Egyptian Pediatric Guidelines for the Management of Children with Isolated Thrombocytopenia Using the Adapted ADAPTE Methodology-A Limited-Resource Country Perspective.

BACKGROUND: Thrombocytopenia is a prevalent presentation in childhood with a broad spectrum of etiologies, associated findings, and clinical outcomes. Establishing the cause of thrombocytopenia and its proper management have obvious clinical repercussions but may be challenging. This article provides an adaptation of the high-quality Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) of pediatric thrombocytopenia management to suit Egypt's health care context. METHODS: The Adapted ADAPTE methodology was used to identify the high-quality CPGs published between 2010 and 2020. An expert panel screened, assessed and reviewed the CPGs and formulated the adapted consensus recommendations based on the best available evidence. DISCUSSION: The final CPG document provides consensus recommendations and implementation tools on the management of isolated thrombocytopenia in children and adolescents in Egypt. There is a scarcity of evidence to support recommendations for various management protocols. In general, complete clinical assessment, full blood count, and expert analysis of the peripheral blood smear are indicated at initial diagnosis to confirm a bleeding disorder, exclude secondary causes of thrombocytopenia and choose the type of work up required. The International Society of Hemostasis and thrombosis-Bleeding assessment tool (ISTH-SCC BAT) could be used for initial screening of bleeding manifestations. The diagnosis of immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is based principally on the exclusion of other causes of isolated thrombocytopenia. Future research should report the outcome of this adapted guideline and include cost-analysis evaluations.

Does anti-HPA-1a affect birthweight in fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia?

BACKGROUND: Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) ensues from parental incompatibility for platelet alloantigens with maternal sensitization. HPA-1a/1b incompatibility is the most common cause of FNAIT in Caucasians. Placental villitis and lower birthweight in FNAIT suggest anti-HPA-1a may have effects beyond inducing thrombocytopenia. OBJECTIVES: Does FNAIT secondary to anti-HPA-1a result in smaller newborns and, the corollary, does antenatal management of FNAIT increase birthweight? STUDY DESIGN: Birthweights of 270 FNAIT-affected newborns from a randomized clinical trial and a NAITbabies.org survey (135 paired siblings) were compared with those of published controls and treated to untreated FNAIT-affected siblings. Birthweights were converted to percentiles to account for gestational age, sex, and role of birth order in birth weight. Body weights of FNAIT-affected and -unaffected pups in a mouse FNAIT model were analyzed. RESULTS: Untreated siblings in both the clinical trial and NAITbabies.org cohorts were not small, compared with normal controls. However, treated siblings in both cohorts had significantly higher birthweight percentiles compared with their previous untreated affected sibling. After accounting for gestational age, sex, and birth order, increased birthweight percentile in treated compared with the untreated siblings remained significant in both cohorts. FNAIT-affected neonatal mice had lower bodyweights than FNAIT-unaffected pups. CONCLUSIONS: Untreated FNAIT-affected newborns were not small; however, treatment of FNAIT-affected pregnancies increased newborn birthweights despite corrections to account for other factors that might have influenced the results. High dose IVIG is believed to "block" FcRn and lower maternal anti-HPA-1a levels, and thus increase birthweights by reducing levels of maternal anti-HPA-1a and reducing placental villitis.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in pregnancy.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in pregnancy is challenging for both mother and fetus. Understanding the pathophysiology, treatments, and risks to the mother and fetus leads to proper management resulting in successful pregnancy and delivery in almost all cases.1 ITP in a pregnant woman has many similarities to ITP not in pregnancy although gestational thrombocytopenia can be confused with ITP. However, recognizing differences is instrumental in avoiding bleeding complications and toxicities of treatment. This Nutshell review focuses on the natural history of ITP in pregnancy, its treatment, and dilemmas.

The highs and lows of cyclic thrombocytopenia.

