Increased prevalence of mild myopathic changes in the post-COVID-19 duration.

OBJECTIVE: There are reports of peripheral nerve and muscle involvement during or after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), even following a mild infection. Here, we aimed to analyze the objective findings regarding peripheral nerve, neuromuscular junction, and muscle function using electrophysiology in patients with a previous COVID-19 infection. METHODS: All consecutive patients with a history of COVID-19 were questioned for post-COVID-19 duration-related neurological complaints via Composite Autonomic Symptom Score-31 (COMPASS-31), modified Toronto Neuropathy score (mTORONTO), and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). Patients were dichotomized into two groups based on their scores in the questionnaire. Group 1 (patients with high scores in any area of the questionnaire) and Group 2 (patients with normal scores in all sections of the questionnaire). In the second step, Group 1 was invited to a preplanned hospital visit for electrophysiological analysis, including nerve conduction studies, repetitive nerve stimulation, needle electromyography (EMG), quantitative motor unit potential analysis (qMUP), and single fiber EMG. We included 106 patients in the study. According to the questionnaire, 38 patients constituted Group 1, and 68 formed Group 2. RESULTS: Of the 38 patients, 14 accepted and underwent preplanned electrophysiological examinations. Needle EMG revealed small, short, polyphasic MUPs with early recruitment, and qMUP analysis demonstrated an increased percentage of polyphasic potentials in three patients. The examinations in other patients were unremarkable. CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of complaints and objective myopathic findings in our cohort implicated the role of muscle involvement in the post-COVID-19 duration. Considering the socioeconomic and psychological burden of the post-COVID-19 duration among individuals and societies, a better understanding of the symptoms and myopathy is warranted.

Atypical findings: Atypical parkinsonian syndromes or Atypical parkinsonian syndromes look-alikes.

OBJECTIVE: In parkinsonian syndromes, presentations other than current diagnostic criteria are considered atypical findings. Our goal was to identify and describe the frequency and features of uncommon manifestations of atypical parkinsonian syndromes within our group. METHODS: We retrospectively retrieved the medical records of all patients admitted to our clinic with parkinsonism between January 2011 and January 2022. We only included patients with atypical parkinsonian syndromes, in which the diagnosis was based on current clinical criteria. We retrospectively analyzed neurological, psychiatric, radiological, and electrophysiological characteristics. Typical and atypical features were classified according to the current clinical criteria and previous reports. RESULTS: We determined 51 patients with atypical parkinsonian syndromes; 46 were included, whereas five were excluded due to insufficient follow-up. The probable diagnoses were multiple system atrophy (MSA, n = 19), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB, n = 10), frontotemporal dementia (FTD, n = 10), corticobasal syndrome (CBS, n = 3), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP, n = 4). The prevalence of atypical findings was similar among different types of atypical parkinsonian syndromes (p = 0.847). Atypical findings were eyelid myoclonus, double vision in MSA; ataxia, myoclonus, and a typical hummingbird sign on MRI in DLB; pyramidal findings and family history in FTD; early onset, family history, and onset with psychiatric findings in PSP-like phenotype. Genetic causes were identified in the FTD-like phenotype with pyramidal findings, whereas symptom onset was early with myoclonus in the PSP-like phenotype. CONCLUSION: Atypical findings such as abnormal saccades, myoclonus, and ataxia may be a part of degenerative syndromes. However, family history, onset at an earlier age, and specific neurological findings suggest genetic syndromes.

Auto brewery syndrome from the perspective of the neurologist.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Auto-brewery syndrome (ABS) is a rare condition that causes the digestive system to produce intoxicating amounts of alcohol due to abnormal growth of the gut microbiota. Medicolegal inferences of ABS have two distinct edges. First, malingering in drunk-driving and abusing the syndrome as a factitious disorder may occur. Second, patients suffering from the syndrome may face medicolegal and social problems. Moreover, chronic exposure to alcohol due to undiagnosed ABS might result in cognitive and behavioral disturbances. Here, we present a patient with recurrent encephalopathy episodes and chronic cognitive disturbances, who was diagnosed with the auto-brewery syndrome, to emphasize the neurocognitive consequences of the syndrome. CASE PRESENTATION: A 58 years old female presented with mild cognitive impairment, behavioral disturbances, and recurrent encephalopathy episodes. The history of hemicolectomy, an odd smell on her breath, and cravings for high carbohydrate meals during the paroxysmal episodes raised the suspicion of ABS. Her blood ethanol concentration reached 315 mg/dL following an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and stool analysis revealed increased colonization with C. krusei and C. parapsilosis. She was free of the acute episodes, cognitive and behavioral disturbances improved, and C. krusei and C. parapsilosis were eliminated from the intestinal flora with dietary recommendations and nystatin treatment. CONCLUSION: The auto brewery syndrome is a rare disorder of dysbiosis leading to a disturbed gut-brain axis. Being a treatable and relatively benign diagnosis, presentation of the ABS with neurocognitive disturbances necessitates highlighting.

Autonomic and neuropathic complaints of long-COVID objectified: an investigation from electrophysiological perspective.

PURPOSE: Here , we aimed to assess the frequency and phenomenology of autonomic and neuropathic complaints of long-COVID and to evaluate them by means of electrophysiology. METHODS: Step 1. Patients with prior COVID-19 infection were screened by COMPASS-31 and mTORONTO to create the target population for further evaluation. Step 2. Patients with high scores were invited for a detailed history of their complaints and electrophysiological analysis, which included nerve conduction studies, cutaneous silent period (CSP), and sympathetic skin response (SSR). We also constituted a control group composed of healthy subjects of similar age and sex for electrophysiological analysis. RESULTS: There were 106 patients, who matched the study criteria. Among them, thirty-eight patients (%35.8) had neuropathic or autonomic complaints or both. Fatigue and headache were significantly more frequent in patients with autonomic and neuropathic complaints. Detailed examination and electrophysiological evaluation were performed in 14 of 38 patients. Neuropathic complaints were patchy and proximally located in the majority. The entire CSP suppression index was higher in the patients (p = 0.002). There was no difference in palmar and plantar SSR between patients and healthy subjects. mTORONTO scores were negatively correlated with palmar and plantar SSR amplitudes, and the correlation was moderate. CONCLUSION: Neuropathic or autonomic complaints were seen in more than one-third of patients with long-COVID. Neuropathic complaints were generally patchy, proximally predominant, asymmetric, or diffuse. The CSP suppression index was abnormal whereas SSRs were normal.