The Impact of Suprarenal Fixation on Renal Function Following Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Meta-analysis Based on Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (EVAR) is currently used routinely to treat AAA. Suprarenal fixation (SRF) of EVAR grafts can lead to renal dysfunction. A meta-analysis of studies using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as a measure of renal injury to assess the effect of SRF on renal function was performed. METHODS: An electronic search was carried out to identify all articles that reported on renal injury following SRF versus infrarenal fixation (IRF) EVAR, and 24 studies were identified. Formal meta-analysis was used to assess eGFR drop at 1 and 5 years. The primary outcome measure was a drop in eGFR >20% at 1 year; secondary measures included eGFR drop >20% at 5 years and "renal dysfunction" based on the definition used in each publication. RESULTS: Five series reported eGFR reduction >20% at 1 year. The weighted odds ratio (OR) was 1.53 (95% CI 0.67-3.51, p = .31, I2 = 53.2%); 9.3% for SRF versus 7.4% for IRF. One study reported eGFR based renal dysfunction at 5 years: OR 1.77 (95% CI 1.04-3.02, p = .03); 16.9% for SRF versus 10.3% for IRF. Nineteen series reported some form of renal dysfunction (5287 SRF vs. 4386 IRF patients, mean follow up: 20.5 months, range 72 h to 5 years). The weighted OR was 1.32 (95% CI 1.01-1.71, p = .03, I2 = 28.4%); 5.1% for SRF versus 4.6% for IRF. "Renal dysfunction" definitions varied greatly and were based on creatinine or other inaccurate methods. CONCLUSION: EVAR using SRF does not lead to a significant drop in renal function at 1 year, based on eGFR. Long-term results are limited. Authors should report long-term renal injury using eGFR and not inaccurate arbitrary measures, which are currently common in the literature.

Role of Simulation in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) Training: A Preliminary Study.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) requires a high-level of technical-competency to avoid device-related complications. Virtual reality simulation-based training (SBT) may offer an alternative method of psychomotor skill acquisition; however, its role in EVAR training is undefined. This study aimed to: a) benchmark competency levels using EVAR SBT, and b) investigate the impact of supervised SBT on trainee performance. METHODS: EVAR procedure-related metrics were benchmarked by six experienced consultants using a Simbionix Angiomentor EVAR simulator. Sixteen vascular surgical trainees performing a comparable EVAR before and after structured SBT (>4 teaching sessions) were assessed utilising a modified Likert-scale score. These were benchmarked for comparison against the standard set by the consultant body. RESULTS: Median procedural-time for consultants was 43.5 min (IQR 7.5). A significant improvement in trainee procedural-time following SBT was observed (median procedural time 77 min [IQR 20.75] vs. 56 min [IQR: 7.00], p < .0001). The mean (SD) trainee Likert score pre- and post-SBT improved (16.6 [SD 1.455] vs. 28.63 [SD 2.986], p < .0001). Fewer endoleaks were observed (p = .0063) and trainees chose an appropriately sized device more often after SBT. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that EVAR-SBT should be considered as an adjunct to standard psychomotor skill teaching techniques for EVAR within the vascular surgery training curricula.