Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence and Mortality Rate Post Liver Transplantation: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Real-World Evidence.

BACKGROUND: liver transplantation (LT) is the best curative option for eligible patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), however recurrence remains a major concern. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of HCC recurrence. METHODS: studies were selected using PubMed, Epistemonikas, and Google Scholar databases published from inception to 15 May 2022 and a meta-analysis of the proportions was conducted. Observational studies reporting the prevalence of recurrent HCC after an LT were included, with the analysis being stratified by an adherence to the Milan criteria (MC), geographical region, AFP levels, and donor type. RESULTS: out of 4081 articles, 125 were included in the study. The prevalence of recurrent HCC was 17% (CI: 15-19). Patients beyond the MC were more likely to recur than patients within the MC. Asian populations had the greatest prevalence of HCC recurrence (21%; CI: 18-24), whereas North American populations had the lowest recurrence (10%; CI: 7-12). The mortality rate after HCC recurrence was 9%; CI: 8-11. North American populations had the greatest prevalence of mortality with 11% (CI: 5-17). CONCLUSIONS: the recurrence, overall survival, and mortality rates among patients with HCC post-LT remains high, with substantial differences between regions.

Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Drug-Eluting Beads in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurs in nearly three-quarters of all primary liver cancers, with the majority not amenable to curative therapies. We therefore aimed to re-evaluate the safety, efficacy, and survival benefits of treating patients with drug-eluting beads transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) compared to the conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (C-TACE). Several databases were searched with a strict eligibility criterion for studies reporting on adult patients with unresectable or recurrent HCC. The pooled analysis included 34 studies involving 4841 HCC patients with a median follow-up of 1.5 to 18 months. There were no significant differences between DEB-TACE and C-TACE with regard to complete response, partial response and disease stability. However, disease control (OR: 1.42 (95% CI (1.03,1.96) and objective response (OR: 1.33 (95% CI (0.99, 1.79) were significantly more effective for DEB-TACE treatment with fewer severe complications and all-cause mortality. The pooled-analysis did not find superiority of DEB-TACE in complete or partial response, disease stability, controlling disease progression, and 30 day or end-mortality. However, results showed that DEB-TACE is associated with a better objective response, disease control, and lower all-cause mortality with severe complications compared to C-TACE treatment. Given that the safety outcomes are based on limited studies with a potential for bias, there was no clear improvement of DEB-TACE over C-TACE treatment.

Long Term Outcomes of Liver Transplantation For Patients With Autoimmune Hepatitis.

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare indication for liver transplantation (LT). Data on the long-term outcomes of living-related LT for AIH are limited and inconsistent. The present study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of deceased donor LT (DDLT) and living donor LT (LDLT) for AIH. METHODS: All patients who received transplants for AIH-related cirrhosis from 2001 to 2018 were included in this study. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients (31 male, 43 female) received LT. The average follow-up was 7.9 ± 6.9 years (median = 7.2 years), average age was 34.3 ± 13.8 years, and average Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 23.6 ± 8.5. Thirty-six (49.3%) patients received a graft from a living donor, and 83% of patients were maintained on steroids. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates of patients were 91%, 89%, 87%, and 82% and of grafts were 89%, 88%, 86%, and 76%, respectively. In univariate analysis, MELD score (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.17; P = .028), donor age (OR per 5 years, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.07-2.02; P = .021), donor type (OR LDLT vs DDLT, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.67; P = .017), and renal function (OR glomerular filtration rate <60 vs ≥60 mL/min/m2, 7.41; 95% CI, 1.88-31.25; P = .004) were significant predictors of graft survival; however, none of the factors remained significant in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: We have shown the highest reported long-term survival rates in LT for AIH, including a large number of patients who underwent LDLT. Standardized management and immunosuppressive therapy, including the maintenance of a low-dose steroid protocol, may have contributed to this outcome.

Changing trends in liver transplantation indications in Saudi Arabia: from hepatitis C virus infection to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

BACKGROUND: Several trend analyses on liver transplantation (LT) indications have been published in the U.S. and in other countries, but there are limited data on LT indication trends in Saudi Arabia (SA), especially since the availability of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV). This study aimed to analyze trends in the frequency of LT indications among LT recipients in SA over a 19-year period and examine associations between etiologic-specific trends and clinicodemographic characteristics. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed clinical and surgical data of adult patients (n = 1009) who underwent LT at the King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center (Riyadh, SA) between 2001 and 2019. Spearman's rank correlation, Poisson regression, and Joinpoint regression analysis were employed to assess changes in LT etiologic trends. RESULTS: In the first period (2001-2010), the main LT indications were HCV (41.9%) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) (21.1%), but nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (29.7%) surpassed HCV (23.7%) as the leading LT indication in the second period (2011-2019); and the trends were significant in correlation analyses [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.09 (1.06-1.13) for NASH; IRR = 0.93 (0.91-0.95) for HCV]. In the Joinpoint regression analysis, increases in NASH from 2006 to 2012 (+ 32.1%) were statistically significant, as were the decreases in HCV from 2004 to 2007 (- 19.6%) and from 2010 to 2019 (- 12.1%). Similar patterns were observed in LT etiological comparisons before and after the availability of DAAs and within hepatocellular carcinoma stratifications. CONCLUSIONS: Trends in the epidemiology of LT indications among LT recipients in SA have changed over a 19-year period. Most notably, NASH has eclipsed HCV in the country due to the effective treatment strategies for HCV. These trends in NASH now need an aggressive public health response to minimize and avert future onset of additional clinical and economic strains on health care systems and LT centers in SA.

Efficacy and Safety of Simeprevir or Daclatasvir in Combination With Sofosbuvir for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Genotype 4 Infection.

INTRODUCTION: The combination of sofosbuvir (SOF) with simeprevir (SMV) or daclatasvir (DCV) is very effective in treating hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, particularly genotype (GT) 1. However, the data on GT4 are very limited. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of SOF in combination with either SMV or DCV in GT4-infected patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this real life, prospective, observational study, HCV (GT4) patients (n=96) were evaluated in 2 groups on the basis of the 12-week treatment regimen they received. Group 1 (n=56) patients were treated with SOF and SMV±ribavirin (RBV), whereas group 2 patients were treated with SOF and DCV±RBV (n=40). The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virologic response 12, whereas the primary safety endpoint was drug discontinuation or occurrence of grade 3/4 adverse events. RESULTS: The mean age was 49±14.6 years (59.4% men). Cirrhosis was present in 53.6% and 35.0% of groups 1 and 2, respectively, whereas 27 patients (48.2%) in group 1 and 21 patients (52.5%) in group 2 had failed prior interferon-based treatment. The median pretreatment HCV-RNA log10 was 6.1 (3.6 to 7.0) and 6.0 (3.6 to 7.2) IU/mL in groups 1 and 2, respectively. RBV was given to 17 patients (30.4%) in group 1 and 2 patients (5%) in group 2. All patients achieved sustained virologic response 12 (100%). Adverse events occurred in 32% of patients (grade 1 and 2), but none discontinued treatment. One patient died in the SMV group (not related to treatment). CONCLUSIONS: SMV/SOF or DCV/SOF combinations are safe and highly effective in HCV-GT4 treatment. Cirrhosis and failure of prior interferon-based treatment did not influence treatment response.

Diminished accuracy of biomarkers of fibrosis in low replicative chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of aspartate aminotransferase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), AST/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ratio (AAR), and age-platelet index (API) for significant fibrosis (Metavir F2-4) in low-replicative (HBV DNA <20,000 IU/mL) chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) patients. METHODS: The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of HBeAg-negative, low-replicative (n = 213) and high-replicative (HBV DNA ≥20,000 IU/mL, n = 153) patients was assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 113 patients (30.9%) had F2-4 fibrosis. Of the low and high-replicative patients, 40 (18.8%) and 73 (47.7%) had F2-4, respectively (P < 0.0001). APRI ≥0.5 less frequently identified F2-4 fibrosis in low vs. high-replicative patients (48.7% vs. 69.6%, P = 0.032) and AAR identified it more frequently in low-replicative patients (37.5% vs. 19.4%, P = 0.037). FIB-4 and API were not different (P > 0.05) for identifying F2-4 fibrosis in low and high-replicative patients. Higher specificities were seen at the lowest cut-offs in low vs. high-replicative states for APRI (≥0.5, 98% vs. 68.9%), AAR (84.3% vs. 76.6%), FIB-4 (≥1.45, 97.5% vs. 87.8%) and API (>4, 94.8% vs. 93.8%). At ROC-defined thresholds, APRI (≥0.33), AAR (≥0.93), FIB-4 (≥0.70) and API (>2) showed greater AUROCs for F2-4 diagnosis in low replicative (0.80, 0.62, 0.81 and 0.71, respectively) vs. high-replicative patients (0.73, 0.52, 0.67 and 0.69, respectively). CONCLUSION: All 4 biomarkers in both, low and high-replicative HBV demonstrate modest accuracy for fibrosis diagnosis at conventional cut-offs. Lowering the cut-offs may increase the diagnostic relevance of these biomarkers, particularly for APRI and FIB-4 in low-replicative disease.

