Causes of sirolimus discontinuation in 97 liver transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Sirolimus is a potent immunosuppressant with a mechanism of action different from calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). It has increasing importance for liver transplant (OLT) patients, in particular if when there is decreased renal function. We evaluated the efficacy and the causes for discontinuation of sirolimus-based immunosuppression among OLT recipients. OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively analyzed 97 liver transplanted patients who were prescribed sirolimus as the principal immunosuppressant. Of these, 61 patients discontinued treatment. Herein we have reported the causes, the timing, and the effects of sirolimus discontinuation. RESULTS: The overall patient survival at 3 years follow-up was 89%. Hepatotoxicity and blood disorders were the most frequent, severe reported side effects. Acute cellular rejection episodes appeared in seven patients and was relieved in 1 to 2 weeks after the sirolimus administration. In 10 patients, the cholestasis associated with chronic rejection was sharply reduced after the introduction of sirolimus. No increase in vascular thrombosis and/or poor wound healing were reported. CONCLUSION: Sirolimus given alone or in combination with CNIs appears to be an effective primary immunosuppressant regimen for OLT patients. However, in the late postoperative period (>3 months) the drug is associated with a relatively high rate of side effects.

Incidence and clinical significance of bacterial and fungal contamination of the preservation solution in liver transplantation.

A perfusion fluid used in the preservation of the grafted liver represents a medium suitable for microorganism growth. In this observational study, a sample of 232 transplanted livers was collected. Perfusion fluid samples were stored for microbiological analysis from harvested donors. Bacteria were isolated in 91 out of 232 samples, post-operative infections related to contaminated perfusion solution occurred in 13 cases. The contamination rate of the preservation medium appears to be high, but postoperative infections occurs rarely. We suggest periodic detection and a protocol in place designed for antibiotic use for transplanted patients exposed to contaminated perfusion solution.

Does arterialisation time influence biliary tract complications after orthotopic liver transplantation?

BACKGROUND: In the cardiac death donor era, many reports deal with biliary tract complications and concerns about ischemic reperfusion injury owing to the exclusive arterial vascularization of the biliary tree, the warm ischemia time has been implicated as responsible for biliary lesions during organ procurement. We defined the arterialization time as the second warm ischemia time. Our purpose was to study the correlation between the arterialization time during liver implantation and the appearance of biliary lesions. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from the last 5-years of orthotopic liver transplantation: namely, indications, cold perfusion fluid, cold ischemia time, operative procedure times, and acute rejection events. We excluded split-liver transplantations, retransplantations, pediatric patients, transplantations for cholestatic disease, cases where hepatic artery thrombosis happened before biliary complications, or patients with posttransplant cytomegalovirus infection. We defined 2 groups: A) without biliary complications; and B) with biliary complications. We compared the mean arterialization time using Student t test to define whether the warm ischemic time during implantation was responsible for biliary tract complications. A P value of <.05 was considered to be significant. RESULTS: Between 2004 and the end of 2008, we grafted 402 patients among whom 243 met the inclusion criteria: 198 in group A and 45 in group B. Only the cold ischemia time was significantly different between the 2 groups (P = .039). CONCLUSION: After the anhepatic time, the surgeon may take time for the arterial anastomosis without fearing increased biliary damage.

Incisional hernia repair after liver transplantation: role of the mesh.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) show a high risk of developing an incisional hernia. The aim of this retrospective study was to establish the incidence and the factors influencing the outcomes of this complication. METHODS: We reviewed 450 consecutive OLT performed in 422 adult recipient between January 2000 and December 2005. Herniae were analysed with aspect to localization, classification, repair technique, and recurrence. All treated herniae were followed for a median of 50.5 months. RESULTS: Incisional herniae occurred in 36 patients (8.5%, Group 1). Their mean age OLT was 51.4 years with 94.4% male subjects. No significant difference was observed between affects and unaffected individuals for age, OLT indication, Child-Pugh score, albumin, comorbidities, operative time, transfusions, immunosuppressant regimen, and graft rejection episodes as well as for the incisional approach and hospital stay. Gender, body mass index (BMI), preoperative ascites, and pulmonary complications after OLT were significantly different (P < .01). Herniae were small (<5 cm; n = 12), medium (5-10 cm; n = 28), or large (> 10 cm; n = 2). Herniorrhaphy techniques included primary suture repair in 5 (13.9%) and mesh repair in 31 (86.1%) cases. In 3 patients with a primary repair and 1 patient with a mesh repair there were recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative ascites, gender, BMI, and pulmonary complications after OLT seemed to have significant influences on the formation of incisional herniae. Polypropylene mesh may be a first choice for the surgical treatment of there transplant recipients.

