Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Anesth Analg ; 113(4): 869-76, 2011 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21788319

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Incentives based on quality indicators such as the Surgical Care Improvement Project core measures (SCIP 1) encourage implementation of evidence-based guidelines consistently into clinical practice. Information systems with point-of-care electronic prompts (POCEPs) can facilitate adoption of processes and benchmark performance. We evaluated the effectiveness of POCEPs on rates of antibiotic administration within 60 minutes of surgical incision and effect on outcome in a prospective observational trial. METHODS: SCIP 1 compliance and the corresponding outcome variable (surgical site infection [SSI]) were examined prospectively over 2 consecutive 6-month periods before (A) and after (B) POCEPs implementation at a regional health system. Secondary analysis extended the observation to two 12-month periods (A' and B'). A 2-year (C and D) sustainability phase followed. RESULTS: The 19,744 procedures included 9127 and 10,617 procedures before (A) and after (B) POCEPs implementation, respectively. POCEPs increased compliance with SCIP indicators in period B by 31% (95% CI, 30.0%-32.2%) from 62% to 92% (P < 0.001) and were associated with a sustainable, contemporaneous decrease in the incidence of SSI from 1.1% to 0.7% (P = 0.003; absolute risk reduction, 0.4%; 95% CI, 0.1%-0.7%). Secondary and sustainability analysis revealed that compliance rates remained >95% with mean SSI rates lower for all periods compared with pre-POCEPs SSI rates (0.8%, 0.7%, and 0.5% vs 1.1%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: POCEPs increased compliance with SCIP indicators by >30% and were associated with a 0.4% absolute risk reduction in the incidence of SSI. POCEPs may be useful to modulate provider behavior and demonstrate intraoperative quality and value.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Anestesia/normas , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Sistemas de Alerta/normas , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/normas , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Sistemas de Informação Hospitalar/normas , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pennsylvania , Assistência Perioperatória , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Hand (N Y) ; 5(1): 65-7, 2010 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19582511

RESUMO

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a frequent cause for patients to present to a physician's office or emergency department. We observed increasing numbers of community-acquired MRSA infections in patients admitted to the hand surgery service at our suburban academic center. It is an important issue as unsuspected community-acquired MRSA hand infections can be admitted to the hospital, inadequately treated, and allowed for nosocomial spread. This study was performed to examine the trend in the incidence of community-acquired MRSA infections in patients admitted to the hand surgery service in order to sensitize practitioners to have a high index of suspicion for this entity and promote early recognition and treatment of this organism. A multihospital retrospective chart review was undertaken to compare the total number of community-acquired MRSA infections in our hospital as well as the number in patients admitted to the hand surgery service with community-acquired MRSA from 2000 through 2008. Statistical analysis was provided by linear regression. Two community-acquired hand MRSA infections were treated in 2000, as compared to three in 2001 and 2002, four in 2003, five in 2004, six in 2005, 14 in 2006, 13 in 2007, and ten in 2008. This increase was statistically significant (p = 0.038). This retrospective review documents a rapidly rising number of community-acquired MRSA hand infections in the suburban environment. The hand surgeon must be aware of the increased prevalence of this entity to adequately combat this organism and prevent prolonged hospital stays, expanded morbidity, and inflated treatment costs.

4.
Am J Infect Control ; 34(7): 458-64, 2006 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16945694

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study sought to establish a benchmark of resistant organism rates among a cohort of regional hospitals. METHODS: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definitions were used to standardize the methodology for obtaining rates per 1000 patient days of nosocomial infection and colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE), and nosocomial infection with Clostridium difficile (CDIF). Only newly acquired nosocomial cases were counted. Data were reported as individual hospital control charts and as cohorted aggregate data. VHA East Coast Infection Control Professionals from 32 hospitals in New Jersey and Pennsylvania were involved. RESULTS: Benchmarks were established with pooled mean rates for each cohort. During the observational period, a statistically significant downward trend was observed for VRE and MRSA (P = .02 and .0007, respectively), and an upward trend was observed for CDIF (P = .0256). CONCLUSION: Benchmarks were established to compare nosocomial MRSA, VRE, and CDIF rates. Although significant changes in rates were observed, no attempt was made to establish a causal relationship between infection control practices and observed rates. However, a secondary gain was achieved through sharing best practices.


Assuntos
Benchmarking/normas , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/epidemiologia , Resistência a Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estreptocócicas/epidemiologia , Resistência a Vancomicina , Clostridioides difficile/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Enterococcus/efeitos dos fármacos , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/microbiologia , Humanos , New Jersey/epidemiologia , Pennsylvania/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções Estreptocócicas/microbiologia
6.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 10(2): 217-24, 2004 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15030686

RESUMO

In early April 2003, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) was diagnosed in a Pennsylvania resident after his exposure to persons with SARS in Toronto, Canada. To identify contacts of the case-patient and evaluate the risk for SARS transmission, a detailed epidemiologic investigation was performed. On the basis of this investigation, 26 persons (17 healthcare workers, 4 household contacts, and 5 others) were identified as having had close contact with this case-patient before infection-control practices were implemented. Laboratory evaluation of clinical specimens showed no evidence of transmission of SARS-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) infection to any close contact of this patient. This investigation documents that, under certain circumstances, SARS-CoV is not readily transmitted to close contacts, despite ample unprotected exposures. Improving the understanding of risk factors for transmission will help focus public health control measures.


Assuntos
Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave/transmissão , Busca de Comunicante , Fatores Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário/epidemiologia , Pennsylvania/epidemiologia , Saúde Pública , Fatores de Risco , Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Viagem , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA