Clinical Implications of Co-administering Apixaban with Key Interacting Medications.

With many available data sources, clinicians need to consider the benefit-risk profile of individual anticoagulants when balancing the need for anticoagulation, including evaluating the risks in patients with comorbidities and potential drug-drug interactions. This narrative review presents clinical data across multiple phases of drug development for the use of apixaban, a selective factor Xa inhibitor, when taken concomitantly with other agents, and evaluates the benefit-risk profile of apixaban with these interacting medications. Key subgroup analyses from the phase 3 ARISTOTLE trial (NCT00412984) are presented using data from patients who received either concomitant inhibitors or inducers of cytochrome P450 3A4 and/or P­glycoprotein. We also review the available evidence for the use of apixaban in patients with cancer-associated thromboembolism, as well as the use of apixaban in patients with COVID-19.

Population pharmacokinetic modeling of oral brepocitinib in healthy volunteers and patients with immuno-inflammatory diseases.

The objective of this population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was to characterize the concentration-time profile of brepocitinib plasma concentration after single- and multiple-oral administration in healthy volunteers (HVs) and patients with immuno-inflammatory diseases. Blood samples from phase I HV and phase II clinical studies of patients with alopecia areata, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, ulcerative colitis (UC), vitiligo, and hidradenitis suppurativa were analyzed using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach. Effects of patients' characteristics on brepocitinib exposure were investigated. Overall, 8552 brepocitinib plasma concentrations from 775 individuals were included in the analysis. The PKs of brepocitinib were adequately described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and a lag time for tablet formulation, dose-dependent bioavailability, and Box-Cox transformed interindividual variabilities on apparent clearance (CL/F) and apparent central volume of distribution (Vc/F). For a typical 70-kg non-Asian female patient with baseline aspartate aminotransferase of 22 unit/liter, CL/F and Vc/F estimates were 17.5 L/h and 88.5 L, respectively. Asians had a higher exposure (independent of body weight), caused by a 10% lower CL/F when compared to other individuals. Independent of baseline body weight, the male population showed 13% higher Vc/F compared to the female population. Patients with UC were predicted to have 46% slower absorption rate compared to other individuals. The PKs of brepocitinib were well-characterized by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and dose-dependent bioavailability. Several covariates, such as race and sex, were identified to have statistically significant, but not clinically meaningful, effects on the estimated PK parameters.

Evaluation of safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of apixaban in pediatric subjects at risk of venous or arterial thrombotic disorder.

Apixaban is an oral small-molecule, direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor approved in adults for treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and for reducing risk of venous thromboembolism recurrence after initial anticoagulant therapy. This phase I study (NCT01707394) evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics (PDs), and safety of apixaban in pediatric subjects (<18 years), enrolled by age group, at risk of venous or arterial thrombotic disorder. A single apixaban dose, targeting adult steady-state exposure with apixaban 2.5 mg, was administered using two pediatric formulations: 0.1 mg sprinkle capsule (age <28 days); 0.4 mg/ml solution (age 28 days to <18 years; dose range, 1.08-2.19 mg/m2 ). End points included safety, PKs, and anti-FXa activity. For PKs/PDs, four to six blood samples were collected ≤26 h postdosing. A population PK model was developed with data from adults and pediatric subjects. Apparent oral clearance (CL/F) included fixed maturation function based on published data. From January 2013 to June 2019, 49 pediatric subjects received apixaban. Most adverse events were mild/moderate, and the most common was pyrexia (n = 4/15). Apixaban CL/F and apparent central volume of distribution increased less than proportionally with body weight. Apixaban CL/F increased with age, reaching adult values in subjects aged 12 to <18 years. Maturation affected CL/F most notably in subjects aged <9 months. Plasma anti-FXa activity values were linearly related to apixaban concentrations, with no apparent age-related differences. Pediatric subjects tolerated single apixaban doses well. Study data and population PK model supported phase II/III pediatric trial dose selection.

Apixaban Use in Obese Patients: A Review of the Pharmacokinetic, Interventional, and Observational Study Data.

Relatively little is known about the influence of extreme body weight on the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), efficacy, and safety of drugs used in many disease states. While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have an advantage over warfarin in that they do not require routine drug monitoring, some may regard this convenience as less compelling in obese patients. Some consensus guidelines discourage using DOACs in patients weighing > 120 kg or with a body mass index > 35-40 kg/m2, given a sparsity of available data in this population and the concern that fixed dosing in obese patients might lead to decreased drug exposure and lower efficacy. Per the prescribing information, apixaban does not require dose adjustment in patients weighing above a certain threshold (e.g., ≥ 120 kg). Data from healthy volunteers and patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE) have shown that increased body weight has a modest effect on apixaban's PK. However, the paucity of exposure data in individuals > 120 kg and the lack of guideline consensus on DOAC use in obese patients continue to raise concerns about potential decreased drug exposure at extreme weight. This article is the first to comprehensively review the available PK data in obese individuals without NVAF or VTE, and PK, PD, efficacy, effectiveness, and safety data for apixaban in obese patients with either NVAF or VTE, including subgroup analyses across randomized controlled trials and observational (real-world) studies. These data suggest that obesity does not substantially influence the efficacy, effectiveness, or safety of apixaban in these patients. Trial Registration ARISTOTLE: NCT00412984; AVERROES: NCT00496769; AMPLIFY: NCT00643201; AMPLIFY-EXT: NCT00633893; ADVANCE-1: NCT00371683; ADVANCE-2: NCT00452530; ADVANCE-3: NCT00423319 Apixaban Use in Obese Patients: A Review of the Pharmacokinetic, Interventional, and Observational Study Data (MP4 161.22 MB).

Evaluation of the Effect of Abrocitinib on Drug Transporters by Integrated Use of Probe Drugs and Endogenous Biomarkers.

Abrocitinib is an oral Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor currently approved in the United Kingdom for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). As patients with AD may use medications to manage comorbidities, abrocitinib could be used concomitantly with hepatic and/or renal transporter substrates. Therefore, we assessed the potential effect of abrocitinib on probe drugs and endogenous biomarker substrates for the drug transporters of interest. In vitro studies indicated that, among the transporters tested, abrocitinib has the potential to inhibit the activities of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), organic anion transporter 3 (OAT3), organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1), and multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1 and 2K (MATE1/2K). Therefore, subsequent phase I, two-way crossover, open-label studies in healthy participants were performed to assess the impact of abrocitinib on the pharmacokinetics of the transporter probe substrates dabigatran etexilate (P-gp), rosuvastatin (BCRP and OAT3), and metformin (OCT2 and MATE1/2K), as well as endogenous biomarkers for MATE1/2K (N1 -methylnicotinamide (NMN)) and OCT1 (isobutyryl-L -carnitine (IBC)). Co-administration with abrocitinib was shown to increase the plasma exposure of dabigatran by ~ 50%. In comparison, the plasma exposure and renal clearance of rosuvastatin and metformin were not altered with abrocitinib co-administration. Similarly, abrocitinib did not affect the exposure of NMN or IBC. An increase in dabigatran exposure suggests that abrocitinib inhibits P-gp activity. By contrast, a lack of impact on plasma exposure and/or renal clearance of rosuvastatin, metformin, NMN, or IBC suggests that BCRP, OAT3, OCT1, and MATE1/2K activity are unaffected by abrocitinib.

Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response analyses of varenicline in adolescent smokers.

Varenicline is an approved smoking cessation aid in adults. Population pharmacokinetics (popPK) and exposure-response (ER) (continuous abstinence rates [CAR] weeks 9-12 and nausea/vomiting incidence) for varenicline in adolescent smokers were characterized using data from two phase 1 and one phase 4 studies. A one-compartment popPK model with first-order absorption and elimination adequately fitted the observed data. The effect of female sex on apparent clearance was significant. Apparent volume of distribution increased with body weight and decreased by 24%, 15%, and 14% for black race, "other" race, and female sex, respectively. The observed range of exposure in the phase 4 study was consistent with that expected for each dose and body-weight group from the results obtained in adolescent PK studies, supporting that varenicline dose and administration were appropriate in the study. The relationship between CAR9-12 and varenicline area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to 24 hours (AUC24 ) was nonsignificant (p = 0.303). Nausea/vomiting incidence increased with AUC24 (p < 0.001) and was higher in females. Varenicline PK and ER for tolerability in adolescent smokers were comparable with adults, while ER for efficacy confirmed the negative results reported in the phase 4 study.

Efficacy, Safety, and Exposure of Apixaban in Patients with High Body Weight or Obesity and Venous Thromboembolism: Insights from AMPLIFY.

INTRODUCTION: As a result of limited clinical data, guidelines do not recommend the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients who weigh > 120 kg or have a body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m2. METHODS: This post hoc analysis of the AMPLIFY trial evaluated the efficacy (venous thromboembolism [VTE]/VTE-related death), safety (major and composite of major and clinically relevant non-major [CRNM] bleeding), and exposure of apixaban compared with enoxaparin followed by warfarin for the treatment of VTE by body weight (≤ 60, > 60 to < 100, ≥ 100 to < 120, ≥ 120 kg) and BMI (≤ 25, > 25 to 30, > 30 to 35, > 35 to 40, > 40 kg/m2). RESULTS: Among the AMPLIFY safety population, 5384 and 5359 patients had recorded body weight (range 28.9 to 222.0 kg; ≥ 120 kg, n = 290) and BMI (range 12.5-71.8 kg/m2; > 40 kg/m2, n = 263), respectively. The rates of recurrent VTE/VTE-related death for apixaban versus enoxaparin/warfarin were similar across body weight subgroups: relative risks (RR; 95% confidence intervals [CI]) were 0.63 (0.23, 1.72), 0.99 (0.65, 1.50), 0.77 (0.34, 1.72), and 0.20 (0.02, 1.72) for the ≤ 60, > 60 to < 100, ≥ 100 to < 120, and ≥ 120 kg groups, respectively (Pinteraction = 0.44). The rates of major bleeding were lower with apixaban versus enoxaparin/warfarin; RRs (95% CI) were 0.15 (0.02, 1.15), 0.41 (0.21, 0.77), not estimable, and 0.34 (0.04, 3.22), respectively (Pinteraction = not estimable). The rates of major/CRNM bleeding were significantly lower for apixaban versus enoxaparin/warfarin; RRs (95% CI) were 0.46 (0.24, 0.89), 0.49 (0.38, 0.63), 0.30 (0.16, 0.58), and 0.28 (0.12, 0.66), respectively (Pinteraction = 0.36). Similar trends were seen in the BMI subgroups. There was a modest, not clinically meaningful, decrease (< 30%) in the median predicted exposure with increasing body weight (n = 281). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this post hoc analysis support the use of apixaban in patients with body weight ≥ 120 kg or BMI > 40 kg/m2. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00643201.

Apixaban Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: Compared with the general population, patients with advanced chronic kidney disease have a >10-fold higher burden of atrial fibrillation. Limited data are available guiding the use of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in this population. METHODS: We compared the safety of apixaban with warfarin in 269 patients with atrial fibrillation and advanced chronic kidney disease (defined as creatinine clearance [CrCl] 25 to 30 mL/min) enrolled in the ARISTOTLE trial (Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation). Cox proportional models were used to estimate hazard ratios for major bleeding and major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. We characterized the pharmacokinetic profile of apixaban by assessing differences in exposure using nonlinear mixed effects models. RESULTS: Among patients with CrCl 25 to 30 mL/min, apixaban caused less major bleeding (hazard ratio, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.14-0.80]) and major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (hazard ratio, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.17-0.72]) compared with warfarin. Patients with CrCl 25 to 30 mL/min randomized to apixaban demonstrated a trend toward lower rates of major bleeding when compared with those with CrCl >30 mL/min (P interaction=0.08) and major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (P interaction=0.05). Median daily steady-state areas under the curve for apixaban 5 mg twice daily were 5512 ng/(mL·h) and 3406 ng/(mL·h) for patients with CrCl 25 to 30 mL/min or >30 mL/min, respectively. For apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily, the median exposure was 2780 ng/(mL·h) for patients with CrCl 25 to 30 mL/min. The area under the curve values for patients with CrCl 25 to 30 mL/min fell within the ranges demonstrated for patients with CrCl >30 mL/min. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with atrial fibrillation and CrCl 25 to 30 mL/min, apixaban caused less bleeding than warfarin, with even greater reductions in bleeding than in patients with CrCl >30 mL/min. We observed substantial overlap in the range of exposure to apixaban 5 mg twice daily for patients with or without advanced chronic kidney disease, supporting conventional dosing in patients with CrCl 25 to 30 mL/min. Randomized, controlled studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of apixaban are urgently needed in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease, including those receiving dialysis. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00412984.

Apixaban: A Clinical Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Review.

Apixaban is an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor that inhibits both free and clot-bound factor Xa, and has been approved for clinical use in several thromboembolic disorders, including reduction of stroke risk in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, thromboprophylaxis following hip or knee replacement surgery, the treatment of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, and prevention of recurrent deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The absolute oral bioavailability of apixaban is ~ 50%. Food does not have a clinically meaningful impact on the bioavailability. Apixaban exposure increases dose proportionally for oral doses up to 10 mg. Apixaban is rapidly absorbed, with maximum concentration occurring 3-4 h after oral administration, and has a half-life of approximately 12 h. Elimination occurs via multiple pathways including metabolism, biliary excretion, and direct intestinal excretion, with approximately 27% of total apixaban clearance occurring via renal excretion. The pharmacokinetics of apixaban are consistent across a broad range of patients, and apixaban has limited clinically relevant interactions with most commonly prescribed medications, allowing for fixed dosages without the need for therapeutic drug monitoring. The pharmacodynamic effect of apixaban is closely correlated with apixaban plasma concentration. This review provides a summary of the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, biopharmaceutical, and drug-drug interaction profiles of apixaban. Additionally, the population-pharmacokinetic analyses of apixaban in both healthy subjects and in the target patient populations are discussed.

The Effects of Clarithromycin on the Pharmacokinetics of Apixaban in Healthy Volunteers: A Single-Sequence Crossover Study.

BACKGROUND: This was an open-label, phase I, nonrandomized, single-sequence, crossover study to evaluate the effect of concomitant administration of multiple doses of clarithromycin on the single-dose exposure, safety, and tolerability of apixaban in healthy subjects. METHODS: In total, 19 subjects received a single oral dose of apixaban 10 mg on day 1. On day 4, subjects began receiving oral clarithromycin immediate release (IR) 500 mg twice daily (bid) for 4 days. On day 8, subjects received oral apixaban 10 mg and oral clarithromycin IR 500 mg bid. Oral clarithromycin IR 500 mg bid was given alone on days 9 and 10. RESULTS: Compared with apixaban alone, coadministration of apixaban with clarithromycin resulted in increased apixaban exposure. The adjusted geometric mean ratio (GMR) was 1.299 (90% confidence interval [CI] 1.220-1.384) for peak plasma concentration (Cmax), whereas the adjusted GMR for the area under the concentration curve (AUC(INF)) was 1.595 (90% CI 1.506-1.698). The mean half-life and median time to Cmax of apixaban were comparable with and without concomitant administration of clarithromycin. Administration of apixaban and clarithromycin concomitantly did not result in increased adverse events compared with administration of either agent alone. All adverse events were mild in intensity. CONCLUSIONS: Apixaban Cmax and AUC(INF) increased 30% and 60%, respectively, when multiple doses of clarithromycin were coadministered with apixaban versus administration of apixaban alone. The increase in apixaban Cmax and AUC(INF) with concomitant clarithromycin was less than that which has been observed when apixaban was given with ketoconazole. Administration of apixaban alone and in combination with clarithromycin bid was safe and generally well-tolerated by the healthy adult subjects in this study. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier number NCT02912234.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Apixaban in Subjects With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.

This analysis describes the population pharmacokinetics (PPK) of apixaban in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) subjects, and quantifies the impact of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on exposure. The PPK model was developed using data from phase I-III studies. Apixaban exposure was characterized by a two-compartment PPK model with first-order absorption and elimination. Predictive covariates on apparent clearance included age, sex, Asian race, renal function, and concomitant strong/moderate cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4/P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitors. Individual covariate effects generally resulted in < 25% change in apixaban exposure vs. the reference NVAF subject (non-Asian, male, aged 65 years, weighing 70 kg without concomitant CYP3A4/P-gp inhibitors), except for severe renal impairment, which resulted in 55% higher exposure than the reference subject. The dose-reduction algorithm resulted in a ~27% lower median exposure, with a large overlap between the 2.5-mg and 5-mg groups. The impact of Asian race on apixaban exposure was < 15% and not considered clinically significant.

Regional Gastrointestinal Absorption of Apixaban in Healthy Subjects.

This study was conducted to investigate the extent of absorption in different regions of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The relative bioavailability of an apixaban crushed tablet was also assessed to investigate the effect of dissolution on absorption. This was an open-label, randomized, 4-period, 4-treatment crossover study with a 7-day washout period balanced for first-order residual effects in 12 healthy subjects. Subjects received a single dose of a 2.5-mg apixaban solution administered orally, released in the distal small intestine and in the ascending colon. In addition, subjects received a single dose of a 2.5-mg apixaban crushed tablet released in the ascending colon. The solution and crushed tablet were delivered via Enterion capsules. The location of Enterion capsules was monitored using scintigraphic imaging. Apixaban maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t ) decreased by approximately 60% when it was delivered to the distal small bowel compared with the oral administration. A greater decrease was observed when it was delivered to the ascending colon, with reductions of 90% and 84% in Cmax and AUC0-t , respectively. A crushed tablet delivered to the ascending colon resulted in exposure that was approximately 40% of that observed for solution released in the same region. These findings indicate that apixaban exhibits region-dependent absorption and that dissolution/solubility of the solid-dose form is limited in the ascending colon. Apixaban absorption decreased progressively along the GI tract, indicating that absorption occurs primarily in the upper GI tract.

Effect of Rifampin on the Pharmacokinetics of Apixaban, an Oral Direct Inhibitor of Factor Xa.

OBJECTIVE: Apixaban is a substrate of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and P-glycoprotein. The effects of rifampin, a strong inducer of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein, on the pharmacokinetics of oral and intravenous apixaban were evaluated in an open-label, randomized, sequential crossover study. METHODS: Twenty healthy participants received single doses of apixaban 5 mg intravenously on day 1 and 10 mg orally on day 3, followed by rifampin 600 mg once daily on days 5-15. Finally, participants received single doses of apixaban 5 mg intravenously and 10 mg orally separately on days 12 and 14 in one of two randomized sequences. RESULTS: Apixaban, given intravenously and orally, was safe and well tolerated when administered in the presence and absence of rifampin. Apixaban absolute oral bioavailability was 49 % when administered alone and 39 % following induction by rifampin. Rifampin reduced apixaban area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC∞) by 39 % after intravenous administration and by 54 % after oral administration. Rifampin induction increased mean clearance by 1.6-fold for intravenous apixaban and mean apparent clearance by 2.1-fold for oral apixaban, indicating rifampin affected both pre-systemic and systemic apixaban elimination pathways. CONCLUSION: Co-administration of apixaban with rifampin reduced apixaban exposure via both decreased bioavailability and increased systemic clearance.

Effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of apixaban.

This open-label study evaluated apixaban pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety in subjects with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment and in healthy subjects following a single 10-mg oral dose. The primary analysis determined the relationship between apixaban AUC∞ and 24-hour creatinine clearance (CLcr ) as a measure of renal function. The relationships between 24-hour CLcr and iohexol clearance, estimated CLcr (Cockcroft-Gault equation), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (modification of diet in renal disease [MDRD] equation) were also assessed. Secondary objectives included assessment of safety and tolerability as well as international normalized ratio (INR) and anti-factor Xa activity as pharmacodynamic endpoints. The regression analysis showed that decreasing renal function resulted in modestly increased apixaban exposure (AUC∞ increased by 44% in severe impairment with a 24-hour CLcr of 15 mL/min, compared with subjects with normal renal function), but it did not affect Cmax or the direct relationship between apixaban plasma concentration and anti-factor Xa activity or INR. The assessment of renal function measured by iohexol clearance, Cockcroft-Gault, and MDRD was consistent with that determined by 24-hour CLcr . Apixaban was well tolerated in this study. These results suggest that dose adjustment of apixaban is not required on the basis of renal function alone.

