Level IV tumor thrombus in non-metastatic renal cell cancer? No, thanks. Level II is better. Lessons learned from a case report.

Up to 19% of patients with renal cell carcinoma present with a venous thrombus at diagnosis and 1% have a thrombus extending above the diaphragm. The higher the thrombus level, the more challenging the surgery. Cavoatrial tumor thrombus usually requires circulatory arrest and sometimes cardiopulmonary by-pass. We present a case of non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma with a cavoatrial tumor thrombus in a patient who was unfit for cardiac surgery. Eight months of targeted molecular therapy downsized the tumor thrombus to inferior vena cava and allowed us to perform a radical nephrectomy with minimal cavothomy for thrombus resection.

Seminoma Retroperitoneal Relapse 23 Years After Surgery.

Stage I seminoma is the most frequent tumour in young men. It has a very good prognosis thanks to the use of a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach including surgery, radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy. Late (after 2 years) and very late (after 5 years) relapses are uncommon, but not impossible, even if standardized follow-up for testicular tumours lasts up to 5 years after the diagnosis. We report a case of a 67-year-old Caucasian man with metachronous bilateral testicular seminoma who developed a retroperitoneal relapse of testicular seminoma 23 years after the first orchiectomy. Based on histological confirmation of testicular relapse, the patient underwent four cycles of systemic chemotherapy with bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (PEB), with no adverse reactions. He subsequently achieved complete radiological response at restaging computed tomography imaging, confirmed by the absence of glucose metabolism on positron emission tomography. In conclusion, this case report suggests the importance of longer standardized follow-up for patients treated for testicular tumours in order to detect earlier recurrence, which can be successfully treated.

Autophagic Gene Polymorphisms in Liquid Biopsies and Outcome of Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Autophagy has been shown to be involved in cancer development and response to cancer therapy. In this study, genotypes of autophagic genes were analyzed to assess their correlation with the risk of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and the outcome of patients treated with pazopanib for metastatic ccRCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)were selected in the following genes: ATG4A (rs7880351), ATG4B (rs6709768), ATG4C (rs2886770, rs6670694, rs6683832), ATG5 (rs9373839, rs3804333, rs490010), ATG16L1 (rs6752107), ATG16L2 (rs10751215) and IRGM (rs10059011). The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to evaluate differences between groups. RESULTS: Forty patients with metastatic ccRCC treated with pazopanib were included in the analysis. ATG16L2rs10751215 was significantly less frequent in patients with ccRCC compared to the general population, suggesting its potential protective role, while ATG4Ars7880351, ATG4C rs6670694 and rs6683832 and ATG5 rs490010 were correlated with the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients treated with pazopanib. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest, for the first time, that autophagic gene SNPs are associated with ccRCC risk and patient outcome.

Update on histopathological evaluation of lymphadenectomy specimens from prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Metastases to lymph nodes (LNs) represent an unfavorable prognostic factor in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Histological examination represents the gold standard in the evaluation of the lymphadenectomy (LND) specimens for the presence of secondary deposits. METHODS AND RESULTS: The metastatic detection rate can vary according to the approach adopted in the microscopic analysis of the LNs, which includes frozen-section examination, total inclusion of the tissue with and without whole-mount sections, serial sectioning, and the application of immunohistochemistry. The assessment of the sentinel LN, the search for micrometastases, and the evaluation of atypical LN metastatic sites further contribute to the detection of the metastatic spread. CONCLUSION: In this review, an update on the histopathological evaluation of LND specimens in patients with PCa is given, and focus is made on their clinical and prognostic significance.

Economic sustainability of anti-PD-1 agents nivolumab and pembrolizumab in cancer patients: Recent insights and future challenges.

Anti-programmed death (PD)-1 agents pembrolizumab and nivolumab have recently obtained enthusiastic results in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and tolerability in cancer patients. Despite these promising data, the high cost of these agents needs careful consideration. Indeed, the evaluation of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and quality-adjusted life year (QALY), as well as different drug reimbursement modalities, will represent fundamental tools in order to guarantee the economic sustainability of health system and the access to care for all cancer patients. In this review, we discussed the recent results obtained by immunotherapy in cancer patients and we evaluated the economic impact of recently approved nivolumab and pembrolizumab in patients with advanced melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Angiogenesis genotyping in the selection of first-line treatment with either sunitinib or pazopanib for advanced renal cell carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Recent data from the COMPARZ study seem to suggest a non-inferiority of pazopanib confronted with sunitinib in PFS and OS. We previously reported how VEGF and VEGFR polymorphisms might have a predictive role in patients treated with first-line sunitinib. Aim of our study was to investigate whether tumour angiogenesis genotyping could influence clinical outcome in RCC patients treated with either sunitinib or pazopanib, in order to help clinicians select the appropriate treatment for each patient. RESULTS: 19 patients were treated with pazopanib while 78 received sunitinib. VEGF A rs833061 resulted significant in PFS in sunitinib vs pazopanib patients (CC+CT>TT in sunitinib, TT>CC+CT in pazopanib; p<0,0001); VEGF A rs2010963 resulted significant in PFS in sunitinib vs pazopanib patients (GG+CG>CC in sunitinib, CC>GG+CG in pazopanib; p<0,0001); VEGF A rs699947 resulted significant in PFS in sunitinib vs pazopanib patients (AA+AC>CC in sunitinib, CC>AA+AC in pazopanib; p<0,0001). OS showed no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: in our analysis patients with opposite polymorphisms of rs833061, rs2010963, rs699947 of VEGF A seems to have a better PFS if treated with either sunitinib or pazopanib. Our data seem to suggest that biology could have a role choosing first line treatment for mRCC patients. METHODS: a retrospective analysis on 97 histologic samples of mRCC patients was conducted for VEGF-A, VEGF-C and VEGFR-1,2,3 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).

Risk of recurrence and conditional survival in complete responders treated with TKIs plus or less locoregional therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: We retrospectively analyzed the risk of recurrence and conditional Disease-Free Survival (cDFS) in 63 patients with complete remission during treatment with tirosin kinase inhibitor (TKI), alone or with local treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. RESULTS: 37% patients achieve CR with TKI alone, while 63% with additional loco-regional treatments. 49% patients recurred after CR, with a median Disease free survival of 28.2 months. Patients treated with multimodal approaches present lower rate of recurrence (40% vs 61%) and longer Disease free survival compared to patient treated with TKI alone (16.5 vs 41.9 months, p=0.039).Furthermore the rate of recurrence was higher in patients with brain (88%), pancreatic (71%) and bone metastasis (50%). Patients who continued TKI therapy after complete response had a longer disease free survival than patients who stopped therapy, although the difference was not significant (42.1 vs 25.1 months, p=0.254). 2y-cDFS was better in patients treated with multimodal treatment and who continued TKIs than the other patient arms. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic value of CR depends on the site where was obtained and how was obtained (with or without locoregional treatment). Cessation of TKI should be carefully considered in complete responder patients.

Correlation of Stomatitis and Cutaneous Toxicity With Clinical Outcome in Patients With Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Treated With Everolimus.

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, discontinuation or dose reduction of everolimus may be induced not only by grade 3 or 4 toxicities but also by prolonged grade 2 toxicities, such as stomatitis and/or cutaneous toxicity, which share some pathogenetic mechanisms. We assessed the correlation between either everolimus discontinuation or dose reduction induced by stomatitis-cutaneous toxicity events (SCTE) and clinical outcome of patients with metastatic renal-cell cancer (mRCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients with mRCC treated with everolimus in 2 Italian centers. Clinical evidence of SCTE was evaluated, and corresponding clinical data were reviewed for response and clinical outcome. RESULTS: Seventy-nine mRCC patients treated with everolimus (57 male, 22 female; median age 66 years; range, 44-88 years) were evaluated. SCTE were observed in 20 (25%) of 79 patients at a median of 30.5 days of everolimus treatment (range, 10-270 days). Partial response or stable disease was achieved in 15 (79%) of 19 evaluable patients with SCTE compared to 28 (48%) of 58 with no SCTE (P = .03). At a median follow-up of 19 months, a significant difference was found in the median PFS equal to 7.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8-24.4) in SCTE patients versus 4.3 months (95% CI, 2.7-7.5) in non-SCTE patients (P = .029), and in the median OS equal to 30.6 months (95% CI, 19.6-not reached) in SCTE patients versus 13.5 months (95% CI, 9.9-17.7) in non-SCTE patients (P = .0007). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that SCTE may be a predictive marker of favorable outcome in mRCC patients treated with everolimus.

Prostate cancer: from Gleason scoring to prognostic grade grouping.

The Gleason grading system was developed in the late 1960s by Dr. Donald F. Gleason. Due to changes in prostatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) detection and treatment, newer technologies to better characterize prostatic pathology, subsequently described variants of PAC and further data relating various morphologic patterns to prognosis, the application of the Gleason grading system changed substantially in surgical pathology. First in 2005 and more recently in 2014, consensus conferences were held to update PAC grading. Here, we review of the successive changes in the grading of PAC from the original system, with emphasis on the newest prognostic grade grouping.

Computational analysis of the mutations in BAP1, PBRM1 and SETD2 genes reveals the impaired molecular processes in renal cell carcinoma.

Clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC) is due to loss of von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene and at least one out of three chromatin regulating genes BRCA1-associated protein-1 (BAP1), Polybromo-1 (PBRM1) and Set domain-containing 2 (SETD2). More than 350, 700 and 500 mutations are known respectively for BAP1, PBRM1 and SETD2 genes. Each variation damages these genes with different severity levels. Unfortunately for most of these mutations the molecular effect is unknown, so precluding a severity classification. Moreover, the huge number of these gene mutations does not allow to perform experimental assays for each of them. By bioinformatic tools, we performed predictions of the molecular effects of all mutations lying in BAP1, PBRM1 and SETD2 genes. Our results allow to distinguish whether a mutation alters protein function directly or by splicing pattern destruction and how much severely. This classification could be useful to reveal correlation with patients' outcome, to guide experiments, to select the variations that are worth to be included in translational/association studies, and to direct gene therapies.

Inside the 2015 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium.

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Genitourinary Cancers Symposium, Rosen Shingle Creek, Orlando, FL, USA, 26-28 February 2015 The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Genitourinary Cancers Symposium was held in Orlando (FL, USA), from 26 to 28 February 2015. This meeting was focused on 'Integrating Biology into patient-centric care' and represented an attractive opportunity for oncology professionals with a special interest in the diagnosis and treatment of genitourinary tumors. The identification and validation of biomarkers for tumor response had been the focus of several researchers at the symposium, together with the development of novel targeted agents. This report is a summary of the highlights on kidney and prostate tumors presented at the 2015 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium by various investigators.

Small renal masses in the era of personalized medicine: Tumor heterogeneity, growth kinetics, and risk of metastasis.

Small renal masses (SRMs) represent a heterogeneous group showing a variety of clinical and biological behaviors. The best treatment for SRMs has been the focus of much debate over the past decades. Present strategies include surgery (partial or radical nephrectomy), local treatments (radiofrequency and cryoablation), or active surveillance. The choice among these therapeutic options is based on patient clinical features such as age or comorbidities rather than on tumor characteristics. Several studies have recently focused on the molecular behavior of SRMs. They showed that SRMs present histotype and nuclear grading heterogeneity, together with not unvarying growth kinetics and risk of recurrence or metastasis, suggesting that personalized approaches should be designed to optimize the management of these patients. At present, several studies are in course to identify predictive biomarkers to guide the decision-making process in this subpopulation. In this review, we summarized the data on growth kinetics, tumor heterogeneity, and risk of metastasis in patients with SRMs, with focus on the current role of biopsies and imaging in the management of these patients.

Prognostic significance of host immune status in patients with late relapsing renal cell carcinoma treated with targeted therapy.

We aimed to assess the prognostic role of pretreatment neutrophilia, lymphocytopenia, and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) for late relapsing (>5 years) metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Data were collected from 13 Italian centers involved in the treatment of metastatic RCC. Late relapse was defined as >5 years after initial radical nephrectomy. One hundred fifty-one patients were included in this analysis. Among them, MSKCC risk score was favorable in 68 %, intermediate in 29 %, and poor in 3 %. Fifty-six patients (37 %) had NLR ≥3 at the start of VEGFR-TKI therapy (group A), while 95 had lower NLR (63 %, group B). The median overall survival (OS) was 28.8 months in group A and 68.7 months (95 % confidence interval (CI) 45.3-NA) in group B (p < 0.001). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15.8 months in group A and 25.1 months in group B (p = 0.03). At multivariate analysis, MSKCC risk group and NLR were independent prognostic factors for both OS and PFS. Pretreatment NLR is an independent prognostic factor for patients with late relapsing mRCC treated with first-line VEGFR-TKIs. A better characterization of baseline immunological impairment may optimize the management of this RCC subpopulation.

Survival in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma is predicted by HIF-1α expression.

AIM: To investigate hypoxia inducible factor-1α's (HIF-1α) immunohistochemical expression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) treated with radical nephrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty-eight patients were considered from those who underwent radical nephrectomy between 1983 and 1993. Archived materials were retrieved from the Institute of Pathological Anatomy for immunostaining. The features considered on the histological specimens were tumor stage, grade, as well as cellular and vascular HIF-1α expression. All considered parameters were correlated with time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: TTR was significantly longer in patients with low cellular HIF-1α expression; patients' survival was higher in those with low HIF-1α expression. Regarding vascular HIF-1α expression, the differences were not statistically significant when considering TTR and OS. On univariate analysis, age, clinical stage and HIF-1α cellular expression showed a significant association with OS. CONCLUSION: Cellular HIF-1α is an important indicator of prognosis in patients with ccRCC; high HIF-1α expression predicts poor survival.

Role of STAT3 pathway in genitourinary tumors.

The STAT3 is often dysregulated in genitourinary tumors. In prostate cancer, STAT3 activation correlates with Gleason score and pathological stage and modulates cancer stem cells and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. In addition, STAT3 promotes the progression from carcinoma in situ to invasive bladder cancer and modulates renal cell carcinoma angiogenesis by increasing the expression of HIF1α and VEGF. STAT3 is also involved in the response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors sunitinib and axitinib, in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and to second-generation androgen receptor inhibitor enzalutamide in patients with advanced prostate cancer. In this review, we describe the role of STAT3 in genitourinary tumors, thus describing its potential for future therapeutic strategies.

Tumor VEGF expression correlates with tumor stage and identifies prognostically different groups in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a potent inducer of tumor angiogenesis and represents the key element in the pathogenesis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). The aim of this study was to investigate the use of tumor VEGF expression as a parameter to identify tumor stage and prognostically different patient groups. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively collected clinical data of 137 patients treated with partial or radical nephrectomy at our institutions for organ-confined, locally advanced, and metastatic ccRCCs between 1984 and 2013. Tumor cell VEGF immunohistochemical expression was compared with pathological and clinical features including age, sex, tumor stage, and Fuhrman grade. Comparison of VEGF expression levels between tumor stages was performed via Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test. Survival analysis was conducted via Kaplan-Meier product-limit method, and Mantel-Haenszel log-rank test was employed to compare survival among groups. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 61 years (range: 33-85 y). Tumor stage was pT1N0M0 in 67 patients (49%), pT2N0M0 in 5 (4%), and pT3N0M0 in 25 (18%), while 40 patients (29%) had metastatic tumors at diagnosis. Fuhrman nuclear grade was G1 in 22 patients (16%), G2 in 60 (44%), G3 in 33 (24%), G4 in 13 patients (9%), and unknown in 9 patients. Tumor VEGF was differentially expressed among different stages (P<0.001) and in low (G1-2) and high (G3-4) Fuhrman grade tumors (P<0.001). No significant differences were found when stratifying by sex (P = 0.06) or age (P = 0.29). Median overall survival (OS) from partial or radical nephrectomy was 161 months (range: 1-366). We observed a significantly longer OS in patients with low (<25%) vs. high (>25%) VEGF expression levels (median OS 206 vs. 65 mo, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that tumor cell VEGF expression is significantly associated with tumor stage and Fuhrman grade and is able to predict patient outcome, suggesting a potential use of this parameter in identifying prognostically different patients with ccRCC.

Sunitinib, pazopanib or sorafenib for the treatment of patients with late relapsing metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Late recurrence of renal cell carcinoma is not a rare event. In this retrospective study we investigate the clinicopathological features and the outcome of patients treated with sorafenib, sunitinib and pazopanib for late relapsing renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from 21 Italian centers involved in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Late relapse was defined as more than 5 years after initial radical nephrectomy. RESULTS: A total of 2,490 patients were screened and 269 (11%) were included in the study. First line therapy was sunitinib in 190 patients (71%), sorafenib in 58 (21%) and pazopanib in 21 (8%). Median progression-free survival was 20.0 months for sunitinib (95% CI 17.0-25.1), and 14.1 months for sorafenib (95% CI 11.0-29.0) and pazopanib (95% CI 11.2-not reported). On multivariate analysis MSKCC score and metastases to lymph nodes, liver and brain were associated with worst overall survival, while pancreatic metastases were associated with longer survival. Furthermore, age, MSKCC score and brain metastases were associated with worst progression-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with late relapsing renal cell carcinoma seem to present a characteristic pattern of metastatic spread without showing significant differences in terms of progression-free survival among sorafenib, sunitinib and pazopanib.

Surgical resection does not improve survival in patients with renal metastases to the pancreas in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare survival of resected and unresected patients in a large cohort of patients with metastases to the pancreas from renal cell carcinoma (PM-RCC). METHODS: Data from 16 Italian centers involved in the treatment of metastatic RCC were retrospectively collected. The Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test methods were used to evaluate overall survival (OS). Clinical variables considered were sex, age, concomitant metastasis to other sites, surgical resection of PM-RCC, and time to PM-RCC occurrence. RESULTS: Overall, 103 consecutive patients with radically resected primary tumors were enrolled in the analysis. PM-RCCs were synchronous in only three patients (3 %). In 56 patients (54 %), the pancreas was the only metastatic site, whereas in the other 47 patients, lung (57 %), lymph nodes (28 %), and liver (21 %) were the most common concomitant metastatic sites. Median time for PM-RCC occurrence was 9.6 years (range 0-24 years) after nephrectomy. Surgical resection of PM-RCC was performed in 44 patients (median OS 103 months), while 59 patients were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs; median OS 86 months) (p = 0.201). At multivariate analysis, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center risk group was the only independent prognostic factor. None of the other clinical variables, such as age, sex, pancreatic surgery, or the presence of concomitant metastases, were significantly associated with outcome in PM-RCC patients. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of PM-RCC is associated with a long survival, and surgical resection does not improve survival in comparison with TKI therapy. However, surgical resection leads to a percentage of disease-free PM-RCC patients.

High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio persistent during first-line chemotherapy predicts poor clinical outcome in patients with advanced urothelial cancer.

BACKGROUND: Increased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), an index of systemic inflammation, is associated with poor outcome for various types of cancers. We assessed the role on outcome prediction of NLR at baseline and persistent during first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 292 patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy between January 2003 and December 2012. The cutoff values of NLR (>3 vs. <3) were evaluated before therapy and at day 1 of the second and third cycle (follow-up NLR). After univariate analysis, a multivariate analysis was carried out by Cox regression model and included the following variables: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (≥ 2 vs. 0-1), visceral disease (present vs. absent), hemoglobin (<12 g/dL vs. >12 g/dL), pretherapy NLR (>3 vs. <3), and follow-up NLR (>3 vs. ≤ 3). RESULTS: Patients with pre- and follow-up NLR of >3 had a median progression-free survival of 3.2 months and a median overall survival of 5.7 months. In multivariate analysis, visceral metastases, pretherapy hemoglobin, and follow-up NLR were significant predictors of progression-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.75, P = 0.0001; HR 1.57, P = 0.0015; HR 2.77, P < 0.0001, respectively], and of overall survival (HR 1.60, P = 0.0023; HR 1.59, P = 0.0024; HR 2.89, P < 0.0001, respectively); whereas pretherapy NLR remained as predictor of overall survival only (HR 1.53, P = 0.0101). CONCLUSIONS: An increased NLR persistent during first-line chemotherapy is an independent predictive factor for patients with advanced urothelial cancer.

Conditional survival of patients treated with first-line chemotherapy for metastatic urothelial cancer.

BACKGROUND: Measures of prognosis for cancer patients are typically evaluated at the time of diagnosis. However, this study assessed the changes in 2-year CS rates after first-line chemotherapy for metastatic UC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Conditional overall survival and CPFS probability were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Adjusted survival functions were stratified according to age groups (< 70 years vs. ≥ 70 years), sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS; ECOG PS ≤ 2 vs. ECOG PS > 2), pretreatment Hb levels (< 12 mg/dL vs. ≥ 12 mg/dL) and pretreatment NLR (< 3 vs. ≥ 3). Pairs of CS curves were compared using the Mantel-Haenszel log-rank test. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-eight patients were included in this analysis, 233 were male, and their median age was 69 years. First-line median overall survival and progression-free survival were 10.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.6-12.6) and 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.5-7.1), respectively. CPFS and COS showed an increasing trend in the population considered (b = 0.35; P < .001 and b = 0.79; P < .001, respectively). A significant increase in terms of COS and CPFS trends was identified in patients with age < 70 years (P = .02 and P = .005, respectively) and pretreatment NLR ≤ 3 (P = .05 and P < .001, respectively). Patients with Hb levels < 12 g/dL showed a significantly poorer 2-year COS. CONCLUSION: The conditional probability of survival at 2 years from the start of first-line chemotherapy for advanced UC changes over time according to clinical characteristics.