Predictors of significant fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients with low viremia.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The data on the prevalence and predictors of significant fibrosis (≥F2, METAVIR) in chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) patients with low viremia are limited. We aimed to assess both the prevalence predictors of ≥F2 fibrosis in hepatitis B envelope antigen-negative patients with HBV DNA <20,000 IU/mL. METHODS: Hepatitis B envelope antigen-negative patients (n=213) with mean HBV DNA <2000 IU/mL (n=97) and HBV DNA 2000 to 20,000 IU/mL (n=116) were included and all had liver biopsy. Variables significantly associated with ≥F2 fibrosis on an univariate analysis were included in a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: Overall, 40 (18.8%) patients had ≥F2 fibrosis, with no difference between those with mean HBV DNA <2000 IU/mL (19.6%) compared with patients with HBV DNA of 2000 to 20,000 IU/mL (18.1%; P=0.782). Fibrosis ≥F2 was similar in patients with HBV DNA <2000 versus 2000 to 20,000 IU/mL in relation to varying alanine aminotransferase thresholds (P>0.05), and was less frequent in persistently normal alanine aminotransferase patients (13.6%) when compared with those with elevated or fluctuating levels (25.3%, P=0.030). Fewer patients under 40 years of age had ≥F2 fibrosis (12.5%) as compared with older ones (28.2%; P=0.004). Logistic regression analysis identified higher aspartate aminotransferase [odds ratio (OR), 6.21; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.48-15.54; P<0.0001], lower albumin (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78-0.95; P=0.002), platelet count (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-0.99; P=0.013), and age (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09; P=0.024) as independent predictors of significant fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: A small but significant minority of HBV patients with low viremia harbor significant fibrosis, although its rate is not different in those with viremia above or below 2000 IU/mL. Our findings may guide in decisions regarding liver biopsy and treatment in this category of patients.

Accuracy of international guidelines for identifying significant fibrosis in hepatitis B e antigen--negative patients with chronic hepatitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Differing threshold levels of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) are recommended by international guidelines for commencement of antiviral therapy. These guidelines advocate therapy for patients with significant fibrosis (METAVIR score ≥F2); we assessed the accuracy of these guideline-defined thresholds in identifying patients with ≥F2 fibrosis. METHODS: We applied the European (European Association for the Study of the Liver [EASL] 2012), Asian-Pacific (Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver [APASL] 2012), American (American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases [AASLD] 2009), and United States Panel Algorithm (USPA 2008) criteria to 366 consecutive hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients with liver biopsy samples: EASL, ALT >laboratory-defined upper limit of normal (ULN) and HBV DNA ≥2000 IU/mL (n = 171); APASL, ALT >2-fold laboratory-defined ULN and HBV DNA ≥2000 IU/mL (n = 87); AASLD, ALT >2-fold the updated ULN (0.5-fold ULN [corresponding to ≤19 U/L] for women and 0.75-fold the ULN [corresponding to ≤30 U/L] for men) and HBV DNA ≥20,000 IU/mL (n = 53); and USPA, ALT >updated ULN (>0.5-fold ULN for women and >0.75-fold ULN for men) and HBV DNA ≥2000 IU/mL (n = 173). RESULTS: Overall, 113 patients (30.9%) had ≥F2 fibrosis, which was more frequent among patients who fulfilled any guideline criteria (45.7% vs 17.9% for those who did not fulfill any criteria, P < .0001). In applying the EASL, AASLD, APASL, and USPA criteria, sensitivity and specificity values for detection of ≥F2 fibrosis were 45.6%, 58.5%, 56.3%, and 45.7% (P = .145) and 82.1%, 73.8%, 77.1%, and 82.4% (P = .366), respectively. The EASL criteria (area under the receiver operating characteristic [AUROC] curve, 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.71) and USPA criteria (AUROC, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.58-0.73) performed better than APASL (AUROC, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.59-0.69; P = .421) and significantly better than the AASLD criteria (AUROC, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.54-0.64; P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: In hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients with chronic hepatitis, the EASL, AASLD, APASL, and USPA criteria identify patients with ≥F2 fibrosis with low levels of accuracy. However, the EASL and USPA criteria are the most accurate for identification of these patients.

Safety and efficacy of peginterferon-α2a plus ribavirin treatment in renal transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Interferon (IFN)-based therapy in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected renal transplant (RT) recipients has been associated with a high risk of acute allograft rejection (AAR) and poor efficacy. We assessed the safety and efficacy of PegIFNα-2a and ribavirin (RBV) combination therapy in HCV-infected RT recipients. METHODS: Thirty-two adult RT recipients of >12-month duration, infected with HCV genotypes 1 (62.5%) and 4 (37.5%), and significant fibrosis (Metavir ≥ F2) were recruited in an open-label trial with PegIFNα-2a 135-180 µg/week, plus RBV 200-1200 mg/day for 48 weeks, based on the estimated glomerular filtration rate. Safety assessments were performed weekly for 4 weeks, 2-weekly for 8 weeks, and 6-weekly for 36 weeks. Study end points were sustained virologic response (SVR) or development of AAR. Allograft biopsies were performed for 20% increase in creatinine from pretreatment levels, or optionally at week 12 on surveillance protocol. Renal safety was compared with matched untreated historical controls (n=31). RESULTS: None of the treated patients showed AAR when biopsied for raised creatinine (12.5%) or during surveillance (37.5%), with incremental and sustained creatinine increases occurring in 6.3% of treated patients and 16.1% of untreated controls (p=0.148), by week 72 assessment. Mean pretreatment and end-of-assessment creatinine in treated patients remained similar (106.8 ± 32.0 vs. 113.4 ± 62.8, respectively; p=0.140), while levels increased significantly in the controls (106.6 ± 35.6 vs. 142.5 ± 93.0, respectively; p=0.013). Rapid, early virologic response (EVR) and SVR occurred in 12.5%, 56.3%, and 37.5% of cases, respectively. SVR was similar in both genotypes (p=1.000). PegIFN and RBV dose reductions were required in 34.4% and 78.1%, respectively; discontinuation was required in 12.5%. Binary logistic regression identified only EVR (OR, 20.4; 95% CI: 2.2-192.6; p=0.008) as an independent predictor of SVR. CONCLUSIONS: PegIFN/RBV therapy is not associated with AAR in RT recipients at low risk for rejection but has modest efficacy in the treatment of HCV.

Efficacy of peginterferon α-2a and predictors of response in HBeAg-negative, genotype D-naive patients.

BACKGROUND: Peginterferon (PEG-IFN) α-2a has been shown to induce a sustained virologic response (SVR) in 20-30% of "hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)"-negative patients. AIM: To determine the safety and efficacy of PEG-IFN α-2a in HBeAg-negative, genotype D-naive patients and to analyze the predictors of response. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized trial was conducted at four hospitals. A total of 35 consecutive HBeAg-negative naive genotype D patients received PEG-IFN α-2a for 48 weeks. RESULTS: Based on a cutoff of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA <400 copies ml(-1), an early virologic response (EVR) at week 12, end of treatment virologic response (ETVR) at week 48, and SVR at week 72 were achieved by 3 (9%), 9 (26%), and 8 patients (23%), respectively. The EVR rate improved to 43%, ETVR to 49%, and SVR to 57%, when a HBV DNA cutoff level of <20,000 copies ml(-1) was used. Pretreatment HBsAg level was not a predictor for SVR on univariate analysis, but correlated with decline in HBV DNA levels at weeks 48 and 72. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, low body weight, high alanine aminotransferase (ALT), low HBV DNA, and low triglyceride levels were identified as baseline predictors of SVR. CONCLUSION: HBeAg-negative genotype D-naive patients treated with PEG-IFN α-2a achieved SVR in 23 (HBV <400 copies ml(-1)) and 57% (HBV <20,000 copies ml(-1)) of patients, a better response than previously reported that might be related to the absence of drug resistance in these naive patients. Pretreatment predictors of SVR were low body weight, high ALT, low HBV DNA, and low triglycerides.

Liver abscess presentation and management in Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Liver abscess (LA) is a well-described disease in the medical literature; however, information about its characteristics and outcome in the Middle East is lacking. We compared the mode of presentation, risk factors, management and outcome of LA patients in Saudi Arabia with cases from the United Kingdom (UK). DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective review of LA patients from three tertiary care centers (2 from Saudi Arabia and 1 from the UK) over a period of 10 years, from 1995 to 2005. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data collected included demographic characteristics; clinical presentation; biochemical, microbiological and radiological findings; treatment modalities; and outcome. RESULTS: A total of 83 patients were diagnosed with LA, including 48 patients from Saudi Arabia and 35 patients from the UK. The mean (SD) age was 45.2 (20.3) years for those from Saudi Arabia and 55.4 (18.8) years for those from the UK (P=.022). The majority of the patients were males (70% from Saudi Arabia and 80% from the UK). Upper abdominal pain and fever were the commonest symptoms, each reported in 87% of the cases. Alkaline phosphatase elevation was the commonest liver function abnormality, seen in 66 (80%) patients. Organisms were isolated in 43 (52%) cases and the majority of these were coliforms (58%). Amebic liver abscesses occurred in 19 (23%) patients and all of those patients were either from or had traveled recently to the Indian subcontinent. Complete resolution of the abscesses was achieved in 66 (80%) patients with aspiration and/or antibiotics, and 9 (10.8%) patients died. On multivariate analysis, underlying malignancy, hypotension and chest signs at presentation were predictors of poor outcome (P=.008, .029 and .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Successful resolution of LA is achievable in the majority of the cases, although underlying malignancy is associated with poor outcome. Amebic liver abscesses must be considered in patients with a history of travel to endemic areas.

Updated thresholds for alanine aminotransferase do not exclude significant histological disease in chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Histological changes in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients with persistently normal alanine aminotransferase (PNALT) have not been evaluated for updated upper limits of normal (ULN; ≤ 19/30 U/L for females/males). We assessed significant fibrosis (≥ F2, METAVIR) in patients with PNALT and persistently elevated alanine aminotransferase (PEALT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine hundred and twenty consecutive, unselected HCV patients were stratified into four groups: Group I: (n = 124) PNALT within the updated ULN [0.5 × ULN (corresponding to ≤ 19 U/L) for females; 0.75 × ULN (corresponding to ≤ 30 U/L) for males]; Group II (n = 173): PNALT ≤ 1 × ULN but greater than Group I; Group III (n = 313): PEALT 1-2 × ULN; and Group IV (n = 310): PEALT > 2 × ULN. PNALT was defined as ≥ 3 determinations within the normal range over ≥ 6 months. RESULTS: Advanced ≥ F3 and ≥ F2 fibrosis increased incrementally across Groups I; II; III; and IV: 24.2 and 45.2%; 25.4 and 56.1%; 36.1 and 64.2%; and 50 and 77.1% respectively (P<0.0001 for both). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified age [odds ratio (OR), 1.05; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.02-1.08; P<0.0001], alanine aminotransferase (ALT) groups (OR 1.38; 95% CI: 1.03-1.83; P = 0.030), presence of moderate-severe steatosis (OR 2.70; 95% CI: 1.19-6.15; P = 0.018) and ≥ A2 necroinflammation (OR 17.9; 95% CI: 8.88-36.20; P < 0.0001) as independent predictors of ≥ F2 fibrosis. Updated ULN for ALT were better at excluding ≥ F2 fibrosis compared with traditional ULN (90.6 vs. 74.2%, P = 0.0041) but less specific (20.8 vs. 44%, P = 0.0007) with similar positive/negative predictive values. CONCLUSIONS: HCV patients with 'updated' normal ALT have the lowest prevalence of significant fibrosis, although utilizing these levels without resorting to biopsy would miss significant fibrosis in almost one-half of such patients.

Coincidence of acute brucella hepatitis and dengue fever or serologic cross-reactivity?

Hepatic involvement in brucellosis is not uncommon since 10-20% of patient infected with brucella species can have abnormal liver function tests. The usual presentation of brucella hepatitis is in the form of chronic granulomatous hepatitis with mild to moderate elevation of liver enzymes, while acute hepatitis is rare. We report a young patient who presented with acute brucella-induced hepatitis and co-infection with dengue hemorrhagic virus resulting in severe elevation of liver enzymes and absence of granuloma on histology. His mother also simultaneously tested positive for both infections. The patient responded well to anti-brucella therapy with normalization of his liver profile. We discuss, herein, the hepatic involvement of these two infections and discuss the possible serological cross-reactivity between brucella and dengue fever virus.

Assessment of alpha-fetoprotein in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in Middle Eastern patients.

BACKGROUND: Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may vary by geographical region and racial background. No data exists for this test in the Middle Eastern population. In addition, there is limited data on the impact of virological status on AFP levels. METHODS: In a multicenter, case-control study involving 206 cases, 199 cirrhotic and 197 chronic hepatitis controls, we assessed the utility of AFP in the diagnosis of HCC (sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, and positive likelihood ratios (LR). PPV and NPV were evaluated for three additional HCC prevalence rates (5, 10, and 20%). RESULTS: The best discriminating AFP value was 11.7 ng/ml. The sensitivity ranged from 32 to 79.5% at different AFP levels with the specificity increasing sequentially from 47.7 to 98.5%. Sensitivity of AFP at the best cut-off level for hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis B virus (HBV) and non-viral etiology for HCC was 73.7, 65.6, and 59.5%, respectively. Specificity at this level for HCV, HBV, and non-viral etiology was 36.6, 30.1, and 29.4%, respectively. AFP cut-off levels of 102, 200, and 400 ng/ml showed similar sensitivity (39.8, 35.9, and 32%, respectively) and specificity (96, 98.5, and 98.5% respectively). Positive LR for AFP at >11.7, >20, >102, >200, >400 ng/ml were 2.8, 3.3, 9.9, 23.8, and 21.2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In cirrhotic patients, AFP has a poor screening and diagnostic value for HCC. Underlying viral etiology fails to influence the diagnostic accuracy of this test. An AFP level greater than 100 ng/ml has a high degree of specificity and may be used as a confirmatory test.

Hepatic granuloma: decreasing trend in a high-incidence area.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic granuloma (HG) has a high reported incidence in Saudi Arabia (14.6%). We aimed to identify the incidence of HG in our centres and review its presenting features and underlying aetiology. METHODS: A total of 5531 liver biopsies were screened through a computer database over 13 years. Sixty-six (1.2%) patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The patients were then divided into three groups according to the aetiology. Group 1, tuberculosis (n=26); Group 2, viral hepatitis B and C (n=11); and Group 3, idiopathic (n=9). The demographical data and the clinical and biochemical features of all the groups were analysed. RESULTS: Infections comprised of 72.2% of HG. The incidence of tuberculosis was 42.6%, viral hepatitis 16.3% and idiopathic 14.8%. Fever (47.5%), weight loss (42.6%) and fatigue (45.9%) were commonly found symptoms. Fever and weight loss were significantly more frequently presenting symptoms in Group 1 than in Groups 2 and 3 (P=0.0002, 0.04, 0.001 and 0.02 respectively). The mean bilirubin levels in Group 1 were significantly lower than in Groups 2 and 3 (P=0.04 and 0.03 respectively). The mean albumin levels were significantly lower in Group 3 compared with Group 2 (P=0.002), and Group 1 had lower levels compared with Group 2 (P=0.018). CONCLUSION: The incidence of HG is much lower than reported previously from this region. Tuberculosis and viral hepatitis are the most common causes and, contrary to previous reports, schistosomiasis is rare. Fever and weight loss distinguished tuberculous HG.

Is serum alanine transaminase level a reliable marker of histological disease in chronic hepatitis C infection?

BACKGROUND: Approximately 20-30% of patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) have persistently normal alanine transaminase (PNALT) levels. These patients are described to have a mild degree of histological liver damage. We aimed to assess the histological liver changes in HCV patients with PNALT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-five patients with HCV and PNALT (group A) underwent a liver biopsy. PNALT was defined as three or more determinations identified to be within the normal range over 6 months or longer. The demographical features and histological changes were compared with 66 consecutive patients with chronic HCV infection and elevated ALT (group B). All patients had a detectable HCV RNA. Histological disease was scored according to the METAVIR system. RESULTS: Females were more likely to have normal ALT levels (65%). The mean ALT level in Group A and B was 30 and 105 IU/L respectively. No patient in either group had normal histology. The mean necro-inflammatory scores in groups A and B (2.0+/-0.68 vs 2.09+/-0.67) and the mean fibrosis scores (2.11+/-0.87 vs 2.24+/-1.04) were not significantly different. Bridging fibrosis in groups A and B was seen in 24.6 and 37.9% patients, respectively, while cirrhosis was seen in 6.2 and 7.6% patients respectively. Hepatic steatosis in groups A and B (0.94+/-0.86 vs 1.0+/-1.02 respectively) was also not significantly different and did not show any association with the fibrosis scores across the two groups. In group A, the necro-inflammatory and fibrosis scores of patients with and without steatosis were not statistically significant. Age was the only predictor of normal ALT levels. However, increasing age did not show a significant increase in histological activity in either group beyond a certain age. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that ALT is a poor surrogate marker for inflammation and fibrosis in HCV patients. Given the presence of significant necro-inflammation in PNALT patients, the risk/benefit ratio justifies treatment without the need for a liver biopsy.

Coeliac disease and hereditary haemochromatosis: association and implications.

Coeliac disease and hereditary haemochromatosis are genetic disorders paradoxically associated with altered intestinal absorption of iron. Hereditary haemochromatosis is the most common autosomal recessive disease in the Caucasian population and is characterised by an iron overload state. Coeliac disease, or gluten sensitive enteropathy, on the other hand is frequently associated with iron deficiency anaemia. We report the cases of two patients who developed both coeliac disease and hereditary haemochromatosis. We review the literature of this rare association and examine how the clinical presentation is modified by their co-existence and the potential genetic linkage of these two disorders.

Impact of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt for secondary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal haemorrhage: a single-centre study over an 11-year period.

AIMS: The role of various treatments for variceal haemorrhage is currently being evaluated. The purpose of this study was to analyse the impact of the use of endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy (EVS), variceal band ligation (VBL) and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPSS) for secondary prophylaxis on the outcome of cirrhotic patients with the first episode of variceal haemorrhage presenting to a single centre. METHODS: Between 1986 and 1996, data from 225 consecutive patients with the first episode of variceal haemorrhage were analysed. The modality of treatment for secondary prophylaxis between 1986 and 1991 was EVS (group I: n = 83; Child class C, 29%; mean follow-up 36 +/- 3 months), between 1991 and 1993 VBL (group II: n = 56; Child class C, 38%; mean follow-up 24 +/- 3 months), and between 1995 and 1996 TIPSS (group III: n = 86; Child class C, 60%; mean follow-up 17 +/- 1 months). Half of the patients between 1993 and 1995 underwent VBL and the other half had TIPSS. Data regarding rebleeding, mortality and encephalopathy were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox's proportional hazard regression was used to test the significance of prognostic factors. RESULTS: Seventy-five per cent of patients re-bled in group I, 40% in group II, and 16% in group III (P < 0.0001). Mortality was significantly lower in the patients with Child class C disease in group III patients compared with those in groups I and II (P < 0.02). TIPSS was associated independently with reduced early mortality and re-bleeding. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that TIPSS improves survival in patients with advanced liver disease and variceal haemorrhage, and should be considered for secondary prophylaxis in high-risk patients.