Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Interv Cardiol ; 2022: 5839834, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35935123

RESUMO

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) practice and outcomes vary substantially in different parts of the world. The contemporary data of PCI in Asia are limited and only available from developed Asian countries. Objectives: To explore the pattern of practice and results of PCI procedures in Thailand as well as a temporal change of PCI practice over time compared with the registry from other countries. Methods: Thai PCI Registry is a prospective nationwide registry that was an initiative of the Cardiac Intervention Association of Thailand (CIAT). All cardiac catheterization laboratories in Thailand were invited to participate during 2018-2019, and consecutive PCI patients were enrolled and followed up for 1 year. Patient baseline characteristics, procedural details, equipment and medication use, outcomes, and complications were recorded. Results: Among the 39 hospitals participated, there were 22,741 patients included in this registry. Their mean age (standard deviation) was 64.2 (11.7) years and about 70% were males. The most common presentation was acute coronary syndrome (57%) with a high proportion of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (28%). Nearly two-thirds of patients had multivessel disease and significant left main stenosis was reported in 11%. The transradial approach was used in 44.2%. The procedural success rate was very high (95.2%) despite the high complexity of the lesions (56.9% type C lesion). The incidence of procedural complications was 5.3% and in-hospital mortality was 2.8%. Conclusion: Thai PCI Registry provides further insights into the current practice and outcomes of PCI in Southeast Asia. The success rate was very high, and the complications were very low despite the high complexity of the treated lesions.


Assuntos
Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Tailândia/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Med Assoc Thai ; 90(12): 2587-96, 2007 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18386707

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Early primary coronary interventions (PCI) in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with improved outcome and mortality rate but delayed reperfusion especially after 6 hours is still doubtful in terms of clinical benefits because most myocardial muscle are infarcted after 6 hours of onset of chest pain. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare the mortality rate of patients treated with PCI within 6 hours of symptom onset to those treated between 6 to 24 hours after the onset of STEMI. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The present study included consecutive patients from the data of the Fast Track Registry of King Chulalongkorn Hospital from June 1, 1999 to October 31, 2003 to compare the thirty-day mortality of patients treated with early or delayed PCI (0-6 hours vs. 6-24 hours after symptom of chest pain) for STEMI. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixteen patients who underwent PCI were enrolled. Male gender (82% vs. 64.9%, p = 0.03) and history of smoking (72.1% vs. 50%, p = 0.04) were predominant in the early treatment group (ETG) vs. the delayed treatment group (DTG). Mean age (60.5% vs. 61.03%, p = 0.11), diabetes (31.4% vs. 29.7%, p = 0.82), hypertension (64.0% vs. 54.1%, p = 0.20), dyslipidemia (58.1% vs. 60.8%, p = 0.73), and ejection fraction < 40% (22.8% vs. 32.0%, p = 0.625) were similar in both groups. There were no differences in angiographic finding and hospital management. Door to balloon and total delay time were 124.13 +/- 143.27 min and 407.94 +/- 268.183 min, respectively. The thirty-day mortality (9.01% vs. 12.76%, p = 0.379) and I year mortality (12.4% vs. 16 9%, p = 0.532) were not significantly determined by Log rank test in both groups. As for cardiogenic shock, ETG tended to have a lower thirty-day mortality than DTG but no statistically significant difference (12.5% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.0809). CONCLUSION: The delayed PCI up to 24 hours in STEMI does not increase short-term mortality at thirty days; therefore, it may still have benefit in STEMI patients. However it tended to have higher short-term mortality than early PCI especially in cardiogenic shock but showed no statistical significance.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Angioplastia com Balão , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Reperfusão Miocárdica/métodos , Perfusão/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Doença Aguda , Feminino , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Infarto do Miocárdio/fisiopatologia , Reperfusão Miocárdica/mortalidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA