Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Anesth ; 37(1): 39-48, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36251094

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study aimed to elucidate the effects of neuraxial analgesia on labor in women classified based on the Robson classification system. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of singleton cephalic nulliparous deliveries in labor at term between January 2018 and December 2021 and compared obstetrical outcomes between deliveries with and without neuraxial analgesia in women of Robson group 1 (spontaneous labor) and group 2a (induced labor). Statistical analyses were performed using the Wilcoxon ranked-sum test, Fisher's exact test, and logistic regression model. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: We identified 2726 deliveries during the period, of which 387 deliveries (215 with analgesia and 172 without analgesia) were in Robson group 1 and 502 deliveries (258 with analgesia and 244 without analgesia) in Robson 2a. In Robson group 1 pregnancies, the cesarean section (CS) rate was higher in those who received analgesia (15%) than in those who did not (3%) (p = 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that labor with analgesia was a significant risk factor for CS (p < 0.0001). Similarly, in Robson group 2a pregnancies, we observed a higher CS rate in those with analgesia than in those without analgesia (18 vs. 11%, p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: A higher CS rate was observed in deliveries with analgesia than in those without analgesia both in the Robson group 1 and group 2a pregnancies.


Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural , Analgesia Obstétrica , Analgesia , Trabalho de Parto , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Cesárea , Estudos Retrospectivos , Paridade
2.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 264: 289-293, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34352425

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Among the various risk factors of pelvic floor disorders, pregnancy has been reported to affect the pelvic floor structure; however, not all these effects have been understood yet. The aim of this study is to elucidate how pregnancy affects pelvic floor structure via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective study between January 2010 and December 2019 to extract clinical records of pregnant and non-pregnant women, who underwent MRI for obstetrical diseases and ovarian benign tumors, respectively. The data on age, body mass index (BMI), complications, gravida, parity, gestational age, and obstetrical history were collected, and pubo-coccygeal line (PCL), pubo-rectal line (PRL), and M line (ML) on their MR images were measured. Statistical analyses were performed with Wilcoxon test, chi-square test, and Kruskal-Wallis test with Steel-Dwass post hoc test as appropriate. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: We analyzed the reports of 56 (pregnancy group) and 106 women (non-pregnancy group). There was no significant difference in age or BMI, while the obstetric history was significantly different between these groups. Median PCL, PRL, and ML in the pregnancy group were significantly longer than those in the non-pregnancy group (114.1 mm vs. 110.0 mm, P = 0.018; 48.6 mm vs. 41.6 mm, P < 0.0001 and 21.7 mm vs. 10.0 mm, p < 0.0001. respectively). The subgroup analysis of the effect of pregnancy and vaginal delivery (VD) history on changes in these lines revealed that pregnancy-induced PRL increase tended to recover to the reference level of "non-pregnant without VD," but ML increase did not fully recover. CONCLUSION: MRI revealed a strong effect of pregnancy on pelvic floor structure.


Assuntos
Distúrbios do Assoalho Pélvico , Diafragma da Pelve , Parto Obstétrico , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Diafragma da Pelve/diagnóstico por imagem , Distúrbios do Assoalho Pélvico/diagnóstico por imagem , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA