Targeted antioxidative and neuroprotective properties of the dopamine agonist pramipexole and its nondopaminergic enantiomer SND919CL2x [(+)2-amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-6-Lpropylamino-benzathiazole dihydrochloride].

Pramipexole has been shown to possess neuroprotective properties in vitro that are partly independent of its dopaminergic agonism. The site of neuroprotective action is still unknown. Using [(3)H]pramipexole, we show that the drug enters and accumulates in cells and mitochondria. Detoxification of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by pramipexole is shown in vitro and in vivo by evaluating mitochondrial ROS release and aconitase-2 activity, respectively. Pramipexole and its (+)-enantiomer SND919CL2X [low-affinity dopamine agonist; (+)2-amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-6-l-propylamino-benzathiazole dihydrochloride] possess equipotent efficacy toward hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide generated in vitro and inhibit cell death in glutathione-depleted neuroblastoma cells. IC(50) values ranged from 15 to 1000 microM, consistent with the reactivity of the respective radical and the compartmentalization of ROS generation and ROS detoxification. Finally, both compounds were tested in superoxide dismutase 1-G93A mice, a model of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. SND919CL2X (100 mg/kg) prolongs survival time and preserves motor function in contrast to pramipexole (3 mg/kg), which shows an increase in running wheel activity before disease onset, presumably caused by the dopaminergic agonism. We conclude that both enantiomers, in addition to their dopaminergic activity, are able to confer neuroprotective effects by their ability to accumulate in brain, cells, and mitochondria where they detoxify ROS. However, a clinical use of pramipexole as a mitochondria-targeted antioxidant is unlikely, because the high doses needed for antioxidative action in vitro are not accessible in vivo due to dopaminergic side effects. In contrast, SND919CL2X may represent the prototype of a mitochondria-targeted neuroprotectant because it has the same antioxidative properties without causing adverse effects.

Na(+)/H(+) exchange inhibition-induced cardioprotection in dogs: effects on neutrophils versus cardiomyocytes.

Numerous studies have examined the effect of Na(+)/H(+) exchanger (NHE) inhibition on the myocardium; however, the effect of NHE-1 inhibition on neutrophil function has not been adequately examined. An in vivo canine model of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in which 60 min of left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion followed by 3 h of reperfusion was used to examine the effect of NHE-1 inhibition on infarct size (IS) and neutrophil function. BIIB-513, a selective inhibitor of NHE-1, was infused before ischemia. IS was expressed as a percentage of area at risk (IS/AAR). NHE-1 inhibition significantly reduced IS/AAR and reduced neutrophil accumulation in the ischemic myocardium. NHE-1 inhibition attenuated both phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate- and platelet-activating factor-induced neutrophil respiratory burst but not CD18 upregulation. Furthermore, NHE-1 inhibition directly protected cardiomyocytes against metabolic inhibition-induced lactate dehydrogenase release and hypercontracture. This study provides evidence that the cardioprotection induced by NHE-1 inhibition is likely due to specific protection of cardiomyocytes and attenuation of neutrophil activity.

Inhibition of the Na(+)/H(+) exchanger confers greater cardioprotection against 90 minutes of myocardial ischemia than ischemic preconditioning in dogs.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the efficacy of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and sodium-hydrogen exchanger (NHE)-1 inhibition to reduce infarct size (IS) induced by a 90-minute ischemic insult and examined the interaction between NHE-1 inhibition and IPC. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a canine infarct model, either IPC, produced by 1 or four 5-minute coronary artery occlusions, or the specific NHE-1 inhibitor BIIB 513, 0.75 or 3.0 mg/kg, was administered 15 minutes before either a 60- or 90-minute coronary artery occlusion followed by 3 hours of reperfusion. IS was determined by TTC staining and expressed as a percentage of the area at risk (IS/AAR). Although both IPC and BIIB 513 at 0.75 mg/kg produced comparable and significant reductions in IS/AAR in the 60-minute occlusion model, insignificant reductions in IS/AAR were observed in the 90-minute occlusion model. However, BIIB 513 at 3.0 mg/kg markedly reduced IS in both models (P<0.05). Next, to examine the interaction between NHE-1 blockade and IPC, BIIB 0.75 mg/kg was administered either before IPC or during the washout phase of IPC before 90 minutes of coronary artery occlusion. Both combinations resulted in a greater-than-additive reduction in IS/AAR (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that although IPC and NHE-1 inhibition provide comparable protection against 60 minutes of myocardial ischemia, NHE-1 inhibition is more efficacious than IPC at protecting against a 90-minute ischemic insult. Furthermore, the combination of NHE-1 inhibition and IPC produces a greater-than-additive reduction in IS/AAR, suggesting either that NHE activity limits the efficacy of IPC or that different mechanisms are involved in the cardioprotective effect of IPC and NHE-1 inhibition.