Predicting anti-TNF treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis: An artificial intelligence-driven model using cytokine profile and routine clinical practice parameters.

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a heterogeneous disease in which therapeutic strategies used have evolved dramatically. Despite significant progress in treatment strategies such as the development of anti-TNF drugs, it is still not possible to differentiate those patients who will respond from who will not. This can lead to effective-treatment delays and unnecessary costs. The aim of this study was to utilize a profile of the patient's characteristics, clinical parameters, immune status (cytokine profile) and artificial intelligence to assess the feasibility of developing a tool that could allow us to predict which patients will respond to treatment with anti-TNF drugs. Methods: This study included 38 patients with RA from the RA-Paz cohort. Clinical activity was measured at baseline and after 6 months of treatment. The cytokines measured before the start of anti-TNF treatment were IL-1, IL-12, IL-10, IL-2, IL-4, IFNg, TNFa, and IL-6. Statistical analyses were performed using the Wilcoxon-Rank-Sum Test and the Benjamini-Hochberg method. The predictive model viability was explored using the 5-fold cross-validation scheme in order to train the logistic regression models. Results: Statistically significant differences were found in parameters such as IL-6, IL-2, CRP and DAS-ESR. The predictive model performed to an acceptable level in correctly classifying patients (ROC-AUC 0.804167 to 0.891667), suggesting that it would be possible to develop a clinical classification tool. Conclusions: Using a combination of parameters such as IL-6, IL-2, CRP and DAS-ESR, it was possible to develop a predictive model that can acceptably discriminate between remitters and non-remitters. However, this model needs to be replicated in a larger cohort to confirm these findings.

Cytokine Profile in Children with Severe Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome Related to the Coronavirus Disease 2019.

The multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a novel and concerning entity related to severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Although MIS-C has been the subject of intensive research efforts, its pathophysiology and optimal treatment remain elusive. We studied the clinical features, laboratory findings, and immunoinflammatory profiles of seven children prospectively admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) during the first wave of the pandemic. All patients had immunoglobulin (Ig)-G against SARS-CoV-2, four of seven patients had both IgM and IgG, and in one of the 7 SARS-CoV-2 was detected in a respiratory sample. All patients received intravenous fluid boluses (median: 15 mL/kg) and norepinephrine. The most common form of respiratory support was supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula. None of the patients needed mechanical ventilation. The cardiovascular system was frequently involved. All patients had an elevated troponin-I (median: 107.3 ng/L). Four out of seven patients had coronary artery abnormalities, and two of seven had both abnormal electrocardiogram (EKG) findings and evidence of left ventricular dysfunction on echocardiogram. Ig levels and complement function were normal. Peripheral blood phenotyping with flow cytometry showed decreased T-cell numbers at the expense of CD8+ T-cells. Cytokine profiling showed a heterogeneous increase in interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interferon (IFN)-γ, IL-18, IL-2Ra, IL-10, and IL-1Ra that tended to normalize after treatment. Our study shows that children with MIS-C have elevated plasma levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in the acute phase of the disease without other relevant immunologic disturbances. These findings suggest the presence of a mixed antagonist response syndrome (MARS) similar to that present in pediatric sepsis. Combining a meticulous differential diagnosis with cautiously coordinated immunomodulatory therapy and high-quality supportive care can help clinicians avoid causing iatrogenic harm in patients with MIS-C.

Ultra-short celiac disease exhibits differential genetic and immunophenotypic features compared to conventional celiac disease.

BACKGROUND: Ultra-short coeliac disease (USCD) is a novel celiac disease (CD) subtype limited to the duodenal bulb (D1). HLA haplotypes and flow cytometry have not been assessed yet. AIMS: To compare genetic, clinical, serologic, histopathologic and inmmunophenotypic parameters between USCD and conventional celiac disease (CCD) patients. METHODS: Prospective single-center study in children and adult patients undergoing duodenal biopsies on a gluten-containing diet. Biopsies for histology and flow cytometry were taken separately from D1 and distal duodenum. Biopsies in seronegative patients with celiac lymphogram were repeated after 2 years on a gluten-free diet. RESULTS: Among 505 included patients, 127 were diagnosed with CD, of whom 7 (5.5%) showed USCD. HLADQ2 was significantly less common in USCD compared to CCD (71% vs. 95%, p 0.003). Likewise, USCD patients showed more frequent non-significant seronegativity (28% vs. 8%, p 0.07) and significantly lower titrations (7-15IU/ml) of tissue transglutaminase antibodies (tTG-IgA) (60% vs. 13%, p<0.001). Biopsies from D1 revealed significant less NK cells down-expression in USCD patients (1.4 vs. 5, p 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Up to 5.5% of CD patients showed USCD. A lower frequency of HLADQ2, along with less serum tTG-IgA titration and duodenal NK cell suppression, were differential features of USCD.

A Case of Immediate Hypersensitivity Reaction to Maltitol.

BACKGROUND: Maltitol is a sugar alcohol that is frequently used as a noncaloric sweetener, although it is also used as an excipient, a plasticizer in gelatin capsules, and an emollient. It has not been previously described as an agent involved in immediate hypersensitivity reactions. METHODS: We report on an anaphylactoid reaction with pharyngeal occlusion suffered by a 60-year-old man after ingestion of a candy containing maltitol syrup. A prick-to-prick test was performed with the candy and maltitol powder. Other allergens were excluded as causative agents of the adverse reaction, although the patient refused to undergo an oral challenge test with the candy. A basophil activation test (BAT) was performed with maltitol powder, and a dose-response curve was generated. The test was also performed in 3 healthy controls. RESULTS: Both prick-to-prick tests were negative. The result of the BAT was positive at all the concentrations tested in the patient's blood and negative in all the controls. CONCLUSIONS: The BAT can help to clarify the agents implicated in an adverse reaction and can reduce the risk involved in diagnosis. The BAT can also prove useful in the study of reactions caused by low-molecular-weight antigens, for which routine diagnostic tests are not feasible.

Short-, Intermediate-, and Long-Term Changes in Basophil Reactivity Induced by Venom Immunotherapy.

PURPOSE: The basophil activation test (BAT) has been used to monitor venom immunotherapy (VIT) due to its high specificity. A previous study has reported a good correlation between a significant decrease in basophil activation during 5 years of VIT and clinical protection assessed by sting challenge. The following prospective study was performed to examine changes in basophil reactivity over a complete VIT period of 5 years. METHODS: BAT in a dose-response curve was studied prospectively in 10 hymenoptera venom-allergic patients over 5 years of VIT. BAT was performed at the time of diagnosis, 1 month after finishing the VIT build-up phase, and 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months after beginning treatment. The repeated measures ANOVA was applied to evaluate basophil activation changes throughout VIT. A cross-sectional study was also performed in 6 patients who received treatment for more than 3 years, and in another 12 patients who followed immunotherapy for at least 5 years. RESULTS: An early activation decrease was observed during the first 3 months of treatment, compared to pre-treatment values. This activation decrease was not maintained 6 to 18 months after treatment, but was observed again after 2 years of treatment, and maintained until the completion of the 5-year immunotherapy period. In cross-sectional analysis, the 6 patients who received treatment for 3 years, and 9 of the 12 patients who received treatment for 5 years, had negative BAT results. Three patients in this last group had positive BAT results and 2 patients had systemic reactions after field stings. CONCLUSIONS: BAT appears to be an optimal non-invasive test for close monitoring of VIT.

Basophil activation test for the in vitro diagnosis of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity.

There is need for an in vitro diagnostic test for hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of one such diagnostic, the basophil activation test. Forty-three drug hypersensitive patients referring several immediate reactions (anaphylaxis, urticaria, angioedema, asthma, and rhinoconjunctivitis) to one or more NSAIDs and 29 controls participated. Using the Basotest commercial kit, 63 determinations were performed with the drugs implicated in the adverse reactions (ASA, ibuprofen, metamizol, diclofenac, paracetamol, and ketorolac). In 16 patients additional determinations were made with other chemically unrelated NSAIDs. Forty-two determinations were made for controls. The analysis was performed by flow colorimetric cytometry and double staining with the monoclonal antibodies anti-IgE and anti-CD63. A Basophil Activation Index (percentage of activated basophils after allergen stimulation/percentage of basally activated basophils) of two or more was considered a positive result. Specificity of 100% and sensitivity of 42.85% were achieved. The positive predictive value was 100%, and the negative predictive value was 53.84%. In 35.29% of intolerant patients there was a positive reaction to at least two drugs implicated in adverse reactions, and in 27.27% of these patients there was a positive reaction to other chemically unrelated NSAIDs. The basophil activation test is useful for the in vitro diagnosis of NSAID hypersensitivity, providing good specificity and positive predictive value and diagnostic reliability in the assessment of NSAID intolerance.

[Effects of atorvastatin in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide plasma levels in hypercholesterolemic patients with or without hypertension]. / Efecto de la atorvastatina sobre los valores del propéptido natriurético cerebral N-terminal en pacientes con hipercolesterolemia con hipertensión arterial y sin ella.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is a useful predictor of cardiovascular events in patients without clinical evidence of cardiovascular disease. It is unknown if the cardiovascular risk factors control can modify these levels. We studied if atorvastatin treatment decrease NT-proBNP levels in hypercholesterolemic subjects, with and without hypertension. PATIENTS AND METHOD: It was an open, prospective study in 39 patients with hypercholesterolemia without clinical evidence of cardiovascular disease. 15 (38.5%) had hypertension. Blood samples were collected initially and 12 and 24 weeks after beginning treatment with 20 mg of atorvastatin. RESULTS: The median age was 54 years, and 41% were males. NT-proBNP (pg/ml) values were: 193 (294) at baseline; 141 (211) (p < 0.05) after 12 weeks therapy, and 89 (130) (p < 0.01) at 24 weeks. In hypertensive patients value changed from: 275 (388) at baseline, 196 (290) (p < 0.05) and 112 (124) (p < 0.001) after 12 and 24 weeks treatment. And the levels in normotensives patients were: 137 (198) at baseline, 103 (129) (p = NS), and 74 (135) (p < 0.001) at 12 and 24 weeks after treatment with atorvastatin. We didn't find any correlations between the percentage decrease in NT-proBNP levels, and change of total cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, C reactive protein, or nitrites/nitrates blood levels, at 12, and 24 weeks compared to baseline levels. CONCLUSIONS: In middle-aged hypercholesterolemic patients, without evidence of cardiovascular disease, atorvastatin therapy decrease NT-proBNP blood levels, in both hypertensive and normotensives subjects.

Anaphylaxis caused by cloxacillin: diagnosis with seriated analysis by way of basophil activation test.

We report a case of anaphylaxis caused by cloxacillin in a 13-year-old patient. The basophil activation test, performed 25 days after the anaphylactic reaction, was positive to cloxacillin, amoxicillin, and penicillin G and negative to ibuprofen, tolerated by the patient. The analysis was performed 17 days after the reaction was not conclusive because 74% of the basophil population was activated in basal conditions. The abnormally high activation was similar to that found in an analysis before the reaction, exactly 4 days after finishing a well-tolerated treatment with amoxicillin. This first analysis was available because a patient's sample was taken from the emergency laboratory as a blind control for a study to assess the basophil activation test reliability in diagnosis of hypersensitivity to NSAIDs. The high number of activated basophils in basal conditions after treatment with amoxicillin and before the anaphylactic reaction to cloxacillin probably reflects the beginning of the sensitization. Until now, no cases of hypersensitivity to cloxacillin have been diagnosed by means of the basophil activation test.