: The DNA methyltransferase inhibitors azacitidine and decitabine for individuals with myelodysplastic syndromes or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia are available in parenteral form. Oral therapy with similar exposure for these diseases would offer potential treatment benefits. We aimed to compare the safety and pharmacokinetics of oral decitabine plus the cytidine deaminase inhibitor cedazuridine versus intravenous decitabine. METHODS: We did a registrational, multicentre, open-label, crossover, phase 3 trial of individuals with myelodysplastic syndromes or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia and individuals with acute myeloid leukaemia, enrolled as separate cohorts; results for only participants with myelodysplastic syndromes or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia are reported here. In 37 academic and community-based clinics in Canada and the USA, we enrolled individuals aged 18 years or older who were candidates to receive intravenous decitabine, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1 and a life expectancy of at least 3 months. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 5 days of oral decitabine-cedazuridine (one tablet once daily containing 35 mg decitabine and 100 mg cedazuridine as a fixed-dose combination) or intravenous decitabine (20 mg/m2 per day by continuous 1-h intravenous infusion) in a 28-day treatment cycle, followed by 5 days of the other formulation in the next treatment cycle. Thereafter, all participants received oral decitabine-cedazuridine from the third cycle on until treatment discontinuation. The primary endpoint was total decitabine exposure over 5 days with oral decitabine-cedazuridine versus intravenous decitabine for cycles 1 and 2, measured as area under the curve in participants who received the full treatment dose in cycles 1 and 2 and had decitabine daily AUC0-24 for both oral decitabine-cedazuridine and intravenous decitabine (ie, paired cycles). On completion of the study, all patients were rolled over to a maintenance study. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03306264. FINDINGS: Between Feb 8, 2018, and June 7, 2021, 173 individuals were screened, 138 (80%) participants were randomly assigned to a treatment sequence, and 133 (96%) participants (87 [65%] men and 46 [35%] women; 121 [91%] White, four [3%] Black or African-American, three [2%] Asian, and five [4%] not reported) received treatment. Median follow-up was 966 days (IQR 917-1050). Primary endpoint of total exposure of oral decitabine-cedazuridine versus intravenous decitabine was 98·93% (90% CI 92·66-105·60), indicating equivalent pharmacokinetic exposure on the basis of area under the curve. The safety profiles of oral decitabine-cedazuridine and intravenous decitabine were similar. The most frequent adverse events of grade 3 or worse were thrombocytopenia (81 [61%] of 133 participants), neutropenia (76 [57%] participants), and anaemia (67 [50%] participants). The incidence of serious adverse events in cycles 1-2 was 31% (40 of 130 participants) with oral decitabine-cedazuridine and 18% (24 of 132 participants) with intravenous decitabine. There were five treatment-related deaths; two deemed related to oral therapy (sepsis and pneumonia) and three to intravenous treatment (septic shock [n=2] and pneumonia [n=1]). INTERPRETATION: Oral decitabine-cedazuridine was pharmacologically and pharmacodynamically equivalent to intravenous decitabine. The results support use of oral decitabine-cedazuridine as a safe and effective alternative to intravenous decitabine for treatment of individuals with myelodysplastic syndromes or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia. FUNDING: Astex Pharmaceuticals.