Cyclic thrombocytopenia (CTP) is characterized by periodic platelet oscillation with substantial amplitude. Most CTP cases have a thrombocytopenic background and are often misdiagnosed as immune thrombocytopenia with erratically effective treatment choices. CTP also occurs during hydroxyurea treatment in patients with myeloproliferative diseases. While the aetiology of CTP remains uncertain, here we evaluate historical, theoretical and clinical findings to provide a framework for understanding CTP pathophysiology. CTP retains the intrinsic oscillatory factors defined by the homeostatic regulation of platelet count, presenting as reciprocal platelet/thrombopoietin oscillations and stable oscillation periodicity. Moreover, CTP patients possess pathogenic factors destabilizing the platelet homeostatic system thereby creating opportunities for external perturbations to initiate and sustain the exaggerated platelet oscillations. Beyond humoral and cell-mediated autoimmunity, we propose recently uncovered germline and somatic genetic variants, such as those of MPL, STAT3 or DNMT3A, as pathogenic factors in thrombocytopenia-related CTP. Likewise, the JAK2 V617F or BCR::ABL1 translocation that drives underlying myeloproliferative diseases may also play a pathogenic role in hydroxyurea-induced CTP, where hydroxyurea treatment can serve as both a trigger and a pathogenic factor of platelet oscillation. Elucidating the pathogenic landscape of CTP provides an opportunity for targeted therapeutic approaches in the future.

Improving the chances of response to splenectomy in immune thrombocytopenia.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder characterized by isolated thrombocytopenia. Its pathogenesis is complex relying in large part on destruction of platelets recognized by autoantibodies within the spleen. However, other mechanisms, such as platelet desialylation, may play a role in platelet reduction by accelerating their clearance in the liver. In their study, Mendoza and colleagues reported on platelet scintigraphy performed in 51 ITP patients, showing a response in 87.5% when the sequestration occurred in the spleen versus 45% in case of non-splenic destruction. Platelet desialylation was also measured after splenectomy and found to be higher in non-responder patients. These latter results, while requiring confirmation prior to splenectomy, support platelet desialylation may also be a potential biomarker of non-response to splenectomy. Commentary on: Mendoza et al. Study of platelet kinetics in immune thrombocytopenia to predict splenectomy response. Br J Haematol 2024;204:315-323.

Rilzabrutinib versus placebo in adults and adolescents with persistent or chronic immune thrombocytopenia: LUNA 3 phase III study.

Background: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is characterized by primarily autoantibody-mediated platelet destruction and impaired platelet production resulting in thrombocytopenia and an increased risk of bleeding. Other manifestations include increased risk of thrombosis and diminished quality of life. Current treatment approaches are directed toward lowering the rate of platelet destruction or stimulating platelet production to prevent bleeding. Rilzabrutinib is an oral, reversible, potent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor that was specifically designed to treat immune-mediated diseases and mediates its therapeutic effect through a dual mechanism of action: (1) inhibiting B-cell activation and (2) interrupting antibody-coated cell phagocytosis by Fc gamma receptor in spleen and liver. A 24-week dose-finding phase I/II study of rilzabrutinib in patients with ITP showed a 40% platelet response (⩾2 consecutive platelet counts of ⩾50 × 109/L and increase from baseline ⩾20 × 109/L without rescue medication use) and a well-tolerated safety profile with only grade 1/2 transient adverse events across dose levels. Objectives: Assess the efficacy and safety of oral rilzabrutinib in adult and adolescent patients with persistent or chronic ITP. Design: Rilzabrutinib 400 mg BID is being evaluated in the ongoing LUNA 3 multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. Methods and analysis: The primary endpoint is durable platelet response, defined as achieving platelet counts of ⩾50 × 109/L for at least two-thirds of ⩾8 available weekly scheduled platelet measurements during the last 12 weeks (including ⩾2 available measurements within the last 6 weeks) of the 24-week blinded treatment period in the absence of rescue therapy. Ethics: Ethical guidelines and informed consent are followed. Discussion: The LUNA 3 trial will further investigate rilzabrutinib's safety and efficacy in adult and adolescent patients, with the primary goal of addressing a major objective in treating patients with ITP: durability of platelet response. Trail Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04562766: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04562766; EU Clinical Trials Register EudraCT 2020-002063-60: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2020-002063-60.

