Exploring First Nations' and Cultural Safety Content of Pharmacy Curricula With Academics in Australia.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore academics' views on Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander Health and Cultural Safety content in pharmacy school curricula to inform recommendations for future curricula. METHODS: All 18 Australian pharmacy schools were contacted, and interviews were conducted with consenting heads of school and/or their delegate(s). The interviews covered what the school was doing with respect to the First Nations theme in the revised accreditation standards and further ideas for improvement. Audio recordings of interviews were transcribed verbatim via an online transcription service. Transcripts were thematically analyzed and coded according to the framework approach and mapped to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Curriculum Framework. Coding was facilitated using NVivo software. RESULTS: All 18 schools consented to participate and a total of 22 interviews were conducted. The pharmacy accreditation standards were well known to most educators, however, the dissemination of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Curriculum Framework, introduced in 2014, appeared to be poor. Many interviewees (n = 14) expressed that the current content regarding Aboriginal health and cultural safety/competence was lacking and cited barriers that have led to a lack of development such as a lack of First Nations staff and expertize. CONCLUSION: While cultural safety/competency was taught in all Australian pharmacy schools, it is apparent that pharmacy schools are at various stages in their development of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health curriculum design and implementation. Future resources should be developed and made available.

Clinical yarning with Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander peoples-a systematic scoping review of its use and impacts.

OBJECTIVES: To explore how clinical yarning has been utilised as a health intervention for Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander peoples and if there are any reported impacts yarning might have on health outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic scoping review of published literature. DATA SOURCES: A one-word search term "yarning" was applied in Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL, MEDLINE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Australian Public Affairs Information Service-Health, and the Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander Health Bibliography databases. Databases were searched from inception to May 20, 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included where clinical yarning had been used as a health intervention. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed and applied according to PRISMA systematic and scoping review reporting methods. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 375 manuscripts were found from the initial data search. After removal of duplicates and removal of manuscripts based on abstract review, a total of 61 studies underwent full-text review. Of these, only five met the inclusion criteria of utilising yarning as a clinical intervention. Four of these studies described consumer self-reported health outcomes, with only one study looking at improvements in objective physiological health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst clinical yarning may be a culturally appropriate intervention in healthcare, there are limited studies that have measured the impact of this intervention. Further research may be needed to ascertain the true benefits of this intervention.