Management of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fracture Dislocations.

Fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint of the finger are often caused by axial load applied to a flexed joint. The most common injury pattern is a dorsal fracture dislocation with a volar lip fracture of the middle phalanx. Damage to the soft-tissue stabilizers of the PIP joint contributes to the deformity seen with these fracture patterns. Unfortunately, these injuries are commonly written off and left untreated. A late-presenting PIP joint fracture dislocation has a poor chance of regaining normal range of motion. The provider must be suspicious of these injuries. Treatment options and algorithm are reviewed.

Median Nerve Injury After Removal of Subdermal Implantable Contraceptive.

Background: Subdermal implantable contraceptives are highly effective, approved in over 60 countries, and used by millions of women. Due to simple insertion and removal protocols, these procedures are often performed in the outpatient clinic setting, and procedural complications are rare. However, given the location of the implant in the medial antebrachial interval, there is a risk of neurovascular injury, especially with malpositioned or deeply placed implants. Methods: We present a case of proximal median nerve injury leading to severe neuropathy after attempted removal of a subdermal implantable contraceptive requiring neurolysis and tendon transfers. Results: At 6 months post surgery, the patient regained flexion of the index interphalangeal joints and protective sensation in the thumb and index fingers. Conclusions: Subdermal implant retrieval can lead to nerve injury, despite the relative simplicity of the procedure. If difficulty is encountered, imaging or open retrieval should be considered. Improvement in function can be gained through operative interventions including neurolysis and tendon transfers in the setting of severe neuropathy.

Wrong-Bone Excision in Hand Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of wrong-bone excision in hand surgery is not known. The wrist offers a unique challenge in that a single surgical incision yields access to multiple potential surgical sites, thus rendering site marking less effective. Mistaken identification of structures in the wrist is a real and potentially troublesome phenomenon. This study is designed to evaluate the occurrence of wrong-bone excision and to identify any risk factors and preventative measures that may help to prevent this complication in the future. METHODS: We designed an anonymous online survey to determine the occurrence, risk factors, medicolegal outcomes, and preventative measures of wrong-bone excision. We distributed the survey to 777 hand surgeons via email. RESULTS: Ninety-nine surgeons responded to our survey. Twenty-three respondents had participated in an excision of the incorrect bone in the wrist. The most common error was partial or complete excision of the scaphoid during a planned excision of the trapezium. Respondents indicated that inadequate visualization, inadequate localization, and teaching of a resident or fellow contributed to the error. There was only 1 case of legal action. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our survey indicate that there exists a non-zero incidence of wrong-bone excision in hand surgery. The most common mistake is incorrect excision of the scaphoid during a planned trapeziectomy. Most surgeons feel that their patients were pleased with their outcome despite this complication, and legal action is rare. Deliberate identification of known landmarks was identified as the most useful strategy in preventing wrong-bone excision.

Patients' preferences regarding the delivery of health care in a hand surgical practice.

BACKGROUND: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 includes patient satisfaction scores in the calculation of reimbursement for services provided. The Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Care Record Incentive Program mandate that physicians provide electronic communication with patients. Little data exists regarding patient preferences that might guide the physician adhering to these guidelines. We performed a survey study to examine patients' attitudes regarding the delivery of their health care. METHODS: We provided an anonymous survey to all outpatient hand surgery patients within a 1-month period at our level I academic center. The survey was structured to ascertain patients' attitudes toward outpatient wait times as well as delivery of patient-specific healthcare-related information. One-hundred and ninety-six surveys were available for review. RESULTS: Of the 196 patients surveyed, 106 (54 %) were between the ages of 45 and 64. Patients aged 25 to 44 were the least willing to wait for an initial outpatient appointment. The majority of patients in all age groups demonstrated unwillingness to wait more than 1 week for evaluation of a new problem. One hundred and forty patients (71 %) were willing to wait longer for an appointment with an upper extremity specialist rather than have an earlier appointment with a non-upper extremity specialist. Wait times of 30 min after arrival in the office were acceptable to 174 patients (89 %) while 40 patients (20 %) were willing to wait an hour or more. Patients preferred a typed handout detailing their specific problem as opposed to referral to a website or an e-mail containing information. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study indicate that patients prefer typed information as opposed to e-mail or websites regarding their health care. Our study also suggests that patients are willing to endure longer wait times if they can be given a sooner appointment, and most prefer a specialist for their problems. These results will provide some guidance to the physician regarding what patients find most appealing.

The effect of anesthesia type on nonsurgical operating room time.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of local-only anesthesia on nonsurgical time compared with monitored anesthesia care (MAC)/local and general anesthesia. Our hypothesis was that local-only anesthesia cases would have lower nonsurgical times compared with MAC/local and general anesthesia. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the surgical records of 1,179 patients undergoing elective hand surgery. For each case, we recorded the type of anesthesia used (general, MAC/local, or local-only anesthesia) and in-room presurgical time, in-room postsurgical time, and, if relevant, room turnover time. We did not record room turnover times for the first case of the day or for cases after procedures that did not meet inclusion criteria. We also recorded the presence of any anesthesia providers (anesthesiologist vs anesthesia-assistant [certified registered nurse anesthetist]). RESULTS: A total of 566 cases performed on 501 patients met inclusion criteria. Room turnover times were not calculated for 304 cases. The choice of anesthesia had a significant effect on nonsurgical operating room time. Local anesthesia cases had significantly less nonsurgical time compared with general anesthesia and MAC/local. Cases performed under MAC/local anesthesia also had significantly reduced nonsurgical time compared with general anesthesia. The presence of a certified anesthesia assistant had no effect on any time metrics recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Choice of local anesthesia, when appropriate, may facilitate rapid operating room turnover and improve overall facility efficiency with lower costs. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Ulnar collateral ligament injuries of the thumb: a comprehensive review.

Injuries to the thumb ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) are common. Failure to address the ensuing laxity of the metacarpophalangeal joint can lead to compromised grip and pinch, pain, and ultimately osteoarthritis. Instability to valgus stress with the lack of a firm end point is a strong indicator of complete rupture of the UCL. Nonoperative treatment is reserved for incomplete ruptures of the thumb UCL. Operative intervention is typically performed for complete ruptures. Repair of acute ruptures and reconstruction for chronic injuries yield excellent results. Complications are rare and most patients show preservation of motion, key pinch, and grip strength.

Elbow injuries in the throwing athlete.

High valgus and extension loads imparted to the athlete's elbow during repetitive overhead throwing can lead to acute and chronic pathology. Over time, normal soft tissue and bony stabilizing structures of the elbow undergo progressive structural changes and can succumb to injury. Modern diagnostic modalities, including plain radiographs, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, in addition to arthroscopy, can aid in diagnosis. Although nonoperative management is often successful, surgical intervention may be necessary before allowing return to play.