Reporting guidelines for population pharmacokinetic analyses.

The purpose of this work was to develop a consolidated set of guiding principles for the reporting of population pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses based on input from a survey of practitioners as well as discussions between industry, consulting, and regulatory scientists. The survey found that identification of population covariate effects on drug exposure and support for dose selection (in which population PK frequently serves as preparatory analysis for exposure-response modeling) are the main areas of influence for population PK analysis. The proposed guidelines consider 2 main purposes of population PK reports: (1) to present key analysis findings and their impact on drug development decisions, and (2) as documentation of the analysis methods for the dual purpose of enabling review of the analysis and facilitating future use of the models. This work also identified 2 main audiences for the reports: (1) a technically competent group responsible for in-depth review of the data, methodology, and results; and (2) a scientifically literate but not technically adept group, whose main interest is in the implications of the analysis for the broader drug development program. We recommend a generalized question-based approach with 6 questions that need to be addressed throughout the report. We recommend 8 sections (Synopsis, Introduction, Data, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusions, Appendix) with suggestions for the target audience and level of detail for each section. A section providing general expectations regarding population PK reporting from a regulatory perspective is also included. We consider this an important step toward industrialization of the field of pharmacometrics such that a nontechnical audience also understands the role of pharmacometric analyses in decision making. Population PK reports were chosen as representative reports to derive these recommendations; however, the guiding principles presented here are applicable for all pharmacometric reports including pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and simulation reports.

Reporting guidelines for population pharmacokinetic analyses.

The purpose of this work was to develop a consolidated set of guiding principles for reporting of population pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses based on input from a survey of practitioners as well as discussions between industry, consulting and regulatory scientists. The survey found that identification of population covariate effects on drug exposure and support for dose selection (where population PK frequently serves as preparatory analysis to exposure-response modeling) are the main areas of influence for population PK analysis. The proposed guidelines consider two main purposes of population PK reports (1) to present key analysis findings and their impact on drug development decisions, and (2) as documentation of the analysis methods for the dual purpose of enabling review of the analysis and facilitating future use of the models. This work also identified two main audiences for the reports: (1) a technically competent group responsible for in-depth review of the data, methodology, and results, and (2) a scientifically literate, but not technically adept group, whose main interest is in the implications of the analysis for the broader drug development program. We recommend a generalized question-based approach with six questions that need to be addressed throughout the report. We recommend eight sections (Synopsis, Introduction, Data, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusions, Appendix) with suggestions for the target audience and level of detail for each section. A section providing general expectations regarding population PK reporting from a regulatory perspective is also included. We consider this an important step towards industrialization of the field of pharmacometrics such that non-technical audience also understands the role of pharmacometrics analyses in decision making. Population PK reports were chosen as representative reports to derive these recommendations; however, the guiding principles presented here are applicable for all pharmacometric reports including PKPD and simulation reports.

Effect of ketoconazole and diltiazem on the pharmacokinetics of apixaban, an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor.

AIM: Apixaban is an orally active inhibitor of coagulation factor Xa and is eliminated by multiple pathways, including renal and non-renal elimination. Non-renal elimination pathways consist of metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, primarily CYP3A4, as well as direct intestinal excretion. Two single sequence studies evaluated the effect of ketoconazole (a strong dual inhibitor of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein [P-gp]) and diltiazem (a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor and a P-gp inhibitor) on apixaban pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects. METHOD: In the ketoconazole study, 18 subjects received apixaban 10 mg on days 1 and 7, and ketoconazole 400 mg once daily on days 4-9. In the diltiazem study, 18 subjects received apixaban 10 mg on days 1 and 11 and diltiazem 360 mg once daily on days 4-13. RESULTS: Apixaban maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity increased by 62% (90% confidence interval [CI], 47, 78%) and 99% (90% CI, 81, 118%), respectively, with co-administration of ketoconazole, and by 31% (90% CI, 16, 49%) and 40% (90% CI, 23, 59%), respectively, with diltiazem. CONCLUSION: A 2-fold and 1.4-fold increase in apixaban exposure was observed with co-administration of ketoconazole and diltiazem, respectively.