Validation of oscillometric ratio and maximum gradient methods for non-invasive blood pressure measurement with intra-arterial blood pressure measurements as reference.

Most non-invasive blood pressure (BP) measurements are carried out using instruments which implement either the Ratio or the Maximum Gradient oscillometric method, mostly during cuff deflation, but more rarely during cuff inflation. Yet, there is little published literature on the relative advantages and accuracy of these two methods. In this study of 40 lightly sedated individuals aged 64.1 ± 9.6 years, we evaluate and compare the performance of the oscillometric ratio (K) and gradient (Grad) methods for the non-invasive estimation of mean pressure, SBP and DBP with reference to invasive intra-arterial values. There was no significant difference between intra-arterial estimates of mean pressure made via Korotkoff sounds (MP-OWE) or the gradient method (MP-Grad). However, 17.7% of MP-OWE and 15% of MP-Grad were in error by more than 10 mmHg. SBP-K and SBP-Grad underestimated SBP by 14 and 18 mmHg, whilst accurately estimating DBP with mean errors of 0.4 ±â€Š5.0 and 1.7 ±â€Š6.1 mmHg, respectively. Relative to the reference standard SBP-K, SBP-Grad and DBP-Grad were estimated with a mean error of -4.5 ±â€Š6.6 and 1.4 ±â€Š5.6 mmHg, respectively, noting that using the full range of recommended ratios introduces errors of 12 and 7 mmHg in SBP and DBP, respectively. We also show that it is possible to find ratios which minimize the root mean square error (RMSE) and the mean error for any particular individual cohort. We developed linear models for estimating SBP and SBP-K from a range of demographic and non-invasive OWE variables with resulting mean errors of 0.15 ±â€Š5.6 and 0.3 ±â€Š5.7 mmHg, acceptable according to the Universal standard.

Association of 24-h central hemodynamics and stiffness with cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. The VASOTENS Registry.

OBJECTIVES: In hemodialysis patients, central hemodynamics, stiffness, and wave reflections assessed through ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) showed superior prognostic value for cardiovascular (CV) events than peripheral blood pressures (BPs). No such evidence is available for lower-risk hypertensive patients. METHODS: In 591 hypertensive patients (mean age 58 ±â€Š14 years, 49% males), ambulatory brachial and central BP, pulse wave velocity (PWV), and augmentation index (AIx) were obtained with a validated upper arm cuff-based pulse wave analysis technology. Information on treatment for hypertension (73% of patients), dyslipidemia (27%), diabetes (8%), CV disease history (25%), was collected. Patients were censored for CV events or all-cause death over 4.2 years. RESULTS: One hundred and four events (24 fatal) were recorded. Advanced age [hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval: 1.03 (1.01, 1.05), P = 0.0001], female sex [1.57 (1.05, 2.33), P = 0.027], CV disease [2.22 (1.50, 3.29), P = 0.0001], increased 24-h central pulse pressure (PP) [1.56 (1.05, 2.31), P = 0.027], PWV [1.59 (1.07, 2.36), P = 0.022], or AIx [1.59 (1.08, 2.36), P = 0.020] were significantly associated with a worse prognosis (univariate Cox regression analysis). The prognostic power of peripheral and central BPs was lower. However, PWV [1.02 (0.64, 1.63), P = 0.924], AIx [1.06 (0.66, 1.69), P = 0.823], and central PP [1.18 (0.76, 1.82), P = 0.471], were not significant predictors in multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In hypertensive patients, ambulatory central PP, PWV, and AIx are associated with an increased risk of CV morbidity and all-cause mortality. However, this association is not independent of other patient characteristics.

Evaluation of the oscillometric method for noninvasive blood pressure measurement during cuff deflation and cuff inflation with reference to intra-arterial blood pressure.

