RESUMO
Image charge detection is the foundation of charge detection mass spectrometry (CDMS). The mass-to-charge ratio, m/z, of a highly charged ion or particle is determined by measuring the particle's charge and velocity. Charge is typically determined from a calibrated image charge signal, and the particle velocity is calculated using the peaks from the shaped signal as they relate to the particle position and time-of-flight through a detector of known length. Although much has been done to improve the charge accuracy in CDMS, little has been done to address the inconsistencies in the particle velocity measurements and the interpretation of peak position and effective electrode length. In this work, we combine SIMION ion trajectory software and the Shockley-Ramo theorem to accurately determine the effective electrode length, peak position, and shape of the signal peaks. Six model charge detector geometries were examined with this method and evaluated in laboratory experiments. Experimental results in all cases agreed with the simulations. Using a charge detector with multiple, 12.7 mm-long cylindrical electrodes, experimental velocities across and between electrodes agreed within 0.25% relative standard deviation (RSD) when this method was used to correct for effective electrode lengths, corresponding to an uncertainty in the effective electrode length of only 40 µm. For a detector with multiple electrodes and varied electrode spacing, experiments showed that the peak amplitude and shape vary with the geometry and with the particle path through the detector, whereas all peak areas agreed to within 2.3% RSD. For a charge detector made of two printed circuit boards, the velocities agreed within 0.44% RSD using the calculated effective electrode length.
RESUMO
We present a novel and thorough simulation technique to understand image charge generated from charged particles on a printed-circuit-board detector. We also describe a custom differential amplifier to exploit the near-differential input to improve the signal-to-noise-ratio of the measured image charge. The simulation technique analyzes how different parameters such as the position, velocity, and charge magnitude of a particle affect the image charge and the amplifier output. It also enables the designer to directly import signals into circuit simulation software to analyze the full signal conversion process from the image charge to the amplifier output. A novel measurement setup using a Venturi vacuum system injects single charged particles (with diameters in the 100 s of microns range) through a PCB detector containing patterned electrodes to verify our simulation technique and amplifier performance. The measured differential amplifier presented here exhibits a gain of 7.96 µV/e- and a single-pass noise floor of 1030 e-, which is about 13× lower than that of the referenced commercial amplifier. The amplifier also has the capability to reach a single-pass noise floor lower than 140 e-, which has been shown in Cadence simulation.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: This study investigated the relationship between blood flow restriction (BFR) cuff pressure and blood flow at rest and during exercise, with the aim of determining if lower cuff pressures will provide an ischemic stimulus comparable to higher pressures. METHODS: The relationship between blood flow and cuff pressure at rest was determined by measuring blood flow (Doppler Ultrasound) through the superficial femoral artery (SFA) in 23 adults across a range of pressures (0%-100% Arterial Occlusion Pressure at rest [rAOP]). The interplay between cuff pressure, blood flow and exercise was assessed by determining AOP at rest and during plantar flexion exercise (eAOP) and subsequently measuring the blood flow response to plantar flexion exercise with BFR cuff pressure set to either 40% rAOP or 40% eAOP. RESULTS: At rest, a nonlinear relationship between cuff pressure and blood flow through the SFA exhibited a plateau at moderate pressures, with nonsignificant differences in blood flow (~9%, P = 1.0) appearing between pressures ranging from 40% to 80% rAOP. While eAOP was greater than rAOP (229 ± 1.5 mm Hg vs 202 ± 1.5 mm Hg, P < 0.01), blood flow during plantar flexion exercise did not significantly differ (P = 0.49) when applying 40% rAOP or 40% eAOP. CONCLUSIONS: Blood flow through the SFA exhibits a nonlinear relationship with cuff pressure, such that cuff pressures in the range of 40% to 80% rAOP reduce blood flow to approximately the same degree. The BFR interventions opting for lower (e.g., 40% AOP), more comfortable pressures will likely provide an ischemic stimulus comparable to that of higher (80% AOP), less-comfortable pressures.