Efficacy and safety of the neonatal Fc receptor inhibitor efgartigimod in adults with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ADVANCE IV): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Primary immune thrombocytopenia is an autoimmune disorder mediated partly by platelet autoantibodies, resulting in thrombocytopenia, bleeding, and constitutional symptoms. Efgartigimod, a first-in-class novel human IgG1 Fc fragment, binds the neonatal Fc receptor with high affinity and thus reduces serum IgG concentrations, including autoantibodies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of efgartigimod in adults with persistent and chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia. METHODS: This phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, 24-week study evaluated the efficacy and safety of intravenous efgartigimod in adults aged 18 years or older with chronic or persistent primary immune thrombocytopenia who had an average platelet count of less than 30 000, had responded to at least one previous immune thrombocytopenia therapy, and were on a concurrent therapy at baseline or had received at least a second previous immune thrombocytopenia therapy. The study took place in 71 participating sites from Asia, Europe, and North America. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive either efgartigimod (10 mg/kg) or placebo intravenously for the first 4 weeks, after which the dosing schedule could be altered to once per week or every other week depending on the patients' platelet count. The primary endpoint, evaluated in the chronic population, was sustained platelet count response (≥50 × 109 for at least 4 of the last 6 weeks). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04188379) and is completed. FINDINGS: A total of 205 patients were screened from Dec 9, 2019, to Feb 3, 2022, and 131 (86 in the efgartigimod group; 45 in the placebo group) were randomly assigned. These patients represented a population with long-term disease who had a mean time since diagnosis of 10·6 years and 67% (88/131) of whom had received at least three previous immune thrombocytopenia treatments. 22% (17/78) of patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia receiving efgartigimod reached the primary endpoint compared with 5% (2/40) of those receiving placebo (p=0·032; adjusted difference in response, 16% [95% CI 2·6-26·4]). The median number of weeks of disease control in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia was 2·0 (IQR 0·0-11·0) for efgartigimod versus 0·0 (0·0-1·0) for placebo (p=0·0009). Efgartigimod was well tolerated; most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. The most common adverse events of interest in both groups were headache (16% in efgartigimod and 13% in placebo), haematuria (16% in efgartigimod and 16% in placebo), and petechiae (15% in efgartigimod and 27% in placebo). INTERPRETATION: Efgartigimod significantly increased sustained platelet count responses compared with placebo in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia, including those who had received multiple previous immune thrombocytopenia therapies. Upon completion of the ADVANCE IV study, patients could enroll in the ongoing open-label extension. Subcutaneous efgartigimod is currently being evaluated in patients with immune thrombocytopenia in the ADVANCE SC+ trial. FUNDING: argenx.

Treatment of immune thrombocytopenia during pregnancy with thrombopoietin receptor agonists.

The introduction of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) led to a paradigm shift in the management of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). However, TPO-RAs are not approved for use during pregnancy due to the absence of evidence and concerns for possible effects on the fetus due to their expected transplacental transfer. This comprehensive review examines the safety and efficacy of TPO-RA in 45 pregnancies of women with ITP (romiplostim n = 22; eltrombopag n = 21; both in the same pregnancy n = 2). Mothers experienced failure of the median of three treatment lines during pregnancy prior to TPO-RA administration. A platelet response (>30 × 109 /L) was seen in 86.7% of cases (including a complete response >100 × 109 /L in 66.7%) and was similar between eltrombopag and romiplostim (87.0% and 83.3%, p = 0.99). The maternal safety profile was favourable, with no thromboembolic events encountered. Neonatal thrombocytopenia was noted in one third of cases, with one case of ICH grade 3, and neonatal thrombocytosis was observed in three cases. No other neonatal adverse events attributable to TPO-RAs were seen. This review suggests that the use of TPO-RA during pregnancy is associated with a high response rate and appears safe. Nevertheless, TPO-RA should not be routinely used in pregnancy and should be avoided in the first trimester until further evidence is accumulated.