There is little quantitative clinical data available to support blood pressure measurement accuracy during cuff inflation. In this study of 35 male and 5 female lightly anaesthetized subjects aged 64.1 ±â€Š9.6 years, we evaluate and compare the performance of both the oscillometric ratio and gradient methods during cuff deflation and cuff inflation with reference to intra-arterial measurements. We show that the oscillometric waveform envelopes (OWE), which are key to both methods, exhibit significant variability in both shape and smoothness leading to at least 15% error in the determination of mean pressure (MP). We confirm the observation from our previous studies that K1 Korotkoff sounds underestimate systolic blood pressure (SBP) and note that this underestimation is increased during cuff inflation. The estimation of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is generally accurate for both the ratio and the gradient method, with the latter showing a significant increase during inflation. Since the gradient method estimates SBP and DBP from points of maximum gradient on each OWE recorded, it may offer significant benefits over the ratio method. However, we have shown that the ratio method can be optimized for any data set to achieve either a minimum mean error (ME) of close to 0 mmHg or minimum root mean square error (RMSE) with standard deviation (SD) of <5.0 mmHg. We conclude that whilst cuff inflation may offer some advantages, these are neither significant nor substantial, leaving as the only benefit, the potential for more rapid measurement and less patient discomfort.

Comparison of cuff inflation and cuff deflation brachial sphygmomanometry with intra-arterial blood pressure as reference.

Conventional sphygmomanometry with cuff deflation is used to calibrate all noninvasive BP (NIBP) instruments and the International Standard makes no mention of calibrating methods specifically for NIBP instruments, which estimate systolic and diastolic pressure during cuff inflation rather than cuff deflation. There is however increasing interest in inflation-based NIBP (iNIBP) instruments on the basis of shorter measurement time, reduction in maximal inflation pressure and improvement in patient comfort and outcomes. However, we have previously demonstrated that SBP estimates based on the occurrence of the first K1 Korotkoff sounds during cuff deflation can underestimate intra-arterial SBP (IA-SBP) by an average of 14 ±â€Š10 mmHg. In this study, we compare the dynamics of intra-arterial blood pressure (IABP) measurements with sequential measurement of Korotkoff sounds during both cuff inflation and cuff deflation in the same individual. In 40 individuals aged 64.1 ±â€Š9.6 years (range 36-86 years), the overall dynamic responses below the cuff were similar, but the underestimation error was significantly larger during inflation than deflation, increasing from 14 ±â€Š10 to 19 ±â€Š12 mmHg ( P  < 0.0001). No statistical models were found which could compensate for this error as were found for cuff deflation. The statistically significant BP differences between inflation and deflation protocols reported in this study suggest different behaviour of the arterial and venous vasculature between arterial opening and closing which warrant further investigation, particularly for iNIBP devices reporting estimates during cuff inflation. In addition, measuring Korotkoff sounds during cuff inflation represents significant technical difficulties because of increasing pump motor noise.

Accurate detection of Korotkoff sounds reveals large discrepancy between intra-arterial systolic pressure and simultaneous noninvasive measurement of blood pressure with brachial cuff sphygmomanometry.

Cardiovascular disease is the number 1 cause of death globally, with elevated blood pressure (BP) being the single largest risk factor. Hence, BP is an important physiological parameter used as an indicator of cardiovascular health. Noninvasive cuff-based automated monitoring is now the dominant method for BP measurement and irrespective of whether the oscillometric or the auscultatory method is used, all are calibrated according to the Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2019), which requires two trained operators to listen to Korotkoff K1 sounds for SBP and K4/K5 sounds for DBP. Hence, Korotkoff sounds are fundamental to the calibration of all NIBP devices. In this study of 40 lightly sedated patients, aged 64.1 ±â€Š9.6 years, we compare SBP and DBP recorded directly by intra-arterial fluid filled catheters to values recorded from the onset (SBP-K) and cessation (DBP-K) of Korotkoff sounds. We demonstrate that whilst DBP-K measurements are in good agreement, with a mean difference of -0.3 ±â€Š5.2 mmHg, SBP-K underestimates true intra-arterial SBP (IA-SBP) by an average of 14 ±â€Š9.6 mmHg. The underestimation arises from delays in the re-opening of the brachial artery following deflation of the brachial cuff to below SBP. The reasons for this delay are not known but appear related to the difference between SBP and the pressure under the cuff as blood first begins to flow, as the cuff deflates. Linear models are presented that can correct the underestimation in SBP resulting in estimates with a mean difference of 0.2 ±â€Š7.1 mmHg with respect to intra-arterial SBP.

New Perspectives on Non-invasive Blood Pressure Measurement.

Noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) devices are calibrated against validated auscultation sphygmomanometers using Korotkoff sounds. This study aimed to investigate the timing of Korotkoff sounds in relation to pulse appearance in the brachial artery and values of intra-arterial blood pressure. Experiments were carried out on 15 participants, (14 males, 64.3 ± 10.4 years; one female, 86 yo), undergoing coronary angiography. A conventional occluding cuff, with a microphone for Korotkoff sounds, was placed on the upper arm (on the brachial artery). Intra-arterial blood pressure (IABP) was measured below the cuff with a fluid-filled catheter inserted via the radial artery and an external transducer. Finger photoplethysmography was used to measure brachial pulse wave velocity (PWV). Korotkoff sounds were processed electronically and custom algorithms identified the cuff pressure (CP) at which the first and last Korotkoff sounds were heard. PWV and max slope of the IABP pressure pulse were recorded to estimate arterial stiffness. The brachial artery closed at a CP of 132.0 ± 17.1 mmHg. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) were 147.6 ± 14.3 and 72.7 ± 10.1 mmHg; mean pressure (MP, 100.1 ± 10.4 mmHg) was similar to MP derived from the peak of the oscillogram (98.5 ± 13.6 mmHg). Difference between IABP and CP recorded at first and last occurrence of Korotkoff sounds were, SBP: 19.0 ± 8.3 (range 2-29) mmHg, DBP: 4.0 ± 4.3 (range 2-12) mmHg. SBP derived from the onset of Korotkoff sounds can underestimate IABP by up to 19 mmHg. Since Korotkoff sounds are the recommended method mandated by the universal standard for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices, these errors are propagated through to all NIBP measurement devices irrespective of whether they use auscultatory or oscillometric methods.

Interaction of large artery stiffness and baroreceptor function explored through multiple measurement techniques - a pilot study.

Baroreceptors, sensors that play a role in controlling arterial blood pressure (BP), are mechanical stretch receptors located in the aortic arch and carotid sinuses. Factors affecting the degree of stretch in the vessel wall with BP, such as increased arterial stiffness, may compromise baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS) to BP changes. Yet, evidence of this is scattered, as both baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS) and arterial stiffness are calculated variables with multiple methodological approaches. This pilot study (n=10) investigates the correlation of arterial stiffness and BRS using multiple BRS calculation techniques (spectral and sequence methodologies at aortic and finger sites) and arterial stiffness measurement [carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), carotid compliance and distensibility]. BRS was assessed under resting BP conditions and during BP altered by maneuvers (0.1 Hz controlled breathing and leg ischemia). Magnitude of arterial stiffness - BRS correlation was positive for carotid distensibility and compliance, and negative for cfPWV, supporting the theory. A sample size of 100 participants (not rounded - exact figure by power calculation) would be required to confirm or reject all permutations of correlation between BRS by multiple calculation methods and large artery stiffness by PWV and compliance/distensibility measures.

From peripheral finger-derived pulse waveforms to aortic pressure waveform features: an application of a generalized transfer function.

OBJECTIVE: Aortic (central) pressure features are associated with cardiovascular complications and can be algorithmically derived from non-invasive peripheral arterial waveforms. This has conventionally been performed with a pressure waveform (i.e., tonometry or oscillometry) rather than with the optical-based sensor (photoplethysmography (PPG)) that is predominantly used in wearable health devices. Extraction of aortic features from a peripheral PPG waveform has yet to be investigated. This study aims to compare aortic features extracted from peripheral arterial waveforms acquired with different sensor modalities using the same transfer function. DESIGN AND METHOD: Radial tonometry (reference), finger volume-clamped PPG (Penáz) and fingertip PPG waveforms were measured in participants (n=29, 36±16 years, 15 female) under baseline conditions. Waveforms were converted into an aortic pressure waveform using the transfer function. Waveform features were extracted from the converted waveform. Extracted features were compared with correlation plots and a Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Aortic pressure features extracted from a finger using the Penáz technique were comparable to radial tonometry derived features. Aortic features extracted from a fingertip waveform were more variable in comparison to radial tonometry-derived features. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic (central) pressure waveform features contain valuable haemodynamic information and have the capacity to be easily and conveniently implemented in wearable health devices. Future use of these features in wearable health devices incorporating PPG requires the development, and/or, optimization of a unique transfer function to more accurately represent the aortic pressure waveform for cardiovascular assessment.Clinical Relevance- Aortic pressure features might be used in wearable health devices following the development of a unique transfer function for optical-transduced peripheral vascular signals.

Comparison of effects of peripheral vasculature on tonometric radial pulse and cuff-based brachial pulse waveform as used in estimation of central aortic pressures.