Liver transplantation exceeding UCSF criteria: case report of a late recurrence treated by surgery and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of a recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation. Surgery has seldom been considered in such a situation because HCC recurrences are generally considered as a systemic disease. PATIENT AND METHODS: We describe a 47-year-old male patient who underwent liver transplantation in October 1999 for HCC exceeding the Milan and University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), criteria. RESULTS: In 2007 (8 years after liver transplantation), the patient developed a cervical bone metastasis treated by surgery. In April 2008, HCC had disseminated to hepatic pedicle lymph nodes. An extended hepatic pedicle lymphadenectomy was then performed. Today, our patient is doing well, without signs of recurrence. DISCUSSION: The risk of developing a tumor recurrence is the main argument against expanding the UCSF criteria. In case of an HCC recurrence, various treatments ranging from a change in the immunosuppression regimen to chemotherapy have been proposed. Surgical treatment has rarely been envisaged in the treatment of HCC recurrences because of the technical difficulties and the frequent dissemination of cancer.

Liver transplantation in recipients over 65 yr old: a single center experience.

INTRODUCTION: The advanced age of the recipient is considered a "relative contraindication" to liver transplantation (LT). However, recently some studies reported a morbidity rate and an overall survival comparable with those of younger patients. Here, we reported the outcome after LT in recipients aged >65 yr. METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2006, 565 LT was performed in 502 recipients in our institution. Of these, 34 were recipients of >65 yr old (aged group). We focused our study comparing: donor age, co-morbidities, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, duration of operation, transfusions and outcome between the two groups (young/aged). RESULTS: For the group aged >65: the mean donor age was 52.5 (range 16-75) yr and the graft weight 1339 g (890-1880 g). Co-morbidity was recorded in 25 (73.5%), coronary artery disease (CAD) in 17 (50%), diabetes mellitus (DM) and chronic renal insufficiency in four (11.7%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in three patients (8.8%). Mean MELD score was 14.9 (range 12-29) and ASA score was two in 15 (44.1%); and three in 19 (55.8%) recipients. Mean operation time was four h 45 min, three patients also received combined kidney transplantation. Twenty-five (73.5%) recipients received blood transfusions (mean 3.2). Morbidity was observed in 20 patients (58.8%); of these two had hepatic artery thrombosis requiring re-LT. Overall survival was 80% (40 months of follow-up), in particularly, at 30-d, one yr, three yr was 91%, 84%, 80%, respectively. The only two statistical differences reported (p = 0.02) are: the lower rate of CAD in the younger group of recipients (12%), compared with the aged group (50%) and the subsequently lower mortality rate secondary to cardiac causes in the younger group (1.4%) compared with aged group (8.8%). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the recipient age should not be considered an absolute contraindication for LT when the graft/recipient matching is optimal and when an adequate cardiac assessment is performed.

Twenty seven years of experience in pediatric liver transplantation in Strasbourg: focus on the ex situ split techniques.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the well-known controversies about split-liver procedures, since 1979 we have utilized an ex situ instead of an in situ technique because of its feasibility. However, we sought to prove the equality of the results of these two procedures. Herein, we have presented our experience after 27 years' follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 1979 and June 2006, we transplanted 84 livers in 67 pediatric recipients including 37 ex situ split livers implanted into 28 patients. RESULTS: We recorded demographic characteristics, transplantation, and retransplantation indications, age difference between donors and recipients, comorbidities, cold ischemia times, surgical times and complications, graft/recipient body weight ratios, organ recovery times, and overall survivals after 1, 5, and 15 years follow-up. We have herein reported 1, 5, and 15 years of patient versus organ survivals of 88.9.1%, 84.5%, 62.1% versus 78.6%, 74.2%, 57.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: We have concluded that an ex situ split liver may be a valid alternative to in situ techniques to achieve good grafts for pediatric transplantation.