The role of genetics in refractory immune thrombocytopenia.

Patients with refractory immune thrombocytopenia (rITP) have increased morbidity and mortality. Currently, there is limited understanding of the cause of refractoriness and no markers to help direct novel treatment options. Understanding the reason(s) for refractoriness is crucial to determining novel treatment options. The pathogenesis underlying rITP has generally been thought to be an underlying genetic predisposition with an environmental trigger. Familial ITP remains rare, and there are few twin studies, suggesting that a simple genetic cause is unlikely. However, genetic mutations provide the background for several autoimmune diseases. In this review, we explore the evidence of either an inherited genetic cause of rITP or an acquired mutation, in particular one resulting in clonal expansion of cytotoxic T cells.

Early initiation of second-line therapy in primary immune thrombocytopenia: insights from real-world evidence.

To compare patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) prescribed early (within 3 months of initial ITP treatment) second-line treatment (eltrombopag, romiplostim, rituximab, immunosuppressive agents, splenectomy) with or without concomitant first-line therapy to those who received only first-line therapy. This real-world retrospective cohort study of 8268 patients with primary ITP from a large US-based database (Optum® de-identified Electronic Health Record [EHR] dataset) combined electronic claims and EHR data. Outcomes included platelet count, bleeding events, and corticosteroid exposure 3 to 6 months after initial treatment. Baseline platelet counts were lower in patients receiving early second-line therapy (10‒28 × 109/L) versus those who did not (67 × 109/L). Counts improved and bleeding events decreased from baseline in all treatment groups 3 to 6 months after the start of therapy. Among the very few patients for whom follow-up treatment data were available (n = 94), corticosteroid use was reduced during the 3- to 6-month follow-up period in patients who received early second-line therapy versus those who did not (39% vs 87%, p < 0.001). Early second-line treatment was prescribed for more severe cases of ITP and appeared to be associated with improved platelet counts and bleeding outcomes 3 to 6 months after initial therapy. Early second-line therapy also appeared to reduce corticosteroid use after 3 months, although the small number of patients with follow-up data on treatment precludes any substantive conclusions. Further research is needed to determine whether early second-line therapy has an effect on the long-term course of ITP.

Overuse of corticosteroids in patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) between 2011 and 2017 in the United States.

Corticosteroids (CSs) are standard first-line therapy for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Prolonged exposure is associated with substantial toxicity; thus guidelines recommend avoidance of prolonged CS treatment and early use of second-line therapies. However, real-world evidence on ITP treatment patterns remains limited. We aimed to assess real-world treatment patterns in patients with newly-diagnosed ITP, using two large US healthcare databases (Explorys and MarketScan) between January 1, 2011 and July 31, 2017. Adults with ITP, ≥12 months of database registration prior to diagnosis, ≥1 ITP treatment, and ≥1 month enrollment following initiation of first ITP treatment were included (n = 4066 Explorys; n = 7837 MarketScan). Information on lines of treatment (LoTs) was collected. As expected, CSs were the most common first-line treatment (Explorys, 87.9%; MarketScan, 84.5%). However, CSs remained by far the most common treatment (Explorys ≥77%; MarketScan ≥85%) across all subsequent LoTs. Second-line treatments such as rituximab (12.0% Explorys; 24.5% MarketScan), thrombopoietin receptor agonists (11.3% Explorys; 15.6% MarketScan), and splenectomy (2.5% Explorys; 8.1% MarketScan) were used much less frequently. CS use is widespread in the US in patients with ITP across all LoTs. Quality improvement initiatives are needed to reduce CS exposure and bolster use of second-line treatments.