RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite impaired humoral response in patients treated with immunosuppressants (ISPs), recent studies found similar severity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) breakthrough infection compared to controls. One potential explanation is the rapid generation of humoral response on infection, but evidence is lacking. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the longitudinal dynamics of the SARS-CoV-2 antibody repertoire after SARS-CoV-2 delta and omicron breakthrough infection in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) receiving ISP therapy and controls. METHODS: As a prospective substudy of the national Target-to-B! (T2B!) consortium, we included IMID patients receiving ISPs therapy and controls who reported SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection between July 1, 2021, and April 1, 2022. To get an impression of the dynamics of the antibody repertoire, 3 antibody titers of wild-type RBD, wild-type S, and omicron RBD were measured at 4 time points after SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection. RESULTS: We included 302 IMID patients receiving ISPs and 178 controls. Antibody titers increased up to 28 days after breakthrough infection in both groups. However, in IMID patients receiving therapy with anti-CD20 and sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor modulators, antibody titers were considerably lower compared to controls. In the anti-TNF group, we observed slightly lower antibody titers in the early stages and a faster decline of antibodies after infection compared to controls. Breakthrough infections were mostly mild, and hospitalization was required in less than 1% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Most ISPs do not influence the dynamics of the SARS-CoV-2 antibody repertoire and exhibit a rapid recall response with cross-reactive antibody clones toward new virus variants. However, in patients treated with anti-CD20 therapy or sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor modulators, the dynamics were greatly impaired, and to a lesser extent in those who received anti-TNF. Nevertheless, only a few severe breakthrough cases were reported.
RESUMO
ABSTRACT: The risk of a venous thrombotic event (VTE) is increased in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV); however, a detailed understanding of the underlying mechanisms of hypercoagulability is limited. We assessed prospectively different coagulation parameters in 71 patients with active AAV at baseline and after 6 months of follow-up. D-dimers and fibrinogen were increased in most patients at presentation and remained elevated in half of the patients. Particularly, thrombin-antithrombin (T:AT) complex and activated coagulation factors in complex with their natural inhibitors of the intrinsic coagulation pathway (ie, activated FXII:C1 esterase inhibitor [FXIIa:C1Inh], FXIa:AT, and FXIa:alpha1-antitrypsin [FXIa:α1AT]) were profoundly elevated in patients at baseline. Thrombin formation was dominantly correlated with coagulation factors of the intrinsic pathway (ie, FXIIa:AT, FXIa:AT, FXIa:α1AT, and FXIa:C1Inh) compared to the extrinsic pathway (ie, FVIIa:AT). Hypercoagulability correlated with higher disease activity, ANCA levels, C-reactive protein, serum creatinine, and proteinuria. VTEs were observed in 5 out of 71 (7%) patients within 1 month (interquartile range, 1-5) after inclusion. Baseline T:AT levels were significantly higher in patients with VTE than in those without VTE (P = .044), but other clinical or laboratory markers were comparable between both groups. Hypercoagulability is dominantly characterized by activation of the intrinsic coagulation pathway and elevated D-dimers in active AAV. The driving factors of hypercoagulability are yet to be studied but are most likely related to an interplay of increased disease activity, vascular inflammation, and endothelial damage. Future targets for intervention could include inhibitors of the intrinsic coagulation pathway and compounds specifically reducing the hyperinflammatory state.