OBJECTIVE: Aortic pressure estimation requires reliable peripheral pulse waveform acquisition. The peripheral waveform can change with local vascular effects that can be independent of aortic pressure. This study quantifies the effects of peripheral vasculature changes on radial and brachial waveforms. DESIGN AND METHOD: In 20 subjects (37± 15 years, 7 female), brachial volumetric displacement (cuff-based) and radial tonometry waveforms were simultaneously measured whilst a cuff around the hand on the same arm was inflated to induce transmural pressures of -60, -30, -15, 0, 15 and 30 mmHg, altering local peripheral resistance and compliance by graded arterial wall unloading. Aortic blood pressure (BP), augmentation index (AIx) and ejection duration were calculated from the measurements using a generalized transfer function. The parameters under unloaded conditions were compared to baseline measurements. RESULTS: Brachial systolic and diastolic BP did not change throughout the experiment. Altering peripheral resistance and compliance did not significantly change calculated aortic BP values, although changes were nominally greater for radial (maximum +8±1 mmHg) compared to brachial (maximum +2±1 mmHg) waveforms. AIx at 0 mmHg transmural pressure (maximum arterial wall unloading) was higher when derived from radial waveforms (+24±3%, p<0.001) but not when derived from brachial waveforms. CONCLUSIONS: Localized changes in peripheral resistance and compliance affect tonometer acquired radial waveforms but not volumetric displacement acquired brachial pressure waveforms, as judged by computed central aortic augmentation pressure parameters. This suggests aortic pressure estimation from the brachial cuff waveform is less sensitive to peripheral vasculature disturbances that alter the peripheral arterial pulse morphology.

Bilateral cuff-induced lower limb post-ischemia hyperemia as a method for acute reduction in blood pressure for cuffless blood pressure device testing.

OBJECTIVE: Development and testing of cuffless blood pressure (BP) devices requires methods to increase and decrease BP. This is also required by cuffless BP validation standards. Pharmacological interventions, whilst successful, are not always feasible for all subpopulations or research settings. Non-pharmacological approaches for increasing BP are available, however, methods for decreasing BP are not well described. This study investigates the hyperemic response following bilateral leg-cuff ischemia as a method for acute BP lowering. DESIGN AND METHOD: Participants (n=8, 24±8 years, 6 female) had their BP measured by continuous (finger, Penáz technique) and intermittent (brachial cuff, oscillometric) methods before, during and following 3-minute leg-ischemia with the participant in an upright position. Total peripheral resistance (TPR) and cardiac output (CO) were calculated from finger BP waveforms. Maxima and minima responses in the variables were extracted and compared to resting conditions by repeated measures analysis of covariance. RESULTS: During the hyperemic period, systolic BP decreased by -22±3 mmHg (finger) and -6±1 mmHg (brachial). Diastolic BP decreased by -14±5 mmHg (finger) and -4 ±1 mmHg (brachial). Calculated TPR and CO varied, with both decreasing by half and almost doubling during the hyperemic response period. CONCLUSIONS: Leg-cuff ischemia provides a controlled, non-pharmacological intervention for decreasing systemic arterial BP. This removes some of the limitations in testing, development and validation of cuffless BP techniques and devices.

Nanosensor technologies and the digital transformation of healthcare.

Nanosensors are nanoscale devices that measure physical attributes and convert these signals into analyzable information. In preparation, for the impending reality of nanosensors in clinical practice, we confront important questions regarding the evidence supporting widespread device use. Our objectives are to demonstrate the value and implications for new nanosensors as they relate to the next phase of remote patient monitoring and to apply lessons learned from digital health devices through real-world examples.

The pressure field as a methodology for fluid management and red cell preservation during cardiac surgery.

PURPOSE: Anemia and red cell transfusion contribute to morbidity and mortality of surgery. The concept of patient blood management to mitigate preoperative anemia, optimize coagulation, conserve red cells intraoperatively and accept lower post-operative transfusion thresholds has recently gained widespread acceptance across a range of surgical disciplines. Fluid administration is likely to contribute significantly to perioperative anemia and red-cell transfusion requirements, yet a robust basis for managing fluid administration in this context has not been articulated. There is an urgent need for this. METHODS: We developed 'the pressure field method' as a novel approach to guiding the administration of fluid and drugs to optimize tissue perfusion. The pressure field method was used for the intraoperative management of 67 patients undergoing semi-elective cardiac surgery. We compared intraoperative anemia and transfusion requirements in this cohort with a conventional group of 413 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. RESULTS: In the pressure field group, no patients required transfusion whereas in the conventional group, 16% required transfusion during bypass and these patients received an average of 2.4 units of packed red cells (P < 0.0001). The average decrease in hemoglobin in the pressure field group was only 13 g/L, whereas in the conventional group it was 52 g/L (P < 0.0001). 80% of the pressure field group received no intravenous fluid during cardiac surgery, and the average intraoperative fluid load was 115 mL. CONCLUSION: The pressure field method appears to reduce transfusion requirements due to decreased intraoperative fluid loading.

Automated 'oscillometric' blood pressure measuring devices: how they work and what they measure.

Automated 'oscillometric' blood pressure (BP) measuring devices (BPMDs) were developed in the 1970s to replace manual auscultatory BP measurement by mercury sphygmomanometer. Automated BPMDs that have passed accuracy testing versus a reference auscultatory sphygmomanometer using a scientifically accepted validation protocol are recommended for clinical use globally. Currently, there are many thousands of unique automated BPMDs manufactured by hundreds of companies, with each device using proprietary algorithms to estimate BP and using a method of operation that is largely unchanged since inception. Validated automated BPMDs provide similar BP values to those recorded using manual auscultation albeit with potential sources of error mostly associated with using empirical algorithms to derive BP from waveform pulsations. Much of the work to derive contemporary BP thresholds and treatment targets used to manage cardiovascular disease risk was obtained using automated BPMDs. While there is room for future refinement to improve accuracy for better individual risk stratification, validated BPMDs remain the recommended standard for office and out-of-office BP measurement to be used in hypertension diagnosis and management worldwide.

Disparate Associations of 24-h Central Aortic and Brachial Cuff Blood Pressure With Hypertension-Mediated Organ Damage and Cardiovascular Risk.

Objective: Aim of this study was to evaluate the associations of non-invasive central aortic and peripheral (brachial) blood pressure (BP) for Hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. Methods: We evaluated associations of HMOD with 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) of central aortic and peripheral BP indices in patients with primary hypertension and presence of several cardiovascular risk factors. BP measurements were performed by means of a non-invasive automated oscillometric device (Mobil-O-Graph). HMOD was defined as the presence of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) above normal values and/or carotid plaque, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), and/or renal abnormalities as assessed by urine albumin/creatinine ratio above normal values and/or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Results: In the study cohort of 273 (age 55.2 ± 13.4 years, 71.8% male) patients with primary hypertension, documented HMOD was present in 180 (65.9%), LVH in 70 (25.6%), increased IMT in 129 (47.3%). Fifty-six patients (20.5%) had kidney organ damage (20.5% albuminuria and 2.6% impaired eGFR). When accounting for confounding factors (age, sex, body-mass-index, antihypertensive treatment, smoking, triacylglycerol, statin treatment, glucose, hypoglycemic therapy, or heart rate) only peripheral 24-h pulse pressure (PP) maintained statistical significance with HMOD indices (OR: 1.126, 95% CI: 1.012~1.253; p = 0.029). Using ASCVD risk score as the independent continuous variable in multiple linear regression, 24-h central systolic pressure (SBP) (ß = 0.179; 95% CI:0.019~0.387; p = 0.031), daytime central PP (ß = 0.114; 95% CI:0.070~0.375; p = 0.005, night-time central SBP (ß = 0.411; 95% CI:0.112~0.691; p = 0.007) and night-time PP (ß = 0.257; 95% CI:0.165~0.780; p = 0.003) were all positively associated with ASCVD risk. Conclusions: Blood pressure obtained by 24-h ABPM was better correlated with HMOD than office BP. Whilst 24-h peripheral BP showed a stronger association with HMOD than 24-h central BP, the prognostic value of 24-h central BP for the 10-year ASCVD risk was superior to 24-h peripheral BP.

Significant venous flow alterations following brain arteriovenous malformation Surgery: Assessment by transcranial colour duplex.

Brain arteriovenous malformation (bAVM) resection imposes several post-operative clinical challenges including intracranial haemorrhage (ICH). Daily non-invasive monitoring of haemodynamic measurements may be useful in predicting post-operative ICH. This prospective study used transcranial colour duplex (TCCD) and central aortic pressure (CAP) measurements to evaluate 15 bAVM patients pre-operatively and daily ≤ 14 days post-operatively. TCCD measurements of middle cerebral artery and veins included peak systolic (PSV), end diastolic (EDV), and pulsatility indices (PI). Parameters were compared with 7 craniotomy patients (non-bAVM craniotomy/surgical group). Normal reference values included 20 healthy volunteers. Significant middle cerebral vein MCV changes in bAVM patients occurred; Maximal PSV was significantly higher (median 47 cm/s) compared to non-bAVM craniotomy/surgical controls (median 17 cm/s, p = 0.0123); maximal PI was significantly higher (median 0.99, p = 0.005) compared to the non-bAVM craniotomy/surgical controls (median 0.49). In 8 of 15 patients, increased MCV velocity and pulsatility "stabilised" within 14 days post-operatively. Mean number of days for the 8 patients to reach stable state was 5.9 days, (range 0-9 days). To our knowledge, this is the first imaging study demonstrating significant venous changes post bAVM resection. Significant increased venous flow occurs in pial veins bilaterally. Increased pressure of venous flow is evidenced by a significant increase in diameter and pulsatility. Subsequently, haemorrhagic complications may be due distal constriction of the pial veins causing venous hypertension. The cause of the dilated vascular bed is unknown.

Relationship between Arterial Stiffness and Renal Function Determined by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equations in a Chinese Cohort Undergoing Health Examination.

Background: The association between arterial stiffness and cardiovascular risk in CKD and ESRD patients is well established. However, the relationship between renal function estimation and properties of large arteries is unclear due to the four different methods used to quantify glomerular filtration. This study investigated the relationship between carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (c-fPWV), as a measure of arterial stiffness, and accepted metrics of renal function. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 431 health examination individuals in China, enrolled from January 2017 to June 2019. c-fPWV and blood pressure were measured, and blood samples were obtained for all participants. Four different methods were used to determine the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as described by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equations: (i) CKD-EPISCr formula based on SCr, (ii) CKD-EPICysC formula based on CysC, (iii) CKD-EPISCr/CysC formula based on Cr and CysC, and (iv) MDRD. Results: Of all of the study participants (average age 53.1 ± 13.0 years, 68.1% male), 23.7% had diabetes mellitus and 66.6% had hypertension. The average eGFR values determined by the CKD-EPISCr, CKD-EPICysC, CKD-EPISCr/CysC, and MDRD equations were 91.9 ± 15.6, 86.8 ± 21.4, 89.6 ± 18.3, and 90.7 ± 16.6 ml/min/1.73m2, respectively. c-fPWV was significantly and negatively correlated with eGFR determined by CKD-EPISCr (r = -0.336, P < 0.001), CKD-EPICysC (r = -0.385, P < 0.001), CKD-EPISCr/CysC (r = -0.378, P < 0.001), and MDRD (r = -0.219, P < .001) equations. After adjusting for confounding factors, c-fPWV remained significantly and negatively correlated with eGFR determined by the CKD-EPICysC equation (ß = -0.105, P = 0.042) and significantly and positively correlated with age (ß = 0.349, P ≤ 0.01), systolic pressure (ß = 0.276, P ≤ 0.01), and hypoglycemic drugs (ß = 0.101, P = 0.019). Conclusion: In a health examination population in China, c-fPWV is negatively correlated with eGFR determined by four different equations; however, only the metric of eGFR determined by the equation for CKD-EPICysC showed an independent relation with c-fPWV.

Estimation of cardiac stroke volume from radial pulse waveform by artificial neural network.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO) are the key indicators for the evaluation of cardiac function and hemodynamic status during the perioperative period, which are very important in the detection and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Traditional CO and SV measurement methods have problems such as complex operation, low precision and poor generalization ability. METHODS: In this paper, a method for estimating stroke volume based on cascade artificial neural network (ANN) and time domain features of radial pulse waveform (SVANN) was proposed. The simulation datasets of 4000 radial pulse waveforms and stroke volume (SVmeas) were generated by a 55 segment transmission line model of the human systemic vasculature and a recursive algorithm. The ANN was trained and tested by 10-fold cross-validation, and compared with 12 traditional models. RESULTS: Experimental results showed that the Pearson correlation coefficients and mean difference between SVANN and SVmeas (R=0.95, mean standard deviation (SD) = 0.00 ± 6.45) were better than the best results of the 12 traditional models. Moreover, as increasing the number of training samples, the performance improvement of the ANN (R=0.94(Δ + 0.04), mean ± SD = 0.00 ± 6.38(Δ± 2.02)) was better than the other best model, namely, multiple linear regression model (MLR) (R=0.93(Δ + 0.03), mean ± SD = 0.00 ± 6.99(Δ± 1.50)). CONCLUSIONS: A method is proposed to estimate cardiac stroke volume by the ANN with time domain features of radial pulse wave. It avoids the complicated modeling process based on hemodynamics within traditional models, improves the estimation accuracy of SV, and has a good generalization ability.

The prevalence and impact of orthostatic intolerance in young women across the hypermobility spectrum.

Orthostatic intolerance (OI) is frequently reported in young women with generalized hypermobility spectrum disorder (G-HSD) and hypermobile EDS (hEDS). However, it remains currently unclear whether OI is a comorbidity or fundamental part of the pathophysiology of G-HSD or hEDS. This study investigated the prevalence and impact of OI in young women across the hypermobility spectrum. Forty-five women (14-30 years, 15 controls, 15 G-HSD, and 15 hEDS) undertook a head-up tilt (HUT) and active stand test. Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) and Orthostatic Hypotension (OH) were assessed using age-related criteria. Autonomic dysfunction and quality-of-life questionnaires were also completed. The prevalence of POTS was higher in women with G-HSD than hEDS and control groups during HUT (43% vs. 7% and 7%, respectively, p < 0.05), but similar between groups during the active stand (47%, 27%, and 13% for G-HSD, hEDS, and control, respectively). No participants had OH. hEDS and G-HSD participants reported more severe orthostatic symptoms and poorer quality of life than controls. Although POTS was observed in hypermobile participants, there is no conclusive evidence that its prevalence differed between groups due to differences between the HUT and active stand assessments. Nevertheless, OI and broader autonomic dysfunction impacted on their quality of life.

Relationship between heart rate and central aortic blood pressure: implications for assessment and treatment of isolated systolic hypertension in the young.

Isolated systolic hypertension in the young (ISHY) remains a challenging problem, partly due to the differences in central aortic pressure observed in studies investigating ISHY. The fundamental relationship between heart rate and central aortic pressure, and more precisely, the relationship between heart rate and amplification of central aortic pressure in the periphery, underpins the assessment and, as a consequence, the treatment of ISHY. Physiology warrants that an increase in heart rate would lead to increased amplification of the pressure pulse between the aorta and the brachial artery. Heart rate generally decreases with age, in particular over the first two decades of life. Thus, a higher heart rate in the young would result in higher pulse pressure amplification, and therefore an elevated brachial systolic pressure would not necessarily translate to elevated aortic systolic pressure. However, elevated heart rate is not a consistent feature in ISHY, and studies have shown that ISHY can present with either high or low central aortic systolic pressure. In this brief review, we summarize the physiological aspects underlying the relationship between heart rate and central aortic blood pressure and its amplification in the brachial artery, how this relationship changes with age, and examine the implications of these effects on the assessment and treatment of ISHY.

Challenges Presented by Cuffless Measurement of Blood Pressure if Adopted for Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertension.

The global health burden presented by hypertension is providing increased motivation for improved means of collection of blood pressure (BP) data. A growing area of research and commercial activity is the use of wearable devices to provide BP data using non-invasive cuffless techniques. The accelerated progress in recent years, particularly relating to connectivity of smartphone technology, has promoted the availability of consumer devices that provide values of BP. The main types of devices are wrist-worn, watch-type devices with sensors that typically record a photoplethysmography (PPG) signal, sometimes also with an electrocardiography (ECG) signal. The general underlying concept of the cuffless BP measurement in most device types is the association of BP and the travel time of the arterial pulse between two locations, determined from the time delay between the ECG and PPG signals. Other methods may involve additional analysis of the PPG waveform features. Experimental data are presented to illustrate the challenges presented by cuffless BP techniques in obtaining reliable BP measurements when the change in BP is caused by different stimuli affecting cardiac and vascular mechanisms. These effects influence the association of the measured and physiological BP change, thus presenting significant challenges and potential limitations in the use of cuffless BP devices for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension.